Connect with us

Non classé

Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress

Published

on

Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress

Oliver Esch

June 12, 2025

Blog

The recent World Procurement Congress brought together procurement leaders from across the globe, from Australia to North America, representing diverse industries and perspectives. As a participant, I had the opportunity to engage with CPOs and senior management, gaining valuable insights into current industry trends and organizational priorities. Here are my key takeaways from the event:

The Human Element Remains Essential in an AI-Driven World

While artificial intelligence dominated many discussions, there was a consensus that human skills remain irreplaceable. CPOs and senior management recognize that even the most sophisticated AI tools cannot be used effectively without the right people and skill sets.

“Human contracts are still done between humans,” was a sentiment echoed throughout the event. Despite technological advances, procurement organizations increasingly invest in finding employees with the right mindset and analytical capabilities to achieve their business objectives.

My learning is that employees are key for CPOs and senior management. While they recognize the importance of AI, they also know that this intelligence cannot be used properly without humans and without their employees. That is why investing in employees is more important—finding the right people with the right mindset to achieve targets.

The Evolving Skill Set of Procurement Professionals

Procurement skills have undergone a significant transformation in recent years. As procurement spending becomes more crucial to organizational success, companies are emphasizing the buying process more.

The analytical requirements have evolved dramatically. Ten years ago, buyers might simply compare quotes, but today’s procurement professionals must analyze:

Extensive data sets

Market volatility factors

Benchmarking information

Supplier performance metrics

Emerging trends

This shift has created demand for more analytical procurement professionals who can manage fewer, more trusted supplier relationships rather than handling numerous vendor interactions.

The skills of procurement and buyers are becoming increasingly different. Companies are caring much more about procurement and buying processes as spending becomes more crucial. Analytical skills are now more important than ever. With massive datasets behind decisions and external factors like volatility, benchmarking trends, supplier performance, and more, the procurement profession now requires a different skill set—more analytical, with deeper interactions with a limited number of trusted suppliers.

Partnership Over Pure Cost-Cutting

One of the most significant shifts in procurement strategy has been the move from pure cost-cutting to building flexible, resilient partnerships. This trend emerged mainly as a lesson from the COVID pandemic, when organizations discovered that strong supplier relationships were critical during capacity constraints.

Companies are more willing to invest in long-term partnerships built on trust and reliability. When capacity is limited, these partnerships prove invaluable—trusted suppliers will work harder to find solutions for valued partners. In contrast, transactional relationships often leave buyers without support during challenging market conditions.

I think partnership is a key element—a lesson from the last three or four years, especially during COVID. Openness to potentially invest a bit more in long-term partnerships with trust and reliability is more valued now than before. With good partnerships during times when capacity was limited, you still had an opportunity to manage your transportation. That’s why partnership has become a key element alongside transit time, supplier performance, and cost in identifying the right partners.

Technology as an Enabler of Better Decision-Making

The technology discussions at the Congress focused primarily on improving data visibility, visualization, and understanding. Procurement leaders are looking for tools that:

Simplify complex data

Provide visual representations of information

Enable quick access to insights (including through AI interfaces)

Help identify optimal solutions within short timeframes

The emphasis is on using technology to deliver immediate, actionable insights that procurement professionals can use in negotiations and strategic planning.

One of the key elements is bringing more visibility to different data, visualizing and simplifying data to help people understand what they’re using. While AI is essential, allowing you to talk to your laptop or phone to get results, the most crucial part is data and data visualization to get an engine that demonstrates the best solution quickly. It’s mainly about data, data visualization, and understanding different data to get immediate insights and understand which direction buyers and procurement should negotiate rates.

Sustainability Continues to Gain Momentum

Sustainability remains crucial for procurement leaders, though it is not as prominently featured as other topics. Organizations increasingly focus on reducing CO2 emissions and incorporating environmental factors into their procurement decisions.

Looking Ahead: Stability in Procurement Priorities

Despite constant market changes, the core priorities for procurement organizations have remained relatively stable. CPOs from major companies like Heineken and Diageo continue to focus on three key areas:

Cost management

Carbon reduction

Partnership development

This consistency provides procurement technology providers with a clear direction and ensures that solution development aligns with long-term market needs.

The procurement world isn’t so volatile that this year’s themes differ dramatically from last year’s. That’s an advantage—we know how to develop our products to meet market interest. Cost, carbon, and partnership are the key areas that CPOs are focusing on.

5 Key Things I Learned at the World Procurement Congress

Human expertise remains irreplaceable: Even with AI advancements, human analytical skills and relationship management are more crucial than ever.

Procurement is increasingly strategic: Companies view procurement as a cost center and a critical strategic function with significant impact.

Partnership trumps pure cost-cutting: Organizations that invest in trusted relationships with suppliers gain flexibility and resilience during market disruptions.

Data visualization is critical: Simplifying and visualizing complex data enables better and faster decision-making.

Employee investment pays dividends: Finding and developing talent with the right analytical mindset and skills is becoming a top priority for CPOs.

Frequently Asked Questions from the Event

During the Congress, several questions repeatedly emerged in discussions:

Q: How can we effectively balance AI implementation with human skills?
A: Focus on developing your team’s analytical capabilities using AI to handle data processing and pattern recognition. The most successful organizations view AI as an enhancement to human decision-making, not a replacement.

Q: What skills should procurement teams prioritize developing?
A: Analytical capabilities, data interpretation, relationship management, and strategic thinking are becoming essential. A technical understanding of supply chain systems is also increasingly valuable.

Q: How can we build resilient partnerships without sacrificing cost efficiency?
A: Look beyond immediate price points to total value, including reliability during disruptions. The cost of failure during capacity constraints often far exceeds modest premiums paid for trustworthy partnerships.

Q: What technologies are delivering the most value in procurement today?
A: Tools that enhance data visibility, provide benchmarking capabilities, and offer intuitive visualization of complex information are proving most valuable for strategic decision-making.

Q: How are leading organizations incorporating sustainability into procurement?
A: They’re making sustainability a core evaluation criterion alongside cost and performance, with increasing focus on measurable carbon reduction throughout the supply chain.

Final Thoughts

The World Procurement Congress reinforced that while technology adoption accelerates across the industry, the fundamentals of good procurement practice remain centered on human expertise, strong partnerships, and data-driven decision-making. Organizations that can balance technological innovation with investment in people and relationships will be best positioned to navigate the complexities of today’s supply chains.

Freightos is committed to supporting this balance by delivering solutions that enhance human capability through automation, visibility, and insight. Our platform combines data benchmarking, rate management, booking capabilities, and visibility tools in a single interface, designed not to replace procurement professionals but to empower them.

As we look toward the next year of transformation in logistics and sourcing, I invite you to reflect on how your organization is balancing technology innovation with human expertise.

Oliver Esch

Oliver brings 15+ years of logistics and supply chain expertise to the table. Before joining Freightos Procure (formerly SHIPSTA), he worked as a consultant, uncovering optimization potential in global supply chain operations for industry leaders. Now, he’s focused on delivering cutting-edge solutions to Fortune 1000 companies, helping them streamline both strategic and operational processes for maximum value.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Federal Industrial Partnerships and Supply Chain Realignment Under the Trump Administration: Pharmaceuticals, Semiconductors, Critical Minerals, and Energy

Published

on

By

Federal Industrial Partnerships And Supply Chain Realignment Under The Trump Administration: Pharmaceuticals, Semiconductors, Critical Minerals, And Energy

In the months leading up to the 2026 midterm elections, the Trump administration has launched a broad initiative to negotiate agreements with companies across as many as thirty industries. According to reporting from Reuters and other outlets, these deals involve a range of mechanisms, including tariff relief, equity stakes, revenue guarantees, and regulatory adjustments.

The purpose of the initiative, according to administration officials, is to strengthen U.S. national and economic security by encouraging companies to expand production domestically, reduce reliance on China, and ensure the availability of critical products.

For logistics and supply chain leaders, this represents a significant change in the relationship between government and industry. Federal agencies are no longer simply regulators or supporters of infrastructure. They are becoming active participants in corporate strategy, investment, and supply chain design.

Structure of the Deals

The administration’s approach is not uniform. Each agreement varies depending on the sector and company involved. Examples include:

Pharmaceuticals: Eli Lilly was asked to expand insulin production, Pfizer was pressed to increase output of its cancer and cholesterol drugs, and AstraZeneca was encouraged to establish a new U.S. headquarters. In exchange, companies have been offered tariff relief or regulatory flexibility.
Semiconductors: A portion of grants provided under the CHIPS Act has been converted into equity stakes, including a reported 10 percent stake in Intel.
Critical Minerals: The Department of Defense took a 15 percent stake in MP Materials, secured a floor price for future government purchases, and facilitated a $500 million supply agreement between MP Materials and Apple for rare earth magnets.
Energy: The Department of Energy has asked companies such as Lithium Americas for equity stakes in exchange for federal loans supporting domestic mining and battery production.

The unifying theme is the use of federal leverage, such as tariffs, financing programs, or regulatory approvals, to secure commitments from private companies that align with stated national security objectives.

Agencies as Dealmakers

What distinguishes this initiative is the scale of inter-agency involvement. The White House has described the approach as “whole of government.”

The Department of Health and Human Services is leading negotiations in pharmaceuticals.
The Department of Commerce, under Secretary Howard Lutnick, has overseen transactions in steel, semiconductors, and industrial manufacturing.
The Department of Energy is linking financing programs to equity arrangements in energy and mining.
The Pentagon has led negotiations with defense contractors and suppliers of critical minerals.

Senior officials, including White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and supply chain coordinator David Copley, are directly involved in negotiations. The presence of Wall Street dealmakers, such as Michael Grimes (formerly of Morgan Stanley) and David Shapiro (formerly of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz), illustrates the administration’s transactional orientation.

Financing Mechanisms

The administration is using multiple sources of capital to finance these arrangements:

International Development Finance Corporation (DFC): Originally designed to support development projects abroad, the DFC has proposed expanding its budget authority from $60 billion to $250 billion. If approved by Congress, it would fund projects in infrastructure, energy, and critical supply chains within the U.S.
Investment Accelerator (Commerce Department): Seeded by $550 billion pledged by Japan as part of a bilateral trade agreement, this entity will direct capital into U.S. strategic sectors, serving as a replacement for an earlier proposal to establish a sovereign wealth fund.
Existing Programs: Agencies are repurposing funds from programs such as the CHIPS Act and Department of Energy loan guarantees, often converting grants into equity holdings.

Together, these mechanisms represent one of the largest coordinated federal interventions in U.S. industrial and supply chain development in recent decades.

Implications for Supply Chains

The administration’s policies carry several direct consequences for logistics and supply chain management.

1. Reshoring of Manufacturing

Many of the deals include explicit requirements for expanded U.S. production. This will increase demand for domestic transportation, warehousing, and distribution capacity. It also implies higher utilization of U.S. ports and intermodal corridors, as inputs shift from finished imports to raw materials and intermediate goods requiring processing inside the United States.

2. Critical Minerals and Energy Security

The focus on rare earths, lithium, and other inputs for advanced manufacturing indicates a restructuring of upstream supply chains. Logistics providers should expect increased flows from domestic mining regions, such as Nevada’s Thacker Pass lithium project, to processing and manufacturing centers. This represents a shift away from reliance on Asian supply hubs, particularly China.

3. Government as Stakeholder

Equity stakes and long-term purchase agreements create a different operating environment. Logistics providers serving these industries may find demand more stable due to government-backed contracts. However, these arrangements may also impose compliance requirements and reduce flexibility in adjusting supply networks.

4. Public-Private Coordination

Federal involvement in freight and industrial infrastructure financing could accelerate long-delayed projects. Rail expansion, port upgrades, and domestic warehouse capacity may benefit from this investment. Companies positioned to partner on these projects may see long-term opportunities.

Risks and Concerns

Several risks accompany this shift:

Policy Reversal: Executives have expressed concern that a future administration could unwind or renegotiate these deals. Supply chains built around government-backed agreements may face uncertainty if political priorities shift.
Equity Demands: Some companies are wary of ceding ownership stakes to the federal government. This creates hesitation in sectors where ownership control and investor confidence are sensitive.
Market Distortions: Critics argue that selecting which companies receive government support could disadvantage firms excluded from the arrangements, altering competitive dynamics within industries.
Implementation Capacity: The scale of proposed financing, particularly the expansion of the DFC, requires congressional approval and capable management. Delays or political opposition could slow execution.

Policy-to-Supply-Chain Impact Table

Policy Mechanism
Industry Example
Government Action
Supply Chain Impact

Tariff Relief
Pharmaceuticals (Pfizer, Eli Lilly)
Tariff exemptions in exchange for expanded U.S. production
Increases demand for domestic warehousing, distribution, and cold-chain logistics for added output

Equity Stakes
Intel (10% stake), MP Materials (15% stake)
Federal ownership through converted grants or Defense Production Act
Creates long-term stability in supply flows, but may add compliance requirements for logistics providers

Purchase Guarantees
MP Materials with Apple
Pentagon set floor prices, Apple committed to $500M supply contract
Locks in demand for rare earth shipments, increasing domestic transport flows from mining to manufacturing

Federal Loans Linked to Equity
Lithium Americas (DOE loan, 5–10% stake requested)
Loan support tied to partial government ownership
Supports new mining and battery projects, creating future logistics demand for raw materials and finished batteries

Investment Accelerator Funding
Commerce Department
$550B in financing, partly funded by Japan, allocated to U.S. manufacturing and freight infrastructure
Potential expansion of ports, intermodal rail, and distribution centers, reducing bottlenecks in supply chains

Expanded DFC Financing
Multiple critical industries
Proposed budget growth from $60B to $250B for U.S. supply chains and infrastructure
Large-scale capital for freight corridors, warehouses, and strategic materials, enabling reshoring of production

Case Examples

MP Materials

The rare earth mining company received federal backing through a 15 percent Pentagon stake, floor pricing commitments, and a supply agreement with Apple. This illustrates the administration’s template: equity participation, purchase guarantees, and private-sector co-investment.

Intel

The conversion of CHIPS Act funding into a 10 percent federal equity stake in Intel highlights the new approach to semiconductor supply chain security. By tying financial support to ownership, the government ensures both accountability and a direct role in strategic sectors.

Lithium Americas

A Department of Energy loan of $2.26 billion, paired with negotiations for a 5 to 10 percent federal equity stake, demonstrates how energy supply chains, particularly those tied to electric vehicles and batteries, are being secured through mixed financing and ownership arrangements.

Long-Term Outlook

The administration’s strategy marks a departure from the traditional U.S. model of private-sector–led industrial development. Instead, it resembles coordinated industrial policies pursued in other economies, though with American characteristics.

For supply chain professionals, this means that:

Government will play a larger role in shaping sourcing, production, and distribution decisions.
Access to federal financing and contracts will become a key factor in strategic planning.
Logistics infrastructure may receive substantial investment, creating new opportunities for providers.
Companies must assess political as well as market risks when designing long-term supply chains.

The Trump administration’s pre-midterm industrial deals reflect a significant realignment of government and industry roles in the United States. By leveraging tariffs, financing programs, and direct equity stakes, the federal government is reshaping supply chains across pharmaceuticals, energy, critical minerals, and freight.

The initiative is intended to secure domestic production, reduce reliance on China, and ensure access to strategic inputs. For logistics leaders, the result will be increased reshoring activity, new demand for domestic infrastructure, and closer integration of supply chains with federal priorities.

At the same time, risks remain. The durability of these arrangements depends on political continuity, effective implementation, and the willingness of companies to partner with government under new terms.

In this evolving environment, logistics and supply chain professionals will need to monitor policy developments as closely as they do market trends. Supply chains are no longer shaped solely by efficiency and cost considerations. They are now integral to the nation’s industrial strategy.

The post Federal Industrial Partnerships and Supply Chain Realignment Under the Trump Administration: Pharmaceuticals, Semiconductors, Critical Minerals, and Energy appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Supply Chain and Logistics News Sept 29 – Oct 2nd 2025

Published

on

By

Supply Chain And Logistics News Sept 29 – Oct 2nd 2025

This week in supply chain news, major companies are demonstrating a mix of strategic adaptations and responses to global pressures. ExxonMobil and Kinaxis are collaborating to develop a next-generation supply chain management solution specifically for the complex oil and gas industry, aiming to increase resilience and provide comprehensive visibility. In a push for network efficiency, FedEx has launched a new direct cargo flight between Dublin, Ireland, and Indianapolis, Indiana, bypassing congested coastal hubs to reduce transit times. The pharmaceutical sector is also focused on resilience, with Eli Lilly and Amgen announcing significant U.S. manufacturing investments to bring critical drug production back to North America. Conversely, General Mills is restructuring its supply chain by closing three manufacturing plants in Missouri as a cost-saving measure in response to changing consumer spending habits. Finally, the U.S. government is imposing new tariffs on imported wood products and furniture, effective October 14, 2025, in a move to address what it identifies as a threat to the domestic industry and supply chain security.

The News of the Week:

ExxonMobil and Kinaxis are Developing a Next-Generation Supply Chain Management Solution for Oil and Gas

The oil and gas industry supply chain is one of the most complex in the world. It involves myriad complex production assets both onshore and offshore, transporting highly volatile products around the globe through pipelines, tank farms, ports, ships, rail, and truck. The end product could be gasoline, petrochemicals, natural gas, hydrogen, or any of hundreds of products from asphalt to motor oil. Disruptions to the oil and gas supply chain can have serious consequences for end users. The industry needs more comprehensive supply chain solutions that increase resilience, provide complete visibility across all aspects of the supply chain, and enable swift responses to business challenges and opportunities. Kinaxis and Exxon are collaborating to digitalize various sectors of Exxon’s business. They aim to leverage Kinaxis’s Maestro software to enhance planning and decision-making processes. Through this collaboration, the two companies aim to share solutions tailored to the oil and gas industry, which currently lacks supply chain management solutions that cater to their specific needs.

FedEx Expands Global Air Network with New Dublin- Indianapolis Route

In an effort to shorten transit times and strengthen its international network, FedEx has launched a new direct cargo flight between Dublin, Ireland, and Indianapolis, Indiana. The new four-day-a-week service bypasses traditional, more congested coastal gateways, which is expected to reduce shipping times by a full day for goods moving between Ireland and the U.S. Midwest. This strategic expansion is a response to the growing trade between the two regions and demonstrates how major carriers are adapting their networks to create more direct and efficient routes to meet evolving customer demands.

Eli Lily and Amgen Announce Massive U.S. Manufacturing Investments

In a major push for domestic drug production, pharmaceutical giants Eli Lilly and Amgen have announced huge investments in new U.S. manufacturing facilities. Eli Lilly is planning a new $6.5 billion factory in Houston, while Amgen is expanding its Puerto Rico plant with a $650 million investment. These moves are a direct response to the global supply chain vulnerabilities exposed in recent years and represent a significant effort to boost the resilience of the U.S. pharmaceutical supply chain. The investments aim to bring critical drug production back to North America, creating jobs and reducing reliance on overseas manufacturing.

General Mills is Closing Three Manufacturing Plants in Missouri

General Mills is closing three manufacturing plants in Missouri—a pizza crust facility in St. Charles and two pet food locations in Joplin—as part of a multiyear supply chain restructuring effort. The company expects to incur $82 million in restructuring charges, including asset write-offs and severance costs. This action is part of a broader trend among food and beverage companies to implement cost-saving measures in response to consumer spending pullbacks. The closures follow previous organizational actions by General Mills, such as job cuts and the closure of its innovation unit, and are intended to improve the company’s competitiveness.

US to Begin Furniture, Wood Import Tariffs on Oct. 14

New tariffs on imported wood products, including furniture, will take effect on October 14, 2025, following a Section 232 national security investigation. The initial duties will be 10% on softwood lumber and 25% on upholstered furniture, kitchen cabinets, and vanities. On January 1, the tariff rates are scheduled to increase to 30% for upholstered furniture and 50% for kitchen cabinets and vanities. The executive order provides for lower tariff caps for imports from specific trading partners, such as the U.K., Japan, and the European Union. These new tariffs are intended to address what the administration has identified as a threat to domestic industry and supply chain security.

Song of the week:

The post Supply Chain and Logistics News Sept 29 – Oct 2nd 2025 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Call for Speakers: Ready to Drive Real Change in Intelligent Operations and Resilient Supply Chains – ARC Industry Forum 2025

Published

on

By

Call For Speakers: Ready To Drive Real Change In Intelligent Operations And Resilient Supply Chains – Arc Industry Forum 2025

Call for Speakers – ARC Industry Forum 2025

The ARC Industry Forum is the premier event where operations, supply chain, and technology leaders gather to shape the future of intelligent and resilient enterprises. In 2025, supply chains face unprecedented disruption, but also unmatched opportunity. We are seeking speakers—executives, practitioners, and innovators—who can share strategies, frameworks, and real-world experiences to inspire and guide their peers.

Sample Session Themes

To help illustrate the types of topics we feature, here are a few recent examples:

The New Frontier of Operations and Supply Chain: AI, Resilience, and Intelligence – Exploring how AI, analytics, automation, and connected intelligence converge to deliver agility and resilience.
Building Resilient Supply Chains in the Age of Shifting Geopolitics – Addressing the regulatory, tariff, and policy challenges facing global supply networks.
Unlocking the Power of Knowledge Transfer in Enterprise Systems – Showcasing best practices to fully leverage enterprise and knowledge management systems.

These examples are only a sample of the many tracks available. Additional sessions will cover digital transformation, sustainability, cybersecurity, workforce strategies, and other timely topics.

Submission Guidelines

We invite proposals that highlight real-world case studies, practical lessons, and strategic frameworks. Presentations should be vendor-neutral, educational, and tailored for an audience of senior executives and practitioners.

If you are interested in speaking, please submit:

A proposed session title and abstract (150–250 words)
Key takeaways for attendees
Speaker bio and organizational role

To submit a proposal, or simply for more information, contact us now

The post Call for Speakers: Ready to Drive Real Change in Intelligent Operations and Resilient Supply Chains – ARC Industry Forum 2025 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending