Connect with us

Non classé

The 2026 Global Calendar for Supply Chain and Logistics Leaders: Where Strategy, Technology, and Collaboration Converge

Published

on

The 2026 Global Calendar For Supply Chain And Logistics Leaders: Where Strategy, Technology, And Collaboration Converge

In 2026, supply chain and logistics leaders will converge at major conferences and industry events across the globe. These gatherings bring together decision-makers who shape capital investments, technology adoption, risk management, and operational strategies. By examining the topics on main stages and the mix of attendees, these events offer an early look at the priorities and innovations that will define the future of supply chain management, often before they appear in budgets or business plans.

Major U.S. Industry & Association Events

NRF 2026 — January 11–13, 2026 • New York, NY
NRF brings together retailers, brands, marketplaces, technology vendors, and service providers across store operations, e-commerce, and fulfillment. Official site: https://nrfbigshow.nrf.com

RILA LINK — February 1–4, 2026 • Orlando, FL
LINK centers on retail supply chain execution — transportation, replenishment, returns, labor, and network decisions — with structured sessions and an associated expo. Official site: https://www.rila.org/conferences/retail-supply-chain-conference

ARC Industry Leadership Forum — February 9–12, 2026 • Orlando, FL
ARC’s forum convenes industrial, infrastructure, transport, and logistics leaders to examine AI, cybersecurity, asset performance, and modernization under operational and regulatory constraints. Official site: https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-industry-leadership-forum-orlando

Manifest — February 9–11, 2026 • Las Vegas, NV
Manifest aggregates logistics technology, automation, visibility platforms, carriers, 3PLs, shippers, and capital under one program. Official site: https://manife.st

TPM26 — March 1–4, 2026 • Long Beach, CA
TPM focuses on ocean contracting, reliability, pricing, equipment availability, and port-to-inland integration, with carriers, BCOs, NVOs, and ports in attendance. Official site: https://tpm.joc.com/en

MODEX 2026 — April 13–16, 2026 • Atlanta, GA
MODEX presents warehouse automation, robotics, material handling, orchestration software, and integration tooling at scale. Official site: https://www.modexshow.com

ISM World 2026 — April 26–28, 2026 • Denver (Aurora), CO
ISM convenes procurement, finance, and supply leaders to address supplier performance, compliance, emissions, and risk. Official site: https://www.ismworld.org/events/conferences-and-events/annual-conference/

WERC — May 17–20, 2026 • Jacksonville, FL
WERC focuses on DC execution — labor, layout, slotting, safety, benchmarking, and continuous improvement. Official hub: https://werc.org/events/event_list.asp

Home Delivery World USA — May 20–21, 2026 • Nashville, TN
Home Delivery World covers parcel and heavy-goods delivery, returns, packaging, middle-mile coordination, and cost-to-serve. Official site: https://www.terrapinn.com/conference/home-delivery-world/index.stm

ASCM CHAINge North America — September 29–30, 2026 • Long Beach, CA
CHAINge addresses planning maturity, S&OP, transformation governance, and workforce capability. Official site: https://na.chainge.events/

CSCMP EDGE 2026 — October 4–7, 2026 • Nashville, TN
EDGE provides a cross-functional forum across planning, sourcing, logistics, analytics, and leadership. Official hub: https://www.cscmpedge.org/website/81276/edge-2026/

Tier-1 Global Events

LogiMAT 2026 — March 24–26, 2026 • Stuttgart, Germany
LogiMAT is Europe’s primary intralogistics event covering automation, software, integration, and safety. Official site: https://www.logimat-messe.de/en

SiTL 2026 — March 31–April 2, 2026 • Paris, France
SiTL convenes freight, warehousing, multimodal, and sustainability actors with close proximity to EU regulatory developments. Official site: https://www.sitl.eu/en-gb.html

DELIVER Europe — June 3–4, 2026 • Amsterdam, Netherlands
DELIVER uses a scheduled 1:1 meeting format for retail and e-commerce logistics decision-makers and solution providers. Official site: https://www.deliver.events/europe

CeMAT Asia Ecosystem — 2026 regional editions
CeMAT APAC events present industrial logistics and automation under regional economics and integration norms. Overview: https://cematseasia.com

Oracle OTM / WMS — EMEA Regional Editions
Regional Oracle OTM/WMS events convene shippers and 3PLs aligning on transport and warehouse stacks. Link: https://www.oatug.org/otmsig/events

Large Vendor & Platform User Conferences

SAP Sapphire & ASUG Annual Conference — May 11–13, 2026 • Orlando, FL
Sapphire brings SAP customers and partners together across finance, procurement, analytics, AI, and supply chain applications, with ASUG community programs alongside. Official hub: https://www.sap.com/events/sapphire.html

Blue Yonder ICON — May 17–20, 2026 • San Diego, CA
ICON convenes users and partners across planning, WMS, and TMS for roadmaps and reference deployments. Official site: https://blueyonder.com/events/icon

Coupa Inspire — May 11–14, 2026 • Las Vegas, NV
Inspire centers on spend control, supplier performance, risk, compliance, and sustainability across procurement and finance stakeholders. Official site: https://inspire.coupa.com

Manhattan Momentum — May 18–21, 2026 • Las Vegas, NV
Momentum highlights WMS, TMS, and omni-order orchestration through product sessions and integrator casework. Event hub: https://www.manh.com/about-us/newsroom/events

Oracle AI World — October 26–29, 2026 • Las Vegas, NV
Oracle AI World addresses enterprise AI adoption across applications, data, and infrastructure. Official site: https://www.oracle.com/ai-world

NetSuite SuiteWorld — October 26–29, 2026 • Las Vegas, NV
SuiteWorld convenes NetSuite ERP customers — often mid-market operators — across finance, operations, and integration. Official site: https://www.netsuitesuiteworld.com/home.shtml

Taken together, these events provide a comprehensive view of how organizations are weighting cost, reliability, governance, labor, AI adoption, and compliance in the current operating environment. The seniority of attendees and the topics elevated to main stages often foreshadow structural shifts before they appear in formal plans or capital cycles. Dates and details may change; please verify using the official URLs listed above.

The post The 2026 Global Calendar for Supply Chain and Logistics Leaders: Where Strategy, Technology, and Collaboration Converge appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Why Octave’s Austin Event Matters: From Asset Lifecycle Software to Intelligence at Scale

Published

on

By

Octave Live OnTour Austin takes place at a consequential point in the evolution of the industrial software market. Asset-intensive organizations are under sustained pressure to improve capital project execution, asset reliability, operational resilience, safety, quality, cybersecurity, and workforce productivity. At the same time, they are being asked to make better use of data and apply AI in ways that are practical, governed, and operationally relevant.

This is the context in which Octave’s Austin event should be evaluated.

Octave, the software spin-off from Hexagon AB, brings together software assets across engineering, construction, geospatial intelligence, asset operations, quality, public safety, physical security, and industrial cybersecurity. Its Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework provides a clear structure for organizing those capabilities around the industrial asset lifecycle.

However, the strategic significance of the event is not limited to Octave’s portfolio structure. The more important issue is what Octave’s positioning indicates about the broader direction of industrial software.

The market is shifting from digitized workflows toward intelligence at scale.

Industrial Software Is Moving Beyond Functional Digitization

For much of the past two decades, industrial software investment has centered on functional digitization. Engineering teams adopted design, modeling, analysis, and engineering information management tools. Construction teams deployed project controls and field execution systems. Operations teams invested in EAM, APM, optimization, and reliability applications. Quality, safety, physical security, and cybersecurity functions developed their own specialized technology environments.

These investments created meaningful value within individual domains. But they also reinforced a long-standing structural problem: industrial work is highly interconnected, while the supporting software environment often remains fragmented.

A design change can alter construction cost and schedule. Construction execution quality can affect commissioning performance. Poor handoff from construction to operations can increase maintenance burden. Maintenance backlog can elevate safety and compliance risk. A cybersecurity incident can become an operational disruption. A public safety event may require geospatial, security, asset, and operational context at the same time.

This is the gap that lifecycle intelligence seeks to address.

Lifecycle Intelligence Requires Context Across the Asset Lifecycle

Octave’s Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework is meaningful because it reflects how industrial assets are planned, built, used, maintained, protected, and improved over time.

In the Design domain, Octave can address engineering, modeling, analysis, information management, and geospatial intelligence. In Build, the portfolio extends into construction, supply chain management, and project performance. In Operate, the focus expands to operations optimization, asset performance, enterprise asset management, quality, compliance, and risk. In Protect, Octave’s positioning includes public safety, physical security, and industrial cybersecurity.

Individually, these are established industrial software categories. Collectively, they suggest a broader strategic direction: the use of software to preserve, connect, and operationalize context across the asset lifecycle.

That is where the Austin event becomes important. Customers and partners should look for evidence that Octave is moving beyond portfolio aggregation toward a more integrated model of lifecycle intelligence.

Intelligence at Scale Depends on Integration, Data, and Workflow Relevance

The phrase “intelligence at scale” should be interpreted operationally, not rhetorically. In industrial environments, intelligence at scale means that software can connect relevant data, apply domain context, and support better decisions across complex workflows.

This requires more than analytics dashboards. It requires software that can help users understand the implications of decisions across functions. It also requires a data foundation that connects engineering data, project execution status, asset histories, maintenance records, geospatial information, quality events, safety incidents, and cybersecurity signals.

AI increases the importance of this foundation. AI capabilities will have limited enterprise value if they are disconnected from operational systems and industrial context. The more material opportunity is AI that is embedded in real workflows and supported by trusted domain data.

For Octave, the strategic question is whether its portfolio can support AI-enabled decision-making across the asset lifecycle, rather than isolated AI features within individual applications.

The Event Should Be Assessed as a Roadmap Signal

Buyers should treat Octave Live OnTour Austin as a roadmap signal.

The first area to assess is integration. Octave’s portfolio breadth creates potential value, but customers will need clarity on how the company intends to connect products and workflows over time. Important indicators include shared data models, workflow orchestration, user experience consistency, API strategy, and cross-domain analytics.

The second area is AI. Customers should listen for specific use cases, not general AI messaging. Relevant examples could include project risk identification, asset performance optimization, maintenance prioritization, quality exception management, safety response, cyber risk monitoring, or engineering decision support. The key issue is whether AI is being tied to operational outcomes.

The third area is ecosystem fit. Industrial organizations rarely standardize on a single vendor across the full technology landscape. Octave will need to clarify how its offerings interact with ERP, EAM, APM, MES, PLM, project controls, cybersecurity, and analytics environments. The value proposition must be additive without increasing architectural complexity.

The fourth area is sequencing. Broad portfolios require disciplined execution. A credible roadmap should identify where Octave will focus first, what integration steps matter most, and how customers should think about value realization over time.

Broader Market Implications

Octave’s Austin event matters because it reflects a larger shift in industrial software.

The next stage of the market will not be defined solely by applications that digitize individual workflows. It will be defined by platforms and architectures that connect operational context across functions. This does not mean every customer will consolidate around a single software suite. Industrial technology environments will remain heterogeneous. But the strategic requirement for connected data, workflow continuity, and decision support will continue to intensify.

AI will accelerate this trend. Effective AI depends on relevant context. If industrial data remains trapped in disconnected systems, AI will be limited to narrow productivity assistance. If data and workflows are connected, AI can support higher-value decisions involving risk, reliability, performance, safety, and resilience.

That is why lifecycle intelligence is becoming an important industrial software concept. It reflects the need to move from systems that record activity to systems that help organizations understand and act on operational complexity.

ARC Advisory Group Perspective

Octave has a credible opportunity to participate in this market transition. The company has meaningful software assets across multiple industrial domains, and its Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework provides a practical way to organize the portfolio.

The central question is execution. Octave will need to demonstrate that its portfolio can become more than a set of adjacent capabilities. Customers will expect integration clarity, practical AI use cases, ecosystem openness, and a roadmap that connects near-term value to a longer-term lifecycle intelligence strategy.

For buyers, the Austin event should be used to evaluate roadmap direction and strategic fit. For partners, it should clarify Octave’s intended role in the industrial software ecosystem. For the broader market, it is another indication that industrial software is moving toward connected intelligence at scale.

The companies that define this next phase will not simply digitize industrial work. They will connect context across the asset lifecycle and convert that context into better decisions.

The post Why Octave’s Austin Event Matters: From Asset Lifecycle Software to Intelligence at Scale appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Chips, Geopolitics, and the New Risk Equation in Component Sourcing

Published

on

By

Electronic component sourcing is no longer just a cost problem.

It is now tied to geopolitics, tariffs, AI infrastructure, defense demand, electrification, industrial automation, product availability, and supply chain resilience. That makes the sourcing decision more strategic and more difficult at the same time.

The old sourcing equation was relatively straightforward: find the right part, qualify the supplier, negotiate the price, protect supply, and keep production moving.

Those fundamentals still matter. But they are no longer enough.

A component decision made today can affect product cost, lead time, compliance, margin, risk exposure, and customer commitments months or years later. For manufacturers, this turns component sourcing into a higher-consequence decision process.

To explore how component sourcing is changing, join ARC Advisory Group for the upcoming webinar, The Hidden Cost of Component Sourcing — and How AI Is Fixing It, featuring Jim Frazer in conversation with Lytica CEO Martin Sendyk. The discussion will examine how manufacturers can use better data, AI, and sourcing intelligence to manage cost and risk together.

Several demand cycles are now converging on the electronics supply base.

AI infrastructure is increasing demand for computing, power management, networking, cooling, and data center equipment. Electrification is increasing electronics content across vehicles, energy systems, buildings, industrial assets, and grid infrastructure. Defense and aerospace demand are placing pressure on specialized and high-reliability components. Industrial automation is expanding demand for sensors, controllers, embedded systems, and connected devices.

At the same time, geopolitical risk is changing sourcing assumptions.

Tariffs, export controls, regional manufacturing incentives, trade restrictions, and national security priorities are forcing companies to think harder about where components come from and how secure those sources really are.

This creates a new risk equation.

A low-cost sourcing decision may look attractive in a spreadsheet but become expensive if it increases exposure to disruption, compliance issues, long lead times, or supplier concentration. A supplier that appears competitive on price may create risk if it lacks redundancy or regional resilience. A component selected late in the engineering process may lock the company into avoidable cost and exposure for the life of the product.

For supply chain leaders, the key point is simple: cost and risk can no longer be managed separately.

Procurement teams must balance price, availability, lead time, supplier health, geographic exposure, lifecycle status, alternate availability, and engineering flexibility. They must do this while supporting product launches, margin targets, working capital discipline, and customer delivery commitments.

That is a demanding operating model.

It also means sourcing intelligence needs to move earlier in the product lifecycle. By the time a design is finalized, sourcing options may already be limited. Approved parts may be embedded in the bill of materials. Alternates may be difficult to qualify. Cost and availability problems may require redesign, delay, or expensive exceptions.

AI can help, but only when it is connected to useful data and real sourcing decisions.

The value is not just automation. The value is faster recognition of pricing anomalies, supplier concentration risk, alternate part opportunities, lifecycle concerns, and categories where negotiation leverage may be stronger than expected.

Component sourcing is becoming a test of organizational intelligence. The best teams will not simply ask whether they can buy the part. They will ask whether that part supports the company’s cost, resilience, product, and risk strategy.

Register now for the ARC Advisory Group webinar with Jim Frazer and Lytica CEO Martin Sendyk to learn how AI and sourcing intelligence can help manufacturers manage component cost, supply risk, and procurement uncertainty together.

Register for the Webinar

The Hidden Cost of Component Sourcing — and How AI Is Fixing It
Date: June 23, 2026
Time: 11:00 AM ET
Location: Online
Speakers: Jim Frazer, Vice President, ARC Advisory Group, and Martin Sendyk, CEO, Lytica

If your organization manages a significant electronic component spend, this webinar will help you understand how AI and transactional market data can expose hidden sourcing costs and turn procurement into a more proactive system of intelligence.

Register now to reserve your spot.

The post Chips, Geopolitics, and the New Risk Equation in Component Sourcing appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update

Published: June 16, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) stayed level.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 4%.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 3%.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) decreased 1%.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices stayed level.

China – N. Europe weekly prices increased 3%.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices decreased 2%.

Analysis

The US and Iran are set to sign an interim peace deal at the end of the week which will include an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, possibly within thirty days, and will start the clock on a sixty-day window to arrive at a final deal. As the sides haven’t released the text of the agreement, there is significant uncertainty around the Memorandum of Understanding’s details and timeline for the reopening.

The war’s broadest impact on freight markets has been via upward pressure on fuel prices. The reopening could mean some near term easing of fuel costs for carriers. President Trump asserts that the Strait will be fully open by the time of the signing, but even if both blockades are lifted then, the consensus is that a full return of traffic will likely take months as the narrow passage is further narrowed by Iranian mines. It will take time to de-mine the waterway, with some countries who have committed to the de-mining process hesitant to join the effort until a final peace deal is in place, meaning ships will have to rely on the few established safe lanes in the interim.

Experts estimate it will take several weeks for daily transits to recover to half of the pre-war norm, and much longer, possibly six months, for oil flows to normalize. In addition to out of place tankers and damage to infrastructure, even once vessels exit, it takes about seven weeks for crude to arrive in the Far East, with an even longer timeline for availability of refined products like bunker and jet fuel first dependent on those crude shipments arriving. The fact that many countries will seek to prioritize replenishing strategic reserves could likewise mean a commercial supply rebound will take time and that downward pressure on oil prices and on fuel costs will be gradual.

For the container market, near-term easing fuel costs would reduce some of the upward pressure on rates that have kept prices higher year on year since the start of the war. But while reduced Emergency Fuel Surcharges will be relevant for spot shipments, large shippers with annual contracts will still be paying higher rates via Q3 BAFs even as fuel costs decline.

Once fuel prices do normalize though, we could expect freight rates to pick up where they left off before the war: downward pressure on prices from a growing fleet. And if the peace deal hastens a broad carrier return to the Red Sea, that downward pressure will be even stronger.

Given this drawn out timeline for oil and fuel recovery however, this easing will come too late to make much of a difference for container rates this peak season. And in any case, spiking container rates at the moment are mostly being driven by peak season demand, not oil prices.

Spot prices on the major lanes were level last week, maintaining the sharp – $1k/FEU or more – GRI and PSS increases that carriers introduced to start the month. Reports that vessels are fully booked through the end of the month and that carriers are rolling containers and reducing allocations make it likely that mid-month increases will take too, with Asia – Europe daily rates already climbing about 10% this week.

Carriers have announced mid-month increases ranging from $1,000/FEU to $2,000/FEU above current levels for Asia – Europe lanes, with additional increases as much as $2,000/FEU higher than anticipated mid-June levels planned for the start of July. Likewise, CMA CGM has reportedly announced a $4,000/FEU PSS for all transpacific containers starting July 10th. And as carriers shift capacity to these lanes where demand is surging, rates are climbing on secondary lanes as vessels are moved away.

The early start to peak season – driven partially by frontloading ahead of BAF increases, tariffs, and coming manufacturer price hikes – has some observers expecting bookings to peak in June, which could mean carriers will find more resistance to July rate increases than they have to June price hikes so far.

Air cargo capacity and volumes continue to recover from the sharp March war-related deficit, with reports that Gulf carriers have restored capacity to about 70% of pre-war levels. But the remaining 30% gap, as well as non-Gulf carriers still mostly avoiding the Middle East, mean that the industry hasn’t normalized yet.

In addition to the lingering capacity slump, elevated jet fuel prices are also contributing to air cargo rates that continue to face upward pressure. Jet fuel prices are about 40% above pre-war levels though they have come down by about 35% from the war-period high reached in April, and some carriers are reducing Emergency Fuel Surcharges as a result.

The Freightos Air Index global benchmark closed last week level with the past two weeks and down 10% from its year high set in May, but still 30% higher year on year and relative to just before the war. Rates on the major lanes are showing similar trends.

China – N. America rates were level at $6.20/kg last week, a price 15% down from a peak in March but 17% higher year on year. China – Europe rates ticked up 3% to $4.62/kg, down 12% from their wartime peak, but still 30% higher than late February and 21% higher than last year. S. Asia prices are at about $4.50/kg to Europe and $3.17/kg to the Middle East, with Europe rates down 12% from their peak but up 50% year on year and Middle East prices 70% higher than a year ago but down 25% from their peak as Gulf capacity recovers.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Trending