Connect with us

Non classé

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Published

on

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Trump’s 2025 tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China reshape global trade, impacting imports, exports, e-commerce, and shipping. Learn what this means for you.

Judah Levine

February 3, 2025

Blog Post

The first shots in 2025’s trade wars have been fired… and it’s a significant volley.

Following through on promises to increase US tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as possible, President Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to apply 25% tariffs on all goods from Canada and Mexico – which accounted for nearly $900B and 28% of total US imports in 2023 – starting February 4th, with the exception of energy imports which will face a 10% tariff.

A 10% tariff will also be applied to all imports from China.

President Trump cited the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs – especially fentanyl – as urgent threats to the nation and as the basis for enacting the IEEPA, which can only be used in response to a national emergency.

Becoming the first president to use the IEEPA to increase tariffs, the act allowed Trump to take immediate action by executive order as opposed to the various acts he used to increase tariffs during his first administration which activate federal agencies to research, review and make recommendations on tariffs first, and can take several months.

Beyond Increased Tariffs

The executive orders for tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China also go beyond just the tariffs:

The orders disallow exemptions to the tariffs – despite intense lobbying by automotive and energy groups.

Aware of potential retaliation (more on that below), the orders also include clauses allowing the president to increase tariffs further if any of these countries apply retaliatory tariffs.

The de minimis exemption, which permits imports under $800 without duties, is also being eliminated for all goods from these three countries, which will be a particular blow to cross-border e-commerce.

The orders also eliminate duty drawbacks, through which importers can request the duties to be returned to them if they ultimately export the finished goods or destroy them.

Finally, the orders state that each of the tariffs will remain in effect until the respective governments have “taken adequate steps to alleviate” these crises through cooperative enforcement actions.

Nor does it appear that the tariffs will end here. The president implied that he will take more trade actions as soon as mid-month targeting computer chips, pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, copper, oil and gas, and that tariffs will also be applied to imports from the European Union, without specifying a level or timeline.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trump’s Sweeping Tariff Impact

The US imported more than $100B of energy products from Canada in 2023, and US Census Bureau data shows that Mexico and Canada combined to supply nearly $900B of US imports in 2023 and about 28% of total US imports through November for 2024. The US relies most heavily on Canada and Mexico for automotive and fresh produce imports, but other key categories include lumber, beer, TVs and PCs.

The US automotive industry, which often moves parts and half-assembled vehicles back and forth cross-border several times during production, faces a particularly difficult challenge from these steep tariff hikes.

Many US e-commerce sellers – as well as some foreign e-commerce platforms – have relied on low duties, free trade with the US as well as the US de minimis exemption and other pass-through incentives to make Canada but especially Mexico a key e-commerce import channel into the US. Mexico significantly scaled back some of these rules in recent months, but closing the de minims exemption to imports from Canada and Mexico will further complicate e-commerce trade flowing through these countries, often originating in China.

Closing de minimis to Chinese goods will have significant implications for the ability of major platforms like Temu and Shein to ship goods from China directly to consumers in the US by air cargo. This exemption – which eliminates duties, entails minimal reporting requirements and reduces filing costs from about $15 – $50 to $0.15 per parcel – has been a key driver of the surge of B2C e-commerce air cargo volumes from China to the US that has kept capacity tight and rates at peak-season levels since about mid-2023.

Not Going Down Without a Fight: Retaliation

Despite the anti-retaliation clauses in the order, Canada announced it will set a 25% tariff on more than $100B of US exports, with the duty applied to 20% of those goods this week and the rest in three weeks. Officials in Mexico and China also plan to retaliate but have not provided specifics.

In addition to the likely negative impact on US exporters from these retaliations, importers will face much higher costs which will likely be passed on to consumers and could drive an increase in inflation. Importers may also shift to alternate foreign trading partners where possible – an extension from the prior “China Plus One” sourcing to “China Plus Mexico/Canada Plus One More.” We could also see some increase in domestic manufacturing – one of President Trump’s key goals through trade barriers – in the rare cases that this is feasible.

But with these tariffs applied only until the White House is satisfied that Mexico, Canada and China are doing enough to combat illegal immigration and drug shipments, US companies will likely hesitate to make any costly changes.

Preparing for Future Tariffs

That the president followed through on these tariff promises – which many hoped were more threats and negotiating chips than concrete policy – only increases the likelihood of his far more significant proposed 60% tariff increase for Chinese imports and 10% – 20% global duty.

As we saw in 2017 – 2019, and as we’ve seen reflected in the higher than normal ocean freight volumes and container rates in Q4 of last year and through the start of 2025, shippers rush to frontload as much inventory as is feasible when tariff hikes are expected. Though this pull-forward has been apparent since at least the election, we may see this trend intensify given recent events.

But there may be far less time to prepare this time around.

Trump’s use of IEEEPA this week – as opposed to during his first administration when the White House announced some significant tariff roll outs several months before implementation – makes these other tariff introductions possible with very short notice, which could cut short the pre-tariff behavior seen with prior hikes.

Depending on how significant frontloading has been so far and how long there is until a big spike in tariffs on China, we could also see a decrease in ocean freight import volumes and container rates from the Far East – or any lane impacted by tariffs – once tariffs go into effect.

The pull forward ahead of the January 2019 tariff hike resulted in a post-tariff slump that snapped a nine year streak of US ocean import volume growth as some of 2018’s total came at the expense of the following year.

The Air Cargo Impact

The biggest short term impact on global freight could be in the air cargo market, where closing the de minimis exemption to Chinese e-commerce imports – which have kept planes full and China – US air cargo rates at more than double typical levels since mid-2023 – could affect air cargo demand and rates across the market.

As noted above, the use of expensive air cargo for low-value e-commerce goods is mainly driven by de minimis exceptions that exempt small imports worth less than $800 from customs filing costs and duties.

Closing de minimis to Chinese imports means that goods arriving by air will be subject to the new and already existing tariffs, incur significant filing requirements and costs, and will take a week or more to clear customs, significantly challenging the speed and savings that have driven the e-commerce air cargo surge.

This change could sharply reduce air cargo volumes from China to the US, which would result in significant downward pressure on transpacific air cargo rates and could also lead to lower rates across the air cargo market as capacity currently absorbed by transpacific e-commerce goods is released back into rotation.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post 2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending