Connect with us

Non classé

What Tech Carriers, Forwarders, and Shippers Think Will Shape 2026 Freight Procurement

Published

on

What Tech Carriers, Forwarders, and Shippers Think Will Shape 2026 Freight Procurement

October 29, 2025

Blog

The recent FreighTech 2025 conference once again brought together a mix of carriers, forwarders, BCOs, academics, and tech providers to hear the latest and share insights around, logistics technology and how it can benefit the freight industry.

Key Tech Trends for Global Freight in 2026

From AI to ocean freight innovation and tendering strategies for 2026, here are some of the key takeaways from this year’s event.

AI is already having an impact, especially in data processing and customer support, with expectations to manage 20% of human tasks within five years – though most organizations aren’t fully AI-ready yet.

Data quality challenges and few standards remain an obstacle for tech implementation, including for AI projects.

Ocean freight digitalization is progressing, with improved carrier APIs expected to trigger a digital transformation similar to what’s occurred in air cargo.

Strategic approaches to tendering are maturing, as technology tools for pricing visibility and rate discovery are helping companies move away from underutilized contracts on low-volume lanes toward a more balanced contract/spot strategy – as MIT research presented at the conference recommends.

Index-linked freight contracts are gaining traction as these flexible agreements are proving beneficial for all parties,often offering better costs, revenue, and reliability than traditional fixed contracts.

AI for Global Freight: Potential, Reality and Best Practices

Key Takeaways:

AI is already being used aggressively, mostly with data processing, automation and front-line customer support.

It’s still just getting started; leaders have high expectations to handle more tasks in coming years with human roles mostly evolving, rather than being eliminated, as a result.

Many are convinced that AI will have a net negative impact on sector employment.

Leaders don’t feel completely ready yet

AI was, as expected, a hot topic this year and top of mind for most in attendance. But discussion focussed on separating current practical AI applications for logistics from the hype, setting realistic horizons, and sharing lessons learned to date.

An audience poll showed expectations that within the next few years AI will handle a meaningful share of current logistics tasks currently done by humans – over half of leaders believe that at least 20% of current roles could be handled by AI in the next five years.

But there was also consensus that, along with some admitted reduction in headcount, human roles will evolve along with AI advances. Logistics professionals will leverage AI to enable teams to do more, and add more value for customers in new ways – just as many logistics tech introductions to date have enhanced instead of eliminated human roles.

Freight is complicated, however, and speakers agreed that AI can’t do it all, and not right away. At the same time, AI is already being applied in multiple ways across the freight landscape, especially for mundane and repetitive tasks. Some examples include using AI to:

Detect data anomalies or process unstructured data

Create content

Enable automation flow between systems

Power agents (and even voicebots) that handle routine customer inquiries or internal processes.

They still aren’t ready though.

That being said, only about a third in attendance consider their organizations AI-ready.

As such, best practices for AI investment, development, and introductions for logistics from those already at the forefront focussed on the following main recommendations:

Problem Mapping: Identify high-impact, high-frequency problems where AI is already likely to add value

Start Small: Begin with clear use cases and expand based on success

Focus: Build AI capabilities in areas where your company has deep domain expertise, and buy solutions for everything else

Experiment and share: Make AI tools available to teams for experimentation and facilitate knowledge sharing.

Data Quality – the Persistent Roadblock

Key Takeaways:

Lack of standards and inconsistent data remains a frustrating roadblock, including for AI

Focus on data that does work; scale from there

But even alongside the excitement surrounding AI, there was a familiar refrain that poor data quality – often from data received from partners in the supply chain, and attributable to the ongoing lack of freight data standards – continues to frustrate some logistics tech aspirations, including AI projects.

“Discovering something you can’t do right now is also important, and opens new opportunities to do that thing, and maybe more, in the future. In this case it showed the value of investing in quality data.” – Robert Khachatryan, CEO FreightRight

Robert Khachatryan of FreightRight shared a case study of the forwarder’s attempt to build an AI-driven predictive pricing system pilot with data scientists from USC. But the project had to be scrapped when they realized that much of their necessary historical freight rate data – where the inputs are complex and varied – was not clean enough to enable AI to succeed in the task.

The lesson learned was that investing in data quality now will enable successful tech, including AI, in the future.

“On the carrier side, we’ve established a shared understanding of what information we can easily exchange right now, and so we focus on that available data for digital solutions, to improve our efficiency and the customer experience.” – Helge Neumann-Lezius, Head of FCL, Hellmann

Helge Neumann-Lezius from Hellmann offered Hellman’s similar pragmatic approach to tech investment and roll outs: focus on building around the quality data you have now, while taking steps to improve data quality in other areas.

Ocean Innovation: Nearing a Digital Tipping Point

Key Takeaways:

Ocean liners are beginning to improve access to APIs

This will likely help fuel the same surge in connectivity that airline APIs have offered.

An example of this strategy is Hellman’s focus on more real-time data exchange with ocean carriers, leveraging improved API connections with carriers to enable real-time rate and tracking data.

So while ocean freight’s digital adoption has lagged air cargo’s – where API-enabled dynamic rates, market intelligence, and eBookings, including through third party platforms, are becoming more and more prevalent – several speakers suggested that ocean is approaching its tipping point.

The logistics supply chain is often only as digitalized as its least digital partner, so as ocean carrier connectivity improves the near term is likely to see a surge in digital ocean freight, including real-time rates, online bookings and TMS integrations.

Tendering in 2026: Finding the Right Balance

Key Takeaways:

Long term contracts are assumed to be the default solution for tendering but can be unreliable or underutilized

Spot freight – used strategically – can reduce costs and save time

Index-linked contracts and even hedging are gathering momentum after many years of discussion.

Looking ahead to 2026, several discussions on ocean freight tendering for the coming year revealed interesting recommendations for striking a contract vs. spot balance, explored the growing prevalence of index-linked contracts, and shared how tech is playing a larger role here as well.

Dr. Angi Acocella of MIT’s Center for Transportation and Logistics shared her recent research showing that shippers in both FTL and ocean rely on long term contracts for the big majority of their volumes, using spot to manage uncertainty – mostly for unexpected volumes, one-off shipments or lanes, or when contracted carriers are unavailable.

But the research also showed an 80/20 split: 80% of shipper volumes go on 20% of the contracted lanes, leaving many contracts for lower-volume lanes underutilized. Unused contracts not only cost shippers in the form of wasted time and resources on negotiations, but also often entail higher rates for shipments moved on these lanes – often at levels above spot costs for those shipments – and slightly higher contract rates on high volume lanes as well.

As such, she recommends examining lane volumes, contract rates and spot usage and costs from the previous year. Shippers are advised to focus contracts on the higher volume lanes, and rely more on spot for the long tail.

Research also shows the growing place for index-linked contracts in freight, and evidence that index-linked contracts benefit both carriers and shippers in the form of lower costs, increased revenue and better volume reliability than non-linked contracts or the spot market.

Multiple speakers noted the importance of trust for index-linked pilots – trust between the partners, in the rate data selected as the basis, and in the contract mechanism. As these grow, index-linked contract adoption is expected to grow as well.

Finally, speakers touched on the increased importance of technology to procurement. Tools that improve pricing/volume visibility, rate discovery, and the speed and efficiency of communication between carriers/LSPs/shippers already contribute to the ability to make better and strategic tendering decisions. Tech-enabled improvements in these areas are helping shippers and LSPs make the procurement process – for both tenders and spot shipments – less costly, faster, more efficient, and more reliable.
If you enjoyed this, you may also enjoy our recent virtual summit, which included discussions of digital freight transformation, spot/tender balances, and more. See it here.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post What Tech Carriers, Forwarders, and Shippers Think Will Shape 2026 Freight Procurement appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Ocean rates tick up to close the year as air peak fades – December 30, 2025 Update

Published

on

By

Ocean rates tick up to close the year as air peak fades – December 30, 2025 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: December 30, 2025

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) increased 1% to $2,145/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 10% to $3,364/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 1% to $2,742/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) increased 4% to $4,004/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 16% to $6.26/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 5% to $3.52/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices decreased 14% to $2.16/kg.

Analysis

Ocean rates on the major East-West lanes trended up to close the year. Asia – Europe prices increased 1% last week to $2,742/FEU but are 12% higher than mid-month and are up to levels last seen at the tail end of peak season. Asia – Mediterranean rates climbed 4% to reach the $4,000/FEU mark for the first time since early July, with prices 20% higher than during the first half of the month.

Current rate levels are supported by an early start to pre-Lunar New Year demand on these lanes as shippers face longer lead times due to Red Sea diversions. As such, prices are likely to stay elevated or continue climbing as we get closer to the holiday.

Periodic GRIs since October have generally been less successful in keeping rates elevated for very long on transpacific lanes than they’ve been for Asia – Europe trades. Price hikes since mid-December have pushed West Coast rates up 9% to $2,145/FEU and raised prices to the East Coast 15% to $3,364/FEU. But rates will be under upward pressure when transpacific pre-LNY demand picks up, and prices increased to start both 2024 and 2025. The holiday begins later than usual – February 17th – this year, which could mean another rate slide in the near term before demand increases. But if volumes do start to rise to start the new year, rate levels should keep climbing too.

Despite transpacific ocean import contractions and an overall dip in US ocean imports due to the trade war this year, ex-Asia volume strength to Europe, Africa and LATAM – as China diversified trading partners – saw global volumes grow 4% through early Q4.

S&P projects US ocean imports will fall again, by 2%, in 2026, making 2025-2026 – after the 2008-2009 financial crisis years and the 2022 – 2023 unwind from the pandemic – the third instance of consecutive years of US container import contraction over the last two decades. Like this year, observers like BIMCO expect global volumes will continue to grow nonetheless.

Freightos Air Index shows air cargo rates fading post peak season. China-US prices fell 16% to about $6.25/kg, its lowest level since early November. South East Asia – US rates fell 19% to $4.60/kg and transatlantic prices dropped 14% to $2.16/kg. China – Europe prices slid 5% to $3.52/kg and SEA – Europe rates decreased more than 20% to $3.12/kg.

IATA estimates that – after sharp, e-commerce-driven, 11% growth in 2024 – 2025 global air volumes will be 3.1% stronger than last year. IATA also expects this year’s resilience to stretch into 2026 in the form of 2.6% annual growth. Opinions differ as to whether cargo capacity growth will outpace volume growth next year or not, making rate projections for next year difficult as well.

Best wishes for a happy new year

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Ocean rates tick up to close the year as air peak fades – December 30, 2025 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Securing the Chain: The Executive Roadmap to Cyber Resilience

Published

on

By

Securing The Chain: The Executive Roadmap To Cyber Resilience

Call to Action: Download the full guide to gain in-depth insights and practical frameworks that will help you lead the transformation towards a resilient supply chain.

Part 10

Over the past nine sections, we have explored the threats, architectures, governance models, data protections, human factors, response strategies, and partnerships required to secure today’s global supply chains.

But executives don’t just need analysis. They need a roadmap, a structured, actionable framework for building resilience step by step.

This final section offers that roadmap. It is designed for boards, CEOs, CSCOs, and CISOs who must align strategy, investment, and execution to ensure their organizations not only withstand cyber shocks but turn resilience into a competitive differentiator.

1. Principles of the Roadmap

The roadmap is built on five guiding principles:

Resilience, not just security. Assume breaches will happen, plan for rapid recovery.
Ecosystem mindset. Protect not just your company, but the partners who form your chain.
Continuous adaptation. Threats evolve; resilience must be a living system.
Shared responsibility. Cyber resilience spans IT, OT, procurement, logistics, legal, HR, and the C-suite.
Value creation. Resilience isn’t a cost center; it drives trust, revenue protection, and investor confidence.

2. The Five Phases of the Executive Roadmap

Phase 1: Assess

Risk Mapping: Identify critical assets (ERP, WMS, TMS, OT systems) and map interdependencies.
Threat Assessment: Analyze the most relevant attack vectors for your sector.
Gap Analysis: Benchmark against frameworks (NIST, ISO 27001, CMMC).
Supplier Review: Audit third- and fourth-party cyber practices.
Board Engagement: Ensure cyber risks are regularly reviewed in board meetings.

Deliverable: Enterprise-wide cyber risk baseline.

Phase 2: Build

Zero Trust Implementation: Segmentation, IAM, MFA, privileged access controls.
Secure-by-Design Systems: Embed cyber requirements into procurement contracts.
Data Safeguards: Encryption, immutable backups, data provenance protocols.
Governance Models: Establish a cyber risk committee reporting to the board.
Training Programs: Launch cyber awareness across all roles, from forklift drivers to executives.

Deliverable: Core cyber resilience infrastructure.

Phase 3: Pilot

Incident Playbooks: Develop and distribute role-specific response protocols.
Tabletop Exercises: Rehearse ransomware, insider threats, and third-party breaches.
Red Team/Blue Team Drills: Test defenses and refine response.
Supplier Pilots: Run joint simulations with top-tier vendors.
Executive War Games: Pressure-test leadership decision-making in crisis.

Deliverable: Validated, tested resilience processes.

Phase 4: Scale

Supplier Scorecards: Implement cyber rating systems across the supplier base.
Ecosystem Platforms: Deploy secure data exchange and federated identity systems.
Industry Participation: Join ISACs/ISAOs for real-time threat intelligence.
Collaborative Defense: Explore joint SOCs, mutual aid agreements, and sector-wide initiatives.
Global Alignment: Standardize resilience practices across regions.

Deliverable: Resilient, interconnected ecosystem defense posture.

Phase 5: Sustain

Continuous Monitoring: AI-driven threat detection across IT and OT.
Board-Level Dashboards: Track cyber resilience metrics alongside financial KPIs.
Regulatory Compliance: Stay ahead of evolving rules (SEC, NIS2, CMMC).
Cultural Reinforcement: Keep cyber resilience visible in strategy, values, and incentives.
Post-Incident Evolution: Use every incident (internal or external) as a learning cycle.

Deliverable: Enduring resilience as an organizational capability.

3. Metrics That Matter

Executives need quantifiable indicators to measure progress. Suggested metrics include:

Mean Time to Detect (MTTD)
Mean Time to Respond (MTTR).
% of suppliers with validated cyber programs.
% of workforce trained in cyber hygiene.
Backup success rate and recovery time alignment with RTO/RPO.
Board meeting frequency with cyber on the agenda.
Number of red team simulations conducted annually.

4. Embedding Resilience into Strategy

Cyber resilience should not be siloed. It must align with corporate goals:

Growth: Customers prefer resilient partners who won’t fail them in crisis.
Innovation: New technologies (AI, IoT, blockchain) must be secured from inception.
Sustainability: ESG frameworks increasingly include digital risk disclosure.
M&A: Cyber due diligence is now as important as financial due diligence.

Executives must position resilience as a strategic enabler, not a defensive drag.

5. Case Study: Retailer Ecosystem Roadmap

A global retailer implemented the roadmap in five phases:

Assess: Mapped digital dependencies across 1,200 suppliers.
Build: Deployed Zero Trust and encryption across warehouses.
Pilot: Conducted ransomware tabletop exercise with top logistics partner.
Scale: Rolled out supplier cyber scorecards to 400 vendors.
Sustain: Embedded cyber metrics into board dashboards.

Outcome: Faster detection, reduced downtime risk, and improved investor confidence.

6. The Board’s Role

Boards must:

Set tone at the top by prioritizing cyber as strategic.
Allocate capital for resilience initiatives.
Hold management accountable for resilience metrics.
Engage external experts to validate programs.

Cyber resilience is now a governance obligation.

7. The Executive Mandate

For CEOs, CSCOs, and CISOs, the roadmap crystallizes into three imperatives:

Lead visibly. Cyber resilience requires executive sponsorship.
Invest smartly. Prioritize resilience initiatives with highest impact.
Collaborate broadly. Partner with suppliers, customers, regulators, and even competitors.

The message to the organization must be clear: cyber resilience is business resilience.

8. Turning Resilience into Advantage

Resilient companies do more than survive, they thrive:

Customer loyalty: Buyers stick with reliable suppliers.
Investor appeal: Stronger governance attracts capital.
Competitive edge: Cyber maturity becomes a differentiator in bids and partnerships.
Market credibility: Companies seen as resilient can set industry standards.

Executive Takeaways from Part 10

Cyber resilience requires a structured, phased roadmap.
Five phases: Assess, Build, Pilot, Scale, Sustain.
Metrics (MTTD, MTTR, supplier compliance, board oversight) drive accountability.
Resilience must be embedded in growth, innovation, and ESG strategy.
Boards have a fiduciary duty to govern resilience.
Executives must champion resilience visibly and collaboratively.
Cyber resilience is a strategic advantage, not just a defense mechanism.

Conclusion

Cyber resilience in supply chains is no longer optional. It is the currency of trust in a digitized, interconnected world.

This roadmap provides executives with a clear path: Assess, Build, Pilot, Scale, Sustain.
By following these steps, organizations will not only protect themselves but strengthen the entire ecosystem.

Resilient supply chains don’t just survive cyber storms. They emerge stronger, and lead the market forward.

The post Securing the Chain: The Executive Roadmap to Cyber Resilience appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

The State of Transportation Systems: TMS Lessons from 2025

Published

on

By

The State Of Transportation Systems: Tms Lessons From 2025

Transportation management underwent steady but meaningful change in 2025. While dramatic innovation was limited, organizations made progress in modernization, connectivity, and decision support. The theme of the year was not transformation. It was alignment—aligning TMS capabilities with the realities of volatile markets, cost pressure, emissions requirements, and customer expectations for more reliable service.

As companies look toward 2026, the lessons of 2025 offer a clearer picture of how TMS platforms are evolving, where value is being created, and what operational constraints continue to limit performance.

Modernization Accelerated and Became More Practical

Organizations continued to migrate from legacy, on-premise systems toward cloud-native platforms. But 2025 marked a shift: modernization was not pursued for its own sake. Instead, companies moved strategically, often focusing modernization efforts on the most constrained, high-visibility transportation processes.

The winning modernization projects delivered:

Cleaner API connectivity for rates, tenders, and tracking

Modular configurations that avoided monolithic system redesign

Reduced onboarding time for carriers and brokers

Better data freshness across execution and visibility systems

Instead of implementing everything at once, most enterprises adopted incremental modernization—starting with visibility integration, rate automation, or fleet scheduling—and expanding gradually.

In 2026, modernization efforts will continue to focus on practical outcomes like reducing manual load, accelerating tender cycles, and improving ETA reliability rather than chasing sweeping transformations.

Continuous Insights Replaced Periodic Reporting

One of the most notable changes was the widespread adoption of continuous, event-driven transportation monitoring. Companies moved away from static weekly performance reviews toward ongoing visibility into network conditions.

The shift was driven by:

the rise of real-time visibility platforms

better quality location data

improved ETA prediction

more reliable carrier status updates

API-fed telemetry replacing batch uploads

Rather than planning once and reacting later, transportation teams used near-real-time insights to:

reroute shipments

adjust pickup windows

realign labor at docks

escalate exceptions before they reached the customer

This “continuous planning” model reduced the latency between data, interpretation, and action.

In 2026, continuous insights will become standard. Static reporting will remain important for strategic planning, but day-to-day operations will revolve around dynamic decision cycles supported by live data.

AI Provided Targeted, Not Transformational, Wins

AI added value in transportation, but only in narrow, well-defined workflows. The strongest results came from AI’s ability to help evaluate alternates and reduce manual decision time.

Routing and Contingency Recommendations

AI helped planners identify viable alternates during:

weather disruptions

port congestion

driver shortages

regional bottlenecks

sudden capacity changes

These recommendations did not replace planning expertise. They accelerated it. AI functioned as a scenario generator—offering options that humans could refine.

Load Matching and Asset Utilization

AI improved load matching for private and dedicated fleets by analyzing:

empty miles

driver hours

backhaul opportunities

dock availability

These gains helped companies squeeze more productivity from constrained assets.

Exception Prioritization

AI helped reduce noise in exception handling by:

filtering out low-impact alerts

grouping related exceptions

identifying root causes

recommending the best corrective action

In 2026, AI will integrate more deeply into TMS workflows, but its role will remain decision support—not autonomy.

API Integration Emerged as a Competitive Advantage

EDI still dominates transportation, but it showed clear limitations in 2025. Delays in status updates, inconsistent message quality, and slow onboarding pushed companies toward API-first connectivity.

Carriers with strong APIs gained share in:

live tracking

instant rate shopping

automated tender acceptance

more granular status updates

lane-specific performance scoring

Shippers discovered that API-enabled carriers delivered faster, more accurate insights and fewer manual interventions.

In 2026, the shift will continue. EDI will remain for large carriers and structured freight networks, but APIs will power high-volume, time-sensitive, and cross-border operations.

Carbon-Aware Planning Began Its Move Into Execution

Sustainability efforts shifted from reporting to operational decision-making. Transportation teams began using emissions as a planning variable.

Companies applied emissions scoring to:

mode selection

carrier procurement

consolidation decisions

routing choices

lane prioritization

Some organizations used TMS enhancements to compare emissions intensity between alternates during routing decisions.

Early adopters discovered that carbon efficiency often aligned with cost and reliability. Efficient lanes tended to be:

better utilized

more predictable

more consistent in transit times

In 2026, carbon-aware routing will expand as regulators tighten expectations and customer requirements evolve.

Planning Cycles Compressed Under Persistent Volatility

Transportation volatility—capacity swings, geopolitical shifts, weather disruptions, and rising energy costs—forced companies to shorten planning cycles.

Teams moved from:

quarterly → monthly carrier scorecards

weekly → daily lane performance checks

static → rolling forecasts

annual → quarterly bid refreshes for variable lanes

This shift required better tools, better data, and better coordination across planning, procurement, and execution.

In 2026, planning cadence will continue to compress as continuous planning becomes the norm.

Visibility Data Became More Actionable

Visibility tools matured in 2025. The strongest improvements included:

more accurate ETAs

simplified exception categories

more reliable location data

better integrations with telematics providers

higher consistency in stop-level information

Companies used this improved data to:

reduce detention

schedule labor more accurately

improve dock turn times

respond earlier to late pickups or missed connections

In 2026, visibility platforms will integrate deeper with TMS systems so planners can adjust execution directly from the exception screen.

Key Constraints That Persisted

Despite progress, several structural issues remained unresolved:

carrier fragmentation

inconsistent small-carrier data quality

limited multimodal synchronization

slow customs processes in certain regions

capacity uncertainty tied to extreme weather

energy price volatility

Technology softened these constraints but did not eliminate them.

What 2026 Will Require

Companies that want to improve transportation performance in 2026 will need to:

strengthen integration discipline

adopt real-time carrier connectivity

incorporate emissions and energy variables

improve scenario modeling

refine carrier scorecards

build continuous planning behaviors

embed AI into exception and routing workflows

The organizations that succeed will treat the TMS as an active operations platform, not a passive system of record.

Final Takeaway

TMS evolution in 2025 was steady and practical. The systems that delivered the most value improved connectivity, reduced latency, and made planning more responsive. In 2026, transportation management will center on real-time coordination, AI-assisted decisions, and cleaner integration across the entire planning-to-execution spectrum. The companies that modernize incrementally, rather than overhaul everything at once, will see the strongest and most reliable gains.

The post The State of Transportation Systems: TMS Lessons from 2025 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending