Connect with us

Non classé

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Published

on

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

November 25, 2025

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 32% to $1,903/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 8% to $3,443/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 1% to $2,457/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) increased 6% to $2,998/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 2% to $6.50/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 1% to $3.97/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 1% to $2.33/kg.

Analysis

Despite higher tariffs since early this year, US retail sales have proved resilient and are expected to grow through the holiday season. The solidifying tariff landscape is nonetheless facing destabilizing forces like recent China-Japan tensions, and the US Supreme Court’s pending decision on the legality of Trump’s IEEPA-based tariffs.

But the White House is signalling it is already taking steps to ensure that a SCOTUS loss will not open a low tariff window. So, if consumer spending remains strong, and the status quo of the trade war holds up, the US could enter a restocking cycle in 2026 as frontloaded inventories wind down. This restocking could mean stronger freight demand than some have anticipated for next year.

On the freight supply side though, there is more and more discussion of container traffic’s coming return to the Red Sea as the fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire remains in effect. And while most carriers are not offering a timeline, ZIM’s CEO recently stated that a return in the near future is increasingly likely.

The shift of most of the 30% of global container volumes that normally transit the Suez Canal away from the Red Sea and around the Cape of Good Hope almost exactly two years ago added seven to ten days and thousands of miles to Asia – Europe journeys and to some Asia – N. America sailings as well.

The return of container traffic to the shorter Suez route will result in the sudden early arrival of these ships, which will mean significant vessel bunching and congestion at already persistently congested European hubs. This congestion will cause delays and absorb capacity which could push container rates up on the affected lanes, and possibly beyond.

Carriers have plans for a gradual phase in of the transition back to the Red Sea, with smaller vessels starting to transit first. This approach would still cause vessel bunching, but would be aimed at minimizing the impact of the reset as much as possible.

But some carriers are skeptical that an orderly phase-in will happen, as they expect pressure from customers who will want a return to the shorter route as quickly as possible. Analysis from Sea Intelligence suggests that the more gradual the transition, the less disruptive it will be, while the faster it is the more disruptive it will be, and the more pressure it will put on freight rates during the up to two months it will take for schedules to return to normal.

Ocean expert Lars Jensen also notes that a return during the lead up to Lunar New Year would coincide with an increase in demand, and would put more pressure on ports and rates than if the transition takes place post-LNY when demand is typically weak.

The capacity absorbed through Red Sea diversions pushed East-West rates up to highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU in 2024 and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year. But even with Red Sea diversions still in place this year, rates on these lanes have consistently been significantly lower than last year, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October.

The transition back to the Suez Canal – be it more or less chaotic – will ultimately release more than two million TEU of container capacity back into the market. This surge will put even more downward pressure on rates and increase the challenge of effectively managing capacity for carriers seeking to keep vessels full and rates profitable.

The current overcapacity on the East-West lanes is the main reason that carriers’ November transpacific GRIs which had pushed West Coast rates up by $1,000/FEU this month to about $3,000/FEU have now fizzled.

Asia – N. America West Coast prices fell 32% last week to $1,900/FEU with daily rates this week down another $100 so far, but prices remain above the $1,400/FEU low for the year hit in early October. Last week’s vessel fire at the Port of LA does not seem to have had an impact on prices as operations have quickly recovered. Rates to the East Coast fell 8% to $3,400/FEU last week but are at $3,000/FEU so far this week, about even with levels in early October before these set of GRI introductions.

Meanwhile, October and November’s GRIs on Asia-Europe lanes have stuck, with rates to Europe and the Mediterranean both 40% higher than in early October at $2,500/FEU and $3,000/FEU respectively. These rate gains may be surviving on aggressive blanked sailings on these lanes.

Carriers are planning additional GRIs for December aiming for the $3k-$4k/FEU level as they continue to reduce capacity – with an announced labor strike in Belgium likely to help absorb some supply – but there are signs that these increases may not take.

In air cargo, peak season demand is driving rates up and should keep doing so for the next couple weeks. Freightos Air Index data show ex-China rates remaining strong at about $6.50/kg to N. America and $4.00/kg to Europe last week. Demand out of S. East Asia has grown significantly during this year’s trade war, with rates also elevated on these lanes at $5.40/kg to the US and $3.50/kg to Europe.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Amazon Tests Structured Delivery Windows as It Repositions Speed

Published

on

By

Amazon Tests Structured Delivery Windows As It Repositions Speed

Amazon is testing a delivery model that divides the day into ten delivery windows across a 24-hour period. This follows recent efforts around sub-hour delivery and a proposed one-hour “rush” pickup model using stores such as Whole Foods Market.

The direction is straightforward: delivery speed is being segmented and potentially priced, rather than treated as a single standard.

From Uniform Speed to Tiered Service

The delivery window model introduces structured choice:

Customers select defined delivery windows

Faster or narrower windows may carry higher cost

Broader windows allow for lower-cost fulfillment

This allows Amazon to shape demand instead of only responding to it.

Operational Impact

The focus is control over network flow rather than absolute speed. With defined windows, Amazon can:

Improve route density

Reduce peak congestion

Align delivery timing with available capacity

The proposed “rush” pickup model extends this into physical locations. By combining online inventory with store stock, stores function as local fulfillment nodes.

Competitive Context

Walmart continues to expand store-based fulfillment and drone delivery. The competitive focus remains:

Proximity to demand

Flexibility in fulfillment options

Cost to serve at different service levels

Amazon’s approach emphasizes range of options rather than a single fastest promise.

Economic Model

This structure creates a clearer link between service level and cost. As supply chains become more dynamic, companies are aligning service commitments with operational constraints and capacity . Delivery windows apply that logic to the last mile.

Implications

If this model scales:

Speed becomes a selectable service level

Customer choice influences network efficiency

Pricing can be used to balance demand and capacity

The change is practical. The objective is not simply faster delivery, but more controlled execution of it.

The post Amazon Tests Structured Delivery Windows as It Repositions Speed appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

NVIDIA and the Role of AI Infrastructure in Supply Chains

Published

on

By

Nvidia And The Role Of Ai Infrastructure In Supply Chains

NVIDIA is not a supply chain software provider. It is part of the infrastructure layer now supporting how supply chain decisions are made.

As AI moves from isolated use cases into core operations, compute and runtime environments become part of system design. NVIDIA’s role sits at that layer.

Infrastructure, not applications

NVIDIA provides the underlying components used to build and run AI systems:

GPU hardware for model training and inference

CUDA and supporting libraries

Enterprise AI deployment software

Simulation platforms such as Omniverse

These are used by software vendors and enterprises. They are not supply chain applications themselves.

From isolated models to concurrent workloads

Earlier AI deployments in supply chains were limited to specific functions. Forecasting, routing, and warehouse automation were typically deployed independently.

With access to scalable compute, multiple models can now run in parallel and update outputs more frequently. This supports:

Continuous forecast updates

Real-time routing adjustments

Computer vision in warehouse operations

Network-level scenario modeling

The change is not the use case. It is the ability to operate them together and at higher frequency.

Planning is no longer periodic

Traditional systems operate in cycles. Data is collected, plans are generated, and execution follows. AI systems supported by GPU infrastructure operate on shorter loops.

Forecasts are updated as new data arrives

Transportation decisions adjust during execution

Inventory positions shift as conditions change

Exceptions are identified earlier

This reduces the time between signal and response.

Simulation as a planning tool

Simulation has been used in supply chains for years, but often with limited scope. GPU-based environments allow more detailed models:

Warehouse layout and flow

Distribution network scenarios

Equipment and automation performance

Platforms such as Omniverse support these use cases. The objective is to evaluate decisions before deployment.

Multi-system coordination

As AI expands across functions, coordination becomes a constraint.

Running multiple models simultaneously requires:

Sufficient compute capacity

Low-latency processing

Integration across systems

NVIDIA’s platforms are commonly used in environments where these conditions are required.

Why this matters

Supply chains are operating with higher variability across demand, supply, and cost.

Systems designed for stable conditions are less effective in this environment.

AI-based approaches increase the frequency and scope of decision-making. That depends on infrastructure capable of supporting continuous model execution.

Implications

The primary question is not whether to adopt AI, but how it is supported. This includes:

Compute availability for training and inference

Data integration across systems

Ability to run models continuously

Use of simulation in planning

AI deployment in supply chains is increasingly tied to infrastructure decisions.

The shift underway is practical. Companies are working through how to run models more frequently, connect systems more effectively, and make decisions with less delay. The enabling technologies are becoming clearer, and the path forward is less about experimentation and more about execution.

The post NVIDIA and the Role of AI Infrastructure in Supply Chains appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Designing Supply Chain Networks for Energy Volatility

Published

on

By

Designing Supply Chain Networks For Energy Volatility

Energy is no longer a background cost in supply chain operations. It is becoming a primary design constraint.

For years, network design focused on labor, transportation, and inventory positioning. Energy was assumed to be stable and largely interchangeable across regions. That assumption is breaking down.

Volatility in fuel and electricity prices, combined with regulatory pressure and increasing electrification, is reshaping cost structures and operational risk. As a result, supply chain leaders are being forced to rethink how networks are designed and managed.

Energy Is Now a Structural Variable

Three forces are driving this shift:

Price volatility across fuel and grid-based energy

Regulatory pressure tied to emissions and reporting

Increased dependency from automation and electrification

In many networks, energy is now one of the most dynamic and least controlled inputs.

A network optimized for transportation cost alone may now be exposed to regional energy spikes. A warehouse automation investment may reduce labor but increase sensitivity to energy pricing. These trade-offs were not historically modeled.

From Static Models to Adaptive Networks

Traditional network design assumes relatively stable inputs and periodic optimization.

That model no longer holds.

Modern supply chains require:

Dynamic cost modeling that incorporates real-time energy inputs

Scenario-based design that accounts for regional volatility

Adaptive routing and sourcing decisions

This reflects a broader shift toward adaptive, data-driven operations described in ARC research . Energy is now one of the variables forcing that transition.

Embedding Energy Into Network Design

Leading organizations are beginning to incorporate energy directly into network decisions:

Facility Placement
Evaluating locations based on grid stability, long-term pricing, and regulatory exposure

Consumption Optimization
Managing energy usage across warehousing, transportation, and fulfillment operations

Integrated Planning
Linking energy considerations into transportation, inventory, and sourcing decisions

This moves energy from a cost line item to a system-level design factor.

Building Resilience Against Volatility

Energy introduces a new layer of operational risk:

Regional grid instability

Fuel price shocks

Regulatory shifts affecting flows and sourcing

Resilience now requires diversified network structures, flexible transportation strategies, and scenario planning that includes energy as a core variable.

The Strategic Implication

Supply chains are becoming more context-aware, adaptive, and interconnected. Energy is not a side consideration. It is a driver of network design, cost performance, and long-term competitiveness.

Organizations that incorporate energy into their network models will operate with greater stability and control. Those that do not will face increasing exposure to volatility they cannot predict or manage.

Download the Energy Report

Designing networks for energy volatility requires new assumptions, new models, and a more integrated approach to planning and execution.

Download the full report to learn how to optimize consumption, build resilience, and design energy-aware supply chains for long-term advantage.

Get the Report Now!

The post Designing Supply Chain Networks for Energy Volatility appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending