Non classé

Transform Your Ocean Freight Quoting Process

Published

2 mois ago

31 août 2026

Join us for an exclusive product tour of Freightos for Forwarders Ocean, a solution that brings the speed and efficiency of digital quoting to ocean freight.

It lets you compare routes by transit time and price, view all carrier surcharges upfront, and build accurate quotes in minutes—all within the same ecosystem you might already use for air freight.

What We’ll Cover in 30 Minutes:

Live Demo of Rate & Quote Ocean: See how the platform lets you search contracts and dynamic spot rates in one click, view carrier surcharges upfront, and build accurate LCL/FCL quotes in seconds.
Q&A: Get your operational and workflow questions answered directly by our product team in a live Q&A session

The post Transform Your Ocean Freight Quoting Process appeared first on Freightos.

Non classé

Scope 3 Is Not Primarily a Reporting Problem. It Is a Supply Chain Data Problem

Published

12 heures ago

18 octobre 2026

Executive thesis. Scope 3 is fundamentally a supply-chain data architecture problem. Credibility depends on boundaries, activity data, factor governance, allocation, lineage, and explicit uncertainty—not on a more polished reporting layer.

The hardest part is evidence

Scope 3 reporting is often described as a carbon-accounting challenge, but much of the difficulty is more fundamental: obtaining reliable activity data across suppliers, carriers, products, facilities, and other parts of the value chain. When primary data is incomplete, organizations rely on estimates, factors, and allocation methods that introduce uncertainty. The quality of the result therefore depends on the quality and lineage of the underlying supply chain data.

Boundaries shape the answer

Before calculation begins, the organization needs clear boundaries for which activities, entities, shipments, products, and periods are included. Inconsistent boundaries can create apparent changes that are methodological rather than operational. Governance should make those choices explicit and preserve them so results can be reproduced and compared over time.

Activity data is more valuable than spend proxies

Spend-based estimates can provide coverage when better information is unavailable, but operational activity data generally creates more effective insight. Shipment distance, mode, weight, equipment, fuel, energy, supplier activity, and other physical measures can connect emissions more directly to the processes the enterprise can change. That is what turns Scope 3 from a reporting exercise into a management tool.

Uncertainty should be visible

A precise number can create false confidence if the source data is weak. Mature programs expose data quality, estimation methods, factor versions, allocation logic, and uncertainty. That allows leaders to distinguish categories where measurement is already decision-grade from areas where improving primary-data coverage should be the immediate priority.

Measurement should point to a lever

The objective is not only to improve the inventory. It is to identify where operational changes can reduce emissions: mode shifts, utilization, routing, carrier choices, supplier changes, energy improvements, packaging, product design, or network configuration. Better data is valuable because it makes those levers easier to quantify and prioritize.

The Logistics Viewpoints Scope 3 Emissions in Logistics: A Practical Guide provides a methodology-focused framework for boundaries, shipment activity, carrier data, factors, allocation, uncertainty, lineage, primary data, and reduction priorities.

Executive implication

The strategic objective is to improve evidence quality while directing attention toward the emissions categories and operating decisions where reduction is actually possible.

Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. Sustainability & ESG connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

Sustainability in the Supply Chain
Transportation Emissions Management: Technology, Data, and Measurement

Go Deeper

Read the full Scope 3 Emissions in Logistics: A Practical Guide.

Explore the broader Sustainability & ESG domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.

The post Scope 3 Is Not Primarily a Reporting Problem. It Is a Supply Chain Data Problem appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Non classé

Supply Chain Sustainability Software Is Moving From Disclosure to Operational Decision-Making

Published

1 jour ago

17 octobre 2026

Executive thesis. Sustainability technology is moving from disclosure infrastructure toward operational decision support. Carbon and ESG data become strategically relevant only when they change sourcing, transportation, facility, product, or supplier decisions.

Reporting is no longer enough

Supply chain sustainability technology developed largely around measurement and disclosure: calculate emissions, collect supplier information, produce reports, and demonstrate compliance. Those functions remain necessary, but they do not by themselves reduce impact. The strategic value appears when sustainability data begins to influence sourcing, network, transportation, facility, product, and supplier decisions.

Different sustainability problems require different data

Carbon accounting, supplier ESG, product footprints, transportation emissions, traceability, and reduction planning are related but not identical capabilities. They rely on different activity data, factors, boundaries, evidence, and operating workflows. Buyers should therefore start with the decisions the business needs to support rather than assume one sustainability platform can solve every problem equally well.

Auditability determines whether the number can be trusted

A defensible metric needs more than a calculated result. The enterprise should be able to trace boundaries, source data, factor versions, allocation rules, transformations, and overrides. This is especially material as sustainability information influences external reporting, customer commitments, procurement decisions, and capital allocation.

Integration moves sustainability into operations

Sustainability systems become more consequential when they connect to procurement, ERP, TMS, facilities, products, carriers, and suppliers. Those connections allow the enterprise to compare operational alternatives before execution rather than calculate the environmental effect after the fact. The data architecture is therefore part of the sustainability strategy.

Reduction planning is the proof of value

The effective question is not how many dashboards the organization can produce. It is whether the platform helps identify and prioritize reduction levers with an understandable economic and operational impact. Better mode selection, improved utilization, supplier changes, energy decisions, product redesign, and network changes are examples of actions that turn sustainability information into operating value.

The Logistics Viewpoints Supply Chain Sustainability Software: Buyer’s Guide separates carbon accounting, supplier ESG, transportation emissions, product footprints, traceability, reduction planning, integration, and auditability so buyers can evaluate the category against real operating decisions.

Executive implication

Buyers should test whether sustainability systems can connect auditable measurement to concrete reduction levers and enterprise workflows, rather than simply produce compliant reports.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

Sustainability in the Supply Chain
Supply Chain & Sustainability Leadership Multimedia Suite

Go Deeper

Read the full Supply Chain Sustainability Software: Buyer’s Guide.

Explore the broader Sustainability & ESG domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.

The post Supply Chain Sustainability Software Is Moving From Disclosure to Operational Decision-Making appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Non classé

Supply Chain Resilience Is Not Visibility. It Is the Ability to Execute Alternatives

Published

2 jours ago

16 octobre 2026

Executive thesis. Visibility tells the enterprise that disruption exists; resilience determines whether it can do something different. The distinction is the availability of executable alternatives and the decision rights to use them.

Awareness is only the first step

A supply chain can have excellent visibility into a disruption and still be unable to respond. Knowing that a supplier is offline, a lane is blocked, or a facility has lost capacity matters, but resilience depends on whether the organization has viable alternatives and the authority to use them. Visibility tells the business what changed. Resilience determines what it can do about it.

Options have to exist before the crisis

Alternate suppliers, substitute materials, qualified routes, buffer inventory, flexible capacity, secondary facilities, and manual fallback cannot usually be created at the moment of disruption. They require advance investment, qualification, contracts, data, and operating procedures. That makes resilience a network-design and operating-model discipline rather than an emergency-response activity.

Decision rights determine response speed

A viable alternative has limited value if nobody knows who can activate it or if approval requires a long chain of escalation. Resilient organizations define thresholds and decision rights in advance, especially for premium freight, inventory reallocation, supplier substitution, customer prioritization, and temporary process changes. Governance is therefore part of resilience.

Technology should connect risk to alternatives

Risk sensing, planning, network models, inventory data, transportation, supplier information, and workflow should help the organization move from a disruption signal to a set of executable responses. The technology does not create resilience by itself. It makes the available options easier to understand, compare, approve, and execute.

Exercises expose false confidence

Plans that have never been tested often depend on outdated assumptions, unavailable capacity, stale contact information, or processes that no longer match the current network. Scenario exercises and recovery tests are therefore operational evidence. They reveal whether the organization can actually use the alternatives it believes it has.

The Logistics Viewpoints Supply Chain Resilience: Technology, Data, and Operating Models guide connects risk sensing to network options, alternate supply, inventory, capacity, routes, crisis workflow, exercises, decision rights, and recovery metrics.

Executive implication

Resilience investments should build options before a crisis—alternate supply, routes, capacity, inventory, procedures, and authority—and regularly test whether those options remain executable.

Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. Risk, Resilience & Security connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.