The conversation around AI in supply chain is evolving.
We have moved beyond proofs of concept and isolated copilots. The central question is no longer whether an agent can summarize a planning report or respond to a transportation exception.
The real question is this:
Can AI systems operate across domains, under governance, and at production scale?
That is not a model question. It is an architectural one.
A layered approach built around Agent to Agent communication, A2A, and the Model Context Protocol, MCP, provides a structured way forward. Not as features. As infrastructure.
Coordination vs Capability: The Foundational Separation
At a high level, the pattern is straightforward:
A2A provides the coordination layer
MCP provides the capability layer
This separation is more consequential than it first appears.
Without it, agent systems collapse into distributed monoliths characterized by:
Embedded business logic inside agents
Hardcoded integrations
Tight coupling between workflows
Limited extensibility
With proper separation:
Orchestration remains distinct
Execution logic is encapsulated
Capabilities are modular
The system can evolve without structural rewrites
This is the difference between experimentation and operational architecture.
A2A: The Coordination Layer
A2A allows agents to discover and communicate with one another through standardized interfaces. Each agent publishes an Agent Card describing:
Capabilities
Acceptable request types
Invocation parameters
Other agents can discover and invoke these capabilities without tight coupling.
For supply chain leaders, the implications are concrete:
A Transportation Agent calls a Compliance Agent
A Supplier Risk Agent coordinates with a Financial Exposure Agent
An Order Promising Agent interacts with a Warehouse Capacity Agent
The objective is not simply inter agent messaging. It is controlled interoperability across domains without embedding vendor specific logic inside every workflow.
This is how specialization scales.
MCP: The Capability Layer
If A2A governs how agents talk, MCP governs how they act.
The Model Context Protocol standardizes how tools, structured data, and predefined prompts are exposed to agents. Rather than embedding all operational logic inside the agent itself, MCP allows capabilities to be modular and discoverable.
In a supply chain context, MCP tools might include:
get_atp_snapshot
quote_spot_rate
screen_restricted_party
check_wave_capacity
generate_trade_documents
Adding a new compliance requirement or operational rule does not require rewriting orchestration logic.
It requires deploying a new tool.
This distinction enables:
Extensibility instead of fragility
Controlled evolution of capability
Separation between business intent and operational mechanics
The Layered Architectural Pattern
This model resolves into three defined roles:
Orchestrator Agent
Translates high level business intent into sequenced tasks
Maintains visibility into the overall objective
Specialist Agents
Execute domain specific responsibilities
Encapsulate transportation, compliance, sourcing, fulfillment, or risk logic
MCP Tool Layer
Provides granular, reusable operational capabilities
Exposes APIs, data services, and rule checks in modular form
The separation is deliberate:
Orchestrators own intent and sequencing
Specialists own execution logic
Tools remain modular and reusable
This ensures:
Business intent remains readable
Execution remains encapsulated
Capabilities remain composable
A Practical Scenario
Consider a high value customer order at risk of service failure.
Business objective: Recover service without eroding margin.
The orchestrator agent decomposes the goal into:
Assess constraints and risk
Generate recovery options
Validate feasibility
Execute and monitor
Through A2A, it coordinates:
Order Promising Agent
Transportation Agent
Compliance Agent
Warehouse Agent
Customer Communication Agent
Each specialist invokes MCP tools relevant to its domain, such as:
Allocation rules
Spot rate quotes
Compliance screening
Capacity checks
CRM case creation
Now introduce change:
A new emissions reporting requirement
A new supplier expedite option
In a layered architecture, these changes require:
Registering a new tool
Or introducing a new specialist agent
They do not require redesigning orchestration logic.
That is structural resilience.
Architectural Advantages
A layered A2A and MCP model enables:
Dynamic Discovery
New agents can join the ecosystem
Orchestration logic does not require rewrites
Composable Capabilities
Specialists assemble behavior from modular tools
Logic is not embedded permanently inside agents
Separation of Intent and Execution
Business goals remain governable
Execution details are isolated and replaceable
Adaptability
New requirements are met through composition
Structural reengineering is minimized
For enterprises operating globally, these are prerequisites, not enhancements.
Governance Is Not Optional
As agents discover tools and access systems, governance becomes central.
Enterprise grade deployment requires:
Strong identity and authorization controls
Tool level access management
Full decision logging and auditability
Human approval gates where required
Deterministic fallback behavior
Autonomy without control increases operational and regulatory risk.
Layered architecture enables governance. It does not replace it.
Coexistence with Deterministic Workflow Engines
This model does not eliminate traditional workflow orchestration platforms.
Those systems remain essential for:
Reliability
Scheduling
Observability
SLA enforcement
The layered model complements them:
Workflow engines provide deterministic backbone and operational control
A2A enables flexible coordination across agents
MCP standardizes capability exposure
The result is adaptability without sacrificing operational discipline.
The Bottom Line
Supply chain AI will not be determined by who deploys the most capable standalone model.
It will be determined by who builds systems that:
Coordinate effectively across domains
Incorporate new capabilities without architectural rewrites
Maintain control under regulatory pressure
Avoid recreating monoliths in distributed form
A2A and MCP represent a structured attempt to provide that foundation.
The post Architecting Agentic Operations for Supply Chain – A Practical View of A2A and MCP appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.