The move scales their joint operations in Sparks, Nevada, to seven times the original AI infrastructure density, providing a blueprint for how second-life batteries can power high-performance computing.

From Pilot to Scale: 7x Growth

The expansion follows a successful pilot program launched in June 2025. Initially, the project utilized four Crusoe Spark™ modular data centers. Following seven months of high performance, the companies are increasing the deployment to 24 modular data centers.

This growth is made possible by the hardware’s “modular” nature. Unlike traditional data centers that require years of stationary construction, modular units can be manufactured off-site and deployed in months.

Powering AI with Second-Life Batteries

A central component of this partnership is the use of “second-life” electric vehicle (EV) batteries. When EV batteries are no longer optimal for automotive use, they often retain significant capacity for stationary energy storage.

Redwood Materials integrates these repurposed batteries into a 12-megawatt (MW) / 63-megawatt-hour (MWh) microgrid. This system, combined with on-site solar power, provides the energy required to run Crusoe’s AI-optimized GPUs. The orchestration of these batteries is handled by Redwood’s “Pack Manager” technology, which ensures steady power delivery for the intense workloads required by AI model training and inference.

Reliability and Performance Metrics

A primary concern with renewable-powered microgrids is “uptime”, the percentage of time the system is operational. The press release highlights several key performance indicators from the initial seven-month period:

99.2% Operational Availability: The microgrid exceeded reliability expectations while running on renewable sources and battery storage.

99.9% Total Uptime: By leveraging the traditional power grid as a backup source, Crusoe Cloud maintained a nearly constant state of operation.

Supply Chain and Sustainability

The partnership addresses two of the most significant bottlenecks in the current AI boom: energy consumption and deployment speed.

Sustainability: By using recycled materials and on-site renewable energy, the “AI factory” model reduces the carbon footprint associated with massive data processing.

Predictability: The ability to scale in months rather than years allows AI providers to meet the rapidly fluctuating demand for compute power.

As the demand for intelligence grows, the convergence of innovative energy storage and modular infrastructure—as demonstrated by Crusoe and Redwood Materials—offers a potential path forward for sustainable and rapid industrial scaling.

The post Crusoe and Redwood Materials Expand Strategic Partnership appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Velotic announced its launch as an independent industrial software company, bringing together multiple established platforms to support evolving industrial and manufacturing requirements. The formation of Velotic coincides with the closing of TPG’s previously announced acquisitions of Proficy, the former manufacturing software business of GE Vernova, and PTC’s former industrial connectivity and Internet of Things (IoT) businesses.

Backed by TPG, Velotic provides a suite of data-driven solutions designed to help improve operational efficiency, enhance productivity, and increase visibility across complex industrial environments. The combined portfolio integrates Proficy’s automation and production management capabilities, Kepware’s industrial connectivity technologies, and ThingWorx’s industrial data and analytics applications.

According to Craig Resnick, Vice President, ARC Advisory Group, “The industrial software market is entering a pivotal moment. Manufacturers are under pressure to modernize operations, extract greater value from data, and rapidly adopt AI—without sacrificing reliability, safety, or control. Against this backdrop, the formation of Velotic as a new standalone industrial software company bringing together Proficy®, Kepware® and ThingWorx® represents more than a corporate restructuring. It signals a shift in how industrial data, analytics, and operations technology (OT) can be delivered at scale, that ARC strongly advocates.”

Velotic is positioned to help address increasing demand for integrated, AI-enabled industrial software by combining established technologies into a unified offering. The company focuses on helping to enable manufacturers to manage data more effectively and support operational decision-making across distributed environments.

Manufacturing software executive Brian Shepherd has been appointed CEO of Velotic. He brings over 25 years of experience in manufacturing technology, including leadership roles at Rockwell Automation, Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence, and PTC. James Heppelmann, former Chairman and CEO of PTC, has been named Executive Chairman.

Velotic operates as a hardware-agnostic platform provider with a focus on flexibility and interoperability. Proficy, Kepware, and ThingWorx will continue as distinct product lines within the broader portfolio. The company is headquartered in the Boston area and reports more than $300 million in revenue, serving customers across manufacturing, oil and gas, utilities, and infrastructure sectors.

The post Velotic Launches as Independent Industrial Software Company Integrating Proficy, Kepware, and ThingWorx appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

A recent briefing with Lytica highlights a shift in procurement from opaque negotiation toward statistically grounded pricing intelligence.

Procurement has long operated with an imbalance of information.

Suppliers understand pricing across customers, volumes, and market conditions. Buyers rely on internal history, limited benchmarks, and negotiation experience to determine whether a price is competitive. In categories such as electronic components, this gap is amplified by volatility and limited transparency.

The result is consistent. Different companies, and often different divisions within the same company, pay materially different prices for the same component.

Lytica is attempting to address that condition.

From Transaction Data to Market Intelligence

Lytica’s platform is built on anonymized buyer transaction data aggregated across a network of companies. This creates a continuously updated view of pricing across suppliers, regions, and time.

This is not modeled data or survey input. It reflects observed market behavior.

That distinction allows procurement teams to assess pricing against a broader market reference:

Where are we overpaying

How do suppliers price across customers

What does competitive pricing look like

This represents a move from internal spend analysis to external market intelligence.

From Benchmarking to a Pricing Discipline

The more important development is how this data is modeled.

Lytica treats pricing as a measure of competitiveness rather than a fixed value. Prices exist within a distribution shaped by real transactions. Each company occupies a position within that distribution.

This enables a more structured evaluation of procurement performance:

Prices can be ranked relative to the market

Outliers can be identified and examined

Expected price ranges can be estimated using observed data

The question shifts from “Is this price good” to “How competitive is this price relative to the market”

This introduces a more disciplined approach to procurement performance.

Quantifying Leverage in Negotiation

Once pricing is modeled this way, negotiation becomes more structured.

Procurement teams can enter discussions with:

Target pricing ranges based on transaction data

Evidence of variance across comparable buyers

Supplier-specific pricing patterns over time

This replaces qualitative positioning with data-backed arguments.

The result is more consistent outcomes and shorter negotiation cycles.

From Data to Decision Support

The next step is applying this dataset in operational workflows.

As outlined in modern supply chain architectures , AI systems become more useful when grounded in domain-specific data and applied with context.

In this case, systems can:

Identify deviations from competitive pricing levels

Estimate expected pricing ranges based on observed transactions

Generate supplier-specific negotiation guidance

Monitor pricing performance over time

These outputs are typically delivered as structured guidance for sourcing teams.

The Role of Context and Retrieval

The effectiveness of this approach depends on how data is accessed and retained.

Retrieval-based architectures allow systems to reference current transaction data when generating recommendations. Context-aware systems retain supplier history, pricing behavior, and prior outcomes across decision cycles.

This supports continuity in decision making rather than isolated analysis.

Positioning in the Stack

Lytica does not replace ERP or sourcing platforms. It operates as an intelligence layer above them.

This reflects a broader shift:

Systems of record manage transactions

Systems of execution manage workflows

Systems of intelligence guide decisions

Over time, as confidence in recommendations increases, this layer is likely to become more integrated into execution.

The Bottom Line

Lytica reflects a shift in procurement.

Pricing is moving from opaque negotiation toward structured, data-based market positioning.

This changes how procurement operates:

From internal benchmarks to external reference points

From periodic sourcing to continuous evaluation

From intuition to structured decision support

In more volatile supply environments, this type of capability becomes increasingly relevant.

Organizations that adopt it early will have a clearer understanding of their market position and a more consistent approach to improving it.

The post Lytica and the Emergence of a Pricing Science Layer in Procurement appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.