Connect with us

Non classé

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Published

on

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

November 25, 2025

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 32% to $1,903/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 8% to $3,443/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 1% to $2,457/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) increased 6% to $2,998/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 2% to $6.50/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 1% to $3.97/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 1% to $2.33/kg.

Analysis

Despite higher tariffs since early this year, US retail sales have proved resilient and are expected to grow through the holiday season. The solidifying tariff landscape is nonetheless facing destabilizing forces like recent China-Japan tensions, and the US Supreme Court’s pending decision on the legality of Trump’s IEEPA-based tariffs.

But the White House is signalling it is already taking steps to ensure that a SCOTUS loss will not open a low tariff window. So, if consumer spending remains strong, and the status quo of the trade war holds up, the US could enter a restocking cycle in 2026 as frontloaded inventories wind down. This restocking could mean stronger freight demand than some have anticipated for next year.

On the freight supply side though, there is more and more discussion of container traffic’s coming return to the Red Sea as the fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire remains in effect. And while most carriers are not offering a timeline, ZIM’s CEO recently stated that a return in the near future is increasingly likely.

The shift of most of the 30% of global container volumes that normally transit the Suez Canal away from the Red Sea and around the Cape of Good Hope almost exactly two years ago added seven to ten days and thousands of miles to Asia – Europe journeys and to some Asia – N. America sailings as well.

The return of container traffic to the shorter Suez route will result in the sudden early arrival of these ships, which will mean significant vessel bunching and congestion at already persistently congested European hubs. This congestion will cause delays and absorb capacity which could push container rates up on the affected lanes, and possibly beyond.

Carriers have plans for a gradual phase in of the transition back to the Red Sea, with smaller vessels starting to transit first. This approach would still cause vessel bunching, but would be aimed at minimizing the impact of the reset as much as possible.

But some carriers are skeptical that an orderly phase-in will happen, as they expect pressure from customers who will want a return to the shorter route as quickly as possible. Analysis from Sea Intelligence suggests that the more gradual the transition, the less disruptive it will be, while the faster it is the more disruptive it will be, and the more pressure it will put on freight rates during the up to two months it will take for schedules to return to normal.

Ocean expert Lars Jensen also notes that a return during the lead up to Lunar New Year would coincide with an increase in demand, and would put more pressure on ports and rates than if the transition takes place post-LNY when demand is typically weak.

The capacity absorbed through Red Sea diversions pushed East-West rates up to highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU in 2024 and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year. But even with Red Sea diversions still in place this year, rates on these lanes have consistently been significantly lower than last year, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October.

The transition back to the Suez Canal – be it more or less chaotic – will ultimately release more than two million TEU of container capacity back into the market. This surge will put even more downward pressure on rates and increase the challenge of effectively managing capacity for carriers seeking to keep vessels full and rates profitable.

The current overcapacity on the East-West lanes is the main reason that carriers’ November transpacific GRIs which had pushed West Coast rates up by $1,000/FEU this month to about $3,000/FEU have now fizzled.

Asia – N. America West Coast prices fell 32% last week to $1,900/FEU with daily rates this week down another $100 so far, but prices remain above the $1,400/FEU low for the year hit in early October. Last week’s vessel fire at the Port of LA does not seem to have had an impact on prices as operations have quickly recovered. Rates to the East Coast fell 8% to $3,400/FEU last week but are at $3,000/FEU so far this week, about even with levels in early October before these set of GRI introductions.

Meanwhile, October and November’s GRIs on Asia-Europe lanes have stuck, with rates to Europe and the Mediterranean both 40% higher than in early October at $2,500/FEU and $3,000/FEU respectively. These rate gains may be surviving on aggressive blanked sailings on these lanes.

Carriers are planning additional GRIs for December aiming for the $3k-$4k/FEU level as they continue to reduce capacity – with an announced labor strike in Belgium likely to help absorb some supply – but there are signs that these increases may not take.

In air cargo, peak season demand is driving rates up and should keep doing so for the next couple weeks. Freightos Air Index data show ex-China rates remaining strong at about $6.50/kg to N. America and $4.00/kg to Europe last week. Demand out of S. East Asia has grown significantly during this year’s trade war, with rates also elevated on these lanes at $5.40/kg to the US and $3.50/kg to Europe.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market

Published

on

By

What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market

November 26, 2025

Blog

As the fragile but still-in-place Israel-Hamas ceasefire nears the two-month mark, and with the Houthis declaring an end to attacks on passing vessels, there is more and more anticipation that the long-awaited return of container traffic to the Red Sea may be coming soon.

Though Maersk maintains it has not set a date, the Suez Canal Authority stated that Maersk will resume transits in early December. ZIM’s CEO recently stated that a return in the near future is increasingly likely, and CMA CGM is reportedly preparing for a full return in December.

Operational Impact

The shift of most of the 30% of global container volumes that normally transit the Suez Canal away from the Red Sea and around the Cape of Good Hope almost exactly two years ago added seven to ten days and thousands of nautical miles to Asia – Europe journeys and to some Asia – N. America sailings as well.

The return of container traffic to the shorter Suez route will result in the sudden early arrival of these ships, which will mean significant vessel bunching and congestion at already persistently congested European hubs. This congestion will cause delays and absorb capacity which could push container rates up on the affected lanes, and possibly beyond.

The shift back through the Suez Canal may initially keep some of the typically lower volume ports in Europe that have become transhipment centers during the Red Sea crisis, like Barcelona, busy while carriers may omit port calls at some of the congested major hubs. But after the unwind, these ports, as well as African ports that have been used as refuelling stops during the last two years, will see port calls decline.

Carriers have plans for a gradual phase in of the transition back to the Red Sea, with smaller vessels starting to transit first. This approach would still cause vessel bunching, but would be aimed at minimizing the impact of the reset as much as possible.

But some carriers are skeptical that an orderly phase-in will happen, as they expect pressure from customers who will want a return to the shorter route as quickly as possible. Analysis from Sea Intelligence suggests that the more gradual the transition, the less disruptive it will be, while the faster the return the more disruptive it will be during the up to two months it will take for schedules to return to normal.

Ocean expert Lars Jensen also notes that a return during the lead up to Lunar New Year would coincide with an increase in demand, and would put more pressure on ports and rates than if the transition takes place post-LNY when demand is typically weak. With carriers signalling the shift will begin in December and pre-LNY demand probably picking up in mid-January next year, it seems likely the two will coincide.

Implications for Capacity – and Rates

Red Sea diversions were estimated to have absorbed about 9% of global container capacity by keeping ships at sea for longer and – with longer journeys meaning vessels would arrive back at origins days behind schedule – via carriers adding extra vessels to services in order to maintain planned weekly departures.

This drain on capacity caused Asia – Europe rates to more than triple and transpacific rates to more than double in the two months from the time the diversions began to just before Lunar New Year of 2024. And though rates moved up and down along with seasonal changes in demand, the capacity drain pushed East-West rates up to 2024 highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year.

But even with Red Sea diversions continuing to absorb capacity in 2025, continued fleet growth through newly built vessels entering the market has meant that the container trade has already become significantly oversupplied.

As such, rates on these lanes – even before the capacity absorbed by diversions has re-entered the market – have consistently been significantly lower than in 2024 even during months when volumes have been stronger, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October. Recent carrier struggles maintaining transpacific GRIs point to this challenge already.

Even with Red Sea diversions continuing and even during months in 2025 with stronger year on year volumes, capacity growth has meant rates in 2025 have been lower than in 2024.

Yes, the initial congestion and delays caused by the transition back to the Suez Canal will at first put upward pressure on rates for Asia-Europe containers and probably to a lesser degree on the transatlantic lanes as well. If the congestion ties up enough capacity or impacts operations at Far East origins, the rate impact could spread to the transpacific as well. As noted above, if the return coincides with the lead-up to LNY, it will have a stronger impact on rates as there will be pressure from the demand side as well.

But once the congestion unwinds and container flows and schedules stabilize the shift will ultimately release more than two million TEU of container capacity back into the market. This surge will put even more downward pressure on rates and increase the challenge of effectively managing capacity for carriers seeking to keep vessels full and rates profitable in 2026.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

How AI Is Driving the Future of Industrial Operations and the Supply Chain

Published

on

By

How Ai Is Driving The Future Of Industrial Operations And The Supply Chain

ARC Industry Leadership Forum • Orlando, Florida
February 9–12, 2026 • Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld

Artificial intelligence is reshaping how industrial organizations run their operations and supply chains. The shift is real. The early experiments are gone. Today, companies are redesigning their planning, logistics, reliability, sourcing, and production workflows around systems that can think, react, and coordinate.

At ARC Advisory Group, we’re seeing this change accelerate every quarter. AI is moving from a standalone project to the connective tissue between operational systems. It’s improving how energy is consumed, how materials flow, how assets behave, and how teams respond to uncertainty.

This February, leaders from across the world will gather in Orlando to break down where AI is creating value and what comes next.

Event Details
Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
6677 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32821
February 9–12, 2026
Event link: https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-industry-leadership-forum-orlando

More than 200 colleagues are already registered, including Conrad Hanf and a broad mix of executives, operations leaders, and technologists.

Why AI Matters Right Now

AI gives industrial organizations three capabilities they’ve never had before.

Real-time awareness.
Factories, yards, pipelines, fleets, and distribution nodes are producing enormous amounts of data. AI helps cut through that noise. It identifies what matters, when it matters, and why. The result is faster decisions and fewer surprises.

Coordination across functions.
Production affects logistics. Maintenance affects throughput. Sourcing affects lead time. AI lets these domains share context and act together instead of waiting for a meeting or a spreadsheet adjustment. Decisions that once took a day now happen instantly.

Pattern recognition at scale.
AI sees the earliest signals of asset degradation, demand shifts, port delays, or supply risk. It doesn’t wait for a problem to become a crisis. It alerts teams early and recommends actions with enough lead time to matter.

What Leaders Are Focusing On

Across our research and briefings, the same themes keep rising to the surface.

AI-driven maintenance and reliability.
Predictive models are becoming the default. They diagnose root causes, calculate the impact of failure, and help schedule work when it makes operational sense.

Modern planning and scheduling.
Forecasts now incorporate external signals, real-time plant conditions, and multi-site interactions. Planners are starting to work with continuously updated recommendations instead of static plans.

Autonomous supply chain operations.
AI agents are beginning to negotiate with carriers, re-route shipments, rebalance inventory, and adjust sourcing strategies. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s quietly happening in live networks.

Graph intelligence.
Industrial networks are connected by thousands of relationships. Knowledge-graph models help organizations understand those connections and trace how one event cascades across an entire operation.

Data discipline.
AI’s performance depends on clean, harmonized data across ERP, MES, historians, WMS, TMS, and supplier systems. Many companies are now tackling this foundational work head-on.

Human and AI collaboration.
The most successful organizations aren’t automating people out. They’re giving operators, planners, and engineers AI tools that amplify experience and judgment.

Why Attend the ARC Industry Leadership Forum

The Forum is where these shifts come together. Attendees will see:

• Real-world case studies from global manufacturers, logistics leaders, and utilities
• Demonstrations of AI-enabled control towers and reliability platforms
• Deep-dive sessions on agent-based systems, context management, RAG assistants, and graph reasoning
• Roundtable conversations with peers facing the same operational pressures
• Practical discussions on governance, cybersecurity, workforce roles, and measurable ROI

This event is built for leaders who want clarity, validation, and a realistic roadmap for scaling AI across the industrial value chain.

A Turning Point for Industrial Operations

AI is changing the fundamentals of how materials move, how assets perform, how demand is met, and how decisions get made. The organizations that learn to use this intelligence well will operate with more resilience, more predictability, and less friction.

The ARC Industry Leadership Forum is the best place to understand what this looks like in practice and how to prepare your organization for it.

Join Us in Orlando

If your role touches operations, supply chain, engineering, logistics, maintenance, or industrial strategy, this gathering will be well worth your time.

Reserve your seat:
https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-industry-leadership-forum-orlando

We hope to see you there.

The post How AI Is Driving the Future of Industrial Operations and the Supply Chain appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Securing the Chain: Building Cyber-Resilient Architectures – Architecture Determines Resilience

Published

on

By

Securing The Chain: Building Cyber Resilient Architectures – Architecture Determines Resilience

Call to Action: Download the full guide to gain in-depth insights and practical frameworks that will help you lead the transformation towards a resilient supply chain.

Part 5

Cybersecurity in supply chains is often portrayed as a policy issue, but in practice, architecture determines resilience. Governance and compliance set the rules; architecture enforces them. For executives, this means that supply chain resilience is not only about vendor contracts and incident reporting, but about the underlying design of the systems that knit together global networks.

A well-architected supply chain system resists disruption, contains breaches, and recovers rapidly. A poorly architected one amplifies vulnerabilities, allowing a single weak link to cascade into systemic failure. This section explores the principles, tools, and practices required to embed resilience into the very fabric of digital supply chains.

1. The Principle of Zero Trust

The foundational shift in modern architecture is the move from perimeter security to Zero Trust.

Old model: Assume everything inside the network is safe; focus defenses at the perimeter.
Zero Trust: Assume every user, device, and system is potentially hostile. Verify continuously, everywhere.

For supply chains:

Every supplier’s connection must be treated as untrusted until proven otherwise.
Identity verification, device authentication, and transaction validation must occur at every step.
Continuous monitoring replaces one-time checks.

Zero Trust is not a technology product but a design philosophy.

2. Network Segmentation and Isolation

Supply chain systems should not be flat. Segmentation limits blast radius.

Microsegmentation: Breaking networks into granular zones with strict access controls.
Operational Technology (OT) isolation: Separating factory floor systems from corporate IT.
Third-party connections: Restricting vendor access to only the resources they need.

Example: If a supplier portal is breached, segmentation ensures attackers cannot leapfrog into ERP or WMS systems.

3. Secure-by-Design Systems and Contracts

Resilient architecture begins not with IT, but with procurement.

Vendor contracts must require security-by-design principles.
Software suppliers should adhere to secure coding standards and provide SBOMs (Software Bills of Materials).
IoT device vendors must commit to patchability and lifecycle support.

Executives should direct procurement teams to enforce cybersecurity clauses as rigorously as cost or delivery terms.

4. Encryption as Default

Data in supply chains moves constantly, across networks, clouds, and jurisdictions. Encryption is the only way to maintain confidentiality.

At rest: Encrypt databases and file systems.
In transit: Use TLS 1.3 or higher for all data flows.
In use: Emerging confidential computing techniques protect data during processing.

Leading firms are adopting a “no plaintext anywhere” policy.

5. Identity and Access Management (IAM)

Access is the number one pathway for attackers. IAM must be modernized.

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Mandatory for all supplier logins.
Least Privilege: Users only get access to the systems/data they need.
Privileged Access Management (PAM): Strict controls over admin-level accounts.
Federated identity systems: Enable secure cross-company authentication without credential sprawl.

Executives should demand regular IAM audits across both internal staff and suppliers.

6. Cloud Security Posture Management

As supply chains adopt multi-cloud architectures, resilience depends on continuous configuration oversight.

CSPM tools automatically scan for misconfigured cloud storage buckets, over-permissive IAM roles, or exposed APIs.
Encryption key management: Avoid provider lock-in by using centralized key vaults.
Hybrid environments: Ensure consistency between on-prem, private cloud, and public cloud.

Executives should require cloud security scorecards from CIOs and CISOs.

7. Resilience Testing and Validation

Paper policies mean little without validation. Resilient architecture is continuously tested.

Red-teaming: Simulated adversarial attacks test defenses.
Penetration testing: External ethical hackers probe for vulnerabilities.
Tabletop exercises: Executives rehearse crisis response scenarios.
Chaos engineering: Intentionally breaking systems to test recovery.

Resilient organizations make testing part of the operating rhythm.

8. Building in Redundancy and Backup

Resilience means assuming failure will happen, and engineering around it.

Data replication: Across multiple geographic zones.
Redundant suppliers: Secondary logistics providers, alternate carriers.
Backup networks: Dark fiber or satellite links as failover.
Immutable backups: Write-once storage to prevent ransomware tampering.

Executives must ask: “If system X goes down, what’s the fallback?”

9. Case Example: Global Automotive Manufacturer

A top 10 automotive OEM re-architected its digital supply chain after a ransomware attack paralyzed operations.

Implemented Zero Trust across supplier portals.
Segmented OT from IT with strict firewalls.
Required SBOMs from all software suppliers.
Created geo-redundant ERP instances with immutable backups.
Conducted quarterly red-team exercises against supplier networks.

The result: the firm reduced its mean time to recover from cyber incidents by over 60%.

10. Executive-Level Implications

For executives, architecture is not a purely technical concern. It shapes:

Risk exposure: Poor architecture amplifies vulnerabilities.
Insurance premiums: Strong architecture lowers risk assessments.
Regulatory compliance: Many regulations (NIS2, SEC) require evidence of resilient architecture.
Customer trust: Demonstrating resilience is becoming a selling point in B2B contracts.

Executives must sponsor architecture programs, not delegate them entirely to IT.

Executive Takeaways from Part 5

Zero Trust is the baseline philosophy for supply chain security.
Segmentation and isolation prevent lateral movement.
Procurement must enforce secure-by-design contracts.
Encryption, IAM, and CSPM are essential hygiene practices.
Testing (red-teams, chaos engineering) validates resilience.
Redundancy ensures recovery is possible even under attack.
Architecture is a board-level risk lever, not just an IT concern.

Looking Ahead

In Part 6: Data Integrity and Confidentiality in a Shared Ecosystem, we’ll explore how companies can protect data provenance, intellectual property, and confidential exchanges in an era where supply chains increasingly rely on shared platforms and distributed technologies.

Call to Action: Download the full guide to gain in-depth insights and practical frameworks that will help you lead the transformation towards a resilient supply chain.

The post Securing the Chain: Building Cyber-Resilient Architectures – Architecture Determines Resilience appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending