Connect with us

Non classé

Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update

Published

on

Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update

Published: June 16, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) stayed level.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 4%.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 3%.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) decreased 1%.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices stayed level.

China – N. Europe weekly prices increased 3%.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices decreased 2%.

Analysis

The US and Iran are set to sign an interim peace deal at the end of the week which will include an agreement to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, possibly within thirty days, and will start the clock on a sixty-day window to arrive at a final deal. As the sides haven’t released the text of the agreement, there is significant uncertainty around the Memorandum of Understanding’s details and timeline for the reopening.

The war’s broadest impact on freight markets has been via upward pressure on fuel prices. The reopening could mean some near term easing of fuel costs for carriers. President Trump asserts that the Strait will be fully open by the time of the signing, but even if both blockades are lifted then, the consensus is that a full return of traffic will likely take months as the narrow passage is further narrowed by Iranian mines. It will take time to de-mine the waterway, with some countries who have committed to the de-mining process hesitant to join the effort until a final peace deal is in place, meaning ships will have to rely on the few established safe lanes in the interim.

Experts estimate it will take several weeks for daily transits to recover to half of the pre-war norm, and much longer, possibly six months, for oil flows to normalize. In addition to out of place tankers and damage to infrastructure, even once vessels exit, it takes about seven weeks for crude to arrive in the Far East, with an even longer timeline for availability of refined products like bunker and jet fuel first dependent on those crude shipments arriving. The fact that many countries will seek to prioritize replenishing strategic reserves could likewise mean a commercial supply rebound will take time and that downward pressure on oil prices and on fuel costs will be gradual.

For the container market, near-term easing fuel costs would reduce some of the upward pressure on rates that have kept prices higher year on year since the start of the war. But while reduced Emergency Fuel Surcharges will be relevant for spot shipments, large shippers with annual contracts will still be paying higher rates via Q3 BAFs even as fuel costs decline.

Once fuel prices do normalize though, we could expect freight rates to pick up where they left off before the war: downward pressure on prices from a growing fleet. And if the peace deal hastens a broad carrier return to the Red Sea, that downward pressure will be even stronger.

Given this drawn out timeline for oil and fuel recovery however, this easing will come too late to make much of a difference for container rates this peak season. And in any case, spiking container rates at the moment are mostly being driven by peak season demand, not oil prices.

Spot prices on the major lanes were level last week, maintaining the sharp – $1k/FEU or more – GRI and PSS increases that carriers introduced to start the month. Reports that vessels are fully booked through the end of the month and that carriers are rolling containers and reducing allocations make it likely that mid-month increases will take too, with Asia – Europe daily rates already climbing about 10% this week.

Carriers have announced mid-month increases ranging from $1,000/FEU to $2,000/FEU above current levels for Asia – Europe lanes, with additional increases as much as $2,000/FEU higher than anticipated mid-June levels planned for the start of July. Likewise, CMA CGM has reportedly announced a $4,000/FEU PSS for all transpacific containers starting July 10th. And as carriers shift capacity to these lanes where demand is surging, rates are climbing on secondary lanes as vessels are moved away.

The early start to peak season – driven partially by frontloading ahead of BAF increases, tariffs, and coming manufacturer price hikes – has some observers expecting bookings to peak in June, which could mean carriers will find more resistance to July rate increases than they have to June price hikes so far.

Air cargo capacity and volumes continue to recover from the sharp March war-related deficit, with reports that Gulf carriers have restored capacity to about 70% of pre-war levels. But the remaining 30% gap, as well as non-Gulf carriers still mostly avoiding the Middle East, mean that the industry hasn’t normalized yet.

In addition to the lingering capacity slump, elevated jet fuel prices are also contributing to air cargo rates that continue to face upward pressure. Jet fuel prices are about 40% above pre-war levels though they have come down by about 35% from the war-period high reached in April, and some carriers are reducing Emergency Fuel Surcharges as a result.

The Freightos Air Index global benchmark closed last week level with the past two weeks and down 10% from its year high set in May, but still 30% higher year on year and relative to just before the war. Rates on the major lanes are showing similar trends.

China – N. America rates were level at $6.20/kg last week, a price 15% down from a peak in March but 17% higher year on year. China – Europe rates ticked up 3% to $4.62/kg, down 12% from their wartime peak, but still 30% higher than late February and 21% higher than last year. S. Asia prices are at about $4.50/kg to Europe and $3.17/kg to the Middle East, with Europe rates down 12% from their peak but up 50% year on year and Middle East prices 70% higher than a year ago but down 25% from their peak as Gulf capacity recovers.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Ocean rates level, but mid-month increases possible soon – June 16, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Tariffs Are No Longer a Customs Problem. They Are a Network-Design Problem

Published

on

By

Executive thesis. Tariffs have moved upstream from customs execution into network economics. A policy change can reshape sourcing, product margins, routing, inventory policy, and supplier viability before the first shipment is tendered.

Tariffs can change the network before freight moves

A tariff is collected at the border, but its economic effect begins much earlier. It can change supplier attractiveness, product margin, inventory strategy, country of origin decisions, routing, mode, customer pricing, and even product design. That makes tariff management a supply chain planning problem as much as a customs execution problem.

Exposure must be mapped to business objects

The enterprise needs to know which products, suppliers, origins, lanes, customers, and business units are affected by a change in tariff treatment. That requires disciplined classification, origin data, valuation logic, and connections to product and transaction systems. Without that mapping, policy changes arrive as a compliance surprise rather than a network scenario that can be evaluated.

Alternatives need to be economically complete

A sourcing or routing alternative should not be judged on duty alone. Freight, lead time, inventory, capacity, service, broker costs, compliance requirements, and operational risk all affect the result. Tariff analysis therefore belongs inside a broader landed-cost and network-decision framework rather than in an isolated duty calculator.

Execution closes the loop

Once an alternative is selected, the change has to propagate into purchasing, orders, transportation, broker instructions, customs documentation, and financial reconciliation. That is where many organizations discover the difference between analysis and operational readiness. A tariff strategy that cannot be executed cleanly is not yet a supply chain strategy.

Policy volatility rewards prepared architectures

The objective is not to predict every trade-policy change. It is to build an operating model that can identify affected flows, quantify exposure, model viable alternatives, approve a response, and update execution with an auditable record. That capability reduces reaction time and gives leaders more options when the economics change abruptly.

The Logistics Viewpoints Tariff and Customs Management: A Practical Guide for Logistics Leaders connects tariff exposure, HS/HTS classification, origin, valuation, landed cost, customs execution, brokers, sourcing, routing, and policy-change response in one operating framework.

Executive implication

Tariff management should therefore connect policy intelligence with product, supplier, origin, routing, and cost data so alternatives can be modeled before exposure becomes unavoidable.

Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. Global Trade & Compliance connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

Global Trade Management (GTM) Software: Buyer’s Guide

Go Deeper

Read the full Tariff and Customs Management: A Practical Guide for Logistics Leaders.

Explore the broader Global Trade & Compliance domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.

The post Tariffs Are No Longer a Customs Problem. They Are a Network-Design Problem appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Trade Compliance Can No Longer Operate as a Back-Office Function

Published

on

By

Executive thesis. Trade compliance is no longer a back-office checkpoint. It is an operating constraint that can approve, block, reroute, delay, or reprice physical supply-chain activity.

Compliance decisions are supply chain decisions

Restricted-party screening, classification, export controls, licensing, origin, and sanctions may be governed by compliance teams, but their effects reach far beyond that function. They can determine whether a supplier can be used, whether a product can move, how it must be documented, what it will cost, and whether a customer commitment can be fulfilled. Treating those controls as a late-stage check creates avoidable operational risk.

The control has to occur at the right moment

A screening result that arrives after an order is released or a shipment is tendered is operationally expensive. So is a classification correction discovered after customs entry. Modern compliance architecture needs to place the control where the decision is made—during onboarding, sourcing, order creation, shipment planning, or document preparation—rather than rely on downstream inspection.

Evidence matters as much as the answer

Compliance systems need more than a pass/fail result. They need to preserve the data, rule, source, version, reviewer action, and exception history that explain the decision. This is especially material as regulatory content changes and as automated workflows reduce the amount of human review applied to routine transactions.

Workflow is where policy becomes execution

The strongest platforms translate policy into operational workflow. They route uncertain cases, enforce approval thresholds, prevent unauthorized progression, and document overrides. This allows the organization to increase automation without losing governance. It also creates a clearer operating model for who owns each class of exception.

Integration should be evaluated as a control surface

Trade compliance is only as strong as the business processes it can influence. Buyers should test connections to ERP, PLM, procurement, customer and supplier master data, order management, transportation, and broker workflows. The critical question is whether compliance status can actually prevent, redirect, or approve the next operational step.

Logistics Viewpoints’ Global Trade Compliance Software: What It Does and How to Evaluate It provides a control-focused framework for restricted-party screening, classification, sanctions, licensing, origin, evidence, workflow, audit trails, and enterprise integration.

Executive implication

Leaders should evaluate compliance technology by the quality of its controls, evidence, timing, workflow, and integration into the systems where consequential decisions are made.

Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. Global Trade & Compliance connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

Download the Global Trade Compliance (GTC) Systems Executive Summary

Go Deeper

Read the full Global Trade Compliance Software: What It Does and How to Evaluate It.

Explore the broader Global Trade & Compliance domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.

The post Trade Compliance Can No Longer Operate as a Back-Office Function appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Infor Builds More Intelligence Into Logistics Execution

Published

on

By

Warehouse and transportation systems have traditionally been judged on execution reliability: receive the inventory, build the wave, pick the order, plan the shipment, tender the load, and record the transaction correctly. Those requirements have not disappeared, but the competitive frontier is moving toward systems that can interpret operating conditions and help improve the work while it is happening.

Infor’s logistics portfolio reflects that shift. Infor WMS combines core warehouse execution with labor management, yard capabilities, 3PL billing, visualization, and connectivity to automation. The broader Infor cloud environment adds analytics, workflow, integration services, machine learning, robotic process automation, and digital-assistant capabilities that can increasingly influence operational decisions rather than simply report them.

The result is a useful example of how mature execution software is being modernized. Warehouse operations are becoming more automated, transportation networks more dynamic, and labor more constrained. Systems therefore need to coordinate people, inventory, equipment, automation, and external logistics partners while also providing enough intelligence to prioritize exceptions and adapt plans during the day.

The critical issue is execution discipline. AI features are valuable only when they improve an already dependable operating process. Buyers should validate core functional depth, automation interfaces, cloud architecture, and the quality of the recommendations generated from operational data before treating AI as a differentiator by itself.

Infor can be viewed in both the Logistics Viewpoints Transportation Management Systems MarketMap and Warehouse Management Systems MarketMap. Those two MarketMaps provide a useful way to assess how the company is evolving across the connected transportation and warehouse execution environment.

The post Infor Builds More Intelligence Into Logistics Execution appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending