Connect with us

Non classé

China’s B2C E-Commerce: Surging Volumes and Impact on Air Cargo

blog

Published

on

China’s B2C E-Commerce: Surging Volumes and Impact on Air Cargo

Judah Levine

July 31, 2024

In the past year, there has been a notable surge in B2C e-commerce parcels from China to the US and Europe, predominantly transported by air cargo. E-commerce giants like Temu and Shein have been at the forefront of this increase, driving a surge of interest in fast-fashion supply chains.

With air cargo typically around 12 times more expensive than ocean freight, it’s usually reserved for high-value, high-margin, time-sensitive goods. However, Chinese e-commerce importers leverage air cargo to offer relatively fast delivery of 9-11 days, compared to a more typical 30-40 days for ocean freight (especially given the Red Sea issues), while keeping the value of goods below the $800 de minimis threshold. This customs status allows the goods to enter the US without paying tariffs or duties, possibly making air cargo cost effective even for low-value products.

The De Minimis Threshold and E-Commerce Surge

This approach has led to a surge in de minimis volumes entering the US. According to US Customs and Border Protection (USCBP) data, in 2022, 685 million de minimis parcels entered the country. In 2023, this number climbed to a billion as Temu and Shein intensified their focus on the US market. As of mid-2024, imports of de minimis parcels have already passed 700 million even before the holiday season rush, exceeding all of 2022’s shipments in just half a year. This trend isn’t only a result of Chinese e-commerce sellers. Many US importers are also leveraging the trends, sometimes while tapping digital custom brokerages.

Impact on Air Cargo Volumes

The increase in Chinese e-commerce imports has significantly impacted air cargo volumes and, as a result, prices.

Reports indicate that some 30-40 freight aircraft are exporting Chinese B2C e-commerce goods globally on a daily basis, with e-commerce volumes at major hubs like Hong Kong sometimes accounting for about 80% of daily air cargo exports. The latest IATA data from May shows a 13% year-to-date increase in global air cargo volumes compared to last year. Volumes out of Asia Pacific increased by 18% in May year on year, with Asia to North America volumes up by 12% compared to the previous year.

This growth is particularly impressive given that it has occurred during what is typically a slow season for air cargo. This volume strength underscores the substantial impact of B2C e-commerce on international air cargo.

Air Cargo Rates and Market Dynamics

Of course, high volumes means higher rates. This surge in e-commerce has dramatically influenced air cargo rates that are already somewhat impacted by soaring ocean freight costs.

According to data from Freightos Terminal, rates for China to North America and China to Europe have remained elevated. Even during typically slow seasons, rates have stayed around $5.50-$6/kg to North America and $4/kg to Europe. These rates are higher than pre-pandemic peak season rates, which typically ranged from $4-5/kg. This persistent elevation in rates reflects tight capacity largely driven by the influx of e-commerce goods.

Stay on Top of The Market

With the Freightos Weekly Freight Update

Regulatory Pressures and Compliance Challenges

The growth of Chinese e-commerce imports has not been without several challenges in the US.

The National Security Act 2024, which was signed into law in April and mandates the sale or shutdown of TikTok in the US by January, reflects the US government’s willingness to take action against Chinese businesses it perceives as threats to security or other national interests.

More directly related to e-commerce, the Americas Act, introduced in the Senate in May, proposes lowering the de minimis threshold and banning certain countries, including China, from using it due to concerns about forced labor, contraband goods, and harm to US industries. Although this act has not progressed, it also sends a message about opposition to this trend and the need for stringent regulation of these imports. This joins a broader trend of US protectionism, with both the Biden administration and the Trump campaign pushing for increased tariffs on US imports from China.

Increased Scrutiny

The dramatic increase in de minimis clearances has also opened the door for a potential increase in bad actors using it to bypass authorities. Recent increases in enforcement and screening of de minimis imports has only increased confidence that this is indeed taking place. The USCBP inspected 100% of e-commerce imports at LAX for several days in May, uncovering many mislabeled items as well as contraband like fentanyl. This crackdown resulted in the suspension of several high-profile forwarders and customs brokers from using the de minimis threshold, highlighting the need for better compliance.

Such enforcement actions underscore the challenges associated with the sheer scale of e-commerce imports and the relatively lax reporting requirements for de minimis shipments. But these developments signal to Chinese e-commerce platforms the importance of robust compliance mechanisms to continue leveraging this import strategy.

Impact on Major E-Commerce Players

The combination of increased compliance, enforcement and legislation may be having an impact on e-commerce platforms. Shein has backed away from plans for a US IPO, and reports had Temu planning a shift of focus away from the North American market indicating expectations that its US sales would drop from 60% to 30% of its annual sales, and that the platform would focus more on customer retention than growth through new customers in the US. Temu has denied these reports, though, and states that expansion to other markets will take place alongside continued plans for growth in the US.

Despite these challenges and reports of a resulting pull back, volume and rate data show no slow down of e-commerce volumes from China to the US even since scrutiny intensified in May.

Amazon a Player Too

In light of these ongoing sales, the United States’ largest e-commerce retailer, Amazon, couldn’t stay on the sidelines and is opening a channel for direct B2C sales from Chinese manufacturers and retailers to US customers, using the de minimis exemption.

This move signifies Amazon’s recognition of the growing importance of this trend, despite likely opposition from US-based Amazon sellers concerned about low-cost, customs-exempt competition. Amazon plans to start signing up merchants this summer and begin accepting inventory in the fall, aiming to offer delivery within the 9-11 day timeframe.

Long-Term Outlook

Despite the mentioned challenges for e-commerce platforms, most signs don’t point to an end of international B2C e-commerce from China in the near future.

Some customs and logistics experts expect that these regulatory steps will push e-commerce platforms to implement better due diligence and compliance on labor and manufacturing standards required by the US including screening out contraband and ensuring detailed and accurate shipment data.

Shein is already setting up a legal and compliance center and plans to spend $50 million on global compliance. Temu, while more hands-off, is also expected to invest in better compliance measures to address these regulatory hurdles.

What it all means

The surge in Chinese B2C e-commerce imports to North America, facilitated by air cargo and the de minimis threshold, represents a significant new trend in global trade. Despite regulatory challenges and increased enforcement, the sustained demand for Chinese e-commerce goods and the strategic responses from major players like Shein, Temu, and Amazon suggest that this trend is far from over. Enhanced compliance and robust logistics strategies will be crucial for these platforms to navigate the evolving regulatory landscape and continue capitalizing on the booming e-commerce market and the regulations that facilitate them. in the survey in the coming months. As businesses adapt to the current landscape, monitoring these trends will be crucial for navigating the evolving international freight market.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Dive deeper into freight data that matters

Stay in the know in the now with instant freight data reporting for your ports and lanes.

The post China’s B2C E-Commerce: Surging Volumes and Impact on Air Cargo appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending