Connect with us

Non classé

Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update

Published

on

Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

October 22, 2025

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) increased 18% to $1,687/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 2% to $3,071/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 13% to $1,975/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) increased 1% to $2,147/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air index

China – N. America weekly prices stayed level at $5.34/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices increased 1% to $3.97/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly increased 5% to $1.78/kg.

Analysis

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is set to meet with China’s Vice Premier He Lifeng this week in Malaysia following the sharp increase in trade tensions between the countries and just ahead of the planned Trump-Xi meeting in S. Korea at the end of the month.

The White House expressed optimism that the US and China will deescalate from recent steps which included China increasing export controls on rare earth metals and President Trump threatening 100% tariffs on Chinese exports starting November 1st. Reports this week also indicate that the US and India are nearing a trade deal that would reduce the US’s current 50% tariffs on Indian exports to around 15%.

In other trade war developments, President Trump signed a proclamation that will impose 10%-25% tariffs on heavy trucks and parts starting November 1st. Alongside this tariff expansion though, the new law also increased tariff offsets for automakers. This move follows an order last month which included a long list of tariff exemptions and authorized some federal agencies to issue tariff exemptions independently.

The past week also saw examples of geopolitical drama directly relevant to the ocean freight market. A US threat to sanction – including via port call fees – countries that vote for an IMO net zero framework may have contributed to the vote being postponed until next year.

And though there are no reports of vessels paying USTR port call fees yet – only one China-built vessel is scheduled to arrive at the Port of Los Angeles this week – a US-flagged container ship was charged $1.7m to dock in Shanghai as China’s reciprocal fees also went into effect. Like on the transpacific eastbound, carriers are shifting their deployment of liable vessels to other lanes to avoid the surcharges at China’s ports.

The 145% US tariffs on Chinese goods from early April to mid-May drove a sharp drop in China-US ocean volumes, and a November 1st 100% tariff would likely do the same. But with frontloading to date and November a slow month for ocean freight, there would likely be a smaller volume drop compared to April-May.

Despite reports of lagging demand as the US container market moves further into an early slow season, carrier mid-month GRI introductions, likely helped by tighter capacity reductions, are pushing Asia – N. America rates up. Transpacific prices to the West Coast increased 18% last week from a year to date low of about $1,400/FEU the week before to about $1,700/FEU, with daily rates this week above the $2,000/FEU mark so far. Daily rates to the East Coast of $3,357/FEU are more than $300/FEU higher than a week ago.

Asia – Europe prices climbed 13% last week to about $2,000/FEU on October GRIs as well, with daily rates this week approaching $2,300/FEU. Daily rates to the Mediterranean are also at about $2,300/FEU for a $200/FEU increase compared to the last couple weeks. Price increases on Europe lanes may be partially supported by port congestion made worse by labor disruptions in both Rotterdam and Antwerp last week – though the parties have now settled the Rotterdam dispute and paused Antwerp strikes for at least the next ten days.

These rate increases have pushed prices back to about September levels. But rates climbing during low-demand periods for both Asia-Europe and the transpacific has many observers skeptical that prices will remain elevated, though carriers will attempt November GRIs as well.

Air cargo on the other hand is about to enter the typical East-West peak season period. There are reports that President Trump’s November 1st tariff threat is sparking some frontloading out of China. But Freightos Air Index China-US rates remained level last week at $5.34/kg and are at about $5.40/kg so far this week, possibly reflecting a quick addition of capacity to the lane as more demand materialized.

Continued Asia – Europe volume growth driven by Chinese B2C e-commerce is also being accompanied by capacity growth, keeping China – Europe rates about level with last year, with prices stable at about the $4.00/kg level last week and this. A massive fire at Bangladesh’s Dhaka airport over the weekend destroyed the airport’s cargo center, suspending flights and causing a major setback for the region’s garment trade during its peak season. Flights resumed by Sunday night, with air cargo rates so far unaffected.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

What the ARC Industry Leadership Forum Revealed About the Future of Supply Chain Execution

Published

on

By

What The Arc Industry Leadership Forum Revealed About The Future Of Supply Chain Execution

By the end of this year’s ARC Industry Leadership Forum, a consistent picture had emerged. The discussion shifted away from aspiration and toward execution discipline.

Across the week, conversations converged on a shared understanding of what is constraining progress. It is not a lack of tools. It is not confusion about direction. And it is not an absence of data.

The constraint is execution under real-world variability.

Supply chain environments are changing faster than many operating models can adapt. Raw materials fluctuate. Energy availability is less predictable. Demand patterns shift with little warning. Under these conditions, even well-designed systems struggle if they rely on assumptions that no longer hold consistently.

Autonomy, viewed this way, is less a technology challenge than an organizational one. Systems can recommend and optimize, but value depends on the ability to respond in a coordinated and timely manner.

Another recurring theme was sequencing. Rather than asking how quickly advanced capabilities can be deployed, leaders focused on what must be stabilized first: standardized execution, shared data definitions, and clear ownership between planning and execution.

A quieter but important shift was the move away from external benchmarks toward internal consistency. The goal was not to emulate industry leaders, but to reduce self-inflicted complexity.

The Forum closed without dramatic conclusions, which is appropriate. Progress in supply chain and logistics operations rarely comes from singular breakthroughs. It comes from addressing constraints methodically.

This year’s Forum clarified the work ahead. For many organizations, that clarity may be the most valuable outcome of the week.

The post What the ARC Industry Leadership Forum Revealed About the Future of Supply Chain Execution appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Supply Chain Takeaways from the Final Day of the ARC Industry Leadership Forum

Published

on

By

Supply Chain Takeaways From The Final Day Of The Arc Industry Leadership Forum

As the Forum drew to a close, the most noticeable shift was not in ambition, but in tone.

There was broad recognition that autonomous operations are an incremental outcome rather than a discrete milestone. Most organizations are still working through foundational constraints, including execution variability, uneven data quality, and loosely connected systems.

In closing conversations, leaders emphasized sequencing over speed. Questions focused on what needs to be stabilized first, where automation adds value today, and where human oversight should remain intentional rather than incidental.

One comment heard late in the week captured the sentiment well: “We don’t need fewer people involved. We need fewer surprises.”

That perspective reflects a move away from assumption-driven roadmaps toward operational realism. Leaders were less interested in bold claims and more focused on reducing sources of instability within their own environments.

Leaving the event, there was less confidence in quick transitions and more clarity about where sustained attention is required next.

The post Supply Chain Takeaways from the Final Day of the ARC Industry Leadership Forum appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

ARC Forum Day Two: Why Supply Chain Coordination Matters More Than Optimization

Published

on

By

Arc Forum Day Two: Why Supply Chain Coordination Matters More Than Optimization

By the second day, attention shifted from individual technologies to how decisions interact across the supply chain.

Many organizations have already optimized local functions with reasonable success. Transportation routes are efficient. Inventory targets are analytically justified. Production schedules are well modeled. Despite this, overall performance often remains inconsistent.

In multiple discussions, similar scenarios emerged. Planning decisions that appeared optimal on paper created congestion or rework once execution constraints were applied. Each function performed well within its scope, yet the system struggled as a whole.

Coordination emerged as the central challenge. Integrated planning is not simply a software feature. It depends on shared assumptions, aligned incentives, and consistent data definitions across functions. Without these, optimization remains local and fragile.

One observation surfaced repeatedly: analytics capabilities are widely available, but alignment is not. Organizations often have the information they need, but lack a common operating rhythm to act on it.

Day two reinforced that the next phase of improvement will come from synchronizing decisions across planning and execution, rather than refining algorithms in isolation.

The post ARC Forum Day Two: Why Supply Chain Coordination Matters More Than Optimization appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending