Non classé
A Call for Cross-Industry Collaboration for Better Supply Chain Resilience
Published
1 an agoon
By
The tens of thousands of bucket trucks and other equipment were brought by utility personnel from utilities of all sizes, all over the U.S.
The NOAA’s National Weather Service most recent predictions call for above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic basin this year. It is worth noting that the major damage to interstate highways from Hurricane Helene in September 2024 took more than five months to repair. In addition, other infrastructure repairs which impact freight transportation in and around Ashville, North Carolina are still not completed.
Unfortunately, Helene was not an exception but instead illustrates the “new normal” situation, where weather events of increasing frequency and severity are no longer isolated incidents, but are instead a consistent threat to supply chains.
In 2024 alone, the billion-dollar damage mark was exceeded by 27 weather-related disasters in the U.S., tallying a staggering $182 billion in damages. These events impacted everything from facility operations and transportation routes to energy costs and inventory management.
The logistics, supply chain, freight transportation, warehousing, and inventory management sectors often operate on razor-thin margins. This is true for regulated electric utilities too. Leading operators in all these sectors have, of necessity, developed a focus on maximizing the lifespan of assets by optimizing their Operations and Maintenance activities.
A triumph of supply chain, transportation, and logistics planning is to be found in certain disaster response capabilities, including workflows associated with electric utilities’ mutual aid mobilization programs for service restoration after major power outages.
The largest U.S. utility mutual aid assistance in U.S. history was the response to Hurricane Helene in September 2024. More than 50,000 crews from utilities all over the country descended on the Southeastern U.S. to aid the impacted communities and ensure power restoration efforts proceeded as safely and expeditiously as possible.
All major industries and the utilities and logistics companies that serve them stand to gain immensely from adopting better planning approaches with regard to supply chain and infrastructure vulnerabilities. Along with severe weather events and aging assets, market-based uncertainties in recent years now include pandemics as well as tariff-based disruptions.
To respond well to this “new normal,” planners are entering an era of greater cross-industry collaboration which isn’t just beneficial—it’s essential for survival and resilience.
The collaborative spirit of utility mutual aid, where resources are pooled and expertise shared for the collective good, provides a powerful model. Imagine a scenario where a regional disruption impacts a key distribution hub: a pre-established network of logistics providers could seamlessly share available warehouse space, cross-docking facilities, or even available truck capacity, mitigating the impact far more effectively than individual companies acting in isolation. They could collaborate in implementation of core strategies for effective disaster response, including pre-positioning supplies outside impact zones for rapid deployment, maintaining diversified sourcing and distribution networks to minimize localized disruptions, utilizing real-time inventory management and demand sensing for efficient resource allocation, implementing flexible transportation and route planning to navigate damaged infrastructure, and deploying dedicated emergency response teams for swift damage assessment and coordination.
This is being done already, to some extent, but the more it is done in a systematic way in the future, the better. Our goal is to underscore the need for industries to move beyond individual disaster recovery plans and embrace a collective resilience strategy. The utility mutual aid model’s emphasis on pre-planning, standardized procedures, and real-time communication during a crisis could be adapted to create cross-industry disaster response protocols for logistics networks.
Utilities have also standardized field crew work management communications protocols and integration between different enterprise software systems, to ensure safe work practices are maintained when crews from diverse locations descend on an area requiring emergency repairs.
This, by analogy for logistics operators, could involve shared databases of available resources—from heavy lift equipment to temporary storage solutions—and agreed-upon frameworks for expedited permits and transportation during emergencies.
This is a two-way street, since the spirit of cooperation (and of cross-industry learning) cuts both ways. In Hurricane Helene’s aftermath, there were numerous cross-industry demonstrations of greater collaboration. Logistics and transportation companies played a crucial role in the broader relief efforts, moving beyond their typical service offerings. FedEx, for example, supported multiple nonprofits by providing trucks for generators, delivering hygiene kits, and transporting kennels for animals. XPO Inc. donated equipment for loading and transporting supplies, partnering with organizations like Convoy of Care. Other companies such as Atlas Van Lines, Dayton Freight Lines Inc., Averitt, and Norfolk Southern all contributed significantly through donations, supply drives, and direct logistical support to affected communities.
This organic collaboration, while commendable, often happens reactively. The lesson from utility mutual aid is to formalize these connections, to proactively build frameworks for resource sharing, and coordinate action before the next crisis hits. By drawing parallels to the highly efficient and collaborative utility mutual aid system, other industries can proactively build resilience, navigate increasing uncertainties, and foster a more robust and responsive national supply chain.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Peter is Director of Research for Electric Power & Smart Grid, on the Energy Sector team at ARC. He analyzes the latest trends across People, Process, and Technology to uncover business and digital transformation best practices for electric, gas, and water utilities.
Peter has a long history of working closely with utility industry executives and decision-makers across major utility lines of business and functional areas, along with equipment manufacturers, software vendors, and other solution providers and stakeholders, with an eye toward best practices for optimizing the current and future value utilities deliver to industrial, commercial, residential, transportation, and other segments.
Peter is a widely published author in numerous trade press and frequent presenter at utility industry conferences. His expertise spans across generation, transmission, distribution, and smart grid and renewables-related technologies, with a strong focus on ROI- and strategic marketing- driven concerns.
The post A Call for Cross-Industry Collaboration for Better Supply Chain Resilience appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
You may like
Non classé
Introducing the Supply Chain & Logistics Video Library: Expert Insights from ARC Advisory Group
Published
24 heures agoon
6 novembre 2026By
ARC ADVISORY GROUP | EXPERT VIDEO INSIGHTS
Supply chain technology is advancing rapidly. Understanding what matters, what works, and where to invest requires more than keeping up with the latest announcements.
Supply chain and logistics leaders face an increasingly complex technology landscape. Artificial intelligence, warehouse automation, cybersecurity, connected vehicles, digital twins, and new approaches to supply chain planning are changing how organizations manage operations, evaluate investments, and prepare for disruption.
Keeping pace with these developments requires more than product announcements and technology demonstrations. Decision-makers need informed perspectives that explain how emerging capabilities work, where they create operational value, and what organizations should consider before investing.
To support that need, Logistics Viewpoints is highlighting its
Supply Chain & Logistics Video Library: Expert Insights from ARC Advisory Group,
a resource designed to make analyst perspectives and industry discussions more accessible to supply chain professionals.
The objective is straightforward: help supply chain leaders translate rapidly evolving technologies into better-informed business and operational decisions.
Bringing Supply Chain Research to Video
For years, Logistics Viewpoints and ARC Advisory Group have provided research and commentary on transportation management, warehouse operations, supply chain planning, industrial automation, and enterprise technology.
Video adds another way to explore that research. Analyst discussions, technology briefings, and industry interviews can help executives examine important developments without having to begin with lengthy research reports or technical documentation.
The objective is not simply to explain what a technology does. It is to examine the business problems it addresses, the challenges associated with implementation, and the implications for supply chain performance.
Exploring the Technologies Reshaping Supply Chains
The video resources reflect several areas of increasing importance across logistics and supply chain management.
01. Artificial Intelligence and Decision Intelligence
Artificial intelligence is changing how organizations approach forecasting, inventory management, transportation planning, and operational exception management. As AI becomes more deeply integrated into enterprise systems, questions concerning governance, interoperability, data quality, and human oversight are becoming equally important.
02. Warehouse Automation and Connected Operations
Robotics, automated storage and retrieval systems, warehouse software, and increasingly interconnected execution technologies are reshaping distribution operations and fulfillment strategies. Understanding how these technologies integrate with existing systems is critical to evaluating their operational and financial impact.
03. Cybersecurity and Operational Resilience
Cybersecurity and operational resilience have become essential considerations as supply chain networks grow more digitally interconnected. The increasing dependence on cloud platforms, connected equipment, logistics partners, and shared operational data introduces new risks that organizations must understand and manage.
04. Sustainability, Transportation, and Digital Twins
Other important areas include sustainability, energy management, connected transportation, and digital twins. Each presents opportunities to improve operational performance while introducing questions about investment requirements, organizational readiness, and long-term value.
From Technology Awareness to Better Decisions
One of the persistent challenges facing supply chain executives is distinguishing technological possibility from operational practicality.
A promising application of AI may still depend on substantial improvements in data integration. A warehouse automation investment may require changes to facility design, workforce processes, and supporting software. A digital twin may provide sophisticated simulation capabilities but offer limited value without accurate, current operating data.
These considerations are central to ARC Advisory Group’s research approach: understanding technology in the context of the operations it is intended to improve.
For technology buyers, analyst video discussions can provide useful context during early research and supplier evaluation. For operations leaders, they offer perspectives on industry developments that may influence future strategy. Technology suppliers can also benefit from a broader understanding of the challenges and priorities facing their customers.
Extending the Logistics Viewpoints Research Experience
The video library complements the broader Logistics Viewpoints research offering, including technology analysis, market commentary, white papers, interviews, and ARC Advisory Group’s MarketMap research.
Different resources serve different purposes. Written research provides opportunities for detailed examination of technology markets and operational challenges. Video can make complex subjects more approachable, communicate key findings, and introduce questions that warrant further investigation.
Together, these formats help supply chain professionals move from general technology awareness toward more informed strategic and operational decisions.
Explore the Supply Chain & Logistics Video Library
The pace of supply chain technology development shows little sign of slowing. New capabilities continue to emerge, but their practical value depends on how well they address the operational challenges businesses actually face.
The Logistics Viewpoints video library provides another avenue for examining those developments through the perspective of industry analysts and subject-matter experts.
Explore Expert Supply Chain Insights
Discover perspectives from ARC Advisory Group on the technologies, trends, and strategic decisions shaping the future of logistics and supply chain management.
The post Introducing the Supply Chain & Logistics Video Library: Expert Insights from ARC Advisory Group appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Blue Yonder Release 2026.3 Introduces New AI-Driven Supply Chain Capabilities
Published
1 jour agoon
6 novembre 2026By
Blue Yonder has announced Release 2026.3, its latest product update, introducing advancements in supply chain intelligence, AI-driven decision-making, connected planning and execution, and coordination across trading partners.
The release focuses on AI that explains its reasoning and operates within governed guardrails, role-based workspaces, and a more unified supply chain operating model.
Orchestrator and Platform: One Place to See, Ask, Decide, and Act
Blue Yonder Orchestrator becomes a unified operating environment for supply chain work, with interactive briefings that allow users to ask questions of personalized Executive Summaries, updated navigation and mobile experiences, and a hands-free Voice-Only Mode.
Blue Yonder Mission Hub provides a self-service environment for provisioning, configuration, onboarding, migration, and observability, with contract-driven deployment automation. Service extensibility for warehousing allows customer-specific logic to run as platform services rather than customized code.
Cognitive Solutions for Planning: Faster, More Confident Plans
Retail planning enhancements include AI-assisted planogram design in Space Planning, a Forecasting Agent that explains forecasts, an audit trail for forecast overrides, and conversational scenario modeling in Merchandise Financial Planning.
Weekly labor forecasts now extend up to 52 weeks and incorporate weather data. Manufacturing planning adds validated forecasting models, scenario conflict management, dynamic supply constraints in Integrated Business Planning, and disruption simulation within scheduling workflows.
Cognitive Solutions for Orders and Returns: One Platform for Every Order and Return
Cognitive Order Management is now available as a unified platform supporting both B2C and B2B operations.
The solution includes a persona-driven console with more than 100 configurable cards, Fulfillment and Customer Service Agents that recommend and execute governed actions, and native B2B capabilities including Excel bulk uploads, supplier purchase order management, and bulk return merchandise authorization processing.
The platform is offered as a single SKU with modular add-ons. Returns management now operates on the Blue Yonder Platform, with expanded third-party drop-off options and brand-level routing and policy controls.
Cognitive Solutions for Execution: Smarter Operations from Warehouse to Road
Warehouse enhancements include a flexible integration layer connecting robotics and automation from multiple vendors, explainable multi-objective slotting recommendations, and a Warehouse Ops Agent that detects advance shipping notice discrepancies, flags perishables, and forecasts trailer shortages. An Allocation Shorts capability is also available in beta.
Transportation enhancements include a new award decision dashboard providing procurement visibility into spending and carrier concentration. MileMaker is now available alongside PC*MILER, while load-building improvements allow planners to adjust stacking orientations for the same SKU.
The Logistics Emission Calculator is also embedded into transportation and network decisions.
Blue Yonder Network and Services: Coordinated Action Beyond Go-Live
Blue Yonder Network continues evolving from a connectivity layer toward intelligent orchestration, introducing multi-party orchestration, Network Intelligence Agents that recommend and automate next steps, and expanded in-transit risk visibility across transportation lanes.
Blue Yonder is also expanding Surround Services, with AI, machine learning, and data science expertise available to customers to support continuous model optimization.
The release reflects Blue Yonder’s continued investment in connecting supply chain planning, execution, and trading partner collaboration through AI-enabled capabilities.
For additional information, visit the Blue Yonder Release 2026.3 announcement.
The post Blue Yonder Release 2026.3 Introduces New AI-Driven Supply Chain Capabilities appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
AI Is Reshaping the TMS Market. Deployment Will Determine the Winners.
Published
1 jour agoon
6 novembre 2026By
The transportation management systems (TMS) market is entering a period of significant change as artificial intelligence moves beyond analytical assistance toward more automated execution. Suppliers are introducing AI agents, intelligent freight procurement, automated exception management, and capabilities that connect transportation planning with operational decisions. Yet a distinction is emerging between the pace of innovation and the rate at which transportation organizations can deploy these capabilities effectively.
The numbers provide perspective. Descartes’ 2026 Transportation Management Benchmark Survey, based on responses from 300 senior transportation decision-makers in the United States and Canada, found that just 19% of shippers and 15% of logistics service providers (LSPs) reported using AI at scale. At the same time, 82% of shippers expected to increase transportation management IT spending over the next two years. The contrast suggests substantial investment appetite but considerable work still required to convert innovation into operating performance.
For transportation executives, the question is no longer simply whether AI can help with planning, carrier management, freight audit, or exception resolution. It is how these capabilities can be incorporated into existing operations while preserving reliability, controlling costs, and delivering measurable returns. For software suppliers, implementation economics may become as important as technological sophistication.
A Market Pursuing Different Paths to Intelligent Transportation
Recent announcements illustrate that AI-enabled transportation management is not developing around a single architectural model. Established vendors are extending existing applications, while others are consolidating platforms or placing transportation intelligence within broader enterprise and logistics networks.
At its September 2026 Insight conference, Trimble announced agent-ready modernization of its TMW.Suite, TruckMate, Innovative, and Fuel Dispatch carrier TMS platforms. Browser-accessible interfaces and cloud-hosted architectures preserve underlying operational logic while making room for AI-enabled workflows. Trimble Arc Agent addresses activities including order entry, contract intake, and freight RFQ preparation, with final approval retained by transportation personnel.
The significance lies in protecting investments that customers have made over years of configuration, integration, and process development. Replacing a carrier TMS can carry considerable expense and execution risk. Modernization within established workflows offers a potential route to new capabilities without requiring a wholesale operational reset.
FreightWise took a different approach with its October 2026 launch of Kuebix AI. Following its acquisition of Kuebix, the company is bringing its transportation technology onto a single platform and roadmap for small and midsize shippers. The offering combines less-than-truckload, truckload, and parcel execution with carrier connectivity, analytics, and integrations. Its AI-supported capabilities include multistop routing, service-time planning, and freight audit exception resolution. Customer migrations are underway, so the benefits of the consolidated architecture will depend in part on how smoothly those transitions proceed.
Oracle’s October announcement points to another direction: governed agentic applications embedded in enterprise processes. Its Fusion Claw-powered Shipment Load Planning Workspace evaluates consolidation opportunities, equipment capacity, timing, and service constraints to develop load recommendations for planner review and approval. Importantly, the workspace supports supply planning decisions; it does not itself execute transportation or replace Oracle Transportation Management. The strategic proposition is tighter coordination between enterprise planning data and decisions that eventually influence transportation execution.
Blue Yonder’s Logistics Ops Agent emphasizes decision support within transportation operations. It helps identify unroutable shipments, uncover backhaul opportunities, assess disruptions, and explain recommended actions in natural language while leaving transportation professionals in control. The approach combines operational context with more accessible analysis rather than treating an AI agent as a substitute for established optimization and execution processes.
project44’s Intelligent TMS, introduced in 2025, represents a network-centered approach. The platform brings freight procurement, planning, execution, visibility, and freight audit together using the company’s logistics data foundation. It can serve as a standalone TMS or operate alongside an incumbent platform, giving enterprises more than one path to adoption.
These are different market segments and technology layers, not five interchangeable products. Trimble’s carrier systems, FreightWise’s shipper-focused platform, Oracle’s planning workspace, Blue Yonder’s enterprise transportation capabilities, and project44’s integrated offering address overlapping but distinct requirements. Their announcements establish strategic direction and claimed functionality, not a uniform basis for comparing independently verified production results.
The Implementation Gap Is an Enterprise Challenge
The Descartes findings help explain why adoption remains uneven. Data quality was identified as a barrier to scaling AI by 33% of shippers and 45% of LSPs, while integration complexity was cited by 39% and 38%, respectively. These are survey respondents’ reported obstacles, not measurements of any individual supplier’s implementation performance.
Nevertheless, the findings identify a structural constraint. A system recommending carriers, consolidating loads, or revising a transportation plan needs dependable information about rates, capacity, delivery commitments, equipment, and operating restrictions. When those inputs are fragmented or inconsistent, even sophisticated recommendations can produce poor operational decisions.
The stakes also change as AI moves from administrative assistance toward action. Extracting information from transportation documents is a relatively bounded task. Changing a carrier assignment, revising a load plan, or responding to a service exception can introduce contractual, financial, and customer-service consequences. Reliable automation therefore depends on business rules, permissions, approval boundaries, exception handling, and auditability, not simply the intelligence of the underlying model.
Incremental deployment can be economically sensible. Organizations may achieve meaningful value from automating order entry, freight audit, communications, or monitoring before extending decision-making authority across a network. The opportunity for suppliers is to make those transitions easier through simpler integration, transparent recommendations, configurable controls, and support for existing processes.
What Transportation Buyers Should Measure
Transportation executives should broaden their software evaluation criteria without abandoning traditional TMS fundamentals. Functional breadth, optimization, multimodal coverage, carrier connectivity, and integration remain essential. AI adds new questions about implementation effort, decision reliability, oversight requirements, usage costs, and the consequences of automated actions.
A product demonstration can show that a workflow is technically possible. It says less about how the workflow behaves across thousands of transactions, difficult exceptions, and variable operating conditions. Buyers should ask suppliers for production evidence: exception rates, the frequency of human intervention, implementation effort, control mechanisms, and results achieved in comparable environments. They should also distinguish features available today from capabilities still on a product roadmap.
Commercial terms warrant similar scrutiny. AI capabilities may be included in subscriptions, priced by usage, or separately licensed. A pilot that looks inexpensive may have different economics when processing volume grows. The relevant measure is total cost to operate the capability, including integration, monitoring, support, and corrective intervention.
Most importantly, benefits should be assessed through transportation outcomes rather than counts of automated tasks. Shippers might track freight cost per shipment, tender acceptance, planner productivity, on-time delivery, and exception resolution costs. LSPs may focus on operating expense per load, revenue per employee, carrier-management productivity, and customer service performance. Improvements should be measured against a defined baseline and over enough time to capture operational variability.
A platform with sophisticated AI but extensive customization requirements may be less attractive for some organizations than one offering narrower functionality with faster deployment and predictable performance. The appropriate choice depends on network complexity, existing technology, and operating maturity, not the number of AI features on a slide.
Deployment Economics Will Shape the Next Competitive Phase
The TMS market is moving toward more intelligent transportation operations, but the transition will not be uniform. Large enterprises must balance innovation with continuity across complex systems and trading-partner relationships. Smaller shippers and service providers may place more immediate value on speed to implementation, integration simplicity, and demonstrable productivity gains.
Suppliers that align their technology and commercial models with these realities will have an advantage. Preserving useful customer configurations, improving data accessibility, reducing integration effort, and introducing automation within governed boundaries can be as important as adding capabilities. Buyers, meanwhile, should insist that the degree of autonomy matches the reliability of the data, the maturity of the workflow, and the cost of a wrong decision.
The Descartes survey points to a market where AI investment intent is strong but scaled deployment remains limited. That gap is an opportunity, not an indictment of existing technology. It shifts attention from what AI can demonstrate to what transportation organizations can reliably implement and measure. The next generation of TMS leaders will not necessarily be determined by how many AI features they introduce, but by their ability to make intelligent transportation execution practical, dependable, and economically valuable at scale.
The post AI Is Reshaping the TMS Market. Deployment Will Determine the Winners. appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Introducing the Supply Chain & Logistics Video Library: Expert Insights from ARC Advisory Group
Blue Yonder Release 2026.3 Introduces New AI-Driven Supply Chain Capabilities
AI Is Reshaping the TMS Market. Deployment Will Determine the Winners.
Freightos Global Freight Outlook – September 2026
Container rates jump another $1k/FEU – but is demand peaking? – July 8, 2026 Update
Walmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
Trending
- Non classé2 mois ago
Freightos Global Freight Outlook – September 2026
- Non classé4 mois ago
Container rates jump another $1k/FEU – but is demand peaking? – July 8, 2026 Update
-
Non classé2 ans agoWalmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
-
Non classé7 mois agoWhy Sulfuric Acid Is Emerging as a Supply Chain Constraint in Copper
- Non classé5 mois ago
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
- Non classé1 an ago
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
- Non classé1 an ago
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
- Non classé4 mois ago
LCL Shipping Cost Calculator: Calculate Air and Sea Shipping Freight Rates
