Connect with us

Non classé

Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress

Published

on

Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress

Oliver Esch

June 12, 2025

Blog

The recent World Procurement Congress brought together procurement leaders from across the globe, from Australia to North America, representing diverse industries and perspectives. As a participant, I had the opportunity to engage with CPOs and senior management, gaining valuable insights into current industry trends and organizational priorities. Here are my key takeaways from the event:

The Human Element Remains Essential in an AI-Driven World

While artificial intelligence dominated many discussions, there was a consensus that human skills remain irreplaceable. CPOs and senior management recognize that even the most sophisticated AI tools cannot be used effectively without the right people and skill sets.

“Human contracts are still done between humans,” was a sentiment echoed throughout the event. Despite technological advances, procurement organizations increasingly invest in finding employees with the right mindset and analytical capabilities to achieve their business objectives.

My learning is that employees are key for CPOs and senior management. While they recognize the importance of AI, they also know that this intelligence cannot be used properly without humans and without their employees. That is why investing in employees is more important—finding the right people with the right mindset to achieve targets.

The Evolving Skill Set of Procurement Professionals

Procurement skills have undergone a significant transformation in recent years. As procurement spending becomes more crucial to organizational success, companies are emphasizing the buying process more.

The analytical requirements have evolved dramatically. Ten years ago, buyers might simply compare quotes, but today’s procurement professionals must analyze:

Extensive data sets

Market volatility factors

Benchmarking information

Supplier performance metrics

Emerging trends

This shift has created demand for more analytical procurement professionals who can manage fewer, more trusted supplier relationships rather than handling numerous vendor interactions.

The skills of procurement and buyers are becoming increasingly different. Companies are caring much more about procurement and buying processes as spending becomes more crucial. Analytical skills are now more important than ever. With massive datasets behind decisions and external factors like volatility, benchmarking trends, supplier performance, and more, the procurement profession now requires a different skill set—more analytical, with deeper interactions with a limited number of trusted suppliers.

Partnership Over Pure Cost-Cutting

One of the most significant shifts in procurement strategy has been the move from pure cost-cutting to building flexible, resilient partnerships. This trend emerged mainly as a lesson from the COVID pandemic, when organizations discovered that strong supplier relationships were critical during capacity constraints.

Companies are more willing to invest in long-term partnerships built on trust and reliability. When capacity is limited, these partnerships prove invaluable—trusted suppliers will work harder to find solutions for valued partners. In contrast, transactional relationships often leave buyers without support during challenging market conditions.

I think partnership is a key element—a lesson from the last three or four years, especially during COVID. Openness to potentially invest a bit more in long-term partnerships with trust and reliability is more valued now than before. With good partnerships during times when capacity was limited, you still had an opportunity to manage your transportation. That’s why partnership has become a key element alongside transit time, supplier performance, and cost in identifying the right partners.

Technology as an Enabler of Better Decision-Making

The technology discussions at the Congress focused primarily on improving data visibility, visualization, and understanding. Procurement leaders are looking for tools that:

Simplify complex data

Provide visual representations of information

Enable quick access to insights (including through AI interfaces)

Help identify optimal solutions within short timeframes

The emphasis is on using technology to deliver immediate, actionable insights that procurement professionals can use in negotiations and strategic planning.

One of the key elements is bringing more visibility to different data, visualizing and simplifying data to help people understand what they’re using. While AI is essential, allowing you to talk to your laptop or phone to get results, the most crucial part is data and data visualization to get an engine that demonstrates the best solution quickly. It’s mainly about data, data visualization, and understanding different data to get immediate insights and understand which direction buyers and procurement should negotiate rates.

Sustainability Continues to Gain Momentum

Sustainability remains crucial for procurement leaders, though it is not as prominently featured as other topics. Organizations increasingly focus on reducing CO2 emissions and incorporating environmental factors into their procurement decisions.

Looking Ahead: Stability in Procurement Priorities

Despite constant market changes, the core priorities for procurement organizations have remained relatively stable. CPOs from major companies like Heineken and Diageo continue to focus on three key areas:

Cost management

Carbon reduction

Partnership development

This consistency provides procurement technology providers with a clear direction and ensures that solution development aligns with long-term market needs.

The procurement world isn’t so volatile that this year’s themes differ dramatically from last year’s. That’s an advantage—we know how to develop our products to meet market interest. Cost, carbon, and partnership are the key areas that CPOs are focusing on.

5 Key Things I Learned at the World Procurement Congress

Human expertise remains irreplaceable: Even with AI advancements, human analytical skills and relationship management are more crucial than ever.

Procurement is increasingly strategic: Companies view procurement as a cost center and a critical strategic function with significant impact.

Partnership trumps pure cost-cutting: Organizations that invest in trusted relationships with suppliers gain flexibility and resilience during market disruptions.

Data visualization is critical: Simplifying and visualizing complex data enables better and faster decision-making.

Employee investment pays dividends: Finding and developing talent with the right analytical mindset and skills is becoming a top priority for CPOs.

Frequently Asked Questions from the Event

During the Congress, several questions repeatedly emerged in discussions:

Q: How can we effectively balance AI implementation with human skills?
A: Focus on developing your team’s analytical capabilities using AI to handle data processing and pattern recognition. The most successful organizations view AI as an enhancement to human decision-making, not a replacement.

Q: What skills should procurement teams prioritize developing?
A: Analytical capabilities, data interpretation, relationship management, and strategic thinking are becoming essential. A technical understanding of supply chain systems is also increasingly valuable.

Q: How can we build resilient partnerships without sacrificing cost efficiency?
A: Look beyond immediate price points to total value, including reliability during disruptions. The cost of failure during capacity constraints often far exceeds modest premiums paid for trustworthy partnerships.

Q: What technologies are delivering the most value in procurement today?
A: Tools that enhance data visibility, provide benchmarking capabilities, and offer intuitive visualization of complex information are proving most valuable for strategic decision-making.

Q: How are leading organizations incorporating sustainability into procurement?
A: They’re making sustainability a core evaluation criterion alongside cost and performance, with increasing focus on measurable carbon reduction throughout the supply chain.

Final Thoughts

The World Procurement Congress reinforced that while technology adoption accelerates across the industry, the fundamentals of good procurement practice remain centered on human expertise, strong partnerships, and data-driven decision-making. Organizations that can balance technological innovation with investment in people and relationships will be best positioned to navigate the complexities of today’s supply chains.

Freightos is committed to supporting this balance by delivering solutions that enhance human capability through automation, visibility, and insight. Our platform combines data benchmarking, rate management, booking capabilities, and visibility tools in a single interface, designed not to replace procurement professionals but to empower them.

As we look toward the next year of transformation in logistics and sourcing, I invite you to reflect on how your organization is balancing technology innovation with human expertise.

Oliver Esch

Oliver brings 15+ years of logistics and supply chain expertise to the table. Before joining Freightos Procure (formerly SHIPSTA), he worked as a consultant, uncovering optimization potential in global supply chain operations for industry leaders. Now, he’s focused on delivering cutting-edge solutions to Fortune 1000 companies, helping them streamline both strategic and operational processes for maximum value.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Balancing Technology and Human Expertise: Insights from the World Procurement Congress appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending