Connect with us

Non classé

What 2025 Means for 2026: Ocean and Air Freight Forecast

Published

on

What 2025 Means for 2026: Ocean and Air Freight Forecast

Published: January 5, 2026

Blog

The year 2025 was another tumultuous one for both ocean and air freight markets. Some of the key drivers of freight trends in 2025 are likely to continue impacting markets in 2026, while others may give way to new factors and trends. What follows is a rundown of those key drivers in 2025, and data-based projections for what these could mean for the new year.

Check out our Global Freight 2025 Year in Review and 2026 Lookahead webinar here

Key Takeaways for 2026:

Trade war dynamics significantly disrupted transpacific ocean freight seasonality in 2025, with frontloading driving stronger H1 than H2 volumes and an overall volume dip for the year.

Global container volumes nonetheless grew as China diversified export markets. A more stable US tariff landscape suggests a likely return to freight seasonality in 2026 – though SCOTUS’s pending IEEPA ruling creates uncertainty – and growth globally even if US imports contract.

Fleet growth created oversupply despite continued Red Sea diversions – and drove consistently lower year on year rates in 2025 – a trend likely to continue into 2026 as new vessels continue to enter the market.

Carriers are also taking cautious steps toward a Red Sea return, increasing the likelihood of resumed Suez traffic in 2026; the transition will initially cause significant congestion and delays at European hubs as well as upward pressure on rates. Once the congestion unwinds though, the released capacity will exacerbate oversupply.

Air cargo proved resilient despite the trade war, both globally and to the US. The US de minimis closure for China initially caused a sharp decrease in transpac volumes; but by July, demand recovered to 2024 levels through e-commerce adjustments and increased general cargo from places like Vietnam where electronics exports have surged.

Volumes on Asia-Europe, intra-Asia and other air cargo lanes grew – even while transpacific volumes stalled, partly from Chinese exports shifting to other markets. IATA projects 2.6% global volume growth in 2026 as these trends are likely to continue.

Air cargo rates remained remarkably stable despite these volume shifts, following seasonal patterns and staying largely on par with 2024 levels as carriers rapidly redeployed capacity from transpacific to growing lanes like Asia-Europe. Agile capacity shifts are likely to temper rate fluctuations for 2026 as well.

Get the weekly Freightos freight update delivered straight to your inbox

Ocean Freight – Tariffs, Capacity & Red Sea

Trade War Impacts

The US-initiated trade war that got underway in February 2025, with its shifting tariffs threats, deadlines, postponements and introductions skewed the typical seasonality of the transpacific ocean freight year.

Source: National Retail Federation, Global Port Tracker

Importers frontloaded or paused container bookings to try and beat or avoid higher costs from potential tariff changes. The start and stop meant stronger US ocean import volumes in the first half of the year and weaker volumes in H2, with uncertainty around consumer demand resulting in an overall 1.4% drop in container imports in 2025 according to the National Retail Federation.

Globally though, the trade war hasn’t proved a drag on container growth, with year to date global volumes through October growing more than 4% year on year global volumes according to CTS. The trade war indirectly spurred this growth by driving a diversification of destination markets for goods coming out of the Far East, especially from China as the manufacturing power sought and found export growth through markets other than the US.

By Q4 the US tariff landscape solidified via US trade agreements with many of its major trading partners, and a China – US deescalation agreement through November 2026. All else being equal then, these developments make the return of freight seasonality for N. America likely in 2026.

Uncertainty Ahead

However, the US Supreme Court is set to decide by July on the validity of the Trump administration’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for all of its country-specific tariffs. Though the White House has stated it is already preparing quick tariff introductions by other means should SCOTUS decide against it, there is some speculation that the administration, facing cost of living concerns, could use a court loss as a tariff off-ramp.

If the Supreme Court decision opens up a big enough low-tariff window, we could see frontloading once again. But if the government quickly restores tariffs through other means there shouldn’t be much of an impact on freight. Finally, if tariffs are removed and importers are convinced they aren’t coming back any time soon, we could see some initial increase in volumes – and stronger volumes overall – but not sudden starts and stops.
Globally, we could expect 2026 to look similar to 2025 in its overall growth, but also in its diversification and volume growth or contraction by lane. The S+P projects that 2026 US ocean imports will contract by 2% as tariff costs could start to impact importer decisions and consumer spending more strongly than in 2025. Meanwhile BIMCO estimates global volumes will increase by 2.5% to 3.5% nonetheless.

Red Sea Diversions, and a Growing Fleet

Red Sea diversions that started in late 2023 were estimated to have absorbed about 9% of global container capacity by keeping ships at sea for longer and – with longer journeys meaning vessels would arrive back at origins days behind schedule – via carriers adding extra vessels to services in order to maintain planned weekly departures.

This drain on capacity drove 2024 Asia – Europe and transpacific rates to peak season highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year.

But even with Red Sea diversions continuing to absorb capacity in 2025, continued fleet growth through newly built vessels entering the market has meant that the container trade has already become significantly oversupplied. And this supply growth has meant consistently lower container rates in 2025 compared to 2024 even during months when volumes have been stronger, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October.

Even with Red Sea diversions continuing and even during months in 2025 with stronger year on year volumes, capacity growth has meant rates in 2025 have been lower than in 2024.

But since November multiple major container carriers have taken cautious steps toward resuming Red Sea transits, increasing the likelihood of a Red Sea return in 2026.

When Red Sea traffic does resume it will cause worse and significant vessel bunching and congestion at European hubs, and likely drive equipment shortages at Far East origin ports as carriers seek to shorten vessel time spent at berth. The shift back will be disruptive and cause delays and rate increases – possibly across the market – whenever it occurs, though the effect would be weaker if the return is in the low demand, spring months post-LNY and pre-peak season, and stronger if it coincides with peak season demand increases, with this transition likely to stretch on for weeks.

Once that congestion unwinds though, the Red Sea return will increase the amount of capacity available in an already oversupplied market and put additional downward pressure on rates.. New vessel deliveries will decrease in 2026 compared to 2025, but the impact of the increase in supply on rates – even if Red Sea diversions continue – will likely be significant nonetheless, with higher levels of newbuild deliveries set for 2027 and 2028.

Carriers will face an even bigger capacity management challenge when Red Sea transits resume, but will do their best to reduce capacity – via blanked sailings, idling vessels, scrapping older ships, and slow steaming – and keep rates at profitable levels.

Air Cargo – De Minimis, Resiliency, Reshuffle

Trade war changes, shifting volumes

For air cargo, de minimis exemptions have been one significant factor facilitating the surge of low-cost B2C e-commerce volumes traveling by high cost air transport since about mid-2023 – mostly from China and mostly to Europe and the US.

At the end of 2024, IATA projected that global air cargo volumes would grow by more than 5% in 2025. But when US tariffs were introduced in April, followed by the US suspension of de minimis eligibility for Chinese exports in May, IATA lowered its expectations to less than 1% growth, anticipating a significant pull back in H2 volumes due to the closure of de minimis to China, and later, to all imports.

But, like in the container market, global volumes proved resilient, both through diversification of China’s exports to other markets as growth engines, and from trade war policies that spurred a shift in transpacific volume flows.

The US de minimis closure for China in May did indeed drive a sharp drop in air cargo imports – estimated at more than 40% for e-commerce imports by air from China to the US month on month in May, a drop of 12% in total Asia – N. America volumes month on month, and a more than 10% decrease year on year.

Source: IATA

Air cargo demand in 2025 grew despite transpacific volume contraction in H2 as volumes on other lanes continued to increase.

But by July, Asia – N. America volumes were back to about even with 2024 levels, pushed back up by some recovery of e-commerce volumes as e-comm platforms adjusted to the new rules, and increases in general cargo both from China and from other Far East manufacturing hubs, most notably Vietnam as electronics exports from there have surged as tariffs on China climbed.

And while transpacific volumes, even with this rebound, have shown no year on year growth in H2, demand on other lanes, especially Asia – Europe and intra-Asia, have shown double digit annual growth throughout the year as Chinese exports surge to markets other than the US, powering year to date global growth of 4% for international volumes through October.

That rate is much lower than the remarkable 11% annual growth seen as e-commerce become a dominant factor in the air cargo market in 2024. But this resiliency and diversification has led IATA to project 2.6% global volume growth in 2026 on expectations that the drivers of demand strength in 2025 will carry over into 2026.

Shifting capacity, more stable rates

Despite these substantial volume swings, Freightos Air Index data shows that air cargo rates followed seasonal trends – increases post-Lunar New Year, stability through the summer, and increases around the Q4 peak season – and remained about even with 2024 levels. This relative price stability alongside significant shifts in demand was due to carriers rapidly removing capacity from the transpacific as demand decreased and shifting it to lanes like Asia – Europe where demand was increasing sharply.

For the year, China to US and Europe rates were up 1% and 2% respectively, though rates were slightly stronger than in 2024 in H1 and slightly weaker in H2, reflecting the decrease in demand for China-US and the significant increase in capacity for China – Europe. Prices out of South East Asia meanwhile, showed double digit year on year gain in H1, while rates were lower year on year in H2, once again reflecting the substantial shift of capacity to these lanes as trade war impacts spurred demand increases out of these origins.

European Union countries announced intentions to close their de minimis exceptions by 2027, with the possibility to do so as early as 2026. The UK too announced a 2029 deadline to close their exemption. If these policies change we will likely see a similar short term dip in volumes, slower overall growth on those lanes. But even with these changes, e-commerce is unlikely to disappear from those lanes or from the skies in general.

Want our freight update delivered to your inbox every week?

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post What 2025 Means for 2026: Ocean and Air Freight Forecast appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending