Connect with us

Non classé

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Published

on

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Trump’s 2025 tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China reshape global trade, impacting imports, exports, e-commerce, and shipping. Learn what this means for you.

Judah Levine

February 3, 2025

Blog Post

The first shots in 2025’s trade wars have been fired… and it’s a significant volley.

Following through on promises to increase US tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as possible, President Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to apply 25% tariffs on all goods from Canada and Mexico – which accounted for nearly $900B and 28% of total US imports in 2023 – starting February 4th, with the exception of energy imports which will face a 10% tariff.

A 10% tariff will also be applied to all imports from China.

President Trump cited the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs – especially fentanyl – as urgent threats to the nation and as the basis for enacting the IEEPA, which can only be used in response to a national emergency.

Becoming the first president to use the IEEPA to increase tariffs, the act allowed Trump to take immediate action by executive order as opposed to the various acts he used to increase tariffs during his first administration which activate federal agencies to research, review and make recommendations on tariffs first, and can take several months.

Beyond Increased Tariffs

The executive orders for tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China also go beyond just the tariffs:

The orders disallow exemptions to the tariffs – despite intense lobbying by automotive and energy groups.

Aware of potential retaliation (more on that below), the orders also include clauses allowing the president to increase tariffs further if any of these countries apply retaliatory tariffs.

The de minimis exemption, which permits imports under $800 without duties, is also being eliminated for all goods from these three countries, which will be a particular blow to cross-border e-commerce.

The orders also eliminate duty drawbacks, through which importers can request the duties to be returned to them if they ultimately export the finished goods or destroy them.

Finally, the orders state that each of the tariffs will remain in effect until the respective governments have “taken adequate steps to alleviate” these crises through cooperative enforcement actions.

Nor does it appear that the tariffs will end here. The president implied that he will take more trade actions as soon as mid-month targeting computer chips, pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, copper, oil and gas, and that tariffs will also be applied to imports from the European Union, without specifying a level or timeline.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trump’s Sweeping Tariff Impact

The US imported more than $100B of energy products from Canada in 2023, and US Census Bureau data shows that Mexico and Canada combined to supply nearly $900B of US imports in 2023 and about 28% of total US imports through November for 2024. The US relies most heavily on Canada and Mexico for automotive and fresh produce imports, but other key categories include lumber, beer, TVs and PCs.

The US automotive industry, which often moves parts and half-assembled vehicles back and forth cross-border several times during production, faces a particularly difficult challenge from these steep tariff hikes.

Many US e-commerce sellers – as well as some foreign e-commerce platforms – have relied on low duties, free trade with the US as well as the US de minimis exemption and other pass-through incentives to make Canada but especially Mexico a key e-commerce import channel into the US. Mexico significantly scaled back some of these rules in recent months, but closing the de minims exemption to imports from Canada and Mexico will further complicate e-commerce trade flowing through these countries, often originating in China.

Closing de minimis to Chinese goods will have significant implications for the ability of major platforms like Temu and Shein to ship goods from China directly to consumers in the US by air cargo. This exemption – which eliminates duties, entails minimal reporting requirements and reduces filing costs from about $15 – $50 to $0.15 per parcel – has been a key driver of the surge of B2C e-commerce air cargo volumes from China to the US that has kept capacity tight and rates at peak-season levels since about mid-2023.

Not Going Down Without a Fight: Retaliation

Despite the anti-retaliation clauses in the order, Canada announced it will set a 25% tariff on more than $100B of US exports, with the duty applied to 20% of those goods this week and the rest in three weeks. Officials in Mexico and China also plan to retaliate but have not provided specifics.

In addition to the likely negative impact on US exporters from these retaliations, importers will face much higher costs which will likely be passed on to consumers and could drive an increase in inflation. Importers may also shift to alternate foreign trading partners where possible – an extension from the prior “China Plus One” sourcing to “China Plus Mexico/Canada Plus One More.” We could also see some increase in domestic manufacturing – one of President Trump’s key goals through trade barriers – in the rare cases that this is feasible.

But with these tariffs applied only until the White House is satisfied that Mexico, Canada and China are doing enough to combat illegal immigration and drug shipments, US companies will likely hesitate to make any costly changes.

Preparing for Future Tariffs

That the president followed through on these tariff promises – which many hoped were more threats and negotiating chips than concrete policy – only increases the likelihood of his far more significant proposed 60% tariff increase for Chinese imports and 10% – 20% global duty.

As we saw in 2017 – 2019, and as we’ve seen reflected in the higher than normal ocean freight volumes and container rates in Q4 of last year and through the start of 2025, shippers rush to frontload as much inventory as is feasible when tariff hikes are expected. Though this pull-forward has been apparent since at least the election, we may see this trend intensify given recent events.

But there may be far less time to prepare this time around.

Trump’s use of IEEEPA this week – as opposed to during his first administration when the White House announced some significant tariff roll outs several months before implementation – makes these other tariff introductions possible with very short notice, which could cut short the pre-tariff behavior seen with prior hikes.

Depending on how significant frontloading has been so far and how long there is until a big spike in tariffs on China, we could also see a decrease in ocean freight import volumes and container rates from the Far East – or any lane impacted by tariffs – once tariffs go into effect.

The pull forward ahead of the January 2019 tariff hike resulted in a post-tariff slump that snapped a nine year streak of US ocean import volume growth as some of 2018’s total came at the expense of the following year.

The Air Cargo Impact

The biggest short term impact on global freight could be in the air cargo market, where closing the de minimis exemption to Chinese e-commerce imports – which have kept planes full and China – US air cargo rates at more than double typical levels since mid-2023 – could affect air cargo demand and rates across the market.

As noted above, the use of expensive air cargo for low-value e-commerce goods is mainly driven by de minimis exceptions that exempt small imports worth less than $800 from customs filing costs and duties.

Closing de minimis to Chinese imports means that goods arriving by air will be subject to the new and already existing tariffs, incur significant filing requirements and costs, and will take a week or more to clear customs, significantly challenging the speed and savings that have driven the e-commerce air cargo surge.

This change could sharply reduce air cargo volumes from China to the US, which would result in significant downward pressure on transpacific air cargo rates and could also lead to lower rates across the air cargo market as capacity currently absorbed by transpacific e-commerce goods is released back into rotation.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post 2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Warehouse Orchestration: Solving the Daily Breakdown Between Plan and Execution

Published

on

By

Warehouse Orchestration: Solving The Daily Breakdown Between Plan And Execution

In most warehouses today, the problem is not whether work gets done; it is how much effort it takes to keep everything aligned and on track. Every day, there is a breakdown between the plan and executing the plan. Labor plans, inbound schedules, picking priorities, and automation all operate from valid assumptions, but not always the same ones. The gaps between them are filled in real time by supervisors and teams, making constant adjustments. That is what keeps operations running, but it is also what makes them fragile.

It is a challenge many operations recognize. Even with modern systems in place, execution still depends heavily on human coordination. Warehouse orchestration is the shift from managing tasks independently to coordinating the entire operation and ensuring decisions across the system stay aligned as conditions change. The best way to understand what that means in practice is not through a system diagram, but through the lens and experience of the people running the floor.

Consider Maria, a warehouse supervisor responsible for keeping a high-volume operation on track. She is experienced, practical, and steady under pressure, but what she is really managing is not just work; it is complexity.

At any given moment, she balances labor availability, work queues, inbound variability, equipment status, and shifting order priorities. Those inputs are not wrong. They are just not aligned. It is her job to bridge that gap in real time.

A shift that starts “normal” … until it does not

Maria arrives before the floor fully wakes up. Her first stop is not the dock or the pick module; it is yesterday’s reality. What shipped? What did not? Where did the backlog form? Which waves did not behave as the plan assumed? She is not looking for blame; she is looking for drift. Drift is what turns into firefighting later.

Demand shifted over the weekend, but the pick face still reflects last week’s reality. One area is short-staffed; another has idle labor. When the team built the labor plan, it made sense, but the day had already moved on. The team scheduled inbound; however, it is not predictable. Every ETA is a best guess, and how trailers show up rarely matches how they appear on a screen.

Individually, nothing here is catastrophic, but warehouses do not fail all at once. They gradually lose alignment between plan and execution. The team compensates in real time by moving people, reprioritizing work, working around automation delays, and making judgment calls. And the shift “works,” but there is a cost:

Overtime, which did not need to happen.

Detention fees, which show up later.

Service misses, driven by wrong priorities rather than a lack of effort.

Leaders who spend more time reacting than improving.

These challenges are the reality across many operations. Execution is strong, but coordination is fragile.

The real bottleneck: decisions are fragmented

Most warehouses are not short on tools. They have WMS, robotics systems, labor tools, and planning solutions. Each one does its job well, but they do not make decisions together. Each system optimizes its scope based on different priorities or timings. The gaps between them are filled manually by people like Maria. In an environment with less variability, that might work, but in most cases:

Demand changes faster and more frequently.

Labor is less predictable.

Automation introduces new dependencies.

Customer expectations continue to rise.

Under these conditions, static plans, especially labor plans and wave structures, can drift out of sync before the shift is halfway through. That is when the operation starts relying on “manual heroics.” Experienced supervisors keep things running. It is hard to scale, and even harder to sustain.

AI-driven warehouse orchestration: keeping the operation aligned

Warehouse orchestration and the power of AI address this gap. Because it is not just about executing tasks, it is about coordinating decisions across the operation and using intelligence to see, analyze, and recommend actions with full visibility to all the variables. Instead of managing isolated activities, intelligent orchestration continuously aligns:

Labor to demand.

Inbound and outbound priorities.

Work sequencing across zones.

Automation with human workflows.

It does this in real time, as conditions change. Variability is constant, and it is not realistic to eliminate. The goal is to see the risk earlier, respond faster and more consistently, and prevent disruption.

Back to Maria: when the system helps carry the load

Now imagine Maria running that same Monday, but operations now behave like a connected ecosystem, not a collection of islands. Before the shift even starts, she is not just reviewing what happened yesterday. She is looking at a forward-facing view that is already adjusting based on incoming signals. She is getting visibility into risk early before it is a problem. Inbound appointments are not just a schedule; they are a ranked set of trade-offs that balance urgency, detention risk, inventory needs, and outbound commitments. Her decisions are clearer because the system prioritizes them, reflecting business impact. Slotting does not rely on disruptive, periodic re-slot projects that leave the pick face to decay. Instead, optimization and learning continuously shape placement, folding the highest value moves into natural replenishment windows and explaining the “why” in business language.

And during the shift, when one area starts falling behind, Maria does not have to guess the best move. She can see the impact of her options:

Shifting labor.

Reprioritizing tasks.

Adjusting sequencing.

Instead of relying on instinct and experience alone, she has visibility into how decisions affect the entire operation. She is still in control, but the system is helping her avoid problems instead of chasing them. And that changes how the shift feels. It is not static; it is dynamic, but stable.

The key ingredients: unified data, SaaS, AI & ML, connected systems

Behind the scenes, this comes down to unified data, SaaS, AI, ML, and systems that work together. When you connect your warehouse systems, add real-time operational signals and visibility to systems outside of the warehouse, and apply AI and ML for speed and precision, you are working from a single source of truth and an interconnected ecosystem of systems. As a result, users make decisions with a broader context. Then the operation starts to learn; outcomes inform future decisions, improving how the system responds over time. And now, humans are not the only thing holding the performance together.

Why this matters right now

For supply chain leaders, this is not only about efficiency. It is about operating in a world where volatility is constant. Across industries, the specifics vary, but the challenges are consistent:

Handling demand swings without inflating labor costs

Scaling operations without scaling complexity

Maintaining service levels under pressure

The operations that succeed are the ones that do not just react faster; they are the ones that operate in alignment.

The shift ahead

A single, modern technology will not define the future of warehouse management. It will be defined by how well operations coordinate across people, systems, and workflows in real time. That is what intelligent warehouse orchestration enables. It turns the warehouse from a collection of well-run processes into a connected system that can adjust continuously. Because in the end, the goal is not just to execute the plan. It is to keep the plan from breaking when the shift starts.

By Tammy Kulesa
Senior Director, Solution & Industry Marketing, Blue Yonder

Tammy is the Senior Director of Solution and Industry Marketing, leading go-to-market strategy and thought leadership for Blue Yonder Cognitive Solutions for Execution, and the LSP Industry. With over 20 years of experience in technology marketing and nearly a decade focused on retail, logistics, and supply chain, Tammy brings a deep understanding of the operational and strategic challenges facing today’s supply chain leaders. A passionate advocate for innovation and collaboration, Tammy has a proven track record of connecting market needs with transformative solutions.

The post Warehouse Orchestration: Solving the Daily Breakdown Between Plan and Execution appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

How Operational AI Turns Supply Chain Recommendations into Action

Published

on

By

Supply chain AI cannot stop at better insight. To create operational value, AI recommendations must connect to workflows, execution systems, approval paths, and measurable outcomes.

Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming part of the supply chain technology conversation. Vendors are adding copilots, recommendation engines, autonomous agents, and predictive analytics to planning, transportation, warehousing, procurement, and visibility applications. The promise is clear: better decisions, faster responses, and more adaptive operations.

But there is a critical distinction that supply chain leaders need to keep in view. An AI system that identifies a problem is not the same as an AI system that helps solve it.

A demand-planning model may identify a likely stockout. A transportation model may flag a lane disruption. A supplier-risk model may detect a deteriorating delivery pattern. Those are useful insights. But unless the system can connect that insight to an action pathway, the burden still falls on the planner, transportation manager, procurement team, or customer service group to decide what happens next.

That is where many AI deployments will either create real value or stall out.

For a deeper look at the architecture behind operational AI, including A2A, MCP, RAG, Graph RAG, and connected decision systems, download the full white paper: AI in the Supply Chain: From Architecture to Execution.

Insight Is Not Execution

Supply chains do not run on insight alone. They run on orders, shipments, purchase orders, inventory moves, carrier tenders, production schedules, warehouse labor plans, customer commitments, and exception workflows.

A recommendation that remains in a dashboard is not yet operational AI. It is decision support. Decision support can be valuable, but it does not fundamentally change the operating model unless it becomes part of the execution process.

The question is not simply, “Can the AI make a recommendation?” The better question is, “Can the organization act on that recommendation in a controlled, auditable, and timely way?”

For example, if an AI system predicts that a regional distribution center will run short of inventory, several action pathways may be available. The company might expedite inbound supply, rebalance inventory from another facility, substitute a product, modify customer allocation rules, or adjust promised delivery dates.

Each action has a cost, a service implication, and a governance requirement.

Operational AI must understand those pathways. It must also know which actions it can recommend, which it can execute automatically, and which require human approval.

The Execution Layer Matters

This is why integration with core execution systems is so important. AI cannot operate effectively if it sits outside the systems where work is actually performed.

For supply chain AI to become operational, it must connect to transportation management systems, warehouse management systems, order management systems, ERP, procurement platforms, supplier portals, customer service workflows, and control tower environments.

Without these connections, AI may diagnose problems faster, but it will not necessarily resolve them faster.

The difference is material. An AI assistant that says, “This shipment is likely to miss its delivery appointment,” is useful. An AI-enabled workflow that identifies the delay, calculates downstream service risk, recommends a carrier alternative, checks cost thresholds, initiates an approval workflow, and updates customer service is much more powerful.

That is the move from analytics to operational intelligence.

Human-in-the-Loop Still Matters

This does not mean every AI recommendation should become an automated action. Supply chain decisions often involve tradeoffs among cost, service, risk, inventory, and customer relationships. Many require judgment.

The more practical model is tiered autonomy.

Low-risk, high-frequency actions may be automated. Moderate-risk decisions may require planner approval. High-impact exceptions may require escalation to a manager or executive.

This is not a weakness. It is a design requirement.

A well-architected operational AI system should know when to act, when to recommend, and when to escalate. It should also capture the outcome so the system can learn whether the decision improved performance.

Closed-Loop Learning Is the Real Prize

The most important capability may not be the first recommendation. It may be the feedback loop that follows.

Did the expedited shipment prevent the stockout? Did the alternate supplier meet the delivery date? Did the inventory transfer protect service without creating a shortage elsewhere? Did the customer accept the revised promise date?

These outcomes should not disappear into operational noise. They should feed back into the intelligence layer.

That is how AI becomes more than a static recommendation tool. It becomes a learning system embedded in the daily operating rhythm of the supply chain.

What This Means for Buyers

Supply chain leaders evaluating AI-enabled software should press vendors on action pathways. The relevant questions are straightforward.

Can the system connect recommendations to execution workflows? Can it distinguish between automated, approved, and escalated actions? Can it operate across functions, not just inside one application? Can it create an audit trail? Can it learn from outcomes?

The vendors that answer these questions well will move beyond AI features. They will become part of the operating architecture.

The next phase of supply chain AI will not be won by the tool that produces the most impressive recommendation. It will be won by the systems that help companies act faster, with more control, better context, and measurable outcomes.

The post How Operational AI Turns Supply Chain Recommendations into Action appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

test

Published

on

By

The post test appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending