Connect with us

Non classé

Supplier Onboarding is Core to a Digital Supply Chain Transformation

Published

on

Supplier Onboarding Is Core To A Digital Supply Chain Transformation

When you talk to companies that have implemented enterprise or supply chain applications, executives will usually admit that they have under-invested in training and preparing users to use the new technology. People issues are always challenging. But change management is significantly more difficult when the technology deployed is used not just internally, but also by key trading partners.

Molex implemented a multi-enterprise supply chain network platform from SAP called SAP Business Network. Molex’s story is interesting because they excelled at overcoming these cultural issues.

MESN is a solution built on a many-to-many architecture that supports a community of trading partners. The most common form of trading partner collaboration is purchase order collaboration. With PO collaboration, buyers send digital purchase orders over the network to suppliers or other trading partners. They gain visibility into whether a supplier can fulfill the complete order in the requested time frame or not. Once the order amount and timeline are agreed upon between the parties, advanced shipping notices are used to track delivery. This collaboration allows for better optimization of the supply chain, ensuring the right products are available at the right time.

Molex is a private company headquartered in Lisle, IL in the US. Molex is a global electronics manufacturer that makes and sells over 100,000 distinct products – connectors, cable assemblies, and a wide variety of other products. They sell to the automotive, data communications, medical, industrial, consumer electronics, and other industries. The company generates over $7 billion in revenue based on a presence in more than 40 countries. 18,000 suppliers ship 70,000 different types of parts to 72 Molex manufacturing plants across the globe.

Tony Gainsford, a supply chain director at Molex, said that before implementing SAP Business Network, 70% of their purchase orders were not confirmed. For goods associated with those POs, they did not know when a shipment would arrive or whether it would be complete. “We needed assurance of supply,” Mr. Gainsford said. Since implementing SAP Business Network, the confirmation rate has gone from 30% to 88% for those on the Network. But getting there was not easy.

Molex began in October of 2022. They started by focusing on the largest and most important suppliers. They explained that they were digitizing their end-to-end requisition to payment process. Mr. Gainsford pointed out that the existing method, with PDFs attached to emails, was cumbersome not just for them but for their suppliers. “It took 7 days on average for a supplier to get a PO.” With a digital process, Mr. Gainsford explained, “we chopped that down by 4 to 5 days.”

Change management was not solely focused on suppliers, buyers, and material managers all had to change how they operated. Change management goes much easier if you can answer the question, “what is in it for me?” There were 65 material managers included in the initial rollout. He painstakingly spoke to each of them to get their buy-in. For material managers, he made the case that they would be much more likely to get their inbound supplies on time.

The buyers don’t report to Mr. Gainsford. He needed to influence them. Getting the buy-in of the material managers helped with this. The task management in SAP Business Network also helps. The application sends reminders to the buyers about actions they need to take. For example, the application sends three auto reminders to a buyer if a PO they cut does not have a corresponding purchase order confirmation associated with it. If no confirmation is received promptly, the buyer must press the supplier to send it.

Suppliers understand that the amount of future business they do with Molex is contingent upon participation. “We have not fired any supplier yet,” Mr. Gainsford said. “But the chief procurement officer has been made aware of the 10% of suppliers not participating. It will certainly be a subject of conversation” before the next contract is cut.

Training is critical. “We took a YouTube approach. We created bite-sized videos. And we had visibility to who took training and who did not.” Those who had ot viewed the videos, Mr. Gainsford explained, were told, “You did not take the training; this will be difficult for you.”

The overall impression one gains from talking to Mr. Gainsford is a systematic and methodical approach to change management. Molex knew that success with the SAP Business Network application was contingent on the successful onboarding of suppliers. The company onboarded suppliers at twice the rate they expected. Molex’s change management program is also one based on continuous improvement. The company continues to refine supplier onboarding; what used to take 6 months now takes 3 weeks.

The tool Molex used to drive adherence to the new process was, without a doubt, a major contributor to the success of this program. The company uses a process monitoring tool called Celonis. With the tool, visibility is gained when the POs are sent out, and again when the confirmations come back in. This tool helped increase supplier delivery performance by double digits. There is a dashboard that shows suppliers lit up as green – performance is good, orange, or red – there are major problems.

But it is not just the performance of suppliers that matters, the performance of their 400 buyers also matters. Mr. Gainsford explained that there is a way the PO collaboration process is supposed to work – there is a “happy path.” Participants in the process must do a series of tasks, often in a defined manner.

The tool provides visibility of what percentage of orders were confirmed, and beyond that, when there are issues, where those issues occurred. Where and how often, for example, did a buyer deviate from the happy path? The tool provides visibility to conformance by plant, supplier, and buyer. With Celonis you can view how long each step took and compare it to how long it was supposed to take. For example, once a PO is confirmed, a tender to carriers should occur within 24 hours? Did that happen? There is a digital thread with the date of the tender confirmation and the time stamp.

Every day at 7 am, the supply chain team looks at supplier scorecards. They can view overall performance and then drill down and look at problems purchase order by purchase order. They might tell a supplier, “Only 30% of purchase orders are confirmed because you are not creating them. This is actionable intelligence,” Mr. Gainsford commented. Celonis accelerated Molex’s “time to value” – their ability to get payback for their investment in SAP Business Network.

Molex has also used the tool to reduce supplier lead times. Long and variable lead times are the bane of a manufacturing supply chain. They lead to poor customer fulfillment, higher inventory, and higher shipping costs. With this tool, a supplier can be told, “Your lead time was supposed to take 10 days. You took 30 days.” Molex has an active lead time program, and they continue to work on reducing them.

Over 900 suppliers – representing $1 billion in spend, are now on the Network. But the work continues. And the benefits from the network will continue to increase with increased supplier involvement.

The post Supplier Onboarding is Core to a Digital Supply Chain Transformation appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower

Published

on

By

The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower

Ocean freight forwarding is an $80+ billion market bogged down by the manual processes related to booking management, documentation services, and the coordination labor that holds it all together.

When working with a freight forwarder, you’re buying three things bundled together:

Carrier relationships — access to capacity, negotiated rates, allocation commitments.
Operational data — knowing which carrier fits a given lane, what documents a particular trade corridor requires, how to handle an exception when a booking gets rejected.
Coordination labor — the booking itself, the documents per container (industry estimates range from 9 to 18 depending on the corridor), the re-keying of data across disconnected systems, the email chains chasing confirmations and clearances.

Shippers have always paid for the bundle because you couldn’t get one piece without the others, but that’s changing.

Where the bundle comes apart

Travel agents used to bundle airline relationships, destination expertise, and the labor of putting trips together into a single fee. Aggregator platforms unbundled the pieces, and the booking layer went first because that’s where the volume was. Ocean freight forwarding is in the same position. More than digitizing booking, though, AI is automating it.

The bulk of the volume and labor cost for freight forwarders is tied up in rate comparisons across dozens of carriers, document preparation and routing by trade lane and commodity classification, booking execution against pre-negotiated contracts, and exception triage on rejected bookings.

But this is all high-volume, rule-governed, multi-system coordination where speed and consistency matter more than creativity. Exactly the type of work that AI agents are well-equipped to handle.

Platforms can now ingest a rate agreement, parse surcharges and FAK provisions into a digital rate profile, compare carriers on cost, transit time, and schedule reliability, and execute a booking based on pre-defined parameters, without a human in the loop.

Automating the entire order lifecycle

Every dollar of margin exposure in ocean freight traces back to a decision made without complete information. That means that every action must be rooted in live network data across shipment flows, carrier performance, and insight from inventory and order systems. A platform with that intelligence can automate and accelerate the full workflow from detecting a supply shortfall, selecting a carrier, booking the container, managing the documents, tracking the shipment, and handling exceptions.

A shipper stitching together a rate tool from one vendor, a booking portal from another, a document system from a third, and a visibility feed from a fourth gets digitization. They get a slightly faster version of the same manual process. The full picture still lives in a person’s head, and the handoffs between systems still require human coordination.

While freight forwarders and other intermediaries are also investing in AI, they’re primarily automating their own coordination labor before someone else absorbs it. But they can’t replicate the data advantage of a platform that sits across the entire supply chain.

A forwarder automating its booking desk draws on its own transaction history. A point solution built specifically for ocean booking draws on booking data. A platform processing millions of supply chain events daily across orders, inventory, carrier performance, and live shipment status, has a different signal base entirely. Carrier selection informed by real-time schedule reliability, live network disruption, and your actual inventory positions is structurally more accurate than carrier selection informed by historical rate tables.

The shrinking intermediary layer

The moats around freight forwarders’ profit margins are eroding, and the lines between legacy endpoint solutions are blurring. High-complexity corridors and specialized commodities still need human expertise, but the bread-and-butter containerized freight that makes up the bulk of forwarder revenue is the volume where automated workflows shine.

Meanwhile, software providers will have a hard time selling dashboards and chatbots to specific teams compared to AI-native platforms offering a single operating system across all supply chain operations, and serving downstream stakeholders.

The question for forwarders is how long they can keep patching automation onto a fragmented architecture with a booking tool here, a document system there, people bridging the handoffs in between. And how much revenue sits in structured, repeatable work that a connected platform absorbs?

For shippers, the choice is whether to invest in a platform that automates the order-to-delivery and exception lifecycle, or keep paying others to hold the pieces together. The second option is a decision to fund the intermediary layer sitting between them and their own data.

The post The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026

Published

on

By

Supply Chain And Logistics News Week Of May 7th 2026

The logistics and supply chain landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation as industries move from rigid, low-cost models toward strategies defined by agility and resilience. This week’s roundup explores how major players are navigating this shift, from Amazon’s bold move to offer its massive infrastructure as a standalone service to Ford’s strategic manufacturing reset in the EV sector. We also dive into the critical human element in modern cost engineering, the logistical reimagining of energy corridors due to geopolitical risks, and the new AI-driven tools closing the gap between inventory detection and real-time execution. Together, these developments highlight a common theme: the pursuit of flexibility and data-driven intelligence in an increasingly unpredictable global market.

Top Supply Chain Stories from this Week:

Modern Cost Engineering Evolution: Rewiring the Human Element for Supply Chain Resilience

In the latest shift for cost engineering, the focus is moving beyond purely digital tools to address the critical human element required for true supply chain resilience. As industrial organizations transition from traditional backward-looking estimates to modern “should-cost” methods powered by AI and digital twins, the real challenge lies in workforce transformation. Success in this new landscape requires a significant cultural shift, moving away from isolated departmental silos toward cross-functional collaboration. By reskilling traditional estimators to act as strategic consultants—capable of interpreting material science and operational constraints—companies can evolve from simple price negotiation to collaborative manufacturing improvements that ensure mutual profitability and long-term stability.

Hormuz Risk Is Redrawing the Supply Chain Geography of Energy

Geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz is forcing a fundamental shift in energy logistics, moving the industry away from lowest-cost network design toward a risk-adjusted model. With the waterway handling roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas, repeated disruptions have transformed infrastructure like pipelines, storage terminals, and deep-water ports outside the Persian Gulf into high-value strategic assets. Nations and corporations are no longer viewing these as simple logistics nodes, but as essential escape routes that provide the optionality and recovery time needed to withstand chokepoint failures. This selective redesign of the global energy map signals a new era where geography and physical redundancy are the primary drivers of supply chain resilience.

Ford’s Manufacturing Reset Shows How Automakers Are Rebuilding the EV Supply Chain

Ford’s manufacturing pivot represents a fundamental shift from aggressive electric vehicle expansion toward capital discipline and supply chain flexibility. By taking a $19.5 billion write-down and restructuring battery joint ventures, the company is moving away from rigid, single-purpose production lines in favor of multi-energy platforms that can adapt to fluctuating demand for hybrids and EVs. A key component of this reset is the repurposing of battery manufacturing assets in Kentucky and Michigan for stationary energy storage and data center support. This strategy transforms these facilities into flexible energy infrastructure rather than just automotive supply nodes. Ultimately, Ford is signaling that the next phase of the market will be defined by the ability to manage uncertainty through cross-functional asset utilization and a focus on manufacturing-driven affordability.

How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes

FourKites has launched a unified solution that bridges the gap between stockout detection and freight execution, reducing resolution time from hours to less than five minutes. By integrating its Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI, the platform eliminates the traditional “manual scavenger hunt” where planners had to jump between ERPs and carrier portals to resolve inventory gaps. The system uses decision intelligence to identify stockout risks up to six weeks in advance and provides ranked recommendations for corrective transfers based on cost, speed, and carrier performance. This closed-loop workflow allows planners to execute optimized shipping options with a single click, addressing the massive financial impact of inventory distortion and reducing the need for expensive, unplanned expedited shipping.

Amazon Launches “Supply Chain Services” Leveraging its Global Logistics Network

Amazon has officially launched Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS), a move that decouples its massive logistics infrastructure from its retail marketplace to serve as a standalone utility for all businesses. Similar to the trajectory of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the platform opens up Amazon’s multimodal freight, automated warehousing, and last-mile parcel delivery networks to companies regardless of whether they sell on Amazon. Major early adopters like Procter & Gamble, 3M, and Lands’ End are already leveraging the service to move everything from raw materials to finished products. By consolidating fragmented logistics contracts into a single automated interface, Amazon aims to use its scale—currently moving 13 billion items annually—to provide businesses with end-to-end visibility and 96.4% on-time delivery rates, signaling a significant new challenge to traditional 3PLs and carriers like FedEx and UPS.

Song of the week:

The post Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes

Published

on

By

How Fourkites Connects Stockout Detection To Freight Execution In Minutes

FourKites is bridging the gap between identifying a problem and solving it. With the integration of Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI. Traditionally, supply chain planners have been stuck in a manual scavenger hunt whenever a stockout alert surfaced, jumping between ERPs to find surplus stock and carrier portals to secure freight. This fragmented process typically took hours, often forcing companies to rely on expensive, last-minute expedited shipping or facing steep On-Time In-Full (OTIF) penalties to avoid customer dissatisfaction. By unifying these disparate data streams, the new solution allows teams to detect risks two to six weeks in advance and execute corrective transfers from a single, seamless workflow.

The impact on operational efficiency is significant, reducing the resolution time from detection to execution from several hours to less than five minutes. Instead of just receiving a warning, planners are presented with recommendations powered by Decision Intelligence that include the fastest, cheapest, and most optimal shipping options based on real-time carrier performance data. This closed-loop system directly addresses the 1.73 trillion dollar global issue of inventory distortion and aims to eliminate the 15-25 hours planners previously spent on manual coordination.

By keeping a human in the loop to select the best recommendation with a single click, FourKites ensures that exceptions are resolved without ever leaving the platform. This integration helps protect freight budgets, where unplanned expedited shipping often consumes up to 48% of total spend. This launch represents a shift from reactive firefighting to proactive execution, allowing teams to move away from costly safety stock and focus on high-value responsibilities. Supply chain planner responsibilities are changing with the continued developments of AI and the de-siloing of disparate systems.

FourKites is a supply chain technology provider that operates a global real-time visibility network tracking over 3.2 million shipments daily across 200 countries and territories. By integrating data from 1.1 million carriers across all modes (road, rail, ocean, and air), the platform uses AI-powered “digital workers” to automate exception resolution and provide predictive insights. More than 1,600 global brands, including leaders in the CPG and Food & Beverage sectors, trust FourKites to transform their logistics from reactive tracking into proactive, intelligent orchestration.

Read the full ARC brief breaking down the new FourKites solution here: https://www.fourkites.com/research/arc-advisory-stockout-detection-freight-execution/

The post How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending