Connect with us

Non classé

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Published

on

2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping

Trump’s 2025 tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China reshape global trade, impacting imports, exports, e-commerce, and shipping. Learn what this means for you.

Judah Levine

February 3, 2025

Blog Post

The first shots in 2025’s trade wars have been fired… and it’s a significant volley.

Following through on promises to increase US tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as possible, President Trump used the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to apply 25% tariffs on all goods from Canada and Mexico – which accounted for nearly $900B and 28% of total US imports in 2023 – starting February 4th, with the exception of energy imports which will face a 10% tariff.

A 10% tariff will also be applied to all imports from China.

President Trump cited the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs – especially fentanyl – as urgent threats to the nation and as the basis for enacting the IEEPA, which can only be used in response to a national emergency.

Becoming the first president to use the IEEPA to increase tariffs, the act allowed Trump to take immediate action by executive order as opposed to the various acts he used to increase tariffs during his first administration which activate federal agencies to research, review and make recommendations on tariffs first, and can take several months.

Beyond Increased Tariffs

The executive orders for tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China also go beyond just the tariffs:

The orders disallow exemptions to the tariffs – despite intense lobbying by automotive and energy groups.

Aware of potential retaliation (more on that below), the orders also include clauses allowing the president to increase tariffs further if any of these countries apply retaliatory tariffs.

The de minimis exemption, which permits imports under $800 without duties, is also being eliminated for all goods from these three countries, which will be a particular blow to cross-border e-commerce.

The orders also eliminate duty drawbacks, through which importers can request the duties to be returned to them if they ultimately export the finished goods or destroy them.

Finally, the orders state that each of the tariffs will remain in effect until the respective governments have “taken adequate steps to alleviate” these crises through cooperative enforcement actions.

Nor does it appear that the tariffs will end here. The president implied that he will take more trade actions as soon as mid-month targeting computer chips, pharmaceuticals, steel, aluminum, copper, oil and gas, and that tariffs will also be applied to imports from the European Union, without specifying a level or timeline.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trump’s Sweeping Tariff Impact

The US imported more than $100B of energy products from Canada in 2023, and US Census Bureau data shows that Mexico and Canada combined to supply nearly $900B of US imports in 2023 and about 28% of total US imports through November for 2024. The US relies most heavily on Canada and Mexico for automotive and fresh produce imports, but other key categories include lumber, beer, TVs and PCs.

The US automotive industry, which often moves parts and half-assembled vehicles back and forth cross-border several times during production, faces a particularly difficult challenge from these steep tariff hikes.

Many US e-commerce sellers – as well as some foreign e-commerce platforms – have relied on low duties, free trade with the US as well as the US de minimis exemption and other pass-through incentives to make Canada but especially Mexico a key e-commerce import channel into the US. Mexico significantly scaled back some of these rules in recent months, but closing the de minims exemption to imports from Canada and Mexico will further complicate e-commerce trade flowing through these countries, often originating in China.

Closing de minimis to Chinese goods will have significant implications for the ability of major platforms like Temu and Shein to ship goods from China directly to consumers in the US by air cargo. This exemption – which eliminates duties, entails minimal reporting requirements and reduces filing costs from about $15 – $50 to $0.15 per parcel – has been a key driver of the surge of B2C e-commerce air cargo volumes from China to the US that has kept capacity tight and rates at peak-season levels since about mid-2023.

Not Going Down Without a Fight: Retaliation

Despite the anti-retaliation clauses in the order, Canada announced it will set a 25% tariff on more than $100B of US exports, with the duty applied to 20% of those goods this week and the rest in three weeks. Officials in Mexico and China also plan to retaliate but have not provided specifics.

In addition to the likely negative impact on US exporters from these retaliations, importers will face much higher costs which will likely be passed on to consumers and could drive an increase in inflation. Importers may also shift to alternate foreign trading partners where possible – an extension from the prior “China Plus One” sourcing to “China Plus Mexico/Canada Plus One More.” We could also see some increase in domestic manufacturing – one of President Trump’s key goals through trade barriers – in the rare cases that this is feasible.

But with these tariffs applied only until the White House is satisfied that Mexico, Canada and China are doing enough to combat illegal immigration and drug shipments, US companies will likely hesitate to make any costly changes.

Preparing for Future Tariffs

That the president followed through on these tariff promises – which many hoped were more threats and negotiating chips than concrete policy – only increases the likelihood of his far more significant proposed 60% tariff increase for Chinese imports and 10% – 20% global duty.

As we saw in 2017 – 2019, and as we’ve seen reflected in the higher than normal ocean freight volumes and container rates in Q4 of last year and through the start of 2025, shippers rush to frontload as much inventory as is feasible when tariff hikes are expected. Though this pull-forward has been apparent since at least the election, we may see this trend intensify given recent events.

But there may be far less time to prepare this time around.

Trump’s use of IEEEPA this week – as opposed to during his first administration when the White House announced some significant tariff roll outs several months before implementation – makes these other tariff introductions possible with very short notice, which could cut short the pre-tariff behavior seen with prior hikes.

Depending on how significant frontloading has been so far and how long there is until a big spike in tariffs on China, we could also see a decrease in ocean freight import volumes and container rates from the Far East – or any lane impacted by tariffs – once tariffs go into effect.

The pull forward ahead of the January 2019 tariff hike resulted in a post-tariff slump that snapped a nine year streak of US ocean import volume growth as some of 2018’s total came at the expense of the following year.

The Air Cargo Impact

The biggest short term impact on global freight could be in the air cargo market, where closing the de minimis exemption to Chinese e-commerce imports – which have kept planes full and China – US air cargo rates at more than double typical levels since mid-2023 – could affect air cargo demand and rates across the market.

As noted above, the use of expensive air cargo for low-value e-commerce goods is mainly driven by de minimis exceptions that exempt small imports worth less than $800 from customs filing costs and duties.

Closing de minimis to Chinese imports means that goods arriving by air will be subject to the new and already existing tariffs, incur significant filing requirements and costs, and will take a week or more to clear customs, significantly challenging the speed and savings that have driven the e-commerce air cargo surge.

This change could sharply reduce air cargo volumes from China to the US, which would result in significant downward pressure on transpacific air cargo rates and could also lead to lower rates across the air cargo market as capacity currently absorbed by transpacific e-commerce goods is released back into rotation.

Freightos will continue to provide ongoing updates as the situation develops

Join 50k+ subscribers who get our free freight weekly update every week

« * » indicates required fields

Consent*

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post 2025 Trump Trade Tariffs: How Trump’s New Policy Affects Global Commerce & Shipping appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

BMW’s Job Cuts Reveal the Real Battle Over Europe’s Automotive Supply Chain

Published

on

By

BMW has spent the past several years looking like the most composed member of Germany’s increasingly unsettled automotive industry.

Volkswagen has been trying to shrink a cost structure built for a larger European market. Porsche has struggled with falling demand in China. Mercedes-Benz has been cutting costs and reconsidering the breadth of its vehicle portfolio.

BMW appeared to have given itself more room to maneuver.

It continued investing in electric vehicles without committing its entire future to a single propulsion technology. Its factories retained the flexibility to build combustion, plug-in hybrid, and electric models. Its premium positioning also offered some protection from the price competition consuming the lower end of the market.

That strategy has not failed. But it has not insulated BMW from the forces now reshaping the European automotive industry.

BMW said in late July that it would eliminate several thousand positions in Germany by the end of 2027 through a voluntary severance program. The cuts are aimed at administrative and development functions, not production workers. Reuters, citing a person familiar with the plan, reported that BMW’s global workforce could eventually decline by roughly 8,000 positions. BMW has not publicly confirmed that figure.

The distinction matters.

This is not simply another automaker cutting factory employment because demand weakened. BMW is taking a harder look at how the company is managed, how decisions move through the organization, and how much overhead is required to develop and sell a vehicle.

At nearly the same time, France, Germany, and the European Commission are moving toward a more deliberate effort to keep automotive production and component value inside Europe.

The two developments belong together.

BMW is trying to become leaner and faster. Europe is preparing to make automotive sourcing more regional, more traceable, and more closely tied to public policy.

The first effort may simplify BMW. The second could make its supply chain considerably more complicated.

BMW’s Margins Leave Little Room for Delay

BMW’s second-quarter results explain why management is prepared to revisit structures that once appeared permanent.

Group profit before tax fell 35.1% from the previous year to €1.697 billion. Revenue declined 7.9% to €31.259 billion. Within the automotive segment, earnings before interest and taxes fell 60.7% to €629 million. The automotive operating margin dropped from 5.4% to 2.3%.

BMW attributed the pressure to lower volumes, intense competition in China, currency movements, higher depreciation, commodity costs, and additional U.S. tariffs. Tariffs alone reduced the automotive margin by approximately 1.25 percentage points during the second quarter and first half.

The company has already been cutting spending. Selling and administrative expenses in the automotive business fell 8.3% during the quarter. But those reductions were not enough to offset the deterioration in the market.

China remains the most immediate problem.

BMW Group deliveries in China fell 30.2% during the second quarter, from 168,959 vehicles to 117,927. Deliveries were down 20.4% for the first half. Global second-quarter deliveries declined 4.9%, despite growth in Europe and the United States.

China once provided German premium automakers with a powerful source of volume, profit, and confidence. Those earnings helped finance large engineering organizations, broad vehicle portfolios, and the enormous cost of developing the next generation of vehicles.

That economic engine is becoming less dependable.

Chinese automakers are no longer simply lower-cost competitors. They are developing new vehicles quickly, integrating software effectively, and competing most aggressively in the electric-vehicle segments where much of the industry’s investment is now concentrated.

BMW has reduced its expected 2026 automotive margin from 4%–6% to 1%–3%. It now expects deliveries to decline slightly and group profit before tax to fall significantly from the previous year.

Those numbers turn the discussion from incremental improvement to structural change.

The Next Restructuring Will Reach the Office

BMW’s decision to focus voluntary departures on administration and development says a great deal about where management believes the company has become too heavy.

Automotive complexity accumulated over decades. New regions, brands, technologies, regulations, and vehicle programs created new processes. Those processes created committees, specialists, interfaces, and layers of management.

That structure was easier to support when margins were higher and China was growing. It becomes much harder to justify when an automaker must simultaneously fund combustion engines, plug-in hybrids, battery-electric vehicles, software platforms, batteries, and autonomous-driving systems.

BMW’s new CEO, Milan Nedeljkovic, has said the company will revisit processes and structures that were previously considered untouchable. The review will extend across sales, procurement, production, and development. BMW also plans to reduce some model variants where demand no longer justifies the complexity.

That may matter more than the final number of job cuts.

A company can remove thousands of positions and still leave the underlying work untouched. The remaining employees simply inherit the same reports, approvals, meetings, and handoffs.

BMW’s real challenge is to remove work from the system.

That may mean fewer model combinations, fewer approval layers, tighter engineering priorities, and a more direct connection between product decisions and supplier execution.

Artificial intelligence will have a role in document-heavy areas such as procurement, engineering support, finance, and compliance. But the technology is not the central story.

The real test is whether BMW uses it to eliminate steps and shorten decision cycles, or merely asks a smaller workforce to operate the same complicated organization.

Germany’s Supplier Base Faces the Harder Transition

BMW’s restructuring will attract attention because of the company’s size. The more severe adjustment may occur among suppliers.

The German Association of the Automotive Industry estimates that the country lost roughly 100,000 automotive jobs between 2019 and 2025. It projects that another 125,000 could disappear by 2035 under current conditions.

Suppliers are caught between two technology systems.

They must continue supporting combustion vehicles that still generate substantial volume and cash flow. At the same time, they must invest in electric drivetrains, battery systems, power electronics, sensors, software, and thermal management.

The old business is expected to decline. The new business often lacks the scale or margins to replace it.

Automakers also continue pushing suppliers for cost reductions while those suppliers face higher European energy, labor, financing, and regulatory costs.

This is why European suppliers are pressing for a meaningful definition of “Made in Europe.”

Their concern is not simply where final assembly occurs. A vehicle can be assembled in Europe while much of its battery, electronics, materials, software, and component value comes from elsewhere.

Europe retains the assembly jobs but gradually loses the industrial capabilities that determine where engineering expertise, intellectual property, and future investment reside.

“Made in Europe” Becomes a Supply-Chain Rule

The European Commission’s proposed Industrial Accelerator Act is an attempt to reverse that drift.

Introduced in March, the proposal would increase demand for European-made, low-carbon industrial products and strengthen capacity in strategic sectors. For the automotive industry, it would connect selected public support and procurement programs to European assembly, regional content, and critical-component requirements.

The proposal has not yet completed the EU legislative process.

According to the framework described by the European automotive supplier association CLEPA, a qualifying vehicle would need to be assembled in the EU and meet a 70% regional-content threshold. A separate 50% threshold for designated critical components would take effect three years after the final regulation is published.

The political logic is straightforward. Europe does not want public money intended to support European industry flowing primarily into imported batteries, electronics, and other technologies.

The supply-chain implications are much less simple.

A 70% threshold turns the nationality of a vehicle into a data problem.

Automakers will need to know not only where final assembly occurred, but where the value inside the vehicle originated. That may require tracing battery cells, power electronics, semiconductors, magnets, software, castings, and raw-material processing across multiple supplier tiers.

Most automakers have strong visibility into tier-one suppliers. Visibility further upstream is far less consistent.

A battery pack may be assembled in Europe using cells produced elsewhere, materials processed in another country, and electronic controls from a third. A semiconductor may be designed in Europe, fabricated in Asia, and packaged in another region.

Regional-content rules will turn those relationships into eligibility decisions.

Procurement teams will have to consider whether a sourcing choice moves a vehicle above or below the threshold and whether that affects access to public incentives or government purchasing programs.

The least expensive component may no longer produce the lowest total cost.

Europe Can Buy Time, Not Competitiveness

There is a legitimate case for protecting critical European industrial capabilities.

China has used coordinated investment, financing, infrastructure, procurement, and industrial policy to build strong positions in batteries, electric vehicles, critical-material processing, and solar technology. The United States has also become more willing to connect public incentives to domestic production.

Europe is responding to a world in which its competitors are already managing industrial outcomes.

But regional-content rules cannot solve BMW’s core operating problems.

They cannot shorten vehicle-development programs, improve software, eliminate unnecessary approvals, restore Chinese demand, or guarantee that a European supplier is globally competitive.

Industrial policy may create time, demand, and investment incentives. BMW still has to use that time well.

That is the tension at the center of the story.

Europe is trying to preserve the automotive supply chain from the outside. BMW is trying to rebuild its competitiveness from the inside.

Both efforts may be necessary. Neither is sufficient on its own.

The future of Europe’s automotive industry will not be determined simply by how many vehicles are assembled in Munich, Stuttgart, Wolfsburg, or elsewhere in the EU.

The more important question is how much of the vehicle’s value is created there.

Europe could retain assembly plants while losing batteries, electronics, software, semiconductors, materials processing, and engineering. Cars would still leave European factories, but a smaller share of the economic and technological value would remain in Europe.

BMW’s cuts are therefore more than another automotive cost program. They are evidence that the next restructuring will extend through management, development, procurement, supplier networks, and the rules used to determine where a vehicle truly comes from.

Europe is preparing to defend its automotive industrial base.

BMW is preparing for the possibility that defense will only buy time.

The post BMW’s Job Cuts Reveal the Real Battle Over Europe’s Automotive Supply Chain appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Master Tendering Season: Combining Rates, Complex Data & Forecasts for Smarter Procurement

Published

on

By

Don’t React to the Market—Lead It.

Procurement season is here, and navigating seasonal shifts requires more than isolated bidding tools or standalone market data. To make confident decisions, you need your rates, market intelligence, complex data, and internal systems working as one connected engine.

In this concise, 20-minute live product tour, you’ll discover how bringing rate management, forecasting, and seamless TMS/ERP integration together gives you full control over every procurement event.

What You’ll Learn in 20 Minutes:

Run Smarter Procurement Events
Combine active rate management with forward-looking market trends to know precisely when to lock in long-term contracts, leverage spot-bidding, or trigger BAF update procedures.
Forecast with Confidence Across Modes
Translate seasonal shifts, rate predictions, and market trends across Ocean and Air into clear, actionable decision points before you enter negotiations.
Streamline Complex Data & API Integrations
Stop fighting fragmented data sets. See how easily complex freight data syncs across your existing TMS and ERP solutions via flexible, connected APIs.

Plus, Judah Levine, Head of Research at Freightos will share what the latest market signals mean for your lanes right now.

Have questions? Bring them to the session for a live Q&A.
If you´re busy that day, save your spot anyway, we’ll send you the full recording after.

Your Expert Hosts

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Oliver Esch

VP Commercial, Enterprise Shippers

Oliver brings 15+ years of experience helping Fortune 500 companies optimize their freight strategies. He’s guided enterprise shippers through multiple market cycles and will share battle-tested insights from the frontlines of ocean procurement.

The post Master Tendering Season: Combining Rates, Complex Data & Forecasts for Smarter Procurement appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Freightos Global Freight Outlook – August 2026

Published

on

By

You’re invited to join us for our upcoming July Freightos Global Freight Outlook market update webinar, on August 13th at 10:00am ET.

We’ll take a data-driven look at the latest in the international ocean and air freight markets, focusing on ocean implications from the latest in the Strait of Hormuz, indications for an early end to peak season on some lanes but signs of a rally for the transpacific, and the latest in tariffs and the trade war.

Speakers

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Connect

The post Freightos Global Freight Outlook – August 2026 appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Trending