Connect with us

Non classé

The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future

Published

on

The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future

September 10, 2025

Blog

SURVEY HIGHLIGHTS: Nearly 3/4 of small importers report significant cost increases from tariffs, with half reducing shipments entirely. 44% face cost spikes of 20%+ while 52% expect weaker holiday sales, according to a new Freightos/Clearit survey of 390+ North American businesses.

This snapshot reveals just the surface of how deeply the ongoing trade tensions are affecting small and medium-sized businesses. As tariff policies become clearer, the outlook grows increasingly concerning for these companies. Below, we explore the comprehensive findings from our latest survey and what they mean for businesses navigating the uncertain trade landscape in 2025.

Businesses Under Pressure: The Widening Effects of Trade Disruption

A recent Freightos/Clearit survey of 390+ North American importers paints a concerning picture of the trade war’s ongoing impact on businesses. Companies are feeling the squeeze, with significant disruptions to their operations so far this year. And now that tariff policies are becoming clearer, the outlook on costs and sales is increasingly worrying, as most respondents believe the worst may be yet to come.

72% of businesses reported moderate to significant increases in landed costs and nearly 50% have reduced shipping activity due to tariffs already in place; over half expect weaker sales as a result. Importers say the 90-day extension of 30% US tariffs on China will not lead to a significant freight rebound this year for several reasons, including earlier frontloading and the status quo already pricing some shippers out.

The findings suggest broader economic consequences, including:

Diminished international trade relationships

Decreased consumer strength

Potentially existential threats for some businesses, especially SMBs

One importer summed it up as follows: “The tariffs combined with the sinking value of the dollar have created a 30% increase in costs just in a few months. Devastating to our bottom line.”

Note that this survey is the third in a series of surveys conducted across small importers. For previous versions, please see here and here.

Tariff Business Impact: Costs Rising, Shipments Falling

This year has been punctuated by tariff announcements including the “Liberation Day” 10 % universal tariff on April 5, country-specific reciprocal tariffs that were announced on April 2 and later paused twice, first until July 8, then again until August 7, when they finally went live. Many of these announcements were provided with what businesses felt were insufficient warning, leading to uncertainty.

Clarity…and Concern

Now, as recent trade agreements and additional sectoral tariffs are clearer, most (56%) businesses report more concern about negative impacts than they had due to earlier tariff changes.

This worry for the future is particularly striking when taking into account how dramatically their businesses have already been impacted:

Widespread disruption: 84% said frequent tariff changes have been disruptive or very disruptive to business.

Substantial cost increases: 72% reported that tariffs have already increased their costs by at least 5%. A shocking 44% say costs have climbed by 20% or more.

Reduced shipping: This has already led to reduced import volumes from small businesses; 50% of businesses have reduced shipment volumes due to higher costs.

Growing concern: 57% are more concerned about tariffs negatively impacting their business than they were earlier in the year. For comparison, when we asked this question in May, only 31% were more concerned than they were earlier in the year.

Consumer weakness: Concern about the downfunnel impact of weaker demand is growing. Slightly more than half (52%) expected weaker back-to-school and holiday sales than last year, compared to only 35% who had expected lower Memorial Day sales due to tariffs when asked back in May.

International standing: Whether the tariffs are removed or not, there could be long-lasting consequences. Some 60% think the trade war has weakened the standing of US businesses as trading partners.

How am I supposed to stay in business if I have $400 tariffs and fees on a $700 order that the client won’t pay?”

– Small importer reporting 20%+ cost increases

Freight Impact: Scrambling for Strategy

Rapid changes are also sending shippers scrambling for strategies to help mitigate the trade war’s impact, taking action such as accelerating orders, changing production centers, or even cancelling. Beyond the 50% who have reduced shipment volumes due to higher costs, about 15% each have:

Pulled holiday orders forward

Paused or delayed holiday orders

Canceled manufacturing mid-order

Moved some sourcing to US

We paused for a period of time when [tariffs were] initially announced. Now we feel there is some stability with the pauses being extended, but before that the uncertainty was so high that we decided to wait to see what would happen.

– Furniture importer

Adapting to these changes has not been one-size-fits-all – businesses are reaching for anything that works to manage the unpredictability.

90-Day China Tariff Extension: Limited Relief

In May and June, the initial postponement of China tariffs led to a brief spike in shipments, as importers accelerated their shipments to beat the tariffs. This front-loading, however, was quite short-lived, as demonstrated in the chart below:

The recent postponement did not have a similar effect.

While some importers said the recent extension of the 30% US tariff on Chinese imports is allowing them to restart shipments, overall, the extension is not triggering a second peak season wave. Instead, it’s having diverse effects on different businesses:

Many are unaffected due to prior frontloading or because sectoral tariffs are a bigger challenge

Others expected the 30% to remain in place and have continued shipping as usual

Some are already priced out by 30% baseline tariffs

As one importer said: “We had to buy more than usual while we could get product at a lower price. 2025 costs will be higher than usual with a greater risk of deadstock”

Another described uncertainty that prompted them to restructure their entire supply chain: “Most if not all my importing has moved out of China. I’m too worried tariffs could switch from one day to the next even though there is a 90-day extension.”

Analysis and Going Forward

The survey results paint a picture of businesses caught in an economic crossfire, with potential ripple effects that could reshape supply chains and trade relationships for years to come.

Long Term Structural Changes Ahead

“The survey shows that the trade war has already negatively impacted many US importers, and that expectations of new or expanded tariffs and the duties applied under the trade deals of the last few weeks has shippers bracing for possibly more severe challenges to business moving forward,” says Judah Levine, Freightos Head of Research. The data suggests we’re witnessing not just temporary disruption but potentially long-term structural changes to international sourcing and pricing strategies.

Impossible To Forecast or Plan

Adam Lewis, President of Clearit Customs points to the particularly hard hit SMBs have taken: “With still so much uncertainty in the trade environment, this survey makes one thing clear: Unfortunately, small and medium sized businesses are bearing the brunt of the trade war. Unlike larger corporations, they don’t have the same insulation or sophistication to absorb frequent tariff changes, currency swings, and rising costs. The unknowns have been the most damaging, making it nearly impossible to forecast, budget, or protect margins.”

Looking ahead, the trade landscape could continue to stabilize in coming months with more agreements reaching finalization. However, the combination of disrupted supply chains, weakened consumer sentiment, and eroded international relationships creates a challenging environment that will likely require businesses to maintain flexibility in sourcing, pricing, and inventory management for the foreseeable future.

Devorah Wolf

Content Marketing Lead

When freight gets complicated, Devorah Wolf, Freightos’ digital freight aficionado, swoops in to clarify the nitty-gritty of global trade with blogs, guides, videos, and newsletters for every shipper – from beginner to expert. She’s so excited about shipping that most of her clothing is imported. But in freight’s defense, that’s basically true about everyone.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post The 2025 Trade War Impact on Small Businesses: Rising Costs and an Uncertain Future appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

The Physical Logistics Network Is Getting an Intelligence Layer

Published

on

By

For most of logistics history, the physical network knew far more about itself than its information systems did. A driver knew a trailer was delayed before the planning system did. A warehouse supervisor could see congestion building at the dock while enterprise applications still showed normal status. A forklift operator knew an aisle was blocked. A container sat at a terminal while downstream systems waited for a status message. That intelligence layer builds on the distinction in Decision Intelligence in 2026 between producing analytical insight and materially improving a consequential operating decision.

That gap between physical reality and digital representation has been one of the defining constraints of logistics management.

It is beginning to narrow.

Physical Assets Are Becoming Observable

Trucks, trailers, containers, forklifts, robots, conveyors, dock doors, pallets, and facilities increasingly generate digital signals. Telematics provides vehicle state and location. RFID and other identification technologies help track goods and assets. Cameras and computer vision can interpret physical activity. Sensors monitor temperature, vibration, equipment condition, and environmental state. Geofencing turns movement into events.

The result is not a literal “internet” of every physical object. It is something operationally more important: a growing ability for software to understand the state of the logistics network without waiting for manual reporting.

Events Become Digital State

An isolated sensor reading has limited value. The architectural change occurs when events are associated with persistent business entities.

This trailer is at this yard. This container contains these orders. This dock is occupied. This robot is unavailable. This shipment is expected to reach this facility at this time. This pallet is associated with this customer commitment.

Identity turns telemetry into context. That is why master data and entity resolution matter so much. If systems cannot reliably determine that two identifiers refer to the same trailer, shipment, location, or product, the digital picture fragments.

Computer Vision Expands What Can Be Measured

Some important logistics states have historically been difficult to capture because they are visual rather than transactional.

Is a dock occupied? Is a trailer damaged? Is freight staged in the wrong location? Is a safety zone blocked? Is a pallet configured correctly? Is a yard lane congested?

Computer vision can convert selected physical observations into structured events. That does not eliminate the need for people, but it expands the range of operating conditions that software can monitor.

Warehouses Become Instrumented Environments

Automated warehouses already produce large volumes of machine data. Robots report status. Conveyors generate events. AS/RS equipment records movement. WMS and WES systems track tasks and inventory transitions.

As those signals become more integrated, the facility can be represented with increasing fidelity. That enables earlier detection of bottlenecks, more dynamic work allocation, predictive maintenance, and better simulation of how changes will affect throughput.

Transportation Becomes a Moving Sensor Network

Transportation is more difficult because assets operate across public infrastructure, carrier networks, and multiple ownership boundaries. Even so, connected vehicles, mobile devices, telematics, ELD-related data, carrier APIs, and location services have dramatically improved the ability to observe movement.

The strategic value is not simply knowing where a truck is. It is connecting that state to orders, appointments, inventory, customer commitments, and downstream resources.

Digital Twins Become More Practical

The phrase “digital twin” is sometimes used too loosely. A useful logistics twin is not merely a visualization. It is a sufficiently current digital representation of a physical system that can support analysis, simulation, or control. The richer the operating state, the more useful that representation becomes.

A warehouse twin can test flow changes. A transportation-network model can evaluate disruption scenarios. A yard representation can help coordinate trailer movement. A broader logistics twin can explore how a constraint in one node propagates to others. The value comes from decision support, not graphical sophistication.

Observability Creates New Failure Modes

More connected logistics also creates new dependencies.

Sensors can fail. Data can be delayed. Identifiers can be wrong. Connectivity can disappear. Computer vision can misclassify. APIs can change. Cybersecurity risk expands as more operational assets become connected.

Organizations therefore need confidence measures and graceful degradation. An intelligent system must know when the underlying state is uncertain.

The Economics of Machine-Readable Logistics

Better physical observability can improve asset utilization, reduce loss, support predictive maintenance, improve service, lower search and coordination effort, and help prevent exceptions before they become expensive. But the largest strategic effect may be indirect.

Software can only make useful operational decisions about the world it can represent. As the digital state becomes richer, optimization and AI can address a larger portion of logistics execution.

Information Is No Longer the Only Constraint

This creates a new paradox. Logistics organizations can now receive more information, more frequently, about more assets than ever before. Yet performance can still be constrained because people and systems cannot interpret and act on that information quickly enough. In other words, the bottleneck moves from sensing to deciding.

That makes decision velocity more than a management concept. It is becoming a form of logistics capacity.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

The New Architecture of Logistics
Systems Engineering in Logistics
2026 Supply Chain Decision Intelligence Market Map
The Emerging Intelligence Layer Above ERP, TMS, and WMS Platforms
Previous in this series: AI Agents Are Coming for Logistics Execution

Request The New Architecture of Logistics Client Edition

If your organization is assessing connected execution, orchestration, AI, observability, decision velocity, or selective autonomy, I would be glad to provide the complete client edition and discuss the implications for your logistics operating model and technology architecture.

Request the client edition

The post The Physical Logistics Network Is Getting an Intelligence Layer appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Why Maritime Cybersecurity Is Becoming an Operational Priority

Published

on

By

Digitalization is changing how ships, ports, offshore platforms, and logistics networks operate. Navigation, cargo handling, propulsion, communications, maintenance, and business applications are increasingly connected. These links improve efficiency and visibility, but they also expose maritime operations to ransomware, supply-chain compromise, navigation interference, and attacks on operational technology (OT).

The central issue is no longer simply whether an attacker can steal data. A maritime cyber incident can delay cargo, impair navigation, interrupt terminal operations, remove visibility into safety-critical processes, or prevent equipment from operating as intended. Cybersecurity therefore belongs within operational resilience and safety management—not solely within the IT department.

Recent Events Show the Range of Exposure

Recent incidents illustrate both the seriousness of the threat and the difficulty of confirming attribution. In August 2026, US authorities boarded the fully laden tanker VL Prosperity after indications of malicious cyber activity. Public reporting described temporary unauthorized access to a propulsion-related digital system, although authorities did not confirm that an attacker issued propulsion commands or caused a physical change. Even with those uncertainties, access to a propulsion environment would mark a significant escalation from attacks limited to administrative networks.

A separate September disruption aboard the Vivit Africa LNG left the crew without access to systems used to monitor cargo parameters. The crew suspected a cyberattack, while the Italian Coast Guard confirmed only that a systems malfunction had occurred and required technical intervention. The distinction matters, but so does the operational lesson: maritime organizations must be able to respond safely while the cause of a disruption is still unknown.

Ports have faced comparable pressure. Ransomware and other cyber incidents have interrupted scheduling, customs processing, gate operations, and supply-chain visibility. These cases demonstrate that an enterprise IT compromise can still stop physical commerce, even when cranes, pumps, or vessel control systems are not directly affected.

A Distinctive Maritime Threat Landscape

Maritime environments combine long-lived assets, intermittent connectivity, distributed operations, and extensive third-party involvement. Ships can remain in service for decades, leaving older controllers, workstations, and protocols operating alongside connected applications that their designers never anticipated. At sea, bandwidth may be constrained, specialist support may be remote, and aggressive containment can remove critical visibility or control.

Navigation adds another layer of exposure. GPS and other GNSS spoofing or jamming can create false position data, while manipulation of Automatic Identification System information can obscure vessel identity or movement. Resilience requires independent position verification, trained crews, and trusted fallback methods—not just stronger perimeter defenses.

The highest-consequence scenarios involve propulsion, power management, ballast control, dynamic positioning, cargo systems, cranes, pumps, and safety functions. Remote maintenance and vendor diagnostics add value, but they can also extend the trust boundary through weak credentials, unmanaged connections, portable media, or poorly governed updates. Security programs should therefore assess suppliers, access pathways, and operational dependencies together.

Regulation Is Raising the Baseline

Regulators and classification bodies are increasingly treating cyber risk as a maritime safety issue. The US Coast Guard’s Marine Transportation System cybersecurity rule establishes requirements for cyber risk assessment, cybersecurity planning, training, exercises, incident response, and recovery. Principal obligations are being phased in, with regulated owners and operators generally expected to designate a cybersecurity officer, complete an assessment, and submit a plan by July 16, 2027.

The International Maritime Organization has already directed organizations to incorporate cyber risk into Safety Management Systems. Its approach is practical: identify, protect, detect, respond, and recover. The IACS Unified Requirements E26 and E27 reinforce this direction by embedding cybersecurity into covered new ships and onboard equipment, encouraging secure design rather than costly retrofits.

European requirements add pressure across maritime operators and technology suppliers. The NIS2 Directive strengthens governance, supply-chain security, incident reporting, and business continuity expectations for critical sectors including transport. The Cyber Resilience Act introduces cybersecurity requirements for connected products sold in Europe. Together, these measures make fragmented, compliance-only programs increasingly difficult to sustain.

What Maritime Operators Should Do Now

The first priority is visibility. Operators need maintained inventories of hardware, software, firmware, communications paths, ownership, safety functions, and dependencies across vessels and shoreside facilities. Criticality should be based on operational and safety consequences, not vulnerability scores alone.

Second, networks should be segmented by operational function. Bridge, machinery, safety, cargo, passenger, corporate, wireless, satellite, and vendor environments should not have unrestricted connectivity. Architectures must also support safe degraded operation when external communications are unavailable.

Third, remote access should be purpose-specific, time-limited, strongly authenticated, approved, and monitored. Operators should know which suppliers can connect, which assets they can reach, and who authorizes each session. Contracts should define responsibilities for security updates, logging, vulnerability disclosure, incident cooperation, and recovery.

Finally, detection and response must reflect OT realities. Playbooks should account for the possibility that isolating a device could create a greater hazard. Exercises should test limited bandwidth, unavailable shore support, compromised navigation data, and loss of trusted configurations. Verified backups, known-good baselines, spare equipment, manual operating modes, and practiced restoration procedures are essential parts of cyber resilience.

ARC Perspective

Maritime cybersecurity is reaching the same inflection point previously encountered in power, oil and gas, and manufacturing. Connectivity is expanding faster than many legacy environments were designed to accommodate, while regulatory expectations and threat capabilities continue to rise.

Compliance provides a necessary baseline, but resilience is the more meaningful measure. Maritime organizations should ask whether crews and operators can recognize abnormal behavior, sustain safe operations through degraded communications, contain an intrusion without creating a new hazard, and restore systems to a known-good state.

Existing resources—including the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, NIST OT security guidance, and the ISA/IEC 62443 series—provide a strong foundation. The task is to apply them consistently across vessels, ports, offshore assets, and suppliers. Organizations that integrate cyber risk with safety, engineering, workforce readiness, and recovery will be better positioned to protect crews, sustain operations, and preserve the flow of global commerce.

The post Why Maritime Cybersecurity Is Becoming an Operational Priority appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Cybersecurity Has Become a Core Logistics Operating Requirement

Published

on

By

Executive thesis. Cybersecurity has become a logistics operating requirement because digital failure now creates physical consequences. Warehouses, fleets, transportation networks, cloud applications, and partner connections all sit inside the operational attack surface.

Digital failure now creates physical consequences

Logistics operations depend on identity systems, cloud applications, warehouse controls, telematics, partner connections, carrier networks, APIs, and automated decision services. A cyber incident can therefore stop more than data processing. It can prevent work release, disrupt picking, disable visibility, interrupt dispatch, block partner communication, and force physical operations into degraded modes.

The security boundary extends beyond the enterprise

Transportation carriers, brokers, suppliers, robotics providers, cloud vendors, integration platforms, and other third parties participate in the operating environment. Their credentials, interfaces, devices, and support paths create dependencies that conventional perimeter thinking does not capture. Logistics cybersecurity has to account for the extended operational ecosystem.

Warehouse OT and telematics require operational thinking

Cyber controls cannot be designed without understanding the physical process they protect. Warehouse automation, vehicle systems, and edge devices may have different patching constraints, availability requirements, and recovery procedures than office IT. Security decisions need to preserve safety and continuity as well as confidentiality and data integrity.

Fallback is part of cybersecurity

A resilient operation needs to know how work continues when a critical digital service is unavailable or untrusted. That may involve manual dispatch, alternate communications, offline picking procedures, controlled order holds, backup identities, or predefined recovery priorities. A backup that has never been restored and a manual process that has never been exercised are not reliable controls.

Recovery should be measured operationally

Cybersecurity metrics should include the ability to restore critical logistics capabilities, not only the number of vulnerabilities closed. Time to isolate, time to recover, transaction reconciliation, backlog clearance, and the safe return to automated operation are supply chain performance measures during a cyber event.

The Logistics Viewpoints Cybersecurity in Logistics: A Practical Guide translates cybersecurity into logistics operations across identity, cloud applications, warehouse OT, telematics, third parties, backups, fallback, and recovery.

Executive implication

Cyber resilience should be measured by continuity and recovery of logistics operations, including degraded-mode procedures and manual fallback—not by security controls in isolation.

Go deeper: provides the durable buyer, architecture, and implementation reference for this topic. Risk, Resilience & Security connects this analysis to the broader Logistics Viewpoints research architecture.

Related Logistics Viewpoints research

Download Cyber Resilience in the Supply Chain
Cybersecurity in Supply Chains

Go Deeper

Read the full Cybersecurity in Logistics: A Practical Guide.

Explore the broader Risk, Resilience & Security domain for related Logistics Viewpoints research and analysis.

The post Cybersecurity Has Become a Core Logistics Operating Requirement appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending