Non classé

Upstream, Midstream, Downstream, LNG, and Petrochemical Supply Chain Networks

Published

2 semaines ago

3 juillet 2026

Oil and gas supply chains are often discussed as if they were one integrated chain stretching from reservoir to customer. In practice, they are several interdependent supply networks. Each network has its own physical constraints, operating cadence, commercial exposure, risk profile, and data requirements. Treating them as one generic supply chain can obscure the details that determine performance.

Download the full white paper:
Oil and Gas in the Supply Chain: A Strategic Framework for Building Resilient and Responsible Supply Chains.

The strategic challenge for energy companies is not simply to centralize control. It is to connect upstream, midstream, downstream, LNG, and petrochemical networks in a way that improves system-wide decisions without losing the domain expertise required to run each part of the business. The companies that get this balance right will be better positioned to manage margin, reliability, resilience, and customer commitments.

Upstream: Where Supply Chain Execution Protects Production

Upstream supply networks support exploration, drilling, completions, production, maintenance, and field operations. These networks include drilling rigs, tubulars, proppant, chemicals, water logistics, artificial lift systems, compressors, pumps, valves, sensors, field labor, service companies, maintenance contractors, field warehouses, and mobile equipment.

In upstream operations, supply chain performance is tightly linked to production continuity. A missing critical spare, a delayed chemical delivery, an unavailable crew, or a constrained water disposal option can result in nonproductive time or deferred production. In active basins, the difference between planned output and actual output is often determined by how well materials, services, equipment, and field logistics are synchronized.

These networks are also difficult to manage because they are geographically dispersed and operationally demanding. Assets may be remote. Demand for services can shift quickly. Weather can interrupt access. Safety requirements are high. Contractor ecosystems are complex. Visibility into what is available, where it is located, and when it can be deployed is therefore a practical operating requirement, not a reporting luxury.

The strongest upstream supply chain priorities tend to focus on reducing nonproductive time, improving materials visibility, optimizing field inventory, coordinating service providers, digitizing field tickets, tracking contractor performance, reducing truck miles, and improving safety and compliance. Water logistics, spare parts availability, and contractor coordination are particularly important because they directly affect field execution.

Midstream: The Connective Tissue of the Energy System

Midstream networks connect production to markets. They include gathering systems, pipelines, compressor stations, processing plants, fractionation assets, storage terminals, and export facilities. These assets are the connective tissue of the oil and gas supply chain. When midstream capacity is constrained, production value can be stranded and downstream commitments can become more difficult to meet.

Midstream performance depends on flow assurance, pressure management, quality specifications, batch scheduling, nomination accuracy, storage availability, asset reliability, and customer coordination. These are not just operating details. They influence throughput, revenue capture, contract performance, and customer trust.

A compressor outage, pipeline integrity issue, tank constraint, or terminal bottleneck can ripple both upstream and downstream. Upstream producers may be forced to curtail volumes. Downstream facilities may lose feedstock flexibility. Commercial teams may face exposure against commitments. For this reason, midstream supply chain management requires tight integration across operations, maintenance planning, logistics scheduling, and commercial nominations.

Midstream organizations have long understood the importance of asset reliability. The next stage is to connect reliability data with commercial and logistics decisions. If maintenance events, capacity constraints, nomination changes, and storage limitations are viewed in separate systems, leaders may not see the full business impact until options have narrowed.

Downstream Refining: A Constrained Supply Chain Node

Refining supply networks transform crude and intermediate feedstocks into usable products such as gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, marine fuels, asphalt, lubricants, and petrochemical feedstocks. A refinery is not merely a production plant. It is a highly constrained supply chain node that sits at the intersection of procurement, processing, blending, storage, transportation, and demand fulfillment.

A refinery must coordinate crude procurement, tankage, process units, catalysts, hydrogen, utilities, product specifications, blending operations, pipelines, terminals, marine movements, and customer demand. A margin-optimized refinery plan only creates value if the supply chain can execute it. If the plan assumes a crude slate, tank position, product movement, or terminal capability that is not available, the theoretical margin will not materialize.

This is where downstream organizations often face friction. Planning may optimize against one set of assumptions, while actual execution is constrained by crude availability, tankage, product specifications, transportation capacity, or terminal congestion. The gap between planning and execution can erode value even when the underlying optimization logic is sound.

The more mature downstream operators are connecting crude slate optimization, refinery scheduling, product blending, inventory positioning, and distribution planning into a more unified decision system. This does not eliminate the need for specialist planning. It improves the ability to see how a change in one area affects the broader supply network.

LNG: Global Gas as a Supply Chain Discipline

LNG has turned natural gas from a largely regional commodity into a global supply chain. The LNG network includes upstream gas production, processing, liquefaction, storage, shipping, regasification, and downstream gas distribution. It is one of the most supply-chain-intensive segments of the energy system because timing and optionality matter at every stage.

LNG supply chains are sensitive to vessel availability, terminal operations, weather, canal access, contract flexibility, regional demand, storage availability, and destination options. A delay in one part of the network can affect cargo scheduling, customer obligations, market exposure, and asset utilization.

Effective LNG operations require coordination across feed gas reliability, liquefaction uptime, LNG tank management, cargo scheduling, boil-off gas management, vessel optimization, destination flexibility, regasification coordination, contract exposure, and emissions documentation. The complexity is high, but so is the strategic value. Companies with better visibility and decision discipline can use optionality to protect commitments and respond to changing market conditions.

LNG also illustrates a broader lesson for oil and gas supply chains: physical constraints, commercial decisions, and logistics execution cannot be separated for long. The cargo that looks optimal commercially must still fit the operating reality of production, liquefaction, marine logistics, terminal capacity, and receiving market requirements.

Petrochemicals: Closer to Manufacturing Than Commodity Flow

Petrochemical supply networks connect feedstocks such as ethane, propane, naphtha, and aromatics to crackers, derivative plants, packaging networks, industrial customers, and global distribution channels. These networks often resemble manufacturing supply chains more than traditional commodity flows. They require segmentation, customer-level responsiveness, product-grade traceability, and precise logistics execution.

Petrochemical performance is shaped by feedstock economics, plant reliability, product grades, customer specifications, packaging availability, rail logistics, marine exports, and downstream manufacturing demand. A feedstock price shift can change production economics. A rail disruption can affect customer fulfillment. A packaging shortage can constrain product movement. A plant outage can ripple through industrial customers that depend on specific materials and grades.

The most effective petrochemical supply chains connect feedstock optimization, plant scheduling, inventory planning, railcar utilization, packaging availability, customer commitments, product-grade traceability, export logistics, margin management, and demand forecasting. This level of integration is essential because petrochemical customers often care not only about volume, but also about specification, timing, packaging, documentation, and service reliability.

The Strategic Requirement: Specificity Plus Visibility

Upstream, midstream, downstream, LNG, and petrochemical networks are often managed separately for good reasons. They involve different assets, different skills, different time horizons, and different operating risks. The problem is not that specialization exists. The problem is that specialization can become fragmentation.

When each network optimizes locally, the enterprise can lose value system-wide. An upstream production plan may not reflect midstream constraints. A refinery plan may not be executable because of tankage or movement limitations. An LNG cargo decision may not fully reflect terminal or contract exposure. A petrochemical production schedule may be disconnected from railcar availability or packaging constraints.

Leaders should focus on building an integrated view across the following areas:

Production and processing: connecting field output, plant operations, refinery constraints, and product availability.
Transportation and storage: aligning pipelines, marine movements, rail, trucking, terminals, tanks, and export facilities.
Commercial exposure: linking nominations, contracts, customer commitments, pricing exposure, and destination options.
Asset reliability: integrating maintenance planning, downtime risk, integrity events, and operating constraints into supply chain decisions.
Inventory and materials: improving visibility into critical spares, feedstocks, intermediates, finished products, packaging, and field materials.
Compliance and emissions: capturing the documentation required for safety, regulatory compliance, emissions reporting, and customer requirements.

This is not simply an IT architecture issue. It is an operating model issue. Data must be timely enough to support decisions. Processes must be designed to resolve trade-offs across functions. Metrics must encourage enterprise performance, not just local optimization. Governance must clarify who makes decisions when production, logistics, maintenance, and commercial priorities conflict.

The future of oil and gas supply chain management will be defined by the ability to preserve domain-specific excellence while improving end-to-end visibility. Companies that connect these networks will gain better control over margin, resilience, and market responsiveness. Companies that do not will continue to optimize individual functions while leaving value on the table.

To explore the broader ARC Advisory Group perspective on oil and gas supply chain transformation, Download the full ARC Advisory Group white paper.

The post Upstream, Midstream, Downstream, LNG, and Petrochemical Supply Chain Networks appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Non classé

From Deluges to Dry Beds: How Extreme Weather is Rewriting Logistics Strategy

Published

7 heures ago

13 juillet 2026

From Deluges To Dry Beds: How Extreme Weather Is Rewriting Logistics Strategy

Historically, supply chain managers viewed extreme weather as a series of isolated, unlinked headaches, a temporary detour here, a delayed container vessel there. But recent events are proving that climate-driven disruptions are no longer isolated events; they are systemic, compounding risks occurring simultaneously. Right now, global logistics are caught in a bizarre paradox of water volatility: inland waterways are concurrently shutting down due to both catastrophic flooding and severe drought.

The Current Snapshot:

In the United States, flash flooding across Missouri and the wider Ohio and Tennessee river valleys has completely knocked out regional road networks, forced emergency evacuations, and pushed the Black River to a projected record crest of 28 feet. Thunderstorms piled on top of each other to dump between 6 and 12 inches of rain across southern Missouri, with some areas near Miaoli receiving nearly 31 inches (80 cm) of downpour. The deluge tore a woman’s home entirely from its foundation, claiming her life, while the Army National Guard had to deploy Black Hawk helicopters to rescue more than 200 children and staff trapped at a summer camp in Lesterville. These slow-moving storms have brought regional last-mile and freight networks to a halt.

Across the Pacific, Typhoon Bavi just battered Taiwan and East China, forcing massive evacuations of over 2 million people and completely disrupting cargo handling and air freight at major hubs like Shanghai, where airlines canceled more than 680 flights. Yet, while parts of the world are drowning, Europe’s most critical commercial artery is choked by a severe mid-summer heatwave. On July 13th, water levels at the critical Kaub chokepoint on the Rhine plummeted to 53cm, well below the 81cm threshold where standard low-water surcharges apply. Freight barges are currently restricted to carrying just 20% of their total capacity, forcing operators to move volumes by individual agreement only. This near-standstill has triggered a massive, expensive migration of freight onto an already maxed-out rail and road infrastructure.

The Strategic Shift: Redundancy is Dead, Dynamic Flex is In

This dual reality underscores a massive trend shaping supply chain management: the shift from static risk planning to dynamic execution. When a primary inland waterway fails, you cannot simply rely on a fixed backup plan, because your backup mode (whether it is rail hubs restricted by local congestion or trucking lanes blocked by flash floods) is likely facing its own climate or operational constraints.

To endure this era of unforeseen climate events, logistics leaders are focusing on three main areas:

Mode Elasticity: Building contractual agility into carrier agreements so that switching from barge to rail, or air to ocean, can happen in hours rather than weeks.
Predictive Visibility Beyond Tier 1: Moving past simple track-and-trace. True resilience requires mapping out how weather events three states over will impact infrastructure, labor availability, and warehouse productivity downstream.
Climate as a Network Design Parameter: Historically, networks were designed almost purely around labor costs, tax incentives, and transit times. Network optimization models must now ingest historical climate data and predictive models as core constraints when choosing warehouse locations and routing strategies.

As the current El Niño cycle threatens to further scramble global rainfall and temperature patterns, the old playbook of waiting out the storm is officially obsolete. Volatility is the new baseline, and the competitive advantage belongs to the networks built to flex.

The post From Deluges to Dry Beds: How Extreme Weather is Rewriting Logistics Strategy appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Non classé

Defense Drones Are Becoming an Industrial Supply Chain Race

Published

8 heures ago

13 juillet 2026

Ondas’ acquisition of DZYNE shows why competitive advantage in autonomous systems is shifting from technical demonstrations toward component security, modular design, manufacturing scale, and supplier integration.

The defense-drone market is moving from technical experimentation to industrialization.

Companies still need better aircraft, autonomy software, sensors, communications systems, and counter-drone technologies. But as governments prepare to purchase autonomous systems in much larger quantities, competitive advantage will increasingly depend on a different set of capabilities: securing components, expanding production, integrating acquired technologies, and supporting rapidly changing products at scale.

Ondas Holdings’ acquisition of DZYNE Technologies is an indication of that shift.

Ondas announced on July 6 that it had acquired DZYNE, a developer and manufacturer of autonomous aerial systems, surveillance platforms, and counter-UAS technologies. The transaction expands an Ondas portfolio that already includes automated drone operations, autonomous platforms, and systems designed to detect and counter unauthorized aircraft.

The immediate story is one of defense-technology consolidation. The more consequential story is industrial.

As demand for lower-cost autonomous systems grows, success will depend on more than which company develops the most advanced drone. It will depend on which companies can construct resilient supplier networks, standardize components, increase production volumes, manage product complexity, and adapt designs as technologies and operating requirements change.

The defense-drone race is becoming an industrial supply chain race.

From Technical Demonstration to Industrial Production

Defense technology companies have become highly effective at demonstrating new capabilities.

A startup can design a sophisticated autonomous aircraft, complete successful flight tests, and secure an initial government contract. That does not necessarily mean the company can produce thousands or tens of thousands of systems reliably and economically.

Scaling production introduces a different set of challenges.

Manufacturers must secure motors, batteries, cameras, processors, communications modules, navigation systems, electronic assemblies, composite materials, permanent magnets, and specialized sensors. Defense applications may also require component traceability, cybersecurity controls, approved suppliers, domestic-content compliance, and production processes that differ substantially from those used in commercial markets.

A technically successful platform can therefore encounter the same constraints seen across automotive, aerospace, electronics, and industrial-equipment supply chains: long lead times, limited supplier capacity, single-source dependencies, inconsistent quality, and inadequate visibility below the first tier.

Those risks become more serious when demand increases quickly.

The proposed fiscal year 2026 defense budget requested $13.4 billion for autonomy and autonomous systems, including $9.4 billion for unmanned and remotely operated aerial vehicles. The request illustrates the size of the potential demand signal now forming around autonomous defense systems.

Large procurement budgets, however, do not automatically create the industrial capacity required to fulfill them.

A Drone Is Also a Network of Supply Chain Dependencies

The relative simplicity and low unit cost of some small drones can obscure the complexity of the industrial base behind them.

Compared with a conventional military aircraft, an individual drone may be inexpensive and comparatively easy to assemble. Yet its components may come from a globally dispersed and highly concentrated supplier network.

Dependencies can include battery materials, electric motors, rare-earth magnets, semiconductors, carbon-fiber materials, communications equipment, cameras, circuit boards, and lower-level electronic assemblies.

These dependencies create both commercial and strategic risks.

A manufacturer may be able to obtain components economically under normal market conditions but lose access when export controls, trade restrictions, geopolitical tensions, or competing domestic demand intervene. The unavailability of a relatively inexpensive motor, magnet, sensor, or battery component can delay delivery of an entire system.

Research from the Center for Strategic and International Studies has identified rare-earth magnets, carbon-fiber materials, lithium-ion inputs, semiconductors, and other upstream materials as potential chokepoints in the drone industrial base. The analysis also highlights the lack of visibility below many first-tier defense contractors.

The implication is significant.

The strategic value of a drone manufacturer is not limited to its aircraft designs, software, or patents. It also includes its qualified supplier base, access to critical materials, manufacturing processes, contract-production relationships, testing infrastructure, and ability to replace unavailable components without redesigning the entire system.

These capabilities are harder to see than a successful flight demonstration, but they may ultimately determine which companies can deliver at scale.

M&A as Industrial Integration

The Ondas-DZYNE transaction reflects a broader effort to assemble complementary autonomous-system capabilities within larger corporate platforms.

DZYNE adds long-endurance aircraft, smaller autonomous systems, surveillance capabilities, counter-UAS technologies, modular airframe expertise, and established defense-customer relationships. Ondas brings additional autonomous platforms, drone infrastructure, security applications, and corporate resources.

The strategic logic extends beyond expanding the product catalog.

An integrated company may be able to combine engineering teams, share software architectures, consolidate suppliers, increase purchasing leverage, coordinate manufacturing investment, and offer customers a broader group of interoperable systems.

It may also be able to spread the costs of compliance, testing, cybersecurity, government contracting, and business development across a larger revenue base.

These potential advantages are especially important in a market where individual products may change rapidly.

The successful autonomous-defense company may not be the one with a single dominant aircraft. It may be the company with an industrial architecture capable of supporting several types of systems while reusing common components, software, communications technologies, manufacturing processes, and supplier relationships.

That begins to resemble a supply chain platform rather than a traditional aerospace program.

Modular Architecture Becomes a Supply Chain Capability

Autonomous systems are evolving much faster than conventional defense platforms.

New processors, sensors, communications technologies, electronic-warfare systems, navigation capabilities, and software functions can emerge within months. A design optimized for one operating environment may quickly require a different payload, communications module, navigation system, or method of avoiding interference.

Manufacturers therefore need product architectures that support rapid change.

A modular design can allow a company to replace a sensor, processor, battery, motor, or communications module without redesigning the entire aircraft. Standardized interfaces can also make it easier to qualify alternative suppliers when a component becomes unavailable or fails to meet cost, security, or performance requirements.

This is both an engineering strategy and a supply chain strategy.

Modularity can reduce dependence on individual components, support multisourcing, simplify product upgrades, and separate stable elements of a platform from technologies that will change frequently.

It can also reduce the disruption created by export restrictions, obsolescence, supplier failures, and sudden increases in demand.

Companies that manage this effectively will be better positioned to balance technological innovation with manufacturability. Those that do not may find themselves repeatedly redesigning products around unavailable components or operating separate, inefficient supply chains for every platform they develop or acquire.

Consolidation Does Not Automatically Create Scale

Acquisitions can create the appearance of industrial scale without delivering it.

Combining several autonomous-system companies may produce a broad technology portfolio, but it can also create duplicated suppliers, incompatible software, fragmented engineering practices, overlapping products, and multiple low-volume manufacturing processes.

The most important post-acquisition work will therefore occur well below the level of the corporate announcement.

Management will need to determine which components can be standardized, which suppliers can support higher volumes, which manufacturing processes can be shared, and which products should remain operationally independent.

It will also need to decide where vertical integration provides a meaningful advantage.

Some components may be strategically important enough to manufacture internally. Others may be better obtained from specialized suppliers. Still others may require domestic or allied capacity that does not yet exist at an acceptable cost or volume.

The strongest consolidators will not simply accumulate technologies. They will rationalize the industrial systems behind them.

That will require common product-development standards, shared supplier data, coordinated sourcing, manufacturing visibility, and disciplined decisions about which platforms continue to receive investment.

Without that integration, a larger portfolio may simply create a larger collection of low-volume supply chains.

Procurement Must Change Alongside Manufacturing

Manufacturers are only one side of the industrial equation.

Government procurement systems must also adapt to a market in which technologies change quickly and production volume may matter as much as the performance of an individual platform.

Traditional defense purchasing can take years to define requirements, evaluate contractors, select a platform, and establish a long-term program. That approach is difficult to reconcile with autonomous systems that may require frequent software updates, component substitutions, or redesigns based on operational feedback.

The fiscal year 2026 budget discussion itself acknowledged the need for more agile funding across unmanned systems, counter-UAS, and electronic warfare because the technologies and available industry capabilities are evolving rapidly.

The challenge is to increase speed without abandoning security, quality, traceability, interoperability, and operational reliability.

That may require shorter purchasing cycles, continuous testing, modular requirements, larger pools of qualified suppliers, and contracts that allow systems to evolve after initial deployment.

It may also require buyers to evaluate vendors differently.

A successful technical demonstration remains important. But procurement decisions may need to place greater weight on production readiness, supplier resilience, component provenance, manufacturing yield, workforce capacity, and the ability to sustain deliveries over time.

The ability to build 100 systems is not evidence that a company can build 10,000.

Domestic Production Is Both an Economic and Security Objective

U.S. policy increasingly treats domestic drone manufacturing as both a commercial-industrial priority and a national-security concern.

A June 2025 executive order called for expanding domestic drone production, reducing reliance on foreign sources, strengthening critical supply chains, prioritizing compliant American-made systems, and securing the supply chain against foreign control or exploitation.

The objective is clear. Execution will be difficult.

Rebuilding domestic capacity involves more than opening final-assembly plants. A drone assembled in the United States may still depend on imported batteries, motor magnets, semiconductor devices, imaging systems, circuit boards, or raw materials.

A durable domestic strategy must therefore look several tiers into the supply chain.

It must identify which dependencies create unacceptable risk, where allied sourcing is sufficient, where domestic production is economically feasible, and where strategic inventories or long-term purchasing commitments may be necessary.

Demand visibility will be essential.

Suppliers are unlikely to invest in new factories, tooling, automation, and specialized labor based on a sequence of small or uncertain contracts. Government customers may need to provide clearer multiyear demand signals while preserving enough flexibility to avoid locking procurement into technologies that become obsolete.

This creates a difficult balance between scale and adaptability.

Manufacturers need stable demand to invest in capacity. Buyers need enough flexibility to incorporate new technology. The industrial model must support both.

The Emerging Competitive Model

The next generation of autonomous-defense companies will compete across several dimensions simultaneously.

They will compete on technology, but also on cost, speed, manufacturability, component availability, software integration, supplier resilience, and production capacity.

They will need to manage product development like technology companies while operating supply chains more like automotive, electronics, or industrial-equipment manufacturers.

That combination will favor companies capable of building common architectures across multiple systems.

It will also favor companies that can convert acquisitions into operational integration rather than allowing each acquired business to remain a separate collection of products, suppliers, engineering standards, and manufacturing processes.

The Ondas-DZYNE transaction is unlikely to be the last of its kind.

As autonomous systems move from specialized programs toward broader deployment, larger companies will continue acquiring technologies, engineering talent, production capabilities, and supplier relationships that would take years to build internally.

But assembling a portfolio is not the same as building an industrial system.

The winners will be the companies that standardize components, rationalize suppliers, design for substitution, integrate manufacturing, and convert rapidly changing technology into reliable production volume.

The next phase of the defense-drone market will not be determined by innovation alone.

It will be determined by who can industrialize it.

The post Defense Drones Are Becoming an Industrial Supply Chain Race appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Non classé

Logistics Viewpoints Expands Its Supply Chain Resource Library

Published

10 heures ago

13 juillet 2026

The growing collection now includes strategic white papers, market-research executive summaries, advisory guides, and supplier visibility programs spanning AI, energy, cybersecurity, transportation, warehousing, and global trade.

As of July 2026, Logistics Viewpoints offers more than two dozen downloadable resources for supply chain executives, technology providers, and industry professionals.

The library has expanded beyond traditional market research to include strategic white papers on emerging operating issues, executive summaries covering major supply chain technology markets, guides to ARC Advisory Group research and advisory services, and commercial programs designed to help suppliers reach a targeted industry audience.

Together, these materials provide a practical starting point for organizations evaluating new technologies, assessing market opportunities, strengthening supply chain resilience, or building greater visibility in the market.

Strategic Supply Chain White Papers

The strategic white-paper collection focuses on issues that are reshaping how supply chains are designed, managed, and governed.

AI in the Supply Chain: Architecting the Future of Logistics with A2A, MCP, and Graph-Enhanced Reasoning

This paper examines the emerging architecture behind enterprise AI systems, including agent-to-agent communication, Model Context Protocol, knowledge graphs, and graph-enhanced reasoning.

Download the AI architecture white paper

AI in the Supply Chain: From Architecture to Execution

The second AI paper moves from architecture to deployment. It explores the decision intelligence layer needed to connect AI systems with enterprise data, workflows, governance, and supply chain execution platforms.

Download AI in the Supply Chain: From Architecture to Execution

Oil & Gas in the Supply Chain

Oil and gas remain critical inputs across transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, chemicals, and industrial production. This paper examines how organizations can build more resilient and responsible supply chains amid geopolitical risk, price volatility, infrastructure constraints, and environmental pressure.

Download Oil & Gas in the Supply Chain

Cyber Resilience in the Supply Chain

This paper examines how organizations can strengthen supply chain resilience against cyber threats that extend across internal systems, connected equipment, suppliers, logistics partners, and technology providers.

Download Cyber Resilience in the Supply Chain

Sustainability in the Supply Chain

The sustainability paper explores how companies can balance environmental goals with operational efficiency, resilience, supplier management, and regulatory compliance.

Download Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Energy in the Supply Chain

Energy cost, availability, and reliability influence transportation, manufacturing, warehousing, and network design. This paper considers how supply chains can better manage energy volatility and changing infrastructure requirements.

Download Energy in the Supply Chain

Connected Vehicles and V2X in the Supply Chain

This paper examines how connected vehicles, infrastructure, devices, and logistics platforms may improve transportation visibility, coordination, and responsiveness.

Download the Connected Vehicles and V2X white paper

Market-Research Executive Summaries

The Logistics Viewpoints library also includes executive summaries of major supply chain software and automation markets. These downloads provide concise introductions to market structure, technology capabilities, adoption patterns, and competitive dynamics.

Available summaries include:

Supply Chain Planning Global Outlook

Transportation Management Systems

Transportation Execution Systems

Warehouse Management Systems

Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems

Autonomous Mobile Robots

Omnichannel Order Management Systems

Global Trade Management Solutions

Global Trade Compliance Systems

Supply Chain Management Market Opportunity

These resources are particularly useful for executives seeking a concise overview before beginning a more detailed technology evaluation or market assessment.

Research and Advisory Guides

Organizations that require deeper analysis can also download guides describing ARC Advisory Group research and advisory services.

Custom Market Research Guide

This guide explains how tailored research can support market sizing, competitive analysis, customer research, technology assessments, and strategic planning.

Download the Custom Market Research Guide

Annual Contract Advisory Service Overview

The annual advisory service provides ongoing access to analysts, market insight, research, and strategic guidance.

Download the Annual Contract Advisory Service Overview

Voice of the Customer Survey Guide

This guide explains how structured customer research can help suppliers understand buyer priorities, customer satisfaction, market perception, and unmet needs.

Download the Voice of the Customer Survey Guide

Standard Market Research Report Guide

This guide outlines the structure, methodology, and business applications of ARC Advisory Group’s standard market research reports.

Download the Standard Market Research Report Guide

Sponsorship and Supplier Visibility Programs

Logistics Viewpoints also offers several programs for technology providers and service companies seeking greater visibility among supply chain executives.

Available program guides include:

Logistics Viewpoints Sponsorship Program

A Broader Supply Chain Knowledge Platform

The expansion of the Logistics Viewpoints resource library reflects a broader shift in the publication’s role.

Logistics Viewpoints remains an editorial platform covering supply chain technology, market developments, and operating strategy. The growing download library extends that role by giving readers access to more structured research, strategic frameworks, market summaries, and practical service guides.

Executives can use the library to explore emerging issues such as artificial intelligence, cyber resilience, energy, and connected transportation. They can also access established research on planning, transportation, warehousing, automation, order management, and global trade.

Technology suppliers can use the commercial guides to evaluate available research, advisory, webinar, podcast, sponsorship, and supplier visibility opportunities.

The collection will continue to expand as new white papers, market summaries, and program materials are published.

Readers can visit the Logistics Viewpoints White Papers library for the latest additions.

The post Logistics Viewpoints Expands Its Supply Chain Resource Library appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.