Connect with us

Non classé

Lenovo Excels in Supply Chain Planning with a Hybrid Approach

Published

on

Lenovo Excels In Supply Chain Planning With A Hybrid Approach

Jack Fiedler, the vice president for digital transformation of the global supply chain at Lenovo

Lenovo is ranked tenth by one leading analyst firm among a list of global companies with exceptional supply chains. Based on an interview with Jack Fiedler, the vice president for digital transformation of the global supply chain at Lenovo, the word “exceptional” certainly applies. I’ve not seen a company that does a better job of agile planning across an end-to-end, multi-tier supply chain.

Lenovo is a multinational company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. The company, which achieved $ 57 billion in revenues in its last fiscal year, is the leading global supplier of PCs. The high-tech firm is more than a manufacturer of PCs, tablets, smartphones, and servers. In their last quarter, the division selling personal devices accounted for only a bit more than half of global revenues.

The company has more than 2000 suppliers and operates over 30 manufacturing sites. Factories serve local markets. During COVID, this more agile and resilient model allowed the firm to grow their market share.

The following interview was edited for conciseness.

Steve Banker: Maybe you could start by talking a little bit about the Lenovo supply chain and what makes it distinctive.

Jack Fiedler: We’re unique in the technology industry. We run one of the few truly hybrid supply chain networks. We own a significant portion of our network, but we also work extensively with partners. A lot of our competition has largely outsourced their supply chain.

We decided 8 or 9 years ago that to create a competitive advantage, we really needed to control much of our supply chain. That has worked out well for us.

We’ve taken the same hybrid approach from a supply chain technology perspective. We have a lot of in-house solutions that we’ve built for our digital transformation, which is my area of expertise. I’m responsible for the overall digital transformation, including technology. But then we also partner with Blue Yonder and others.

We put a huge amount of focus on digitalization, as many companies have. But I think we’ve taken it to a more extreme level.

We invest a huge amount of time and resources into our people and making sure that we have the best digital talent in the industry and that we’re doing the most innovative things in the supply chain.

Banker: You mentioned an approach to digitalization that’s both in-house as well as being reliant on external software partners. Could you talk more about that?

Fiedler: I’ll start with Blue Yonder, because Blue Yonder truly is the foundational building block for our supply chain intelligence.

We’ve been using Blue Yonder for many years. We have evolved Blue Yonder from being a traditional demand and supply planning solution. We’ve done a lot of customization, with Blue Yonder’s help, to create a digital twin of our entire supply network. We’ve moved from weekly supply collaboration with suppliers to daily.

We have all our factories, both in-house and outsourced, all of our distribution centers, and our transportation network on the Blue Yonder foundational system. We now have complete visibility of our supply chain. And then we’ve layered our own AI on top of that, which allows us to simulate the entire supply chain.

We can run a plan simulation to maximize revenue, maximize shipments, maximize the customer experience, or minimize transportation costs. We’ve now built this AI capability to simulate the entire supply chain. This was a huge effort, but it has been very valuable.

We have continued to build on that foundation. Just last year we finished integrating the sales process into the end-to-end supply chain process. A seller, from the moment they engage with a customer, and all the way through the sales process, can get whatever information they need to communicate with a buyer on what we have available, and what the lead times are, and other similar information. This starts with the initial discussion about what kind of products are available and how the product will be configured. Then a simulation is run and we get an estimated date for delivery. Once a contract is in place, we have real-time visibility on the delivery status. This includes visibility to emerging supply chain constraints. During COVID constraints were popping up all over the place. An iGPU (integrated graphic processing unit) is a current example. Everybody wants to know what the lead time on iGPUs are, and what the alternatives are if they are not available.

We’ve used the Blue Yonder technology, and that digital twin of the network, and the simulations we run, to give the sales team full visibility as to what is available and when it can be delivered. The sales team can go have those conversations, with real-time lead times and even the factory the product will ship from, with customers.

This has been a real game changer for sales. It’s really reduced a lot of sales friction. It used to be that a customer would ask questions, then sales would have to go to the supply chain organization, and we’d have to get that information, and back and forth it would go.

We’ve connected the supply chain end-to-end and made it intelligent. That is what everybody’s trying to do, but we’ve done it from the beginning of a sales opportunity all the way to the delivery of a shipment.

That was made possible because of this investment we made with Blue Yonder and our investment in building our simulation capabilities in the digital twin.

The second thing we’ve done, and this is our most valuable asset, is that 7 years ago we made a big investment in our own intelligence platform we call supply chain intelligence. It started out as a traditional control tower. But then it very quickly evolved into a full intelligence platform.

We have benchmarked our SCI (Supply Chain Intelligence) solution; we looked at all the solutions in the industry. We don’t believe anybody has anything as comprehensive as what we built in-house. We run the entire supply chain from this intelligence platform.

We have full visibility. We have all the connected planning data we get from blue Yonder, all of the product data we get from the product systems, all of the shipment information that’s coming in from the carriers, as well as risk information from Everstream and other sources.

We have complete visibility of the performance of the entire supply chain in one tool. But it’s not just a visibility platform. It provides risk alerts, decision-making, and automation. As an example, if we have congested lanes, the system will automatically flag that we have a potential risk of delay based.

The platform will look at all the potential alternatives and the cost of those alternatives, and it will make a recommendation for a supply chain person to go in and look at the event. That planner can choose to reroute a shipment so that it doesn’t get delayed.

To build this took seven years and a significant investment . This was meant to be an internal tool for Lenovo. But we’ve now got customers that are starting to lease this technology from us.

We are continuing to invest in the solution. We are working to make the platform more autonomous. For example, we’re working on telling the solution that it has a budget. “You have a budget of $5,000,000 and here are some other parameters. Show us the best way to fix the freight delays!”

The AI looks at the potential alternatives and the trade-offs and then spits out an answer. That frees up the logistics team to go work on even more difficult problems.

When the chief supply chain officer wants to review the performance of the supply chain, we start with the KPI dashboards. Then, the tool drills down and looks at real-time performance on late orders or parts. It might highlight logistics jams, manufacturing capacity, quality issues, or procurement cost trends. Really, everything you need to manage the supply chain. This is so much more than a control tower.

Banker: Can you speak in a bit more detail about what you are doing around artificial intelligence?

Fiedler: We have built a number of AI use cases over the last four years that we’ve embedded into the tool. The first wave of those was made possible because of the foundational digital twin capability work that we did with Blue Yonder.

Advanced demand forecasting based on machine learning, for example, is a classic example of the use of AI in supply chain management. But we have taken machine learning further than this.

During COVID there were so many part shortages. We struggled to figure out what we could build and, then, beyond this, what should be built based on optimizing for either cash or revenue or customer satisfaction or other things as well.

Banker: Was this based on a series of Bill of Materials explosions?

Fiedler: Yes, that is exactly what it does. It takes the demand that we have, it takes the orders that we have, it takes the BOMs on those orders and then compares it against the digital twin of the supply chain and says, “What do we have right now? What can we make? And based on our objectives, what should we make?”

And this is not just a solve done at the plant level. A lot of companies can do that. This is a network solution based on the centralized supply visibility and management. It can involve moving parts from plant A to plant B, for example.

We are also using AI to help with customer allocation issues. When critical components are in short supply, it can end up being whichever customer screams the loudest that gets prioritized. That’s not a sustainable way to manage supply issues.

We used AI to create smart allocation. Basically, this allows us to say, “OK, if we want to reprioritize our order stack, what are the impacts if we move customer C from slot 8 up to slot 2? How will that impact other customers? How will it impact our supply chain?

It took a very chaotic area and helped create order. We can now have really good data-driven conversations. The sales team can now make better trade-off decisions involving their customers.

We also recently created a machine learning capability that helps us better predict when suppliers will make deliveries to us. During COVID, all of our suppliers got very conservative because all their suppliers got very conservative. The accuracy of the delivery dates we were getting went way down. Basically, we use AI to go say, “Who’s hedging?”

There was unpredictability during COVID from key suppliers on shipment dates due to the dynamics everyone was trying to navigate. Using AI, we were able to predict when the delivery would occur. This allowed us to plan our manufacturing capacity more effectively.

Banker: You know, if you were to talk to Blue Yonder, they would say they’re investing in the same sort of things that you’ve invested in. So why do it yourself?

Fiedler: A couple of reasons.

Lenovo is a large global business and with that comes some complexity for supply chain software solutions companies. We have many products, many different bill of material structures, and many different business models. We operate in many countries. Supporting the complexity of the business in somebody else’s tool is difficult.

And while supply chain solution vendors are building some of these capabilities, they can’t match all the things that we could do ourselves, or the speed at which we can do them.

We do use their technology and where it makes sense, where they’ve invested in it, we will leverage their capabilities. We practice a hybrid model – we use what the supply chain vendors are really good at, and then we add to it.

Lenovo has a huge research team. Thousands of AI data scientists work for us. Some of these data scientists are among the best in the world. We’ve got the ability to build this stuff very quickly with our own skills.

I’ll give you an example. If we want to change the machine learning algorithm three times a day, based on new information we’re getting from the sales team or suppliers, we can go do that. When you’re working with a partner, and using their technology, that’s much, much more difficult to do.

And so, I think just the bottom line is that the size and scale of our company allows us to make choices surrounding AI other companies can’t make. To be as responsive, as agile, and as innovative as we want to be requires us to use a hybrid model.

Banker: Jack, thank you so much. This is fascinating! I could talk to you for hours.

Fiedler: Thank you.

The post Lenovo Excels in Supply Chain Planning with a Hybrid Approach appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending