Day one discussions highlighted a reality many organizations are already experiencing: assisted supply chain operations have delivered benefits, but they are reaching practical limits.

Decision support systems and analytics platforms have improved visibility across planning and execution. Alerts surface faster. Recommendations are more informed. However, translating insight into action often remains slow. Decisions stall as they move across functions with different priorities, assumptions, and timelines.

In one example shared informally, a disruption was identified quickly, but resolution took hours because multiple teams interpreted the situation differently. The information was available, but coordination lagged.

Visibility alone does not produce alignment. When planning, execution, and response operate on different clocks, human intervention becomes the bottleneck. The issue is not the quality of the recommendation, but the organization’s ability to act on it consistently.

Several practitioners noted that layering advanced algorithms on top of inconsistent execution can increase friction. The calculations themselves are rarely disputed. The concern is whether the operating environment can support the actions being recommended.

The takeaway from day one is not that assisted operations have failed. Rather, their limits are now clear. Moving beyond them will require stronger foundations than many organizations currently have in place.

The post ARC Forum Day One: Why Assisted Supply Chain Operations Are Reaching Their Limits appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

As this year’s ARC Industry Leadership Forum approaches, conversations with supply chain and logistics leaders point to a familiar concern: execution remains uneven, despite years of investment in systems and tools.

Most organizations have already deployed the platforms they intended to implement over the past decade. ERP upgrades are largely complete. Transportation and warehouse management systems are in place. Planning tools and analytics platforms are widely used. Yet performance still varies significantly across sites, regions, and product lines.

In early discussions, several executives described the same pattern. The systems exist, but teams continue to rely on manual coordination to keep operations moving. Exceptions are handled through email, meetings, and spreadsheets rather than flowing cleanly through integrated processes. The result is workable, but fragile.

The underlying issue is not technical capability. It is absorption. Complexity has accumulated over time without a corresponding simplification of operating models. Systems that were expected to integrate seamlessly often require workarounds to function day to day.

Operational variability adds further pressure. Raw material quality fluctuates. Energy supply is less predictable. Demand signals arrive later than planning cycles would prefer. Under these conditions, static assumptions and rigid workflows become difficult to sustain.

Heading into the Forum, the focus is less on adding new technology and more on execution discipline. Leaders are asking how much variability can realistically be reduced, and whether progress now depends more on stabilizing existing systems than on deploying additional ones.

The post Why Supply Chain Execution Is a Top Issue Heading into the ARC Industry Leadership Forum appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

For many organizations, sustainability in the supply chain began as a reporting obligation. Track emissions. Publish metrics. Meet regulatory requirements. File disclosures.

That framing is no longer sufficient.

Today, sustainability is increasingly tied to whether a supply chain can operate reliably under stress, absorb disruption, and adapt as conditions change. Climate volatility, regulatory pressure, resource constraints, and shifting customer expectations are not abstract risks. They are operational realities that affect cost, service, and continuity.

The most resilient supply chains are discovering that sustainability is not something added on later. It is something designed in.

Why Sustainability Now Shapes Supply Chain Resilience

Modern supply chains are exposed to overlapping forms of pressure. Extreme weather disrupts transportation and production. Resource scarcity raises costs and introduces volatility. Regulatory requirements evolve faster than traditional planning cycles. At the same time, stakeholders expect transparency across suppliers, partners, and logistics networks.

Treating sustainability as a compliance function leaves organizations reacting after disruptions occur. Treating it as a structural capability allows them to anticipate risk, adapt faster, and maintain performance when conditions change.

This shift moves sustainability from a reporting exercise into the core of supply chain design and execution.

Beyond Emissions: Sustainability as System Performance

A narrow focus on emissions alone misses the broader opportunity.

Sustainability at the system level is about how efficiently a network uses resources, energy, labor, and data across its entire lifecycle. It is about eliminating waste, reducing unnecessary variability, and designing flows that are both efficient and resilient.

Digitally mature supply chains are beginning to connect sustainability outcomes with operational decisions. Network design, inventory placement, transportation modes, supplier selection, and facility operations all influence environmental impact and resilience at the same time.

When these decisions are made in isolation, tradeoffs are hidden. When they are made at the system level, sustainability becomes a performance lever rather than a constraint.

Transparency Enables Adaptation

One of the biggest barriers to sustainable supply chain design is lack of visibility.

Many organizations still operate with fragmented data across procurement, logistics, manufacturing, and compliance functions. Sustainability metrics are often disconnected from day-to-day operational decisions, making it difficult to see how actions taken to improve service or reduce cost affect environmental outcomes.

Transparency changes that equation.

By integrating digital systems, improving data quality, and linking sustainability metrics to operational performance, organizations can identify risks earlier, understand tradeoffs more clearly, and adapt faster when conditions change.

Transparency is not just about reporting. It is about control.

Designing Networks That Endure Disruption

Sustainable supply chains are not optimized for a single steady-state condition. They are designed to endure disruption and adapt over time.

That means anticipating where risks are likely to emerge, whether from regulatory change, environmental stress, supplier concentration, or infrastructure constraints. It means building flexibility into networks so that shocks can be absorbed without cascading failure. And it means aligning sustainability goals with operational incentives, so improvements persist rather than degrade under pressure.

Resilience, sustainability, and competitiveness are increasingly intertwined. Improving one without considering the others leads to fragile outcomes.

A Practical Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Design

The white paper Sustainability in the Supply Chain: Building Networks that Reduce Impact, Endure Disruption, and Adapt Over Time addresses these challenges directly.

Rather than treating sustainability as a standalone initiative, the guide frames it as a design principle that spans planning, execution, and continuous improvement. It explores how digitalization, transparency, and systems-level thinking can reduce environmental impact while strengthening operational performance.

The focus is pragmatic: how to anticipate risk, absorb shocks, and adapt as regulatory, market, and operational realities evolve.

Download the Guide

For supply chain leaders responsible for long-term performance, sustainability is no longer optional, and it is no longer separate from resilience or competitiveness.

Download: Sustainability in the Supply Chain – Building Networks that Reduce Impact, Endure Disruption, and Adapt Over Time

The organizations that succeed over the next decade will not be those with the best sustainability reports. They will be the ones that designed their supply chains to perform responsibly under real-world constraints.

The post Sustainability Is Not a Side Initiative – It’s a Structural Capability appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.