Connect with us

Non classé

Terrified of Tariffs? Three Key Strategies to Implement Tariff Optimization and Create Adaptive Supply Chains

Published

on

Terrified Of Tariffs? Three Key Strategies To Implement Tariff Optimization And Create Adaptive Supply Chains

Global trade is riddled with uncertainties. Trade agreements have long existed to try to reduce some of that uncertainty, create a more even playing field, or to create mutually advantageous trade conditions between specific countries. The significant increase in tariffs proposed by the upcoming Trump administration adds to the challenge of businesses working to safeguard profitability. Tariffs hit hard on the bottom line by hiking up costs across supply chains, thereby affecting sourcing, manufacturing, and distribution decisions. However, if organizations adopt proactive tariff optimization strategies and build adaptive supply chains, these challenges can be turned into opportunities. Here’s how.
Understanding Tariff Dynamics
Optimization for tariffs requires that organizations understand how tariffs play into their supply chains and that they model their impact. Having a supply chain digital twin set up makes the process of understanding the impact of tariffs much easier. However, understanding tariffs in detail is only the first step, especially when they are constantly evolving. Below are some of key areas businesses need to familiarize themselves with to understand tariff dynamics:

A) Tariff Points in the Supply Chain

Tariffs can be imposed at any of the following levels: raw material, manufactured or semi-finished goods, or finished products. Knowing the product tariff points is crucial to enable enterprises to identify specific areas where costs are likely to be affected and create effective strategies for dealing with such impacts. The following are the stages of a product in its journey from raw material to the final consumer and where impact can occur:

1. Raw Material Stage:

Impact: Tariffs on raw materials, like metals, minerals, or agricultural products, directly increase input costs to the manufacturers.

Strategy: Diversification of raw materials sources, exploration of alternative materials, or investment in domestic production are some of the ways to limit exposure to the tariff.

2. Intermediate Goods Stage:

Impact: Tariffs on intermediate goods, like components or semi-finished products, will increase the manufacturing cost.

Strategy: Reshoring production, regionalizing supply chains, or finding alternative suppliers are among the strategies available to mitigate the impact of tariffs on intermediate goods.

3. Finished Goods Stage:

Impact: Finished goods tariffs can be so high that it increases the cost of goods sold, therefore impacting pricing and competitiveness in the marketplace.

Strategy: Product redesign, value-added manufacturing, and duty drawback are a few of the numerous potential strategies to implement to lower the tariff burden.

B) Rules of Origin

“Rules of origin” refers to regulations that identify the country of origin of a product and the tariff rates on that product. These are often complicated rules that differ for each commodity, state, or country.

Key considerations for rules of origin regulations:

Substantial transformation:

The product is substantially transformed in a country so it can be said to have originated from that country thereby avoiding a tariff.

Example: Aluminum ingots are imported from China into the U.S. and then fabricated into aluminum car parts. The fabrication process in the U.S. is considered a substantial transformation because the aluminum ingots are converted into an entirely new product with a different name, character, and use.

Regional value content:

A minimum percentage value of the product added within the specific region or economic block.

Example: A pickup truck assembled in Mexico using parts from the U.S. and Canada must meet the USMCA rule requiring 75% regional value content. If the truck’s total value is $30,000, at least $22,500 of the value must come from the USMCA region (U.S., Mexico, and Canada) to receive tariff-free treatment under USMCA.

Change in tariff classification:

There should be sufficient change in the tariff classification of the merchandise for the item to get preferential treatment.

Example: Imported raw cocoa beans (HS code: 1801) from Ghana are processed in the U.S. into chocolate bars (HS code: 1806). The significant processing alters the HS classification from raw cocoa beans to finished chocolate bars, qualifying the chocolate bars as a U.S.-origin product for preferential trade treatment under trade agreements that require a change in tariff classification.Understanding such rules helps companies to streamline their supply chains in order to reduce the tariff costs effectively.

C) Effect of Value Addition

Value addition is enhancing the value of a product by transforming raw materials or semi-finished goods into a more finished or marketable form, thereby increasing its worth. The more value addition, the higher the tariff rate. The implication of this on strategy:

Domestic Value Addition:

Companies can bring about value addition within their home countries in order to reduce the impact of tariffs on the imported components.

Example: A company imports semiconductors but designs and assembles final electronic products in the U.S. By adding domestic innovation and assembly, it minimizes tariff impact and qualifies as a U.S.-origin product under certain rules.

Strategic Sourcing:

This would involve sourcing components from countries that have lower value-added requirements, hence reducing tariff costs.

Example: A U.S. clothing brand sources fabric from Vietnam, which has a trade agreement with the U.S. requiring lower value addition thresholds for tariff reductions.By strategically sourcing from Vietnam instead of China, the company reduces overall tariff liability.

D) Dependent and Independent Variables:

Tariffs as a Double-Edged Sword

Whether tariffs are dependent or independent variables has a significant impact on how they impact companies.

Dependent Variable:

Tariffs are often dependent on trade agreements, geopolitical factors, and economic conditions. For instance, a country can negotiate preferential trade agreements with its trading partners, thus enjoying lower tariffs.

Independent Variable:

Tariffs can also be independently imposed regardless of the state and conditions of the trade agreements. This builds uncertainty for companies and makes consumers nervous about cost increases.

Tariffs could have positive or negative impacts depending on the scenario

Now that we have seen the factors that impact tariffs, the following examples illustrate three real-life scenarios of tariffs (both positive and negative):

Solar Industry:

● Section 201 Tariffs: In 2018, the Trump administration imposed tariffs on imported solar cells and modules under Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. This significantly increased the cost of solar energy projects, slowing the growth of the U.S. solar industry and leading to job losses.

Automotive Industry:

● Section 232 Tariffs: The Trump administration also imposed Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, which are crucial components in automobile manufacturing. These tariffs increased the cost of producing vehicles in the U.S., making them less competitive in the global market.

Residential Appliances Industry:

● Section 201 Tariffs: The Trump administration imposed 20% Section 201 tariffs on imported large residential washing machines.Companies like Whirlpool expanded U.S. operations, creating more jobs and boosting local economies. After initial price increases, competition among domestic manufacturers drove prices down, leading to affordable options for consumers.
Key Strategies to Optimize Tariffs and Build Adaptive Supply Chains
In our opinion, tariffs are a constraint that must be modeled within the end-end supply chain model in addition to all other constraints such as production, logistics, consumer demand, interest rates, taxes, etc. Objectives such as costs, margins, resiliency, and sustainability must simultaneously be optimized to meet these goals.

In real-life it is not possible to optimize all objectives equally and hence the corporate and societal goals drives the priorities. For instance, is the goal to maximize corporate profits while not taking into consideration the goals of the society of improving employment or sustainability vs trying to balance profits with societal goals such as increased employment. In other words, it is important to have a clear idea of the objective and constraints. There are three strategies that companies can adopt in order to optimize around the constraints imposed by tariffs and build adaptive supply chains.

A) Integrated Scenario Planning

Integrated scenario planning lets companies model the effect of potential tariffs on their supply chain. Building adaptive supply chains equips organizations with the ability to react faster and more positively toward these changes. This includes:

Modeling Different Scenarios:

Quantify how tariffs change with regard to variables such as supply chain geography and the level of value addition.

Manufacturing Footprint Optimization:

Evaluate the cost-benefit tradeoffs of moving production to locations closer to key markets as a means of minimizing tariff exposure.

Sustainability improvements are often a byproduct of manufacturing footprint optimization.

Ensure that sustainability is one of the objectives modeled.

Export-Import Offsets:

Identify cases where exports can be used to offset import tariffs while maintaining balanced and strategic trade flows.

Antifragility:

Developing a highly adaptive supply chain – one that can move fast in response to disruptions, such as unexpected tariff increases. An antifragile supply chain improves supplier diversification, reduces capability redundancy, and can deploy advanced technologies quickly.

B) Optimizing Sourcing and Diversification

Being dependent on one country or one supplier greatly increases the risk to business due to tariffs. Diversification can be achieved in several ways:

Regional Sourcing:

Lessen the impact of tariffs by sourcing supplies from countries that have favorable trade pacts with the consuming countries.

Nearshoring and Onshoring:

Improve supply chain resilience and potentially avoid tariffs by moving production closer to home markets.

Optimize Supplier Mix:

Adopt a diverse mix of suppliers, irrespective of whether companies are nearshoring or offshoring, can help ensure that ESG goals are met.

Optimize Product – Production Type Mix:

Minimize the impact of tariffs by identifying opportunities for semi-finished goods import and final assembly versus importing finished goods. CKD (completely knocked down) kits for automotive is an example of countries performing final assembly to avoid tariffs.

C) Cost-to-Serve Models

Adopting the cost-to-serve model enables companies to adopt real-time measures to offset tariff effects. This will include:

Transport Node, Flow, and Mode Optimization:

Cost-to-serve models allow the consideration of different nodes of warehouses, cross-docks, and production facilities. Flows indicate the transportation of materials from one node to another using a transportation method such as air, rail, or truck. Tariffs will be an input factor to decide on the nodes, flow, and modes of the supply chain network.

Cost-Revenue Analysis:

Know how the tariff will impact the profitability of every product at various touchpoints in the supply chain.

Incremental Costing:

Understand how the imposition of the tariff impacts production and distribution costs and make decisions on cost absorption, offsetting, or passing on.

AI-Driven Insights:

Leverage AI and machine learning to get ongoing analyses of the tariff scenarios for next-best responses.

Companies can stay ahead of all the complexities of the global trade landscape and come out more robust by embracing scenario-based decision-making and building adaptive supply chains. Download the white paper, 6 Strategies for Building an Adaptive Supply Chain, to understand how institutionalized scenario-based decision-making helps you handle all types of disruptions with peace of mind.

Nari Viswanathan
Sr. Director, Product Segment Marketing, Coupa

Nari is currently Sr. Director of Product Segment Marketing at Coupa, where he brings products to markets in the areas of Direct Material Procurement and Supply Chain Design and Planning. Over the past 20 years, Nari has held VP and Director of Product Management, Research and Marketing roles at Aberdeen Group, River Logic, Steelwedge and E2open. He has significant experience building products from the ground up and managing the P&L for a product suite. He is a proven B2B marketer with expertise in content marketing, competitive intelligence, and positioning. He has published numerous thought leadership articles, whitepapers, blogs and delivered dozens of webinars during his career. Nari Viswanathan is a six times SDCExec Supply Chain Pro to Know award winner. Nari holds a master’s degree in Manufacturing Systems Engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai.

The post Terrified of Tariffs? Three Key Strategies to Implement Tariff Optimization and Create Adaptive Supply Chains appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Last Chance: Join the Webinar on AI, Component Sourcing, and the Future of Procurement

Published

on

By

Electronic component sourcing is becoming one of the most important cost and risk challenges facing manufacturers.

Pricing remains opaque. Supplier quotes do not always reflect true market pricing. Internal purchase history may show what a company paid, but not whether that price was competitive.

At the same time, chips and components are increasingly tied to geopolitics, tariffs, AI infrastructure, defense demand, electrification, industrial automation, and supply chain resilience.

The webinar is tomorrow at 11 AM ET. Register now to join ARC Advisory Group’s discussion, The Hidden Cost of Component Sourcing — and How AI Is Fixing It, featuring Jim Frazer in conversation with Lytica CEO Martin Sendyk.

This is a practical conversation for procurement, supply chain, engineering, operations, and executive leaders who are trying to understand how component sourcing is changing.

Manufacturers need to control cost, protect supply, support product launches, and manage risk in a market where visibility is often limited. Overpayment can remain hidden. Component risk can appear too late. Engineering and procurement decisions can become locked in before teams have enough market intelligence to make the best sourcing choices.

Tomorrow’s webinar will examine why traditional approaches to component sourcing are under pressure and how manufacturers can use better intelligence to identify hidden cost, improve benchmarking, and manage sourcing risk more effectively.

Attendees will learn:

Why electronic component pricing remains difficult to benchmark

How hidden overpayment can persist inside normal procurement activity

Why supplier quotes, list prices, and internal history are not enough

How real transactional data can improve pricing visibility

Why geopolitics, AI demand, tariffs, electrification, and defense demand are changing the sourcing risk equation

How AI and sourcing intelligence can help procurement teams make better cost and risk decisions

The issue is no longer only whether a company can secure supply.

The issue is whether it can secure the right components, at the right price, with the right risk profile, early enough to influence the business outcome.

For many manufacturers, that requires a more transparent, data-driven, and intelligence-led sourcing model.

Register now for the ARC Advisory Group webinar with Jim Frazer and Lytica CEO Martin Sendyk before the session begins tomorrow at 11 AM ET.

Register for the Webinar

The Hidden Cost of Component Sourcing — and How AI Is Fixing It
Date: June 23, 2026
Time: 11:00 AM ET
Location: Online
Speakers: Jim Frazer, Vice President, ARC Advisory Group, and Martin Sendyk, CEO, Lytica

If your organization manages a significant electronic component spend, this webinar will help you understand how AI and transactional market data can expose hidden sourcing costs and turn procurement into a more proactive system of intelligence.

Register now to reserve your spot.

The post Last Chance: Join the Webinar on AI, Component Sourcing, and the Future of Procurement appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Weekly Supply Chain and Logsitics News Round Up (June 15th-18th 2026)

Published

on

By

Weekly Supply Chain And Logsitics News Round Up (june 15th 18th 2026)

This week in logistics, the industry faces a pivotal shift as Transportation Management Systems evolve into ‘decision intelligence’ hubs, moving beyond basic routing to become the core operating brain of the supply chain. Meanwhile, operational complexity reaches new heights with the massive logistical undertaking of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, even as trade tensions show signs of cooling following the European Parliament’s approval of a landmark EU-US tariff relief deal. From record-breaking automation at Nestlé’s new California hub to the fluctuating volatility of global air freight rates, these developments underscore a sector increasingly defined by high-tech integration and rapid adaptation to global market forces.

The Leading Supply Chain and Logistics Stories of the Week:

TMS Is Becoming Less of a Routing Tool and More of a Decision Intelligence Layer Beyond Execution

The role of the Transportation Management System (TMS) is undergoing a major paradigm shift. While traditional evaluations still focus heavily on execution-level metrics—like route optimization, automated tendering, and freight audit capabilities—these features have essentially become table stakes. Moving forward, the true strategic value of a TMS lies in its evolution from execution software to “transportation decision infrastructure.” Rather than just completing transactions, next-generation platforms serve as the continuous decision-making layer of the supply chain. By drawing data from across the entire network, integrating external market signals, and resolving multi-functional bottlenecks, modern TMS solutions are transitioning into the core operating brain that synchronizes movement, cost, and service levels in real time.

The Logistics Issue: The Supply Chains Behind the World Cup

While most fans focus entirely on the action on the pitch, supply chain professionals are watching what might be the most complex logistical undertaking in sporting history: the 2026 FIFA World Cup. Spanning three host nations—the United States, Canada, and Mexico—the sheer scale of the tournament requires moving more than twenty million pounds of equipment, coordinated across 5,000 vehicles and millions of square feet of warehouse space. The challenge isn’t just massive volume; it’s the absolute lack of tolerance for delay or error across highly regulated international borders. Industry experts point out that success hinges on establishing a unified ecosystem in which freight forwarders, customs officials, and vendors collaborate in real time. Crucial to this effort are standardized product identification and cloud-based labeling networks, which ensure that every critical piece of equipment, food shipment, and medical supply is fully traceable and compliant with differing regional mandates—proving that at this scale, elite collaboration is the only way to avoid catastrophic bottlenecks.

Transatlantic Trade Relief: European Parliament Greenlights EU-US Tariff

In a major relief to transatlantic supply chain operators, the European Parliament has officially voted to implement the long-awaited trade agreement with the United States. Under the newly approved legislation, the EU will eliminate tariffs on all American industrial goods and grant preferential market access to key U.S. agricultural and seafood shipments. In return, the U.S. has agreed to cap import tariffs on European products at 15%—effectively averting threatened 25% tariff hikes on European-built vehicles. Importantly for logistics planners, the deal incorporates a “defensive toolbox” to mitigate long-term trade volatility, including a sunset clause set for late 2029, a safeguard mechanism to protect EU markets from disruptive import surges, and strict conditions that allow the EU to suspend tariff preferences by the end of 2026 if the U.S. fails to lower existing duties on European steel and aluminum derivatives.

Nestlé Opens Its Largest and Most Technologically Advanced Distribution Center in the U.S.

Nestlé USA has officially unveiled its new 700,000-square-foot distribution hub in Arvin, California. Equipped with a $330 million price tag, the state-of-the-art facility represents a critical step in the company’s broader $25 billion U.S. infrastructure upgrade, emphasizing a pivot toward leaner, automation-first supply chain workflows. The Arvin facility houses the largest Automated Storage and Retrieval System (ASRS) in Nestlé’s global network, operating alongside laser-guided vehicles, automated crane systems, and layer-picking robotics. This build marks a major shift from retrofitting existing spaces to intentionally designing high-tech capabilities directly into greenfield logistics layouts from day one. Designed to mitigate peak-season labor bottlenecks, upskill the frontline workforce, and run on 100% renewable electricity as a zero-waste site, the facility showcases how global leaders are leveraging heavy automation to establish flexible, resilient distribution networks that protect margins against ongoing labor and capacity constraints.

Air Freight Spot Rates Spike 41% YoY in May, but Relief Is Expected Soon

Global air cargo spot rates surged by 41% year-over-year in May, averaging $3.40 per kilogram, driven by persistent geopolitical disruptions, carrier fuel surcharges, and localized demand booms like semiconductor and data center equipment shipments. According to Xeneta data, spot rates from Northeast and Southeast Asia to North America jumped nearly 40% compared to earlier this year. However, the pricing pressure isn’t uniform; transatlantic lanes from Europe to North America actually saw a 26% decline over the same period. For procurement teams battling these elevated costs, there is a glimmer of light on the horizon. Long-term contract rates appear to have peaked in April, and as carriers restore capacity and the market enters its traditional summer lull, analysts predict that year-over-year spot rate comparisons will finally begin to cool down, offering much-needed breathing room for shippers who have been relying on short-term contract extensions.

Song of the week:

The post Weekly Supply Chain and Logsitics News Round Up (June 15th-18th 2026) appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Why Octave’s Austin Event Matters: From Asset Lifecycle Software to Intelligence at Scale

Published

on

By

Octave Live OnTour Austin takes place at a consequential point in the evolution of the industrial software market. Asset-intensive organizations are under sustained pressure to improve capital project execution, asset reliability, operational resilience, safety, quality, cybersecurity, and workforce productivity. At the same time, they are being asked to make better use of data and apply AI in ways that are practical, governed, and operationally relevant.

This is the context in which Octave’s Austin event should be evaluated.

Octave, the software spin-off from Hexagon AB, brings together software assets across engineering, construction, geospatial intelligence, asset operations, quality, public safety, physical security, and industrial cybersecurity. Its Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework provides a clear structure for organizing those capabilities around the industrial asset lifecycle.

However, the strategic significance of the event is not limited to Octave’s portfolio structure. The more important issue is what Octave’s positioning indicates about the broader direction of industrial software.

The market is shifting from digitized workflows toward intelligence at scale.

Industrial Software Is Moving Beyond Functional Digitization

For much of the past two decades, industrial software investment has centered on functional digitization. Engineering teams adopted design, modeling, analysis, and engineering information management tools. Construction teams deployed project controls and field execution systems. Operations teams invested in EAM, APM, optimization, and reliability applications. Quality, safety, physical security, and cybersecurity functions developed their own specialized technology environments.

These investments created meaningful value within individual domains. But they also reinforced a long-standing structural problem: industrial work is highly interconnected, while the supporting software environment often remains fragmented.

A design change can alter construction cost and schedule. Construction execution quality can affect commissioning performance. Poor handoff from construction to operations can increase maintenance burden. Maintenance backlog can elevate safety and compliance risk. A cybersecurity incident can become an operational disruption. A public safety event may require geospatial, security, asset, and operational context at the same time.

This is the gap that lifecycle intelligence seeks to address.

Lifecycle Intelligence Requires Context Across the Asset Lifecycle

Octave’s Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework is meaningful because it reflects how industrial assets are planned, built, used, maintained, protected, and improved over time.

In the Design domain, Octave can address engineering, modeling, analysis, information management, and geospatial intelligence. In Build, the portfolio extends into construction, supply chain management, and project performance. In Operate, the focus expands to operations optimization, asset performance, enterprise asset management, quality, compliance, and risk. In Protect, Octave’s positioning includes public safety, physical security, and industrial cybersecurity.

Individually, these are established industrial software categories. Collectively, they suggest a broader strategic direction: the use of software to preserve, connect, and operationalize context across the asset lifecycle.

That is where the Austin event becomes important. Customers and partners should look for evidence that Octave is moving beyond portfolio aggregation toward a more integrated model of lifecycle intelligence.

Intelligence at Scale Depends on Integration, Data, and Workflow Relevance

The phrase “intelligence at scale” should be interpreted operationally, not rhetorically. In industrial environments, intelligence at scale means that software can connect relevant data, apply domain context, and support better decisions across complex workflows.

This requires more than analytics dashboards. It requires software that can help users understand the implications of decisions across functions. It also requires a data foundation that connects engineering data, project execution status, asset histories, maintenance records, geospatial information, quality events, safety incidents, and cybersecurity signals.

AI increases the importance of this foundation. AI capabilities will have limited enterprise value if they are disconnected from operational systems and industrial context. The more material opportunity is AI that is embedded in real workflows and supported by trusted domain data.

For Octave, the strategic question is whether its portfolio can support AI-enabled decision-making across the asset lifecycle, rather than isolated AI features within individual applications.

The Event Should Be Assessed as a Roadmap Signal

Buyers should treat Octave Live OnTour Austin as a roadmap signal.

The first area to assess is integration. Octave’s portfolio breadth creates potential value, but customers will need clarity on how the company intends to connect products and workflows over time. Important indicators include shared data models, workflow orchestration, user experience consistency, API strategy, and cross-domain analytics.

The second area is AI. Customers should listen for specific use cases, not general AI messaging. Relevant examples could include project risk identification, asset performance optimization, maintenance prioritization, quality exception management, safety response, cyber risk monitoring, or engineering decision support. The key issue is whether AI is being tied to operational outcomes.

The third area is ecosystem fit. Industrial organizations rarely standardize on a single vendor across the full technology landscape. Octave will need to clarify how its offerings interact with ERP, EAM, APM, MES, PLM, project controls, cybersecurity, and analytics environments. The value proposition must be additive without increasing architectural complexity.

The fourth area is sequencing. Broad portfolios require disciplined execution. A credible roadmap should identify where Octave will focus first, what integration steps matter most, and how customers should think about value realization over time.

Broader Market Implications

Octave’s Austin event matters because it reflects a larger shift in industrial software.

The next stage of the market will not be defined solely by applications that digitize individual workflows. It will be defined by platforms and architectures that connect operational context across functions. This does not mean every customer will consolidate around a single software suite. Industrial technology environments will remain heterogeneous. But the strategic requirement for connected data, workflow continuity, and decision support will continue to intensify.

AI will accelerate this trend. Effective AI depends on relevant context. If industrial data remains trapped in disconnected systems, AI will be limited to narrow productivity assistance. If data and workflows are connected, AI can support higher-value decisions involving risk, reliability, performance, safety, and resilience.

That is why lifecycle intelligence is becoming an important industrial software concept. It reflects the need to move from systems that record activity to systems that help organizations understand and act on operational complexity.

ARC Advisory Group Perspective

Octave has a credible opportunity to participate in this market transition. The company has meaningful software assets across multiple industrial domains, and its Design, Build, Operate, and Protect framework provides a practical way to organize the portfolio.

The central question is execution. Octave will need to demonstrate that its portfolio can become more than a set of adjacent capabilities. Customers will expect integration clarity, practical AI use cases, ecosystem openness, and a roadmap that connects near-term value to a longer-term lifecycle intelligence strategy.

For buyers, the Austin event should be used to evaluate roadmap direction and strategic fit. For partners, it should clarify Octave’s intended role in the industrial software ecosystem. For the broader market, it is another indication that industrial software is moving toward connected intelligence at scale.

The companies that define this next phase will not simply digitize industrial work. They will connect context across the asset lifecycle and convert that context into better decisions.

The post Why Octave’s Austin Event Matters: From Asset Lifecycle Software to Intelligence at Scale appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending