Connect with us

Non classé

The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future

Published

on

The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future

September 10, 2025

Blog

SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS: Nearly 3/4 of small importers report significant cost increases from tariffs, with half reducing shipments entirely. 44% face cost spikes of 20%+ while 52% expect weaker holiday sales, according to a new Freightos/Clearit survey of 390+ North American businesses.

This snapshot reveals just the surface of how deeply the ongoing trade tensions are affecting small and medium-sized businesses. As tariff policies become clearer, the outlook grows increasingly concerning for these companies. Below, we explore the comprehensive findings from our latest survey and what they mean for businesses navigating the uncertain trade landscape in 2025.

Businesses Under Pressure: The Widening Effects of Trade Disruption

A recent Freightos/Clearit survey of 390+ North American importers paints a concerning picture of the trade war’s ongoing impact on businesses. Companies are feeling the squeeze, with significant disruptions to their operations so far this year. And now that tariff policies are becoming clearer, the outlook on costs and sales is increasingly worrying, as most respondents believe the worst may be yet to come.

72% of businesses reported moderate to significant increases in landed costs and nearly 50% have reduced shipping activity due to tariffs already in place; over half expect weaker sales as a result. Importers say the 90-day extension of 30% US tariffs on China will not lead to a significant freight rebound this year for several reasons, including earlier frontloading and the status quo already pricing some shippers out.

The findings suggest broader economic consequences, including:

Diminished international trade relationships

Decreased consumer strength

Potentially existential threats for some businesses, especially SMBs

One importer summed it up as follows: “The tariffs combined with the sinking value of the dollar have created a 30% increase in costs just in a few months. Devastating to our bottom line.”

Note that this survey is the third in a series of surveys conducted across small importers. For previous versions, please see here and here.

Tariff Business Impact: Costs Rising, Shipments Falling

This year has been punctuated by tariff announcements including the “Liberation Day” 10 % universal tariff on April 5, country-specific reciprocal tariffs that were announced on April 2 and later paused twice, first until July 8, then again until August 7, when they finally went live. Many of these announcements were provided with what businesses felt were insufficient warning, leading to uncertainty.

Clarity…and Concern

Now, as recent trade agreements and additional sectoral tariffs are clearer, most (56%) businesses report more concern about negative impacts than they had due to earlier tariff changes.

This worry for the future is particularly striking when taking into account how dramatically their businesses have already been impacted:

Widespread disruption: 84% said frequent tariff changes have been disruptive or very disruptive to business.

Substantial cost increases: 72% reported that tariffs have already increased their costs by at least 5%. A shocking 44% say costs have climbed by 20% or more.

Reduced shipping: This has already led to reduced import volumes from small businesses; 50% of businesses have reduced shipment volumes due to higher costs.

Growing concern: 57% are more concerned about tariffs negatively impacting their business than they were earlier in the year. For comparison, when we asked this question in May, only 31% were more concerned than they were earlier in the year.

Consumer weakness: Concern about the downfunnel impact of weaker demand is growing. Slightly more than half (52%) expected weaker back-to-school and holiday sales than last year, compared to only 35% who had expected lower Memorial Day sales due to tariffs when asked back in May.

International standing: Whether the tariffs are removed or not, there could be long-lasting consequences. Some 60% think the trade war has weakened the standing of US businesses as trading partners.

How am I supposed to stay in business if I have $400 tariffs and fees on a $700 order that the client won’t pay?”

– Small importer reporting 20%+ cost increases

Freight Impact: Scrambling for Strategy

Rapid changes are also sending shippers scrambling for strategies to help mitigate the trade war’s impact, taking action such as accelerating orders, changing production centers, or even cancelling. Beyond the 50% who have reduced shipment volumes due to higher costs, about 15% each have:

Pulled holiday orders forward

Paused or delayed holiday orders

Canceled manufacturing mid-order

Moved some sourcing to US

We paused for a period of time when [tariffs were] initially announced. Now we feel there is some stability with the pauses being extended, but before that the uncertainty was so high that we decided to wait to see what would happen.

– Furniture importer

Adapting to these changes has not been one-size-fits-all – businesses are reaching for anything that works to manage the unpredictability.

90-Day China Tariff Extension: Limited Relief

In May and June, the initial postponement of China tariffs led to a brief spike in shipments, as importers accelerated their shipments to beat the tariffs. This front-loading, however, was quite short-lived, as demonstrated in the chart below:

The recent postponement did not have a similar effect.

While some importers said the recent extension of the 30% US tariff on Chinese imports is allowing them to restart shipments, overall, the extension is not triggering a second peak season wave. Instead, it’s having diverse effects on different businesses:

Many are unaffected due to prior frontloading or because sectoral tariffs are a bigger challenge

Others expected the 30% to remain in place and have continued shipping as usual

Some are already priced out by 30% baseline tariffs

As one importer said: “We had to buy more than usual while we could get product at a lower price. 2025 costs will be higher than usual with a greater risk of deadstock”

Another described uncertainty that prompted them to restructure their entire supply chain: “Most if not all my importing has moved out of China. I’m too worried tariffs could switch from one day to the next even though there is a 90-day extension.”

Analysis and Going Forward

The survey results paint a picture of businesses caught in an economic crossfire, with potential ripple effects that could reshape supply chains and trade relationships for years to come.

Long Term Structural Changes Ahead

“The survey shows that the trade war has already negatively impacted many US importers, and that expectations of new or expanded tariffs and the duties applied under the trade deals of the last few weeks has shippers bracing for possibly more severe challenges to business moving forward,” says Judah Levine, Freightos Head of Research. The data suggests we’re witnessing not just temporary disruption but potentially long-term structural changes to international sourcing and pricing strategies.

Impossible To Forecast or Plan

Adam Lewis, President of Clearit Customs points to the particularly hard hit SMBs have taken: “With still so much uncertainty in the trade environment, this survey makes one thing clear: Unfortunately, small and medium sized businesses are bearing the brunt of the trade war. Unlike larger corporations, they don’t have the same insulation or sophistication to absorb frequent tariff changes, currency swings, and rising costs. The unknowns have been the most damaging, making it nearly impossible to forecast, budget, or protect margins.”

Looking ahead, the trade landscape could continue to stabilize in coming months with more agreements reaching finalization. However, the combination of disrupted supply chains, weakened consumer sentiment, and eroded international relationships creates a challenging environment that will likely require businesses to maintain flexibility in sourcing, pricing, and inventory management for the foreseeable future.

Devorah Wolf

Content Marketing Lead

When freight gets complicated, Devorah Wolf, Freightos’ digital freight aficionado, swoops in to clarify the nitty-gritty of global trade with blogs, guides, videos, and newsletters for every shipper – from beginner to expert. She’s so excited about shipping that most of her clothing is imported. But in freight’s defense, that’s basically true about everyone.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending