Series connection: The previous articles established the need for connected decisions and adaptive execution. This installment focuses on the sensing layer: visibility creates value only when an exception is connected to business impact and a governed response. Part 4 turns to the architecture required to support those connections.

Supply chain visibility once meant answering a basic operational question: Where is the shipment?

That question remains important, but it is no longer sufficient.

A modern visibility platform can provide shipment location, estimated arrival times, temperature conditions, route deviations, dwell events, and other operational signals. The harder question is what the company should do with that information.

Visibility is therefore evolving from tracking to intervention.

More Alerts Do Not Necessarily Produce Better Decisions

The first generation of visibility initiatives focused on consolidating data that was previously fragmented across carriers, freight forwarders, emails, spreadsheets, and telephone calls.

That created substantial value. It also created a new problem: alert volume.

An organization may have thousands of shipments in motion and hundreds of deviations on a given day. Most do not require executive attention. Some will resolve themselves. Others may be operationally inconvenient but financially insignificant. A small number may threaten production, revenue, customer service, regulatory compliance, or product integrity.

The challenge is to distinguish the exceptions that matter from the exceptions that merely exist.

FourKites’ February 2026 Loft launch provides a concrete example of the move from alerts to intervention. The platform is designed to combine external network intelligence with internal enterprise systems and preserve the logic behind automated decisions. Descartes’ February 2026 technology showcase similarly highlighted the use of connected logistics data and AI across routing, fleet operations, transportation, and trade processes. The announcement illustrates how visibility is increasingly being embedded in execution workflows rather than treated as a stand-alone tracking layer. These examples point toward business-impact visibility rather than event visibility.

An ETA Is Only the Beginning

An estimated arrival time provides a forecast. It does not provide a decision.

Consider an inbound component projected to arrive a day late. The company may have several options:

Expedite the shipment.

Substitute inventory from another location.

Reschedule production.

Reallocate finished goods.

Renegotiate a customer delivery commitment.

Accept the delay because the business impact is limited.

Selecting among those options requires context that a transportation feed alone may not contain. The system needs information about inventory, production schedules, customer priorities, material dependencies, contractual obligations, transportation costs, and alternative supply.

This is where visibility begins to overlap with planning, execution, and decision intelligence.

Kinaxis’ January 2026 outlook described adaptable supply chains as systems that sense shifts, predict impact, prescribe responses, and execute quickly. InterSystems’ May 2026 data-quality analysis stressed that trusted, harmonized data is essential for diagnosing root causes and supporting faster decisions. Blue Yonder’s February 2026 Orchestrator release focused on helping users understand the business impact of issues and move toward action. The approaches differ, but they share the premise that disruption data becomes more valuable when connected to consequences and response options.

Intervention Requires Prioritization

A mature visibility program should classify exceptions according to consequence, urgency, confidence, and available response options.

A disruption with a low probability of affecting the customer may require only monitoring. A high-confidence disruption affecting a constrained product or strategic account may justify immediate action. A temperature excursion involving regulated or perishable goods may trigger a predefined compliance workflow.

This is a decision-design problem as much as a data problem.

Companies must define which outcomes matter, what thresholds justify intervention, who owns each class of exception, and which actions can be automated. Without that discipline, visibility platforms can become sophisticated notification engines that transfer the burden of interpretation to already overloaded operators.

The objective should be a managed exception queue, not an expanding stream of warnings.

Visibility Must Extend Beyond Transportation

Transportation visibility was a natural starting point because shipment data could be collected from carriers, telematics systems, mobile devices, ocean data providers, and other external sources.

The next step is broader operational visibility.

A late truck may be caused by carrier performance, but its business impact depends on what is inside the truck, where inventory is positioned, whether production has alternatives, and what commitments have been made to customers.

Similarly, a warehouse delay, supplier quality issue, labor shortage, or production constraint may be more important than a transportation event.

End-to-end visibility is not achieved by placing more dots on a map. It requires understanding the relationships among materials, orders, capacities, inventory, suppliers, facilities, and customers.

A Practical Intervention Model

Consider a shipment of critical components that is projected to miss its delivery window by 14 hours.

A basic visibility system identifies the delay.

A more advanced process determines that the receiving plant has only six hours of available inventory, the component is required for a high-priority production sequence, and an alternate location has two days of excess stock. The system can then recommend an inventory transfer, estimate the premium freight cost, show the production risk avoided, and route the recommendation to the appropriate manager.

The underlying value does not come from knowing that the truck is late. It comes from connecting the delay to the operational consequence and identifying a viable response while there is still time to act.

From Decision Support to Controlled Automation

Once an organization can reliably identify material exceptions and evaluate response options, some interventions can be automated.

A low-risk shipment may be rerouted according to approved rules. A customer may receive a revised delivery estimate automatically. Warehouse appointments may be adjusted. An inventory transfer may be proposed for human approval. A planning workflow may be initiated when a supplier disruption crosses a defined threshold.

The progression is likely to occur in stages:

Detect the event.

Explain the likely impact.

Recommend an action.

Execute the action with approval.

Automate repeatable, governed decisions.

Trust will be critical. Users must understand why a recommendation was made, what data supported it, and what constraints were considered. Automation without transparency can create new operational risk.

The Real Measure of Visibility

The success of a visibility platform should not be measured primarily by the number of shipments tracked or alerts generated.

More meaningful measures include disruptions avoided, service failures prevented, expediting costs reduced, manual status inquiries eliminated, and the time required to move from detection to response.

Tracking remains the foundation. Intervention is where the larger economic value emerges.

The visibility market is therefore entering a more demanding phase. The most useful systems will not merely describe the supply chain more accurately. They will help organizations change the outcome while there is still time to act.

The post Supply Chain Visibility Is Evolving from Tracking to Intervention appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Following the completion of two research cycles, I have recognized an emerging trend in the Warehouse Management Systems and Supply Chain Planning Market. Through this process, I have spoken with supply chain vendors, customers, and product specialists. These recent experiences have revealed a pivotal industry shift: the emergence of “Platforms” and “Networks” as primary competitive advantages. This trend is fundamentally changing customer engagement. Historically, organizations managed disparate systems like WMS and TMS through multiple vendors. Today, leading providers are leveraging these integrated platforms to encourage total ecosystem adoption. By consolidating supply chain services, organizations can dismantle data silos, ensure a single source of truth, and significantly reduce the risk of data fragmentation.

The emergence of Manhattan Active Platform, Blue Yonder Network, E2open, and SAP Business Network reflects a broader transformation underway in the supply chain software market. Historically, organizations invested in applications that optimized individual functions such as warehouse management, transportation, procurement, or planning. Today, leading vendors are expanding beyond standalone applications and positioning themselves as providers of comprehensive platforms and interconnected business networks.

These strategies differ in their emphasis. Manhattan Associates has built its vision around a unified, cloud-native platform that provides a common foundation for warehouse management, transportation, order management, labor management, and omnichannel fulfillment. Its focus is on delivering seamless execution across supply chain operations with shared data, extensibility, and continuous innovation.

Blue Yonder, through its acquisition of One Network, is extending beyond traditional planning and execution software to create a multi-enterprise network that connects suppliers, manufacturers, logistics providers, carriers, and customers. The emphasis is on real-time visibility, orchestration, collaboration, and coordinated decision-making across the broader supply chain ecosystem.

Similarly, E2open has long championed a network-centric approach, connecting trading partners across procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and channel operations through a shared digital platform. Its value proposition focuses on enabling collaboration and visibility beyond the enterprise to improve responsiveness and resilience.

SAP Business Network extends SAP’s enterprise footprint beyond traditional ERP boundaries by connecting buyers, suppliers, logistics providers, and other business partners in a shared environment. The strategy is designed to facilitate collaboration, automate business processes, and improve transparency across complex global supply chains.

Collectively, these offerings highlight a significant market trend: supply chain technology vendors are no longer competing solely on application functionality. Increasingly, they are differentiating themselves through their ability to create digital ecosystems that connect organizations, synchronize data, and enable real-time collaboration across entire value chains. As supply chain disruptions, geopolitical uncertainty, and demand volatility continue to challenge businesses, platforms and networks are becoming critical enablers of resilience, agility, and end-to-end supply chain orchestration.

If you are interested in obtaining ARC Advisory Group’s recent market data on Warehouse Management Systems and Supply Chain Planning, please reach out to (gsimon@arcweb.com) or (Chanf@arcweb.com).

Vendor Deep Dive:

Manhattan Associates:

Manhattan Active Platform serves as the foundational cloud-native infrastructure for Manhattan Associates, underpinning its suite of commerce and supply chain solutions such as WMS, TMS, OMS, and Labor Management. Developed to offer a cohesive, modern environment, the platform facilitates perpetual innovation by removing the complexities and disruptions of conventional software upgrade cycles. This technological framework provides several key capabilities:

Key Capabilities

Cloud-Native Architecture – Employs containerization and microservices to ensure robust scalability, system resilience, and consistent availability.
Evergreen Delivery Model – Deploys quarterly functional updates and improvements, eliminating the need for large-scale migration projects or operational downtime.
API-First Design – Utilizes a vast library of RESTful APIs to coordinate with external partners, automated systems, and various ERP environments.
Low-Code/No-Code Extensibility – Empowers users to tailor business rules, workflows, and data structures without necessitating deep technical development or custom coding.
Unified Data Model – Establishes a singular user interface and shared data layer across all integrated supply chain applications.
AI and Analytics – Integrates machine learning and operational intelligence to provide actionable dashboards and end-to-end network visibility.

The platform is optimized for enterprises that value agility and long-term adaptability over minimal upfront expenditure. Its sophisticated architecture and flexible design make it a primary choice for organizations navigating complex omnichannel demands or extensive digital transformation initiatives.

Blue Yonder:

Blue Yonder Network represents the culmination of Blue Yonder’s August 2024 acquisition of One Network Enterprises. This strategic integration, finalized and rebranded during the 2026 customer conference, leverages One Network’s legacy in intelligent control towers and multi-party digital supply chain networks.

The unified platform is designed to facilitate real-time collaboration and seamless orchestration across the entire value chain, providing organizations with several core functionalities:

Multi-tier Visibility – Enables granular transparency across multiple levels of the supplier base and trading partner ecosystem.
Synchronized Capacity – Provides a shared view of inventory levels and operational capacity to improve planning and execution.
Network Orchestration – Supports sophisticated, network-based coordination of logistics and supply chain movements.
Intelligent Exception Management – Utilizes AI-driven insights to identify, prioritize, and resolve supply chain disruptions automatically.
Rapid Partner Onboarding – Streamlines the technical integration and connection process for new external partners and vendors.
End-to-End Transparency – Ensures comprehensive visibility from initial procurement through to final fulfillment.

By moving beyond isolated point solutions like standalone WMS or TMS, the Blue Yonder Network provides a comprehensive technology foundation. It positions itself as a unified platform that connects and synchronizes every component of a modern, complex supply chain.

E2open: The Connected Supply Chain Network

E2open is one of the pioneers of the network-based supply chain model. Its Connected Supply Chain Platform is designed to link manufacturers, suppliers, contract manufacturers, logistics providers, and channel partners in a single multi-enterprise network. Rather than focusing solely on internal operations, E2open emphasizes collaboration across trading partners to improve visibility, planning, procurement, logistics, and fulfillment. The company’s value proposition centers on helping organizations manage supply chain complexity by providing a shared view of inventory, orders, shipments, and demand across the broader ecosystem. In many respects, E2open represents one of the purest examples of a network-first supply chain strategy.

SAP Business Network: Extending the Enterprise

SAP has taken a similar approach through SAP Business Network, which connects buyers, suppliers, logistics providers, and asset operators on a common platform. Built on the foundation of assets such as Ariba Network and SAP’s logistics collaboration capabilities, the network extends traditional ERP workflows beyond the enterprise and into the broader value chain. SAP’s strategy is particularly attractive to organizations that have already standardized on SAP ERP and want to enable supplier collaboration, procurement automation, logistics visibility, and business partner connectivity within a unified ecosystem.

If you are interested in obtaining ARC Advisory Group’s recent market data on Warehouse Management Systems and Supply Chain Planning, please reach out to (gsimon@arcweb.com) or (Chanf@arcweb.com).

The post The Rise of Supply Chain Platforms: Why Networks Are Becoming the New Competitive Advantage appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 6%.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) stayed level.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 2%.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) decreased 4%.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 13%.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 1%.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices stayed level.

Analysis

The US and Iran have traded strikes for ten days straight, with Iranian actions also targeting neighbor states and area vessels, and missile attacks reaching as far as US positions in Jordan. Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has again slowed to a trickle, and the conflict has now extended to the Bab el Mandeb strait as well.

Saudi Arabia and the Houthis have had a ceasefire in place since 2022, but tensions increased recently as Saudi Arabia fired at Sanaa airport, preventing a flight from Iran to land. In response, the Houthis, who have not attacked passing vessels since late last year, announced that the Red Sea channel is now closed to all Saudi-linked vessels and ships calling at Saudi ports.

The Saudis have diverted a significant share of pre-war oil flows away from the Strait of Hormuz via pipelines reaching Jeddah Port in the Red Sea, where volumes continue on by tankers passing Yemen on their way east. Container carriers are also diverting some Gulf traffic through Jeddah, though most major carriers get there via the Mediterranean and northern Red Sea, still avoiding the Houthi choke point. So the new closure would likely be a bigger blow to energy flows than to the container market, but could see carriers like CMA CGM and Maersk backtrack on recent steps back toward Red Sea transits, as well as disrupt regional carriers who were still passing through the Bab el Mandeb for Saudi calls.

Oil prices are facing upward pressure from the recent deteriorations. Crude prices are now up 20% since an early July low and are back to mid-June levels. Bunker prices are up 12%, erasing more than a month of decline too, with jet fuel rates up 25% and back to mid-May levels – 50% higher than the pre-war baseline.

But even with fuel prices rising, container rates are easing – slightly – for the first time since April, as carriers add capacity to some lanes and an early unwind from an early peak season begins.

Carriers had announced significant GRIs and PSSs for July 15th, but instead spot rates declined slightly across the major east-west lanes, with Asia – N. America East Coast prices staying level. Daily rates so far this week show West Coast and Asia – Mediterranean prices continuing to slide. That carriers decided against the mid-month hikes suggest that recent projections of cooling demand after a red hot, frontloaded, June and early July may be playing out now.

This likely demand decrease is coinciding with the arrival of extra loaders sent to service the surging demand that are increasing capacity, and contributing to the flat or easing rates as well. The capacity aspect may explain the slight discrepancy between transpacific West and East Coast rates, as more vessels were added to West Coast services.

At the same time, serious port congestion is absorbing capacity in the Far East, which may mitigate the degree of downward pressure there otherwise would be on spot rates via the current demand dip and capacity additions. Delays at major origin ports, initially caused by surging volumes, have increased from bouts of bad weather, including from last week’s Typhoon Bavi.

The storm temporarily shut down several major ports, leading to serious vessel bunching in Shanghai and Ningbo, multiple-day waits in Qingdao, and delays at other ports in eastern China, Taiwan, S. Korea and the Philippines. Some carriers are omitting port calls and diverting volumes to alternatives in the region, which will then move on by transhipment and also contribute to delays. A recent toxic gas leak in Antwerp also shut down operations at several terminals temporarily.

One reason for the US ocean import pull forward was the July 24th tariff deadline at which point 10% global Section 122 tariffs will expire. The White House is working to replace those with 10% – 12.5% Section 301 tariffs on sixty trading partners targeting forced labor issues. Experts expect the administration will be able to roll out those tariffs – which keep duties about level with the current status quo – by or soon after the deadline.

The government has also launched 301 investigations into excess capacity violations by sixteen countries. But the USTR has still not released its findings for this inquiry or set a date for public comments, leading some to speculate that the government intends to wait until after midterm elections to move forward with these duties which could push tariffs back to IEEPA levels. President Trump also announced that he will put 50% tariffs into effect on about 5% on Canadian exports in thirty days using a different section of the US trade law.

In air cargo, increased tensions in the Middle East have some international carriers pushing off planned returns to the region, helping to keep some upward pressure on Middle East rates. Freightos Air Index South Asia – Middle East rates were about level at $2.93/kg last week, but are about double pre-war levels.

China – Europe prices were down 7% compared to the end of June last week, just before the EU suspended its de minimis exemption, with daily rates this week continuing to trend downward. Alongside reports of volume decreases from the rule change, carriers are reducing capacity too, likely preventing a more pronounced rate decline. At the same time, different EU member states are approaching fee collection differently, with those requiring larger upfront deposits seeing a sharper drop in volumes and capacity compared to countries with more relaxed policies.

The post Ocean rates ease on early peak season cooling and capacity additions – July 22, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.