Non classé
Incoterms 2026: Meaning, Chart & List Of Incoterms
Published
3 mois agoon
By
If you are shipping goods, knowing your incoterms is essential to understanding who is responsible for what in your supply chain.
Read on to learn all about incoterms and how to choose the right one for your shipment.
Incoterms in Plain English: The Incoterms Guide for Freight Shipping
What are Incoterms?
Freight incoterms (International Commercial Terms) are the standard terms used in sales contracts for importing and exporting. They are used to define responsibility and liability for goods over the course of a shipment. In other words, they spell out when responsibility for the goods transfers from the supplier to the buyer. They also define who pays which costs for the goods and their transport.
How Incoterms Impact Your Shipping Cost
You can use our freight rate calculator to help you decide how different incoterms will impact your freight cost. For example, when shipping EXW, you’ll be responsible for the added cost of getting your goods from your supplier to the seaport or airport. Simply choose container, box, or pallet shipping, enter your dimensions and weight, and you’ll get an instant estimate of freight shipping costs.
List of All 11 Incoterms
EXW – Ex Works: The seller’s responsibility is to make the goods available for pickup at the warehouse or factory. From that point forward, the buyer assumes responsibility for all costs and risks. For most importers and exporters, this means working with a freight forwarder that arranges the entire shipment, starting at pickup from the factory.
FCA – Free Carrier: The seller is responsible for delivering the goods to the carrier at a named place, which is usually the terminal or a warehouse. Once the goods are handed over to the carrier, the risk transfers to the buyer.
CPT – Carriage Paid To: The seller is responsible for the costs of transporting the goods to a named destination. Responsibility transfers to the buyer once the goods are delivered to the agreed-upon destination.
CIP – Carriage and Insurance Paid To: This incoterm is the same as CPT except that with CIP, the seller much also arrange and pay for insurance coverage in case of loss or damage to the goods during transit to the agreed-upon destination.
DAP – Delivered at Place: The seller is responsible for arranging the entire shipment up to delivering the goods to a named place. Risk transfers to the buyer upon delivery. The seller is responsible for clearing goods for export but the buyer assumes responsibility for import customs duties, fees, and taxes.
DPU – Delivered at Place Unloaded: The seller is responsible arranging the shipment and delivering the goods to a named place. They are also responsible for unloading them. Risk transfers to the buyer once the goods are unloaded.
DDP – Delivered Duty Paid: The seller is responsible for entire shipment, including customs clearance and fees, and delivering the goods to the buyer’s premises. This incoterm places the maximum responsibility on the seller.
FAS – Free Alongside Ship: The seller is responsible for picking up the goods at the factory, clearing them for export, and delivering them to a departure location, usually the ship loading dock. Tisk transfers to the buyer when the goods are placed alongside the ship; they are responsible for the main leg of transit and every other step in delivery.
FOB – Free On Board: The seller is responsible for packaging, pickup, and delivery of goods onto a vessel at the port of shipment. Liability transfers to the buyer once the goods are on board the vessell; the buyer is responsible for every other step of the journey.
CFR – Cost and Freight: The seller is responsible for transportation to the port of origin and for loading the goods onto the vessel. They are also responsible for transportation to the destination port – but they are not liable for that portion of the journey. Instead, risk transfers to the buyer when the goods are on boarded at the origin port.
CIF – Cost, Insurance, and Freight: Similar to CFR, but the seller also arranges and pays for insurance coverage for the goods during transit to the port of destination.
2020 Incoterms
The 2020 Incoterms, updated from the 2010 Incoterms, are a set of international trade terms that define the responsibilities and obligations of buyers and sellers when shipping goods. They are designed to facilitate smooth and efficient international trade by providing standardized rules for the delivery of goods, payment, risk transfer, and other key aspects of international transactions.
2020 Incoterms Rules for Any Mode of Transport
Whatever mode of transport you use – sea, air, road, or rail – you’ll need to choose your incoterm. However, not every incoterm can be used for every mode.
The following seven incoterms can be used for both ocean and air shipping:
EXW – Ex Works
FCA – Free Carrier
CPT – Carriage Paid To
CIP – Carriage and Insurance Paid To
DAP – Delivered at Place
DPU – Delivered at Place Unloaded
DDP – Delivered Duty Paid
2020 Incoterms for Sea and Inland Waterway Transport
These four incoterms can be used for sea and inland waterway shipments only:
FAS – Free Alongside Ship
FOB – Free On Board
CFR – Cost and Freight
CIF – Cost, Insurance, and Freight
2010 Incoterms
The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) updates incoterms every ten years or so. Prior to 2020, the last update was in 2010. The 2010 version was largely similar to the 2020 version.
However, in 2020 some changes and clarifications were made to better reflect modern trade practices and technology.
Using 2010 Incoterms After 2020
It is generally advisable to use the most current set of Incoterms – that is, the 2020 Incoterms. These updated terms are designed to reflect modern trade practices and provide more clarity and specificity, which can help reduce misunderstandings and disputes in international trade.
However, it is not prohibited to use the 2010 Incoterms if both the buyer and seller agree to do so.
It’s essential to clearly specify in the sales contract which set of Incoterms is being used to avoid any confusion or disputes.
2020 Incoterms vs. 2010 Incoterms
Here are some differences between the 2020 Incoterms and the 2010 Incoterms:
Introduction of DPU: In 2020, the DPU (Delivered at Place Unloaded) incoterm replaced DAT (Delivered at Terminal). DPU allows for delivery at a specific place, not just at a terminal, providing more flexibility.
Insurance in CIP and CIF: The 2020 Incoterms clarify that in CIP (Carriage and Insurance Paid To) and CIF (Cost, Insurance, and Freight), the seller is responsible for obtaining insurance coverage with minimum coverage. In the 2010 Incoterms, this was not explicitly stated.
Different Levels of Security Obligations: The 2020 Incoterms include more detailed security-related obligations, aimed at addressing increased security concerns in international trade.
Bill of Lading with FCA: The 2020 Incoterms allow the use of the FCA term in conjunction with a bill of lading. In the 2010 Incoterms, FCA was typically associated with multimodal transport and not used with a bill of lading.
Incoterms for Air Freight
Incoterms commonly used for air shipments are:
EXW (Ex-works), in which the buyer assumes responsibility at the seller’s warehouse and takes care of everything including transportation and insurance.
CIP (Carriage and insurance), which puts responsibility for insurance on the seller.
CPT (Carriage Paid To), in which the seller delivers the goods and covers all fees involved in delivering the goods to the named destination. After delivery, the buyer assumes responsibility.
DDP (Delivered Duty Paid), which puts most obligations on the seller. They carry all the costs and risks of transport, insurance, and customs clearance. This is the only incoterm that lists the seller as the importer of record at destination.
DAP-Delivered At Place, where the seller covers the costs involved in main carriage but is not responsible for customs clearance.
These Incoterms can be adapted for air freight transactions, ensuring that responsibilities and costs are clearly defined between the parties involved in the trade.
Why are Incoterms Important in 2026?
Importers and exporters should consider which incoterms is best for them before the contract of sale is negotiated. This can prevent surprise costs and unnecessary complications.
Choosing an incoterm means getting on the same page as your supplier – it aligns everyone on shipping procedures when multiple parties and stakeholders are involved. These globally accepted terms ensure the timely payment of goods, services, and duties, while protecting suppliers, carriers, and buyers.
Incoterms Chart and List
Check out this quick reference chart of Incoterms and the breakdown of whether the buyer or seller is responsible for what at various points in the international supply chain.
What Incoterms Should I Use?
Here are some of the most common incoterms and when you might choose them:
FOB (Free on Board)
This very common incoterm is for sea freight only, and means that liability and responsibility for cost transfer to the buyer when the goods are loaded “on board” the shipping vessel.
FOB gives the buyer a high degree of control over the freight shipping process. Since the buyer is choosing their own forwarder, they benefit from greater flexibility with regards to cost, terms, and shipping planning.
The ExWorks incoterm means that responsibility transfers to the buyer at the supplier’s warehouse and not on board the vessel.
This means the buyer pays for and is responsible for goods’ transport every step of the way, from door to door. All the supplier needs to do is prepare the goods for pick up.
This incoterm gives the buyer full control over freight costs, but also means they are responsible for everything that happens in the origin country– which is frequently not their country of residence. More experienced shippers may benefit from using this incoterm.
When using FCA, the buyer assumes responsibility and costs once the goods are loaded onto a mode of transportation or delivered to a specific location agreed upon by the buyer and seller – typically this is a port.
This incoterm is used for all shipping modes.
With FCA, the supplier is responsible for packaging and transport at the origin. This means the supplier has more responsibility than they do with ExWorks, but the buyer still assumes costs and responsibilities earlier than they do when using FOB.
Main Differences Specific to a Country
The above advice covers most countries in most circumstances. But there are some factors to keep in mind when choosing an incoterm with your supplier:
Customs procedures are much more relaxed at porous borders, like within the EU
Different countries require different produres and paperwork for shipments: the US requires a Customs Bond, importing into the UK requires a Deferment Account, and exporting from India includes a withholding tax.
When to Challenge Advice
Some freight forwarders prefer only using a favored set of incoterms because they “seem to work.” Therefore don’t be surprised if some forwarders push back on your selection of incoterm, despite it being the most appropriate incoterm for your shipment.
What Shipping Incoterms Don’t Cover
Incoterms do not cover property rights, possible force majeure situations and breach of contract. Include of these within the contract of sale. Similarly, all incoterms except the C terms do not assign responsibility for arranging insurance. Cargo insurance is, therefore, a separate cost for buyers.
Define Named Place in the Sales Contract
When the incoterm is written in the sales contract, the named place should immediately follow the three letter incoterm abbreviation, e.g. “FCA Shenzen Yantian CFS.” Be precise when defining the location, especially with larger cities that may have several terminals, and with larger terminals that may have several drop-off points. You can use this global port finder to find specific port codes.
How Letters of Credit Limit Choice of Incoterm
If the sale is being completed with a letter of credit or documentary credit, the chain that releases funds begins with the seller providing several documents to the bank, including the bill of lading/air waybill. Letters of credit are used where there is limited trust between the seller and the buyer. That rules out EXW, because the supplier will be paid before pickup. F terms require trust because if the buyer cancels the international transit, the supplier won’t have a bill of lading to present to the bank. D terms require trust because the seller is bearing all of the transport costs. That leaves the four C terms as the best options to use with a letter of credit.
Individual Incoterms
EXW | FCA | FAS | FOB | CPT | CIP | CFR | CIF | DPU | DAP | DDP
The post Incoterms 2026: Meaning, Chart & List Of Incoterms appeared first on Freightos.
You may like
Non classé
Choosing a TMS: What Logistics Leaders Should Evaluate Beyond Features
Published
7 heures agoon
7 octobre 2026By
A TMS evaluation should begin with the operating problem, not the product demo. In a crowded market, feature lists create an illusion of comparability; the better question is which platform best fits the decisions, constraints, interfaces, and outcomes of the buyer’s actual transportation operation.
The core job is the freight-centric planning and execution system used to translate orders and demand into feasible transportation plans, carrier decisions, tenders, shipment execution, visibility, settlement, and performance management. Buyers should translate that mission into explicit requirements tied to service, cost, capacity, risk, and response time. That prevents a vendor’s strongest demo feature from quietly becoming the buyer’s strategy. The same logic behind Select Technology for the System, Not the Feature List applies directly to TMS selection, where architecture, integration, decision rights, and operating fit can matter more than a long checklist.
Core capabilities include rate and contract management, multimodal planning, optimization, consolidation, routing, carrier selection and tendering, execution monitoring, real-time visibility, exception management, parcel and last-mile workflows, freight audit and settlement, analytics, and carrier performance management. Not every organization needs maximum depth in every area. The evaluation should weight the capabilities that matter to the operating model and explicitly de-emphasize those that do not.
Evaluate the architecture around the feature
The platform will live inside an architecture where ERP and OMS supply demand and order context; TMS converts that context into freight plans and execution; carrier networks, visibility, telematics, WMS/YMS, parcel, payment, and decision layers continuously update the operating state. Integration should therefore be tested as part of the business case, including data frequency, failure handling, API maturity, ownership of master data, latency, security, and what happens when an upstream feed is incomplete.
A useful demonstration should include a tender rejection, a late pickup, a new order after the plan is built, a capacity shortfall, a missed delivery window, or a warehouse constraint that makes the transportation plan infeasible. Ask the provider to show what the system knows, what it recommends, who or what has authority, how the action is executed, and how the outcome is recorded. A polished happy path is far less informative than a realistic exception.
The evaluation should cover multimodal depth, optimization quality, carrier connectivity, execution completeness, exception handling, global reach, integration architecture, configurability, scalability, implementation burden, and evidence of measurable transportation outcomes. Where a provider claims better intelligence, automation, or autonomy, ask for measurable evidence using freight cost, tender acceptance, on-time pickup and delivery, plan stability, empty miles, utilization, dwell, cost-to-serve, exception-resolution time, invoice accuracy, and service performance. Referenceability matters because the difference between an available feature and an operating capability is usually implementation, adoption, and governance.
The provider landscape includes enterprise suite TMS; specialist transportation platforms; network- and managed-transportation-led offerings; and cloud-native or execution-centric platforms with strong connectivity and visibility. Those archetypes are not a ranking. They represent different design centers and strengths, which is why the right shortlist will vary by network complexity, operating model, existing stack, internal skills, and the decisions the organization is trying to improve.
The best product is therefore not the one with the most boxes checked. It is the one that satisfies the requirements, fits the interfaces, supports the people and decision rights around it, and can evolve without turning every future change into a custom project.
Implementation evidence belongs in the TMS buying decision
A TMS evaluation should test the operating environment the platform will actually inherit: modes, regions, carrier networks, procurement models, parcel complexity, spot exposure, freight payment, international requirements, data quality, and integration to ERP, OMS, WMS, telematics, and carrier networks. Those conditions determine whether a feature becomes an operating capability.
Request evidence from comparable networks and make vendors demonstrate the difficult path. Use tender rejection, late pickup, missing milestone, rate conflict, capacity shortage, changed order, cross-border documentation, and invoice discrepancy scenarios. Then observe how many manual steps, external tools, custom workflows, and specialist interventions are required. The demonstration should expose the real operating model behind the product.
Related Logistics Viewpoints research
2026 Transportation Management Systems Market Map
The New Architecture of Logistics
Systems Engineering in Logistics
Editor’s Choice: 5 Pitfalls to Avoid When Choosing a TMS
Previous in this series: Why the TMS Market Is Moving Toward Continuous Transportation Execution
Request the 2026 Transportation Management Systems Market Map Brochure
The 2026 Market Map is designed to help organizations understand the structure of the TMS market, evaluate provider differences, and identify the capabilities most relevant to their transportation operating environment. If your organization is evaluating TMS platforms or preparing a shortlist, I would be glad to provide the Market Map brochure and discuss the evaluation questions and provider differences most relevant to your requirements.
Request the TMS Market Map Brochure
For technology providers
Providers may request the brochure, discuss the research framework, or contact me to confirm how their capabilities are represented in the market assessment.
The post Choosing a TMS: What Logistics Leaders Should Evaluate Beyond Features appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Aera Technology Keeps Decision Intelligence Focused on the Decision Loop
Published
8 heures agoon
7 octobre 2026By
Decision intelligence can become an abstract category if it is defined only by analytics or recommendations. Aera Technology takes a more operational view: a decision has value when the system can assemble the required context, recommend an action, govern how that action is approved, write the result back into enterprise systems, and learn from the outcome.
Aera Decision Cloud is organized around that closed-loop model. The platform combines data orchestration, a decision data model, optimization and AI, reusable Aera Skills, decision memory, and controlled execution across connected systems. This positions Aera less as a traditional planning suite and more as a decision and orchestration layer spanning supply chain and adjacent enterprise functions.
That architecture is particularly relevant for exception-heavy operating environments. Repetitive decisions around inventory, orders, logistics, master data, or control-tower workflows can often be standardized, monitored, and partially automated, while ambiguous or high-impact cases remain under human control. The result is a more explicit path from human-in-the-loop decision support toward bounded autonomy.
The discipline required is governance. Enterprises need to know what data was used, why a recommendation was produced, who or what approved it, what system was changed, and how the outcome was measured. Those controls become more—not less—important as decision systems gain the ability to act.
Aera Technology appears in the Logistics Viewpoints Supply Chain Decision Intelligence MarketMap and Autonomous Exception Management MarketMap. Those two MarketMaps provide complementary views of the company’s role in decision orchestration and the emerging automation of operational exceptions.
The post Aera Technology Keeps Decision Intelligence Focused on the Decision Loop appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Decision Intelligence Is Emerging as the New Layer Between Signals and Execution
Published
11 heures agoon
7 octobre 2026By
Executive thesis. Supply chains do not lack signals; they lack a reliable mechanism for converting signals into economically coherent decisions. Decision intelligence is emerging to close that gap between analytics and execution.
Supply chains do not suffer from a shortage of signals
Modern operations generate alerts from planning, transportation, warehouses, suppliers, risk platforms, quality systems, and customer channels. The bottleneck is the decision between signal and action. Someone still has to determine whether the change matters, what it affects, which alternatives exist, and how the tradeoffs should be resolved.
Decision intelligence addresses that gap
Decision-intelligence platforms attempt to connect operational signals with business context, models, alternatives, recommendations, approvals, and execution. That places them above individual systems of record while requiring close integration with those systems. Their value is not another analytics layer. It is reducing the friction in consequential operational decisions.
Business impact has to be explicit
An alert becomes effective when the platform can map it to affected orders, inventory, customers, suppliers, lanes, capacity, revenue, service, or risk. That impact model helps prioritize work and avoids treating every deviation as equally material. It also creates the basis for evaluating alternatives against the objectives the business actually cares about.
Recommendations need a path to action
A recommendation that ends in a dashboard leaves much of the decision process manual. Stronger architectures can route approvals, invoke workflows, or push authorized decisions into planning and execution systems while preserving an audit trail. That is where decision intelligence begins to converge with orchestration and control-tower capabilities.
Evaluate the decision loop
Buyers should examine the full sequence from signal to action: detection, context, impact, alternatives, tradeoffs, recommendation, approval, execution, and outcome. The platform should make each step more reliable without obscuring decision ownership. Explainability, governance, and integration therefore matter as much as optimization or AI sophistication.
The Logistics Viewpoints Supply Chain Decision Intelligence: What It Is and How to Evaluate Platforms guide provides a buyer framework for connecting signals to impact, alternatives, tradeoffs, recommendations, approvals, and execution across operational systems.
Executive implication
The category should be judged by the quality of the decision loop: impact, alternatives, tradeoffs, approvals, execution, and feedback—not by recommendation generation alone.
Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. AI & Advanced Analytics connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.
Related Logistics Viewpoints research
2026 Supply Chain Decision Intelligence Market Map
Planning, Execution & Visibility
Go Deeper
Read the full Supply Chain Decision Intelligence: What It Is and How to Evaluate Platforms.
Explore the broader AI & Advanced Analytics domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.
The post Decision Intelligence Is Emerging as the New Layer Between Signals and Execution appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Choosing a TMS: What Logistics Leaders Should Evaluate Beyond Features
Aera Technology Keeps Decision Intelligence Focused on the Decision Loop
Decision Intelligence Is Emerging as the New Layer Between Signals and Execution
Freightos Global Freight Outlook – September 2026
Container rates jump another $1k/FEU – but is demand peaking? – July 8, 2026 Update
Walmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
Trending
- Non classé1 mois ago
Freightos Global Freight Outlook – September 2026
- Non classé3 mois ago
Container rates jump another $1k/FEU – but is demand peaking? – July 8, 2026 Update
-
Non classé2 ans agoWalmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
-
Non classé6 mois agoWhy Sulfuric Acid Is Emerging as a Supply Chain Constraint in Copper
- Non classé4 mois ago
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
- Non classé1 an ago
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
- Non classé12 mois ago
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
- Non classé3 mois ago
LCL Shipping Cost Calculator: Calculate Air and Sea Shipping Freight Rates
