Connect with us

Non classé

How Chinese Software Companies Succeed Abroad: Comparing Client-Following, Agent Partnerships, and Local Subsidiaries

Published

on

How Chinese Software Companies Succeed Abroad: Comparing Client Following, Agent Partnerships, And Local Subsidiaries

In-depth Analysis of Overseas Expansion Models for Chinese Software Enterprises

Driven by the global digitalization trend, the software industry has become a focal point of global economic competition. After accumulating rich experience and technical strength in the domestic market, Chinese software enterprises are actively seeking to expand into overseas markets to enhance their international competitiveness and market share.

The choice of overseas expansion models is crucial for enterprises’ success in overseas markets, as different models have their respective characteristics and applicable scenarios. This article deeply analyzes three main models for Chinese software enterprises to go global: expanding alongside clients, partnering with local agents, and relying on local subsidiary operations. It explores their core logics, typical cases, advantages, and challenges, aiming to provide valuable references for the overseas expansion of Chinese software enterprises.

Expanding Alongside Clients – Deeply Bound to the Industrial Chain

Core Logic

With the global layout of Chinese manufacturing and the vigorous development of cross-border e-commerce, many Chinese enterprises have established factories or expanded their businesses overseas. Software enterprises follow these clients abroad, providing supporting software solutions such as Warehouse Management Systems (WMS) and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). The core of this model lies in closely centering on clients’ overseas business needs, forming a collaborative development pattern of “where clients are, services follow.” By extending the good cooperative relationship established with clients domestically to overseas markets, it achieves deep integration of software services with clients’ businesses, meets clients’ personalized needs in different regions, and jointly addresses challenges in overseas markets.

Typical Cases

Haofang WMS and Xiaomi: As a global renowned smartphone brand, Xiaomi has invested heavily in the Indian market. Haofang WMS provided a professional WMS for Xiaomi’s overseas warehouse in Bangalore, India. Through the implementation of this system, Xiaomi’s delivery time in India was significantly shortened from the original 7-10 days to 2-3 days. The efficient logistics and distribution services greatly enhanced the competitiveness of Xiaomi’s products in the Indian market, helping Xiaomi become the smartphone brand with the largest market share in India. Haofang WMS also accumulated rich industry experience and customer reputation in the Indian market through cooperation with Xiaomi, laying a solid foundation for further expanding into India and surrounding markets.
SIS Global and CIMC Group: As a global leading supplier of logistics and energy equipment, CIMC Group has a large and complex semi-trailer export project in the Middle East. SIS Global provided an integrated WMS + TMS (Transportation Management System) solution for CIMC Lighthouse’s project in the Middle East. The solution supports multi-warehouse collaborative operations and realizes full-process traceability of cross-border logistics. After implementation, the order processing efficiency of CIMC Group’s Middle East project increased by approximately 40%, effectively reducing logistics costs and improving customer satisfaction. Through cooperation with CIMC Group, Juling Supply Chain successfully entered the Middle East market, demonstrating the service capabilities of Chinese software enterprises in complex cross-border projects.

Advantages and Challenges

Advantages:

Clear customer needs: Due to the existing cooperation foundation with clients domestically, software enterprises have an in-depth understanding of clients’ business processes and requirements. In overseas projects, clients’ needs are relatively clear, reducing the costs of requirement research and communication, and enabling projects to be implemented more quickly.
Replicable domestic success experience: The experience and solutions accumulated by software enterprises in serving similar clients domestically can be partially replicated to overseas projects. This helps reduce project implementation risks, improve project success rates, and quickly adapt to some of the needs of overseas clients.
Close cooperative relationship: In-depth cooperation with clients overseas can further strengthen the strategic partnership between the two sides. Software enterprises can continue to provide services as clients’ businesses expand, achieving common growth, and attract more cooperation opportunities from peer enterprises through clients’ word-of-mouth promotion.

Challenges:

Adaptation to overseas local regulations: Regulatory policies vary greatly across different countries and regions. For example, India’s BIS certification has strict requirements for product quality and safety standards. Software enterprises need to ensure that their products and services comply with local regulations, which may involve product function adjustments, tedious certification procedures, and in-depth research on local regulations, increasing the enterprise’s operational costs and time costs.
Differences in supply chain ecosystems: Overseas supply chain ecosystems differ significantly from those in China, including logistics infrastructure, supplier systems, labor markets, and other aspects. Software enterprises need to quickly adapt to these differences and optimize their software solutions to ensure good compatibility with the local supply chain ecosystem. For example, in regions with relatively backward logistics infrastructure, special designs for WMS system distribution strategies may be required.

Expanding via Agents – Leveraging Local Resources to Penetrate Markets

Core Logic

Cooperating with local overseas agents is an effective way for Chinese software enterprises to quickly enter target markets. Local agents have rich channel resources, in-depth industry experience, and localized service capabilities. By establishing cooperative relationships with agents, software enterprises can leverage their advantages in the local market to promote software products to target customer groups. Agents are responsible for product promotion, sales, and localized services, while software enterprises focus on product research and development and technical support, complementing each other’s advantages to jointly 开拓 overseas markets.

Typical Cases

FLUX: FLUX successfully promoted its WMS products to the Australian market through cooperation with Australian agent networks. Relying on their familiarity with the local market, agents accurately positioned target customers, such as manufacturing and logistics warehousing enterprises. Through localized marketing and services, FLUX WMS quickly gained market recognition in Australia, with the number of customers increasing and market share gradually expanding.
Best Software and Southeast Asian Agents: In the Southeast Asian market, Best Software closely cooperated with local agents to promote WMS systems. For the work habits of Southeast Asian employees, agents carried out a work order-based transformation of the system. This transformation reduced the system’s learning cost by approximately 60%, enabling employees to get started with the use more quickly. The good user experience has brought an excellent result of a customer retention rate of over 90%, and Best Software has gained a firm foothold in the Southeast Asian market with the help of agents.

Advantages and Challenges

Advantages:

Lower market entry costs: Compared with setting up branches independently, cooperating with agents can greatly reduce market entry costs. Software enterprises do not need to invest a lot of funds in overseas office space rental, personnel recruitment and training, etc., reducing initial capital pressure and operational risks.
Avoid cultural differences risks: Local agents have a deep understanding of local culture, business habits, and market needs, and can better communicate and cooperate with local customers. Software enterprises can 借助 the localized advantages of agents to avoid market promotion and customer service problems caused by cultural differences and improve product acceptance.
Rapid market coverage: Agents have mature channel resources and sales networks, which can quickly promote software products to all corners of the target market. Software enterprises can reach many potential customers in a short time, improving brand awareness and market share.

Challenges:

Uneven technical capabilities of agents: The technical strength and service levels of different agents vary. Some agents may not have an in-depth technical understanding of software products, and cannot accurately convey product value in the process of product promotion and service, or even affect the customer experience due to technical problems. Software enterprises need to establish strict agent screening mechanisms to ensure that agents have certain technical capabilities and service levels.
Construction of training and support systems: In order to ensure that agents can effectively promote and service software products, software enterprises need to establish a sound training and support system. This includes product technical training, sales skills training, and continuous technical support for agents. The construction of training and support systems requires a lot of investment in human, material, and time costs, and needs to be continuously optimized and updated to adapt to product upgrades and market changes.

Relying on Subsidiaries – Localized Operations to Build Barriers

Core Logic

Establishing wholly-owned subsidiaries in target markets is an important strategy for Chinese software enterprises to achieve deep localized operations. Through subsidiaries, enterprises can realize comprehensive localization of research and development, sales, and services. In terms of research and development, carry out customized development and optimization of products according to local market needs and user habits; in terms of sales, form a localized sales team, deeply understand local customer needs, and formulate targeted marketing strategies; in terms of services, establish a localized service team to provide customers with timely and efficient technical support and after-sales services. This model helps enterprises deeply integrate into the local industrial chain, enhance brand influence, and build long-term and stable market competition barriers.

Typical Cases

FLUX Southeast Asia Branch: FLUX set up a branch in the Philippines, focusing on the 3PL (Third-Party Logistics) market. Relying on the rich scenario experience accumulated in the logistics software field, the branch has an in-depth understanding of the business needs of local 3PL enterprises and provides them with customized software solutions. Through localized operations and services, FLUX Southeast Asia Branch has become the preferred partner of local leading enterprises and occupies an important position in the 3PL market in the Philippines and surrounding areas.
JD Logistics’ European Self-Operated Warehouses: JD Logistics has set up self-operated warehouses in Germany and Poland and provides customized WMS services through local teams. The local team has an in-depth understanding of the needs of European customers and has carried out targeted optimization of the WMS system, such as meeting the strict data security and privacy regulations in Europe. In 2024, JD Logistics’ revenue in the European market increased by 120% year-on-year, and customers covered international logistics providers such as DHL and DB Schenker. Through localized operations, JD Logistics has established a good brand image in the European market and enhanced its market competitiveness.

Advantages and Challenges

Advantages:

Deep control over service quality: By setting up branches, software enterprises can directly manage sales and service teams to ensure the consistency and stability of service quality. Enterprises can quickly adjust service strategies according to local customer needs, provide more personalized and professional services, and improve customer satisfaction.
Rapid response to customer needs: Localized teams can more timely understand customer needs and market changes and quickly respond to customer feedback and problems. Compared with enterprises headquartered domestically, branches have obvious advantages in communication efficiency and decision-making speed, and can better meet local customers’ requirements for service timeliness.
Enhance brand influence: Localized operations help enterprises integrate into the local community and business environment and enhance brand awareness and reputation locally. By participating in local industry activities, establishing cooperative relationships with local enterprises, etc., enterprises can enhance their brand image, establish a good corporate citizen image, and thus gain broader recognition and support in the local market.

Challenges:

High initial investment: Setting up branches requires a lot of funds for office space rental, personnel recruitment and training, market promotion, etc. In addition, it is also necessary to deal with complex administrative procedures such as local registration and tax declaration, with high initial operating costs and a long capital recovery period.
Data compliance issues: Different countries and regions have different regulatory requirements for data security and privacy protection. For example, the EU’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) has strict provisions on enterprises’ data collection, storage, use, and transmission. Software enterprises need to ensure that their business operations comply with local data compliance requirements, which may involve system architecture adjustments, data security technology upgrades, and the establishment of compliance processes, increasing the enterprise’s operational difficulty and cost.
Localized talent recruitment: Recruiting suitable localized talent is the key to the operation of branches. In some regions, there may be problems such as a shortage of software technical talents and fierce talent competition. Enterprises need to formulate attractive compensation and benefits policies and talent development plans to attract and retain excellent localized talents, and at the same time, they need to solve problems such as cultural integration to ensure the efficient collaboration of the team.

Conclusion

In the process of going global, the three models of “expanding alongside clients,” “expanding via agents,” and “relying on local subsidiary operations” for Chinese software enterprises each have their own advantages and disadvantages. Enterprises should flexibly choose suitable overseas expansion models according to their own strategic goals, product characteristics, resource strength, and the specific conditi

The post How Chinese Software Companies Succeed Abroad: Comparing Client-Following, Agent Partnerships, and Local Subsidiaries appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Ocean rates up pre-LNY; geopolitics driving (more) uncertainty – January 13, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Ocean rates up pre-LNY; geopolitics driving (more) uncertainty – January 13, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: January 13, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) increased 5% to $2,757/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 7% to $4,033/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 1% to $2,978/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) stayed level at $4,851/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 4% to $5.91/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices increased 6% to $3.64/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 5% to $2.10/kg.

Analysis

Asia – Europe container rates remained steady but elevated last week – at about $3,000/FEU to Europe and $4,850/FEU to the Mediterranean – at levels last reached during the summer peak season as pre-Lunar New Year demand is now supporting the start of the year GRIs and carriers add capacity to service rising volumes.

This seasonal demand bump started earlier than usual and so may already be at about its peak as daily rates this week cool slightly. Some carriers have nonetheless announced mid-month GRIs aiming at $4k/FEU for Europe and more than $5,500/FEU for Mediterranean routes. The recent winter weather in Europe has caused disruptions at some key ports, which could help support rate levels.

Rates on the transpacific have been on the rise since mid-December and continued to climb about 5% last week. Prices so far this week have remained stable at about $2,750/FEU to the West Coast and $4,000/FEU to the East Coast, though some forwarders report that carriers are already starting to offer discounts as space remains available.

The current rate bumps to North America would also be earlier than normal for pre-LNY, but are in line with the latest National Retail Federation US ocean import projections. The report estimates January volumes will increase 6% compared to December for the first month-on-month increase since July, though these volumes would be 5% lower than last January, with annual deficits expected through April. The NRF’s January report however, projects stronger 2026 volumes than its report from a month ago did, suggesting importers may be getting slightly more optimistic about post-holiday restocking strength.

In geopolitical developments, the US Supreme Court has until the end of June to issue a ruling on the legality of IEEPA tariffs, though there is speculation that a decision could come as soon as tomorrow. It seems likely that SCOTUS will rule against the administration. Such a decision would raise significant question marks regarding whether or how quickly the White House might move to restore tariffs by other means, and what the decision will mean for tariff refunds.

The administration’s IEEPA-based tariffs on China were set at their current level until November of this year as part of the China-US deescalation back in November. Amid the turmoil in Iran though, President Trump released a statement on social media, though no executive order has been issued, saying 25% tariffs are in effect for any country that trades with Iran. If this move becomes law it could apply to China – Iran’s largest trading partner – and risk disrupting the China-US trade status quo.

The unrest in Iran could have other implications for freight as well. Iran has threatened to respond to a US attack with actions against US shipping interests. These steps could include closing the Strait of Hormuz. While closing the passage would be disruptive to oil flows, only 2% – 3% of global container volumes, according to Container Trade Statistics, transit the Strait, so disruptions to the container market would mostly be felt locally.

A closure would cut off access to Dubai’s Port of Jebel Ali, a major transhipment hub between the Far East and points to the west, especially Europe, with a share moving from ocean to air in Dubai. Tranship volumes would need to be shifted elsewhere, possibly to South Asian hubs, which could cause some congestion and higher freight rates, but would not represent a major disruption to the overall container market. If protests do topple the regime, leaving the Houthis without Iranian support, the collapse could hasten a container traffic return to the Red Sea, where carriers like Maersk continue to test the waters.

Last week’s storms and cold in Europe disrupted flights along with container ports, though operations are recovering this week. Air rates continue to cool post the December peak on the transpacific, with Freightos Air Index China – US prices below $6.00/kg for the first time since October, and prices from South East Asia slumping below $4.00/kg.

While transpacific volumes fell sharply following US de minimis suspensions in May, capacity and volumes have gradually recovered. This rebound is driven partly by a recovery in e-commerce volumes, but mostly by general cargo growth from China and South East Asia – especially Vietnam – as demand for AI hardware and trade war shifts in electronics sourcing push more volumes to the air.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Ocean rates up pre-LNY; geopolitics driving (more) uncertainty – January 13, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Amazon and the Next Phase of Supply Chain Advantage

Published

on

By

Amazon And The Next Phase Of Supply Chain Advantage

Amazon is still widely cited as the supply chain benchmark. That assessment is not wrong, but it is increasingly incomplete. Too many discussions focus on the visible outcomes of Amazon’s network while missing the underlying logic that produces them.

For years, Amazon’s advantage was explained in terms of speed, scale, and cost efficiency. Those attributes still matter, but they no longer explain why Amazon continues to outperform peers facing similar technologies and capital constraints. The more relevant advantage today is Amazon’s ability to sense weak signals across its network and act on them faster and with less friction than most organizations can manage.

This distinction matters because it changes what leaders should be studying. Tools are easy to observe. Operating logic is not.

Optionality Over Efficiency

Amazon does not optimize its supply chain primarily for efficiency. It optimizes for optionality.

Redundant paths, excess capacity, and parallel experimentation all carry cost. In stable environments, those costs look unnecessary. In volatile environments, they become strategic assets. Amazon consistently favors the ability to change course quickly over short term efficiency gains.

Many organizations still evaluate these decisions using traditional cost metrics and conclude they are inefficient. That conclusion usually reflects a mismatch between the metric and the objective, not a flaw in the design.

Fulfillment Is No Longer Just Execution

Another common misconception is that Amazon’s fulfillment network exists mainly to respond to demand. Increasingly, it shapes demand.

Inventory positioning, delivery promises, pricing, and promotion are coordinated to steer customers toward options the network can serve reliably and profitably. The boundary between demand planning and fulfillment execution has narrowed significantly. In operational terms, it is often no longer meaningful.

Most retailers continue to treat these as separate functions. As a result, their ability to influence outcomes once demand materializes is limited.

The Real Advantage Lives Between Systems

Amazon’s advantage is often attributed to individual systems such as forecasting engines, robotics, routing algorithms, or last mile capabilities. These systems are impressive, but they are not the primary source of differentiation.

The more durable advantage lies in how those systems are coordinated. Decision latency is low. Feedback loops are continuous. Information moves across planning, execution, and customer promise layers without waiting for manual reconciliation.

This is why simply purchasing similar software rarely produces similar results. If decision rights, escalation paths, and governance structures remain unchanged, system level performance will not improve meaningfully.

Why Replication Efforts Disappoint

Organizations attempting to emulate Amazon tend to encounter predictable limitations. Automation is layered onto legacy workflows. AI is deployed without authority to act. Control towers provide visibility without operational control. Optimization remains constrained by static planning cycles.

The result is localized improvement without system level change.

Amazon approached this problem differently. It redesigned workflows to support machine scale decision making first, then structured human oversight around exceptions rather than routine execution. The sequencing matters more than the technology choices.

Interpreting the Private Label Pullback

Amazon’s reduced emphasis on private label brands is often framed as a strategic reversal. A more accurate interpretation is that it reflected learning.

Amazon identified other ways to influence assortment and availability with lower exposure. When a strategy no longer improves system learning or overall performance, Amazon exits quickly. That willingness to abandon sunk cost remains a differentiator.

Control Matters More Than Ownership in the Last Mile

In the last mile, Amazon increasingly prioritizes control over customer promises rather than asset ownership.

The ability to set delivery windows, reroute dynamically, and manage exceptions has more impact than incremental improvements in delivery speed. Speed still matters, but it is no longer the dominant objective it once was. This shift is evident in how Amazon structures its logistics partnerships.

Amazon’s Hardest Problem Is Internal

Amazon’s most significant constraint is not external competition. It is internal scale.

As the organization grows, decision latency and coordination costs rise. Local optimization tendencies reappear. Organizational friction increases. Amazon invests continuously in mechanisms to counter these effects, but the pressure is structural and persistent. At Amazon’s scale, even small increases in friction compound quickly.

This challenge is not unique to Amazon, but its magnitude is.

Benchmarking the Wrong Thing

Amazon is still benchmarked primarily as a retailer. That framing encourages competitors to focus on surface metrics such as fulfillment speed, labor ratios, and unit cost. These metrics are familiar and easy to compare, which makes them attractive.

A more accurate framing is that Amazon operates as a systems integrator. Benchmarking decision latency, signal ingestion, and cross functional coordination would be more informative. Few organizations do this consistently, in part because these dimensions are harder to measure.

What Supply Chain Leaders Should Take Away

The primary lesson from Amazon is not to move faster or automate more. It is to be explicit about what the supply chain is optimizing for.

Speed without predictive capability is fragile. Automation without authority produces limited results. Visibility without action does not materially change outcomes.

Amazon’s model is not universally transferable. Its underlying logic, prioritizing optionality, reducing decision friction, and integrating demand with execution, is broadly applicable. Organizations that adopt that logic will not necessarily resemble Amazon operationally, but they will tend to be more adaptive and more resilient than traditional benchmarks suggest.

The post Amazon and the Next Phase of Supply Chain Advantage appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Global Supply Chain & Logistics News January 5th – 8th 2026

Published

on

By

Global Supply Chain & Logistics News January 5th – 8th 2026

From executive leadership shifts to multi-billion dollar energy investments, this week’s supply chain round-up is defined by strategic moves aimed at long-term stability. This roundup covers the appointment of Razat Gaurav as the new CEO of Kinaxis and Bentley Systems’ expansion into AI-driven asset analytics through key acquisitions. We also examine significant policy shifts, including the one-year postponement of furniture tariffs and a $2.7 billion federal investment into the nuclear fuel supply chain. Finally, we look toward the future of manufacturing as Boston Dynamics and Hyundai prepare to bring the Atlas humanoid robot to the factory floor.

This week’s news:

Bentley Systems Acquires Talon Aerolytics and Pointivo Technology for Asset Analytics Leadership

Bentley Systems acquired the infrastructure engineering software company and today announced the acquisitions of Talon Aerolytics and the technology and technical expertise of Pointivo. These acquisitions, which closed in December, significantly strengthen Bentley’s Asset Analytics portfolio, which applies digital twins and AI to help owner-operators improve asset performance and resilience across infrastructure sectors. Bentley Asset Analytics includes OpenTower iQ for telecommunication towers and Blyncsy for road networks. The new acquisitions extend Bentley’s offerings in both telecommunications and electric utilities, enabling integrated digital workflows that support global 5G deployments and grid modernization. As next-generation networks and electrification imperatives drive unprecedented demand, these capabilities empower infrastructure owners to digitize, analyze, and optimize assets at scale.

Kinaxis Appoints Razat Gaurav as New CEO

Kinaxis announced on January 8th the appointment of Razat Gaurav as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) effective January 12, 2026. After a rigorous search, the Board selected Razat to lead the company as CEO,” said Bob Courteau, Interim CEO and Board Chair at Kinaxis. “Razat’s twenty-five years of experience in supply chain solutions, his proven track record in advancing innovation-driven growth, and his passion for developing high-performing cultures make him uniquely qualified for this role. The Board looks forward to supporting Razat as he leads Kinaxis to the next phase of growth and success.”Gaurav has an established track record of building and scaling global organizations in high-growth markets. He was the former CEO of both Planview and LLamasoft and previously held senior roles at Blue Yonder and i2 Technologies. He is also a board member at SPS Commerce, a publicly traded SaaS company helping businesses exchange data, automate processes, and run more efficient supply chains.

Trump Postpones Higher Tariffs on Wood Products for 1 year

Tariff hikes of up to 50 percent on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities were due to take effect Jan. 1. President Donald Trump on Wednesday delayed for one year planned tariff hikes on imports of upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities, another in a series of trade policy walk-backs as the White House tries to address cost-of-living concerns. Trump signed the proclamation postponing the tariffs late Wednesday night, hours before they were due to take effect Jan. 1. The president initially raised the duties in a September proclamation following a Commerce Department investigation into the security implications of imports of timber, lumber, and derivative wood products. The administration concluded that those imports threaten the domestic industry and national security

Energy Department Makes $2.7 Billion Bet on Nuclear Reactor Fuel Supply Chain

The U.S. Department of Energy has allocated $2.7 billion to developing a supply chain for nuclear reactor fuel. The U.S. Department of Energy has allocated $2.7 billion to developing a supply chain for nuclear reactor fuel. The department announced contracts for three reactor fuel companies on Monday in an effort to undercut Russia’s dominance in the market for advanced reactor fuel. The funding comes as electricity demand increases and federal policy shifts away from renewable energy development. The Trump administration is betting on a larger role for nuclear power in America’s energy future. But the U.S. relies heavily on imported fuel for its existing nuclear power plants, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration

Boston Dynamics and Hyundai Move Humanoid Robot to Factory Floor

The companies recently revealed a new, production-ready version of the Atlas humanoid robot, built to take on real jobs inside factories and supply chains. The idea is not to replace workers but to handle the physically demanding, repetitive tasks that are increasingly hard to fill. Atlas is a six-foot-tall, all-electric robot that walked and interacted on stage during Hyundai Motor Group’s CES presentation. Hyundai says it plans to begin using the robot in its own manufacturing operations as early as 2028. The robot is designed to move parts, support assembly lines, and operate in environments that can be tough on people. Hyundai says Atlas can lift about 110 pounds and work in both hot and cold conditions, which makes it a fit for factory floors rather than controlled lab settings.

Song of the week:

The post Global Supply Chain & Logistics News January 5th – 8th 2026 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending