Non classé
Amazon’s Antitrust Problem
Published
2 ans agoon
By
In August, a federal judge ruled that Google had illegally maintained a monopoly in online search. The Department of Justice is considering breaking up Google to remedy its monopoly on the search market. Last Monday, September 9th, a second trial starts. Google has faced complaints about how it dominates the online advertising market. The concerns stem from software known as Google Ad Manager, which websites around the world use to sell ads on their sites. The remedy here could be forcing Google to sell Ad Manager.
However, Google is not the only big tech company that has antitrust problems. The Federal Trade Commission and 17 state attorneys general sued Amazon.com, Inc. alleging that the online retail and technology company is a monopolist that uses a set of interlocking anticompetitive and unfair strategies to illegally maintain its monopoly power.
The FTC and states allege Amazon’s anticompetitive conduct occurs in two markets—the online market that serves shoppers and the market for online marketplace services purchased by sellers.
Aftermarket services is based on Amazon’s logistics business, Fulfillment by Amazon. According to the FTC, this service “conditions sellers’ ability to obtain “Prime” eligibility for their products—a virtual necessity for doing business on Amazon—on sellers using Amazon’s costly fulfillment service, which has made it substantially more expensive for sellers on Amazon to also offer their products on other platforms. This unlawful coercion has, in turn, limited competitors’ ability to effectively compete against Amazon.”
Fulfillment by Amazon is a significant source of revenue for Amazon. In the last quarter, sales generated by third-party seller services rose 12% on a year-over-year basis to $36.2 billion.
Amazon will undoubtedly argue that this service is good for consumers. In the first-quarter earnings report, Amazon reported that it delivered to Prime members at its fastest speed ever. In March, across the top 60 largest U.S. metro areas, nearly 60% of Prime member orders arrived the same or next day. In 2021 it was estimated that 73% of all Amazon sellers use FBA as part or all of their fulfillment strategies. That includes 65% of the top Amazon sellers, including a large percentage of private label brands. Because Amazon lists over 9.7 million individual sellers selling some 3.4 billion products per year, FBA is one of the largest logistics service providers in the world.
According to the FTC, Amazon charges “costly fees on the hundreds of thousands of sellers that currently have no choice but to rely on Amazon to stay in business. These fees range from a monthly fee sellers must pay for each item sold, to advertising fees that have become virtually necessary for sellers to do business,” and logistics fees associated with fulfillment. “Combined, all of these fees force many sellers to pay close to 50% of their total revenues to Amazon. These fees harm not only sellers but also shoppers, who pay increased prices for thousands of products sold on or off Amazon.”
As bad as the FTC makes Amazon’s activities sound, the book The Everything War: Amazon’s Ruthless Quest to Own the World and Remake Corporate Power, by the whistle-blower Dana Mattioli, makes Amazon sound ten times worse.
Fulfillment by Amazon requires that sellers jump through numerous hoops to prepare their products for storage and shipment into Amazon’s fulfillment centers. This is called FBA Prep. Item labeling, shrink wrapping, bundling, kitting, of inbound products is complicated as every product has a different preparation requirement. Outsourcing this work is difficult because it is manual, hard to scale, and high-touch. Consequently, few logistics service providers do take work involving FBA prep. It is
One of the 3PLs that do take this work is MyFBAPrep. MyFBAPrep has over 100 warehouses and 85 million square feet of warehouse space, and they offer a range of services that help third-party sellers navigate the complexities of FBA requirements. However, when I talked to their CEO, Tom Wicky, he told me that they work with Amazon’s larger third-party sellers, so this still leaves smaller sellers at Amazon’s mercy.
Just as the Department of Justice may seek to break Google into smaller independent companies to fix the antitrust issues, if the government wins its suit against Amazon, it could seek to have Amazon divest Fulfillment by Amazon.
The post Amazon’s Antitrust Problem appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
You may like
Non classé
AI Is Moving Into the Physical Supply Chain: What Leaders Should Watch
Published
21 heures agoon
24 mars 2026By
AI is no longer confined to planning systems and dashboards. It is moving into the execution layer of the supply chain, where decisions are made in motion, not after the fact.
For the past decade, most AI investment in supply chains has focused on forecasting, planning, and analytics. These systems improved visibility and supported better decisions, but they remained upstream. Warehouses, fleets, ports, and production lines continued to operate with limited real time intelligence.
That separation is now collapsing.
A new phase is emerging where AI is embedded directly into physical operations. Systems are no longer just recommending actions. They are beginning to sense conditions, coordinate responses, and execute decisions across the network.
This shift has material implications for cost, service levels, and resilience. It also changes where value is created and who controls it.
The Shift from Insight to Execution
Most supply chain AI to date has been advisory. It has answered questions such as:
What will demand look like next month
Where should inventory be positioned
Which supplier carries the lowest risk
These are important questions, but they sit upstream from execution.
The next wave moves downstream. It focuses on questions such as:
What should happen to this shipment right now
How should this route change given current conditions
Which order should be prioritized inside the warehouse
These decisions are continuous and time sensitive. They cannot wait for batch planning cycles or manual intervention. As AI moves into execution, the cadence of decision making shifts from periodic to continuous. That is where the real operational leverage sits.
The Supply Chain Is Becoming a Network of Active Nodes
Physical supply chains are being instrumented. Vehicles, containers, facilities, and even individual assets are becoming data generating nodes.
Each node produces signals about location, status, constraints, and performance. More importantly, these nodes are no longer passive.
They are beginning to participate in decision making.
A truck is no longer just executing a route. It is part of a system that can:
Adjust routing based on congestion and delivery windows
Coordinate arrival times with warehouse capacity
Trigger downstream inventory decisions
A warehouse is no longer just processing orders. It is dynamically adjusting labor allocation, slotting, and picking sequences based on incoming conditions.
This changes the structure of the supply chain from a linear process to a responsive network.
Coordination Becomes the Core Problem
As intelligence moves into physical operations, the primary challenge is no longer prediction. It is coordination.
Optimizing one function in isolation delivers limited value. A perfectly optimized route has little impact if the receiving facility cannot process the shipment. Inventory decisions fail if transportation and supplier realities are not aligned.
What matters is how decisions interact across the system.
This is where many current deployments fall short. They optimize within silos. The next phase connects those silos.
Execution systems are beginning to coordinate across:
Transportation and warehousing
Procurement and inventory
Order management and fulfillment
The result is not just faster decisions. It is better system level outcomes.
The Compression of Decision Cycles
One of the clearest signals of this shift is the compression of decision cycles. Traditional supply chains operate on defined rhythms. Daily planning runs. Weekly forecasts. Monthly reviews. Physical execution does not operate on those timelines. Disruptions occur in minutes. Conditions change continuously. Opportunities are fleeting.
As AI moves into execution, decision cycles compress from hours and days to seconds and minutes.
This has three direct effects:
Reduced latency between signal and action
Fewer manual interventions
Increased ability to absorb disruption without escalation
The organizations that adapt to this cadence will operate with a structural advantage.
Where Value Is Moving
As AI enters the physical layer, value is shifting. Historically, value concentrated in planning systems and enterprise platforms. These systems aggregated data and produced recommendations. Now, value is moving toward the execution layer, where decisions are acted on.
Three areas stand out:
1. Real time orchestration
The ability to coordinate decisions across transportation, warehousing, and inventory in real time.
2. Embedded intelligence in assets
Vehicles, automation systems, and edge devices that participate in decision making.
3. Network level visibility tied to action
Not just seeing what is happening, but acting on it immediately.
This has implications for technology providers, operators, and investors. Control points are shifting.
What Leaders Should Watch
This transition is underway, but uneven. Most organizations are still early.
There are several signals worth tracking.
Execution level use cases moving to production
Look for systems that are not just advising planners but actively influencing routing, picking, allocation, and scheduling.
Tighter integration across systems
Disconnected tools will not support this model. Integration across TMS, WMS, and upstream systems becomes critical.
Rise of real time data pipelines
Batch processes will not support continuous decision making. Event driven architectures will.
Shift in organizational roles
Planners move from direct decision making to oversight and exception management.
Vendor positioning around orchestration
The most important platforms will not be those that optimize a single function. They will be those that coordinate across the network.
The Risk of Standing Still
The risk is not that AI fails to deliver. The risk is that competitors operationalize it first. A supply chain that can sense and respond in real time will outperform one that relies on delayed information and manual coordination.
The gap will not be incremental. It will be structural. Faster response times, better asset utilization, fewer disruptions, and higher service levels compound quickly. Organizations that remain in a planning centric model will find themselves reacting to a system that is already moving.
The Bottom Line
AI in the supply chain is no longer about better forecasts or improved dashboards. It is about execution.
As intelligence moves into the physical layer, supply chains become more responsive, more coordinated, and more resilient. Decisions happen continuously, across the network, not in isolated systems.
The leaders who recognize this shift early and align their architecture, data, and operating model accordingly will define the next generation of supply chain performance.
The post AI Is Moving Into the Physical Supply Chain: What Leaders Should Watch appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Walmart AI Pricing Patents Signal Shift Toward Real-Time Retail Execution
Published
5 jours agoon
20 mars 2026By
Walmart’s new patents and digital shelf rollout point to a more tightly integrated model linking demand forecasting, pricing, and store-level execution.
Walmart has secured two patents related to automated pricing and demand forecasting, drawing attention to how large retailers are evolving their pricing and execution capabilities.
One patent, System and Method for Dynamically Updating Prices on an E-Commerce Platform, covers a system that can dynamically update online prices based on changing market conditions. A second, Walmart Pricing and Demand Forecasting Patent Classification, relates to demand forecasting technology designed to estimate what customers will buy and recommend pricing accordingly. At the same time, Walmart is expanding digital shelf labels across its U.S. stores, replacing paper labels with centrally managed electronic displays.
Individually, none of these elements are new. Retailers have long used forecasting models, pricing tools, and store execution processes. What is notable is the combination.
Walmart now has three capabilities aligned:
Demand forecasting tied to predictive models
Price recommendation based on that demand
Store-level infrastructure capable of rapid execution
That combination reduces the operational friction historically associated with pricing in physical retail.
Pricing Moves Closer to Execution
Traditional store pricing changes required coordination across multiple steps: analysis, approval, printing, distribution, and manual shelf updates. That process introduced delay and inconsistency.
Digital shelf labels materially change that constraint. Prices can be updated centrally and executed across stores with significantly less manual intervention.
This does not change the underlying logic of pricing decisions. Retailers have always adjusted prices based on demand, competition, and margin targets. What changes is the speed and consistency of execution.
As a result, pricing moves closer to real-time operational control.
Implications for Supply Chain Operations
Pricing is not an isolated commercial function. It directly influences demand patterns, inventory flow, replenishment timing, and markdown activity.
When pricing becomes faster and more responsive, those linkages tighten.
Three implications are clear:
1. Increased Execution Speed
Retailers can align pricing decisions more quickly with current demand conditions, reducing lag between signal and action.
2. Stronger Dependence on Forecast Accuracy
When pricing recommendations are driven by predictive models, the quality of demand sensing becomes more consequential. Forecast errors can propagate more quickly into sales and inventory outcomes.
3. Closer Coupling of Merchandising and Supply Chain
Pricing decisions influence demand. Demand impacts inventory, replenishment, and store execution. Faster pricing cycles compress the distance between these functions.
Centralization and Control
Walmart has positioned its digital shelf label rollout as an efficiency and accuracy initiative. Centralized price management improves consistency between systems and store execution while reducing labor tied to manual updates.
That positioning aligns with the operational realities of large-scale retail. At Walmart’s footprint, even small improvements in execution efficiency translate into material cost and accuracy gains.
At the same time, the shift toward algorithm-supported pricing introduces standard enterprise control requirements. Organizations need clear governance around how pricing recommendations are generated, reviewed, and executed, particularly as systems become more automated.
A Broader Technology Pattern
Walmart’s patents are best understood as part of a broader shift in supply chain and retail technology.
AI and advanced analytics are moving closer to operational decision points. Forecasting models are no longer confined to planning environments; they are increasingly connected to systems that can act.
In this case, that connection spans:
Demand sensing
Price recommendation
Store-level execution
The result is a more tightly integrated operating model in which commercial decisions and supply chain execution are linked through software.
What This Signals
The significance of Walmart’s move is not tied to public debate over surge pricing scenarios. The underlying development is structural.
Retailers now have the ability to connect demand forecasting, pricing logic, and execution infrastructure into a faster decision loop.
For supply chain leaders, that represents a clear direction:
Execution is becoming more digital, more centralized, and more tightly coupled to predictive models.
The companies that benefit will be those that can align forecasting, pricing, and operational execution within a controlled, coordinated system.
The post Walmart AI Pricing Patents Signal Shift Toward Real-Time Retail Execution appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Supply Chain and Logistics News March 16th-19th 2026
Published
5 jours agoon
20 mars 2026By
This week’s installment of Supply Chain and Logistics news includes stories about record increases in oil prices, Rivian’s autonomous taxis, and much more. Firstly, the Trump administration has issued a 60-day waiver of the Jones Act, a century-old regulation that requires goods moved between US ports to be transported by US-built vessels, etc. Additionally, this week Uber & Rivian announced a partnership for Rivian to build 50,000 autonomous robotaxis by 2031 with over a billion dollars in investment from Uber. Schneider Electric and EcoVadis announced a partnership to target emissions in the health care sector. Lastly, DHL announces 10 warehousing sites to be used for data center manufacturing capacity, and Mind Robotics raises 100 million in series A funding.
Your Biggest Stories in Supply Chain and Logistics here:
Trump Administration Issues Pause on Century-old Maritime Law to Ease Oil Prices
The Trump administration has issued a 60-day waiver of the Jones Act. This century-old regulation typically requires goods moved between US ports to be carried on vessels that are US-built, US-owned, and US-crewed. However, with oil prices surging toward $100 a barrel due to escalating conflict in the Middle East, the suspension aims to ease logistics for vital commodities like oil, natural gas, and fertilizer. While the move is intended to lower costs at the pump and support farmers during the spring planting season, it has sparked a debate between those seeking immediate economic relief and domestic maritime unions concerned about the long-term impact on American shipping and labor.
Uber and Rivian Partner to Deploy up to 50,000 Fully Autonomous Robotaxis
Uber and Rivian have announced a massive strategic partnership that signals a major shift in the future of autonomous logistics and urban mobility. Under the terms of the deal, Uber is set to invest up to $1.25 billion in Rivian through 2031, a move specifically tied to the achievement of key autonomous performance milestones. The primary focus of this collaboration is the deployment of a specialized fleet of fully autonomous R2 robotaxis, with an initial order of 10,000 vehicles and an option to scale up to 50,000 units. From a supply chain perspective, this represents a significant commitment to vertical integration; Rivian is managing the end-to-end production of the vehicle, the compute stack, and the sensor suite, including its in-house RAP1 AI chips, while Uber provides the scaled platform for deployment. Commercial operations are slated to begin in San Francisco and Miami in 2028, eventually expanding to 25 cities globally by 2031.
Schneider Electric and EcoVadis Announce Partnership to Decarbonize Global Healthcare Supply Chains
Schneider Electric, a major player in the digital transformation of energy management and automation, and EcoVadis, a provider of business sustainability ratings, have announced a strategic partnership aimed at accelerating decarbonization within the healthcare industry. “Energize” is a collective initiative to engage pharmaceutical industry suppliers in climate action. The collaboration focuses on addressing Scope 3 emissions, those generated within a company’s value chain, which often represent the largest portion of a healthcare organization’s carbon footprint. By combining Schneider Electric’s expertise in energy procurement and sustainability consulting with EcoVadis’s supplier monitoring and rating platform, the partnership provides a structured pathway for pharmaceutical and medical device companies to transition their global suppliers toward renewable energy.
Mind Robotics, a Rivian spin-off, raises $500 million in Series A Funding
RJ Scaringe, CEO of Rivian, is positioning his new $2 billion spin-off, Mind Robotics, as a technological solution to the chronic shortage of manufacturing labor in the Western world. By developing a “foundation model” that acts as an industrial brain alongside specialized mechatronic bodies, the company aims to move beyond the rigid, fixed-motion plans of traditional robotics toward systems capable of human-like reasoning and adaptation. Scaringe emphasizes that while these machines must perform with human-level dexterity, they don’t necessarily need to be humanoid in form; instead, the focus is on creating a data-driven “flywheel” within Rivian’s own facilities to lower production costs and help domestic manufacturing remain globally competitive.
DHL is significantly scaling its data center logistics (DCL) footprint in North America, announcing the addition of 10 dedicated sites totaling over seven million square feet of warehousing capacity. This expansion is a direct response to the explosive demand for AI-driven infrastructure and the specific needs of hyperscale and colocation data center operators. By offering specialized services like rack pre-configuration, white-glove handling of sensitive IT hardware, and warehouse-to-site transportation, DHL is positioning itself as an end-to-end partner in a sector where 85% of operators express a preference for a single logistics provider. This move not only addresses the logistical complexities of moving high-value components like GPUs and cooling systems across global borders but also underscores the critical role of integrated supply chains in maintaining the build speed of the digital backbone.
Song of the Week:
The post Supply Chain and Logistics News March 16th-19th 2026 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
AI Is Moving Into the Physical Supply Chain: What Leaders Should Watch
Walmart AI Pricing Patents Signal Shift Toward Real-Time Retail Execution
Supply Chain and Logistics News March 16th-19th 2026
Walmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
Trending
-
Non classé1 an agoWalmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
- Non classé5 mois ago
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
- Non classé7 mois ago
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
- Non classé2 mois ago
Container Shipping Overcapacity & Rate Outlook 2026
- Non classé4 mois ago
Ocean rates climb – for now – on GRIs despite demand slump; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 11, 2025 Update
- Non classé1 mois ago
Ocean rates ease as LNY begins; US port call fees again? – February 17, 2026 Update
- Non classé1 an ago
Unlocking Digital Efficiency in Logistics – Data Standards and Integration
-
Non classé6 mois agoNavigating the Energy Demands of AI: How Data Center Growth Is Transforming Utility Planning and Power Infrastructure

You must be logged in to post a comment Login