Connect with us

Non classé

Lenovo Excels in Supply Chain Planning with a Hybrid Approach

Published

on

Lenovo Excels In Supply Chain Planning With A Hybrid Approach

Jack Fiedler, the vice president for digital transformation of the global supply chain at Lenovo

Lenovo is ranked tenth by one leading analyst firm among a list of global companies with exceptional supply chains. Based on an interview with Jack Fiedler, the vice president for digital transformation of the global supply chain at Lenovo, the word “exceptional” certainly applies. I’ve not seen a company that does a better job of agile planning across an end-to-end, multi-tier supply chain.

Lenovo is a multinational company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The company, which achieved $ 57 billion in revenues in its last fiscal year, is the leading global supplier of PCs. The high-tech firm is more than a manufacturer of PCs, tablets, smartphones, and servers. In their last quarter, the division selling personal devices accounted for only a bit more than half of global revenues.

The company has more than 2000 suppliers and operates over 30 manufacturing sites. Factories serve local markets. During COVID, this more agile and resilient model allowed the firm to grow their market share.

The following interview was edited for conciseness.

Steve Banker: Maybe you could start by talking a little bit about the Lenovo supply chain and what makes it distinctive.

Jack Fiedler: We’re unique in the technology industry. We run one of the few truly hybrid supply chain networks. We own a significant portion of our network, but we also work extensively with partners. A lot of our competition has largely outsourced their supply chain.

We decided 8 or 9 years ago that to create a competitive advantage, we really needed to control much of our supply chain. That has worked out well for us.

We’ve taken the same hybrid approach from a supply chain technology perspective. We have a lot of in-house solutions that we’ve built for our digital transformation, which is my area of expertise. I’m responsible for the overall digital transformation, including technology. But then we also partner with Blue Yonder and others.

We put a huge amount of focus on digitalization, as many companies have. But I think we’ve taken it to a more extreme level.

We invest a huge amount of time and resources into our people and making sure that we have the best digital talent in the industry and that we’re doing the most innovative things in the supply chain.

Banker: You mentioned an approach to digitalization that’s both in-house as well as being reliant on external software partners. Could you talk more about that?

Fiedler: I’ll start with Blue Yonder, because Blue Yonder truly is the foundational building block for our supply chain intelligence.

We’ve been using Blue Yonder for many years. We have evolved Blue Yonder from being a traditional demand and supply planning solution. We’ve done a lot of customization, with Blue Yonder’s help, to create a digital twin of our entire supply network. We’ve moved from weekly supply collaboration with suppliers to daily.

We have all our factories, both in-house and outsourced, all of our distribution centers, and our transportation network on the Blue Yonder foundational system. We now have complete visibility of our supply chain. And then we’ve layered our own AI on top of that, which allows us to simulate the entire supply chain.

We can run a plan simulation to maximize revenue, maximize shipments, maximize the customer experience, or minimize transportation costs. We’ve now built this AI capability to simulate the entire supply chain. This was a huge effort, but it has been very valuable.

We have continued to build on that foundation. Just last year we finished integrating the sales process into the end-to-end supply chain process. A seller, from the moment they engage with a customer, and all the way through the sales process, can get whatever information they need to communicate with a buyer on what we have available, and what the lead times are, and other similar information. This starts with the initial discussion about what kind of products are available and how the product will be configured. Then a simulation is run and we get an estimated date for delivery. Once a contract is in place, we have real-time visibility on the delivery status. This includes visibility to emerging supply chain constraints. During COVID constraints were popping up all over the place. An iGPU (integrated graphic processing unit) is a current example. Everybody wants to know what the lead time on iGPUs are, and what the alternatives are if they are not available.

We’ve used the Blue Yonder technology, and that digital twin of the network, and the simulations we run, to give the sales team full visibility as to what is available and when it can be delivered. The sales team can go have those conversations, with real-time lead times and even the factory the product will ship from, with customers.

This has been a real game changer for sales. It’s really reduced a lot of sales friction. It used to be that a customer would ask questions, then sales would have to go to the supply chain organization, and we’d have to get that information, and back and forth it would go.

We’ve connected the supply chain end-to-end and made it intelligent. That is what everybody’s trying to do, but we’ve done it from the beginning of a sales opportunity all the way to the delivery of a shipment.

That was made possible because of this investment we made with Blue Yonder and our investment in building our simulation capabilities in the digital twin.

The second thing we’ve done, and this is our most valuable asset, is that 7 years ago we made a big investment in our own intelligence platform we call supply chain intelligence. It started out as a traditional control tower. But then it very quickly evolved into a full intelligence platform.

We have benchmarked our SCI (Supply Chain Intelligence) solution; we looked at all the solutions in the industry. We don’t believe anybody has anything as comprehensive as what we built in-house. We run the entire supply chain from this intelligence platform.

We have full visibility. We have all the connected planning data we get from blue Yonder, all of the product data we get from the product systems, all of the shipment information that’s coming in from the carriers, as well as risk information from Everstream and other sources.

We have complete visibility of the performance of the entire supply chain in one tool. But it’s not just a visibility platform. It provides risk alerts, decision-making, and automation. As an example, if we have congested lanes, the system will automatically flag that we have a potential risk of delay based.

The platform will look at all the potential alternatives and the cost of those alternatives, and it will make a recommendation for a supply chain person to go in and look at the event. That planner can choose to reroute a shipment so that it doesn’t get delayed.

To build this took seven years and a significant investment . This was meant to be an internal tool for Lenovo. But we’ve now got customers that are starting to lease this technology from us.

We are continuing to invest in the solution. We are working to make the platform more autonomous. For example, we’re working on telling the solution that it has a budget. “You have a budget of $5,000,000 and here are some other parameters. Show us the best way to fix the freight delays!”

The AI looks at the potential alternatives and the trade-offs and then spits out an answer. That frees up the logistics team to go work on even more difficult problems.

When the chief supply chain officer wants to review the performance of the supply chain, we start with the KPI dashboards. Then, the tool drills down and looks at real-time performance on late orders or parts. It might highlight logistics jams, manufacturing capacity, quality issues, or procurement cost trends. Really, everything you need to manage the supply chain. This is so much more than a control tower.

Banker: Can you speak in a bit more detail about what you are doing around artificial intelligence?

Fiedler: We have built a number of AI use cases over the last four years that we’ve embedded into the tool. The first wave of those was made possible because of the foundational digital twin capability work that we did with Blue Yonder.

Advanced demand forecasting based on machine learning, for example, is a classic example of the use of AI in supply chain management. But we have taken machine learning further than this.

During COVID there were so many part shortages. We struggled to figure out what we could build and, then, beyond this, what should be built based on optimizing for either cash or revenue or customer satisfaction or other things as well.

Banker: Was this based on a series of Bill of Materials explosions?

Fiedler: Yes, that is exactly what it does. It takes the demand that we have, it takes the orders that we have, it takes the BOMs on those orders and then compares it against the digital twin of the supply chain and says, “What do we have right now? What can we make? And based on our objectives, what should we make?”

And this is not just a solve done at the plant level. A lot of companies can do that. This is a network solution based on the centralized supply visibility and management. It can involve moving parts from plant A to plant B, for example.

We are also using AI to help with customer allocation issues. When critical components are in short supply, it can end up being whichever customer screams the loudest that gets prioritized. That’s not a sustainable way to manage supply issues.

We used AI to create smart allocation. Basically, this allows us to say, “OK, if we want to reprioritize our order stack, what are the impacts if we move customer C from slot 8 up to slot 2? How will that impact other customers? How will it impact our supply chain?

It took a very chaotic area and helped create order. We can now have really good data-driven conversations. The sales team can now make better trade-off decisions involving their customers.

We also recently created a machine learning capability that helps us better predict when suppliers will make deliveries to us. During COVID, all of our suppliers got very conservative because all their suppliers got very conservative. The accuracy of the delivery dates we were getting went way down. Basically, we use AI to go say, “Who’s hedging?”

There was unpredictability during COVID from key suppliers on shipment dates due to the dynamics everyone was trying to navigate. Using AI, we were able to predict when the delivery would occur. This allowed us to plan our manufacturing capacity more effectively.

Banker: You know, if you were to talk to Blue Yonder, they would say they’re investing in the same sort of things that you’ve invested in. So why do it yourself?

Fiedler: A couple of reasons.

Lenovo is a large global business and with that comes some complexity for supply chain software solutions companies. We have many products, many different bill of material structures, and many different business models. We operate in many countries. Supporting the complexity of the business in somebody else’s tool is difficult.

And while supply chain solution vendors are building some of these capabilities, they can’t match all the things that we could do ourselves, or the speed at which we can do them.

We do use their technology and where it makes sense, where they’ve invested in it, we will leverage their capabilities. We practice a hybrid model – we use what the supply chain vendors are really good at, and then we add to it.

Lenovo has a huge research team. Thousands of AI data scientists work for us. Some of these data scientists are among the best in the world. We’ve got the ability to build this stuff very quickly with our own skills.

I’ll give you an example. If we want to change the machine learning algorithm three times a day, based on new information we’re getting from the sales team or suppliers, we can go do that. When you’re working with a partner, and using their technology, that’s much, much more difficult to do.

And so, I think just the bottom line is that the size and scale of our company allows us to make choices surrounding AI other companies can’t make. To be as responsive, as agile, and as innovative as we want to be requires us to use a hybrid model.

Banker: Jack, thank you so much. This is fascinating! I could talk to you for hours.

Fiedler: Thank you.

The post Lenovo Excels in Supply Chain Planning with a Hybrid Approach appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower

Published

on

By

The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower

Ocean freight forwarding is an $80+ billion market bogged down by the manual processes related to booking management, documentation services, and the coordination labor that holds it all together.

When working with a freight forwarder, you’re buying three things bundled together:

Carrier relationships — access to capacity, negotiated rates, allocation commitments.
Operational data — knowing which carrier fits a given lane, what documents a particular trade corridor requires, how to handle an exception when a booking gets rejected.
Coordination labor — the booking itself, the documents per container (industry estimates range from 9 to 18 depending on the corridor), the re-keying of data across disconnected systems, the email chains chasing confirmations and clearances.

Shippers have always paid for the bundle because you couldn’t get one piece without the others, but that’s changing.

Where the bundle comes apart

Travel agents used to bundle airline relationships, destination expertise, and the labor of putting trips together into a single fee. Aggregator platforms unbundled the pieces, and the booking layer went first because that’s where the volume was. Ocean freight forwarding is in the same position. More than digitizing booking, though, AI is automating it.

The bulk of the volume and labor cost for freight forwarders is tied up in rate comparisons across dozens of carriers, document preparation and routing by trade lane and commodity classification, booking execution against pre-negotiated contracts, and exception triage on rejected bookings.

But this is all high-volume, rule-governed, multi-system coordination where speed and consistency matter more than creativity. Exactly the type of work that AI agents are well-equipped to handle.

Platforms can now ingest a rate agreement, parse surcharges and FAK provisions into a digital rate profile, compare carriers on cost, transit time, and schedule reliability, and execute a booking based on pre-defined parameters, without a human in the loop.

Automating the entire order lifecycle

Every dollar of margin exposure in ocean freight traces back to a decision made without complete information. That means that every action must be rooted in live network data across shipment flows, carrier performance, and insight from inventory and order systems. A platform with that intelligence can automate and accelerate the full workflow from detecting a supply shortfall, selecting a carrier, booking the container, managing the documents, tracking the shipment, and handling exceptions.

A shipper stitching together a rate tool from one vendor, a booking portal from another, a document system from a third, and a visibility feed from a fourth gets digitization. They get a slightly faster version of the same manual process. The full picture still lives in a person’s head, and the handoffs between systems still require human coordination.

While freight forwarders and other intermediaries are also investing in AI, they’re primarily automating their own coordination labor before someone else absorbs it. But they can’t replicate the data advantage of a platform that sits across the entire supply chain.

A forwarder automating its booking desk draws on its own transaction history. A point solution built specifically for ocean booking draws on booking data. A platform processing millions of supply chain events daily across orders, inventory, carrier performance, and live shipment status, has a different signal base entirely. Carrier selection informed by real-time schedule reliability, live network disruption, and your actual inventory positions is structurally more accurate than carrier selection informed by historical rate tables.

The shrinking intermediary layer

The moats around freight forwarders’ profit margins are eroding, and the lines between legacy endpoint solutions are blurring. High-complexity corridors and specialized commodities still need human expertise, but the bread-and-butter containerized freight that makes up the bulk of forwarder revenue is the volume where automated workflows shine.

Meanwhile, software providers will have a hard time selling dashboards and chatbots to specific teams compared to AI-native platforms offering a single operating system across all supply chain operations, and serving downstream stakeholders.

The question for forwarders is how long they can keep patching automation onto a fragmented architecture with a booking tool here, a document system there, people bridging the handoffs in between. And how much revenue sits in structured, repeatable work that a connected platform absorbs?

For shippers, the choice is whether to invest in a platform that automates the order-to-delivery and exception lifecycle, or keep paying others to hold the pieces together. The second option is a decision to fund the intermediary layer sitting between them and their own data.

The post The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026

Published

on

By

Supply Chain And Logistics News Week Of May 7th 2026

The logistics and supply chain landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation as industries move from rigid, low-cost models toward strategies defined by agility and resilience. This week’s roundup explores how major players are navigating this shift, from Amazon’s bold move to offer its massive infrastructure as a standalone service to Ford’s strategic manufacturing reset in the EV sector. We also dive into the critical human element in modern cost engineering, the logistical reimagining of energy corridors due to geopolitical risks, and the new AI-driven tools closing the gap between inventory detection and real-time execution. Together, these developments highlight a common theme: the pursuit of flexibility and data-driven intelligence in an increasingly unpredictable global market.

Top Supply Chain Stories from this Week:

Modern Cost Engineering Evolution: Rewiring the Human Element for Supply Chain Resilience

In the latest shift for cost engineering, the focus is moving beyond purely digital tools to address the critical human element required for true supply chain resilience. As industrial organizations transition from traditional backward-looking estimates to modern “should-cost” methods powered by AI and digital twins, the real challenge lies in workforce transformation. Success in this new landscape requires a significant cultural shift, moving away from isolated departmental silos toward cross-functional collaboration. By reskilling traditional estimators to act as strategic consultants—capable of interpreting material science and operational constraints—companies can evolve from simple price negotiation to collaborative manufacturing improvements that ensure mutual profitability and long-term stability.

Hormuz Risk Is Redrawing the Supply Chain Geography of Energy

Geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz is forcing a fundamental shift in energy logistics, moving the industry away from lowest-cost network design toward a risk-adjusted model. With the waterway handling roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas, repeated disruptions have transformed infrastructure like pipelines, storage terminals, and deep-water ports outside the Persian Gulf into high-value strategic assets. Nations and corporations are no longer viewing these as simple logistics nodes, but as essential escape routes that provide the optionality and recovery time needed to withstand chokepoint failures. This selective redesign of the global energy map signals a new era where geography and physical redundancy are the primary drivers of supply chain resilience.

Ford’s Manufacturing Reset Shows How Automakers Are Rebuilding the EV Supply Chain

Ford’s manufacturing pivot represents a fundamental shift from aggressive electric vehicle expansion toward capital discipline and supply chain flexibility. By taking a $19.5 billion write-down and restructuring battery joint ventures, the company is moving away from rigid, single-purpose production lines in favor of multi-energy platforms that can adapt to fluctuating demand for hybrids and EVs. A key component of this reset is the repurposing of battery manufacturing assets in Kentucky and Michigan for stationary energy storage and data center support. This strategy transforms these facilities into flexible energy infrastructure rather than just automotive supply nodes. Ultimately, Ford is signaling that the next phase of the market will be defined by the ability to manage uncertainty through cross-functional asset utilization and a focus on manufacturing-driven affordability.

How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes

FourKites has launched a unified solution that bridges the gap between stockout detection and freight execution, reducing resolution time from hours to less than five minutes. By integrating its Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI, the platform eliminates the traditional “manual scavenger hunt” where planners had to jump between ERPs and carrier portals to resolve inventory gaps. The system uses decision intelligence to identify stockout risks up to six weeks in advance and provides ranked recommendations for corrective transfers based on cost, speed, and carrier performance. This closed-loop workflow allows planners to execute optimized shipping options with a single click, addressing the massive financial impact of inventory distortion and reducing the need for expensive, unplanned expedited shipping.

Amazon Launches “Supply Chain Services” Leveraging its Global Logistics Network

Amazon has officially launched Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS), a move that decouples its massive logistics infrastructure from its retail marketplace to serve as a standalone utility for all businesses. Similar to the trajectory of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the platform opens up Amazon’s multimodal freight, automated warehousing, and last-mile parcel delivery networks to companies regardless of whether they sell on Amazon. Major early adopters like Procter & Gamble, 3M, and Lands’ End are already leveraging the service to move everything from raw materials to finished products. By consolidating fragmented logistics contracts into a single automated interface, Amazon aims to use its scale—currently moving 13 billion items annually—to provide businesses with end-to-end visibility and 96.4% on-time delivery rates, signaling a significant new challenge to traditional 3PLs and carriers like FedEx and UPS.

Song of the week:

The post Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes

Published

on

By

How Fourkites Connects Stockout Detection To Freight Execution In Minutes

FourKites is bridging the gap between identifying a problem and solving it. With the integration of Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI. Traditionally, supply chain planners have been stuck in a manual scavenger hunt whenever a stockout alert surfaced, jumping between ERPs to find surplus stock and carrier portals to secure freight. This fragmented process typically took hours, often forcing companies to rely on expensive, last-minute expedited shipping or facing steep On-Time In-Full (OTIF) penalties to avoid customer dissatisfaction. By unifying these disparate data streams, the new solution allows teams to detect risks two to six weeks in advance and execute corrective transfers from a single, seamless workflow.

The impact on operational efficiency is significant, reducing the resolution time from detection to execution from several hours to less than five minutes. Instead of just receiving a warning, planners are presented with recommendations powered by Decision Intelligence that include the fastest, cheapest, and most optimal shipping options based on real-time carrier performance data. This closed-loop system directly addresses the 1.73 trillion dollar global issue of inventory distortion and aims to eliminate the 15-25 hours planners previously spent on manual coordination.

By keeping a human in the loop to select the best recommendation with a single click, FourKites ensures that exceptions are resolved without ever leaving the platform. This integration helps protect freight budgets, where unplanned expedited shipping often consumes up to 48% of total spend. This launch represents a shift from reactive firefighting to proactive execution, allowing teams to move away from costly safety stock and focus on high-value responsibilities. Supply chain planner responsibilities are changing with the continued developments of AI and the de-siloing of disparate systems.

FourKites is a supply chain technology provider that operates a global real-time visibility network tracking over 3.2 million shipments daily across 200 countries and territories. By integrating data from 1.1 million carriers across all modes (road, rail, ocean, and air), the platform uses AI-powered “digital workers” to automate exception resolution and provide predictive insights. More than 1,600 global brands, including leaders in the CPG and Food & Beverage sectors, trust FourKites to transform their logistics from reactive tracking into proactive, intelligent orchestration.

Read the full ARC brief breaking down the new FourKites solution here: https://www.fourkites.com/research/arc-advisory-stockout-detection-freight-execution/

The post How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending