Connect with us

Non classé

How to Optimize Fulfillment with Unified Data

Published

on

How To Optimize Fulfillment With Unified Data

Order fulfillment is the complete process from when an order is placed until the shipment is delivered. Accurately fulfilling thousands of orders for millions of items is extremely challenging. Many large organizations have multiple systems for order, warehouse, or transportation management that are barely integrated – frequently not at all. However, large organizations are often equipped to handle fulfillment in-house, leveraging their extensive resources and capabilities. An organization with tens of thousands of different products may have to move them across many modes of transportation, IT systems, and third-party logistics partners, all adding to complexity, as well as loss of visibility and control.

Sudden and significant changes in demand, especially in consumer markets, stack up more challenges, requiring order revision and reallocation. If your systems are disjointed and you lack the ability to analyze masses of data in real time, you will struggle to deliver on-time, in-full and your reputation and revenue will be negatively impacted.

Optimizing fulfillment requires a series of steps to get a shipment from its source to the end customer. These steps include sourcing and receiving inventory, storing inventory, order processing, picking and packing an order, shipping the order, and returns management. Standard sizes and categorizations play a crucial role in determining the costs associated with shipping products that meet standard criteria in fulfillment centers. The fulfillment process is further complicated by ongoing shifts in customer expectations and demands and geo-political and weather disruptions.

Introduction to OTIF Fulfillment

The key measurement of fulfillment is on-time in-full (OTIF) fulfillment, which is calculated as a percentage of orders that are delivered on the requested delivery date and in the quantity requested by the customer. The formula for OTIF is:

Measuring a supply chain against OTIF metrics is a key strategy that helps decision makers attach a tangible value to the success of their fulfillment and allows them to determine key strategies. Factors like planning tools, inventory management, demand patterns, and innovations in technology contribute to the success or failure of fulfillment optimization. Establishing standard benchmarks for services and innovations in fulfillment centers is crucial in this context. Fulfillment costs can significantly impact profit margins, making it crucial for businesses to understand these financial implications and how they influence consumer spend.

The question then becomes “what is a good OTIF score to shoot for?” Fulfillment success, and the associated OTIF score, will vary by industry, region, and other assorted factors, but generally speaking, an OTIF score is considered good if it falls between 80% and 90%. Many companies aim for 95% or higher, which can be a daunting task. For suppliers, the penalties associated with missing OTIF goals can be significant. For example, Walmart’s OTIF program mandates that suppliers should meet the 90% on-time and 95% in-full goals to avoid penalties. Walmart fines suppliers 3% of the cost of goods sold (COGS) for orders that fail to meet on-time and in-full delivery requirements.

A good fulfillment strategy can help businesses boost customer satisfaction (CSAT), reduce inefficiencies, and increase sales. By setting clear expectations and standards for fulfillment operations, including OTIF rates, shipping times, and inventory levels, businesses can ensure that they meet customer demands and maintain high levels of satisfaction. Regularly monitoring and analyzing fulfillment operations can help identify areas for improvement and implement strategies to optimize these processes.

Effective fulfillment requires a well-designed system, efficient logistics, and a reliable supplier network to ensure timely and accurate delivery of products. Companies have two options to consider for fulfillment operations: in-house fulfillment or outsourcing fulfillment to a third-party logistics (3PL) provider. While outsourcing to a 3PL is a common strategy, new technologies and approaches now exist to achieve higher OTIF rates in house.

Warehouse Fulfillment Complexities and Inefficiencies

InterSystems surveyed 450 senior supply chain practitioners to examine key supply chain technology challenges, trends, and decision-making strategies across five key use cases: fulfillment optimization; demand sensing and forecasting; supply chain orchestration; production planning optimization; and environmental, social, and governance (ESG). These respondents came from 13 countries and 12 industries, representing decision-makers across project management, fleet management, sales & marketing, HR, and finance.

This blog is Part 1 in our Optimizing Supply Chain Performance with Unified Data series, with a focus on optimizing fulfillment. Effective inventory management strategies are crucial for businesses looking to expand their operations and improve delivery efficiency, particularly when scaling to multiple warehouse locations. Looking to the future, businesses should prepare for trends such as the growth of micro fulfillment centers and the need for adaptive strategies to stay competitive in the evolving landscape.

Ability to Meet Fulfillment Goals

According to the survey, only a mere 1% of respondents achieve 80% or higher for their OTIF metrics, with the average percentage of OTIF being a mediocre 62.21%. The ability to meet fulfillment goals is impeded by several issues. When asked to name their top three challenges for fulfillment optimization, respondents cited the high volumes and complexities of SKUs (59%), inadequacies of existing planning tools (51%), and volatile demand (42%). Considering that the majority of respondents are using manual processes, legacy systems, or multiple solutions from different vendors to integrate and prepare disparate data, this makes sense.

SKU complexity generally refers to the challenges and inefficiencies associated with keeping a large number of SKUs within a store, warehouse, or factory. This includes picking the correct items from inventory, packing them appropriately, and ensuring their timely delivery to customers. Managing too many SKUs leads to higher inventory carrying costs and general inefficiencies. On top of that, the lifecycle of a SKU is getting shorter, especially as more businesses turn to e-commerce for direct-to-consumer selling. A SKU is designed, received, and pushed to the market, but often it is not available six months later, making replenishment nearly non-existent. Without re-stocks, optimizing fulfillment from the right location is more important than ever. Strategies for managing excess inventory and preventing overstocking are crucial to maintaining efficient operations.

Inadequacy of Planning Tools

The second challenge identified by respondents was the inadequacy of planning tools. This can lead to fulfillment failure from the standpoint of missed deadlines, increased costs, or poor customer satisfaction. Timely information is critical, as data older than a few days can lead to costly supply chain disruptions. Perhaps not surprisingly, the industries that reported they would see the biggest improvement in fulfillment rates if able to ingest real-time data and provide actionable insights to business users were automotive and aeronautics (55%), FMCG (44%), and manufacturing/CPG (43%).

Demand Volatility

The final challenge associated with optimized fulfillment is demand volatility. Demand volatility is the sudden and unpredictable variation in customer demand for products or services over a specific time. The root causes are not always easy to identify, but they can be attributed to changing customer expectations and demands, changing promotions, or a shift in market dynamics such as external weather events, geo-political instability, and shipping disruptions like the Francis Scott Key Bridge collapse or the blockage of the Suez Canal. These changes make it harder for companies to forecast demand in both the near and long term and can lead to further supply chain disruptions. Effective returns management is also crucial in handling the unpredictable nature of demand, ensuring that returned products are inspected, restocked, or disposed of efficiently. Tracking how much inventory is held and assessing inventory age are essential to making informed decisions about restocking and mitigating risks such as stockouts and overstocking.

Fulfillment Strategies

Respondents were asked to identify the data technology innovations they would most want to implement to achieve fulfillment optimization. The top response was the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) (46%), which outpaced predictive and prescriptive analytics (37%), the use of a decision intelligence platform within supply chain (37%), real-time harmonized and normalized data from multiple sources internal and external (37%), and streamlined integration of different solutions (37%).

These technologies can be directly integrated with existing systems, allowing businesses to automate workflows and reduce errors in managing inventory and order fulfillment.

AI and ML impact every stage of the order fulfillment process, with a specific emphasis on forecasting, inventory management, order processing and picking, and last mile deliveries. For improved OTIF, AI and ML help companies make smarter decisions faster, improve turnaround times, and simplify manual processes in the warehouse. The real desire for survey respondents is to improve upon current systems and processes to make better sense of their data, enabling optimized fulfillment processes. Inventory management systems can ensure businesses are notified when stock levels are low, allowing timely replenishment and minimizing the risk of stockouts.

Actionable insights drive significant efficiencies in every area, increasing automation and significantly boosting productivity. Supply Chain Orchestrator provides the infrastructure needed to optimize raw materials handling from point-of-supply to end consumption. Organizations can integrate transportation, warehouse management systems, and advanced robotics. Packaging plays a crucial role in the fulfillment process, ensuring items are carefully packaged for safe transport.

By increasing automation through Supply Chain Orchestrator, organizations accelerate decision-making, offer self-service access to analytics, and remove human errors. Organizations are ready to implement AI and ML-driven prediction and productivity gains. They achieve rapid adaptation to any changes in demand, logistics disruptions, or business priorities, leading to increased CSAT and higher revenue. An efficient fulfillment system is essential in managing order delivery and inventory, contributing to better operational efficiency.

Order Accuracy and Efficiency

Order accuracy and efficiency are critical aspects of fulfillment operations, as they directly impact a business’s ability to fulfill orders on time and in full. Effective order picking and shipping processes are essential for improving order accuracy and efficiency, reducing fulfillment costs, and enhancing the overall customer experience.

By implementing efficient logistics and shipping strategies to ship orders, businesses can reduce shipping times, improve their OTIF rates, and increase CSAT. Regular monitoring and analysis of picking and shipping processes are vital for identifying areas for improvement and implementing strategies to optimize fulfillment operations.

Technology plays a significant role in improving order accuracy and efficiency. Automated packaging and shipping systems can help businesses streamline their operations, reduce errors, and lower fulfillment costs. By leveraging these technologies, businesses can ensure that their customers receive their orders accurately and on time, leading to higher levels of satisfaction and loyalty. But technology plays an even bigger role in data unification and management, especially when it comes to integrating new technology with existing applications.

Final Thought on Fulfillment and Repeat Purchases

These survey findings confirm that most organizations lack the necessary capabilities to optimize highly complex supply chains with interwoven dependencies. To be truly agile and competitive, organizations must be capable of extracting critical insights in near real-time. But as things stand, this remains a significant challenge when so many businesses lack end-to-end visibility, or rely on manual data analysis and ad hoc assemblages of different solutions.

In the face of constant change, disruption, and opportunity, organizations need a streamlined source of standardized, clean, meaningful, and reliable data that is available to business users. Maintaining proper stock levels is crucial to ensure product availability and prevent issues like stockouts or overstocking. An intelligent data platform eliminates the significant data challenges that organizations encounter on their path to optimized fulfillment and repeat purchases.

Read the full report here.

Chris Cunnane is the Supply Chain Product Marketing Manager at InterSystems. In this role, he is responsible for developing and executing marketing strategy and content for the InterSystems supply chain technology suite. Chris has 20+ years of supply chain expertise, leading the supply chain practice at ARC Advisory Group, as well as holding various sales, marketing, and operations roles in the wholesale, retail, and automotive parts markets. He holds a BA in Communications from Stonehill College and an MA in Global Marketing Communications from Emerson College.

The post How to Optimize Fulfillment with Unified Data appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market

Published

on

By

What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market

November 26, 2025

Blog

As the fragile but still-in-place Israel-Hamas ceasefire nears the two-month mark, and with the Houthis declaring an end to attacks on passing vessels, there is more and more anticipation that the long-awaited return of container traffic to the Red Sea may be coming soon.

Though Maersk maintains it has not set a date, the Suez Canal Authority stated that Maersk will resume transits in early December. ZIM’s CEO recently stated that a return in the near future is increasingly likely, and CMA CGM is reportedly preparing for a full return in December.

Operational Impact

The shift of most of the 30% of global container volumes that normally transit the Suez Canal away from the Red Sea and around the Cape of Good Hope almost exactly two years ago added seven to ten days and thousands of nautical miles to Asia – Europe journeys and to some Asia – N. America sailings as well.

The return of container traffic to the shorter Suez route will result in the sudden early arrival of these ships, which will mean significant vessel bunching and congestion at already persistently congested European hubs. This congestion will cause delays and absorb capacity which could push container rates up on the affected lanes, and possibly beyond.

The shift back through the Suez Canal may initially keep some of the typically lower volume ports in Europe that have become transhipment centers during the Red Sea crisis, like Barcelona, busy while carriers may omit port calls at some of the congested major hubs. But after the unwind, these ports, as well as African ports that have been used as refuelling stops during the last two years, will see port calls decline.

Carriers have plans for a gradual phase in of the transition back to the Red Sea, with smaller vessels starting to transit first. This approach would still cause vessel bunching, but would be aimed at minimizing the impact of the reset as much as possible.

But some carriers are skeptical that an orderly phase-in will happen, as they expect pressure from customers who will want a return to the shorter route as quickly as possible. Analysis from Sea Intelligence suggests that the more gradual the transition, the less disruptive it will be, while the faster the return the more disruptive it will be during the up to two months it will take for schedules to return to normal.

Ocean expert Lars Jensen also notes that a return during the lead up to Lunar New Year would coincide with an increase in demand, and would put more pressure on ports and rates than if the transition takes place post-LNY when demand is typically weak. With carriers signalling the shift will begin in December and pre-LNY demand probably picking up in mid-January next year, it seems likely the two will coincide.

Implications for Capacity – and Rates

Red Sea diversions were estimated to have absorbed about 9% of global container capacity by keeping ships at sea for longer and – with longer journeys meaning vessels would arrive back at origins days behind schedule – via carriers adding extra vessels to services in order to maintain planned weekly departures.

This drain on capacity caused Asia – Europe rates to more than triple and transpacific rates to more than double in the two months from the time the diversions began to just before Lunar New Year of 2024. And though rates moved up and down along with seasonal changes in demand, the capacity drain pushed East-West rates up to 2024 highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year.

But even with Red Sea diversions continuing to absorb capacity in 2025, continued fleet growth through newly built vessels entering the market has meant that the container trade has already become significantly oversupplied.

As such, rates on these lanes – even before the capacity absorbed by diversions has re-entered the market – have consistently been significantly lower than in 2024 even during months when volumes have been stronger, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October. Recent carrier struggles maintaining transpacific GRIs point to this challenge already.

Even with Red Sea diversions continuing and even during months in 2025 with stronger year on year volumes, capacity growth has meant rates in 2025 have been lower than in 2024.

Yes, the initial congestion and delays caused by the transition back to the Suez Canal will at first put upward pressure on rates for Asia-Europe containers and probably to a lesser degree on the transatlantic lanes as well. If the congestion ties up enough capacity or impacts operations at Far East origins, the rate impact could spread to the transpacific as well. As noted above, if the return coincides with the lead-up to LNY, it will have a stronger impact on rates as there will be pressure from the demand side as well.

But once the congestion unwinds and container flows and schedules stabilize the shift will ultimately release more than two million TEU of container capacity back into the market. This surge will put even more downward pressure on rates and increase the challenge of effectively managing capacity for carriers seeking to keep vessels full and rates profitable in 2026.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post What a Return to the Red Sea Could Mean for the Container Market appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Published

on

By

Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

November 25, 2025

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 32% to $1,903/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 8% to $3,443/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 1% to $2,457/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices (FBX13 Weekly) increased 6% to $2,998/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air index

China – N. America weekly prices decreased 2% to $6.50/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 1% to $3.97/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 1% to $2.33/kg.

Analysis

Despite higher tariffs since early this year, US retail sales have proved resilient and are expected to grow through the holiday season. The solidifying tariff landscape is nonetheless facing destabilizing forces like recent China-Japan tensions, and the US Supreme Court’s pending decision on the legality of Trump’s IEEPA-based tariffs.

But the White House is signalling it is already taking steps to ensure that a SCOTUS loss will not open a low tariff window. So, if consumer spending remains strong, and the status quo of the trade war holds up, the US could enter a restocking cycle in 2026 as frontloaded inventories wind down. This restocking could mean stronger freight demand than some have anticipated for next year.

On the freight supply side though, there is more and more discussion of container traffic’s coming return to the Red Sea as the fragile Israel-Hamas ceasefire remains in effect. And while most carriers are not offering a timeline, ZIM’s CEO recently stated that a return in the near future is increasingly likely.

The shift of most of the 30% of global container volumes that normally transit the Suez Canal away from the Red Sea and around the Cape of Good Hope almost exactly two years ago added seven to ten days and thousands of miles to Asia – Europe journeys and to some Asia – N. America sailings as well.

The return of container traffic to the shorter Suez route will result in the sudden early arrival of these ships, which will mean significant vessel bunching and congestion at already persistently congested European hubs. This congestion will cause delays and absorb capacity which could push container rates up on the affected lanes, and possibly beyond.

Carriers have plans for a gradual phase in of the transition back to the Red Sea, with smaller vessels starting to transit first. This approach would still cause vessel bunching, but would be aimed at minimizing the impact of the reset as much as possible.

But some carriers are skeptical that an orderly phase-in will happen, as they expect pressure from customers who will want a return to the shorter route as quickly as possible. Analysis from Sea Intelligence suggests that the more gradual the transition, the less disruptive it will be, while the faster it is the more disruptive it will be, and the more pressure it will put on freight rates during the up to two months it will take for schedules to return to normal.

Ocean expert Lars Jensen also notes that a return during the lead up to Lunar New Year would coincide with an increase in demand, and would put more pressure on ports and rates than if the transition takes place post-LNY when demand is typically weak.

The capacity absorbed through Red Sea diversions pushed East-West rates up to highs of $8,000 – $10,000/FEU in 2024 and set a highly elevated floor of $3,000 – $5,000/FEU during low demand periods that year. But even with Red Sea diversions still in place this year, rates on these lanes have consistently been significantly lower than last year, with prices on some lanes reaching 2023 levels for a span in early October.

The transition back to the Suez Canal – be it more or less chaotic – will ultimately release more than two million TEU of container capacity back into the market. This surge will put even more downward pressure on rates and increase the challenge of effectively managing capacity for carriers seeking to keep vessels full and rates profitable.

The current overcapacity on the East-West lanes is the main reason that carriers’ November transpacific GRIs which had pushed West Coast rates up by $1,000/FEU this month to about $3,000/FEU have now fizzled.

Asia – N. America West Coast prices fell 32% last week to $1,900/FEU with daily rates this week down another $100 so far, but prices remain above the $1,400/FEU low for the year hit in early October. Last week’s vessel fire at the Port of LA does not seem to have had an impact on prices as operations have quickly recovered. Rates to the East Coast fell 8% to $3,400/FEU last week but are at $3,000/FEU so far this week, about even with levels in early October before these set of GRI introductions.

Meanwhile, October and November’s GRIs on Asia-Europe lanes have stuck, with rates to Europe and the Mediterranean both 40% higher than in early October at $2,500/FEU and $3,000/FEU respectively. These rate gains may be surviving on aggressive blanked sailings on these lanes.

Carriers are planning additional GRIs for December aiming for the $3k-$4k/FEU level as they continue to reduce capacity – with an announced labor strike in Belgium likely to help absorb some supply – but there are signs that these increases may not take.

In air cargo, peak season demand is driving rates up and should keep doing so for the next couple weeks. Freightos Air Index data show ex-China rates remaining strong at about $6.50/kg to N. America and $4.00/kg to Europe last week. Demand out of S. East Asia has grown significantly during this year’s trade war, with rates also elevated on these lanes at $5.40/kg to the US and $3.50/kg to Europe.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Transpac ocean rates fizzle; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 25, 2025 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

How AI Is Driving the Future of Industrial Operations and the Supply Chain

Published

on

By

How Ai Is Driving The Future Of Industrial Operations And The Supply Chain

ARC Industry Leadership Forum • Orlando, Florida
February 9–12, 2026 • Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld

Artificial intelligence is reshaping how industrial organizations run their operations and supply chains. The shift is real. The early experiments are gone. Today, companies are redesigning their planning, logistics, reliability, sourcing, and production workflows around systems that can think, react, and coordinate.

At ARC Advisory Group, we’re seeing this change accelerate every quarter. AI is moving from a standalone project to the connective tissue between operational systems. It’s improving how energy is consumed, how materials flow, how assets behave, and how teams respond to uncertainty.

This February, leaders from across the world will gather in Orlando to break down where AI is creating value and what comes next.

Event Details
Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
6677 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32821
February 9–12, 2026
Event link: https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-industry-leadership-forum-orlando

More than 200 colleagues are already registered, including Conrad Hanf and a broad mix of executives, operations leaders, and technologists.

Why AI Matters Right Now

AI gives industrial organizations three capabilities they’ve never had before.

Real-time awareness.
Factories, yards, pipelines, fleets, and distribution nodes are producing enormous amounts of data. AI helps cut through that noise. It identifies what matters, when it matters, and why. The result is faster decisions and fewer surprises.

Coordination across functions.
Production affects logistics. Maintenance affects throughput. Sourcing affects lead time. AI lets these domains share context and act together instead of waiting for a meeting or a spreadsheet adjustment. Decisions that once took a day now happen instantly.

Pattern recognition at scale.
AI sees the earliest signals of asset degradation, demand shifts, port delays, or supply risk. It doesn’t wait for a problem to become a crisis. It alerts teams early and recommends actions with enough lead time to matter.

What Leaders Are Focusing On

Across our research and briefings, the same themes keep rising to the surface.

AI-driven maintenance and reliability.
Predictive models are becoming the default. They diagnose root causes, calculate the impact of failure, and help schedule work when it makes operational sense.

Modern planning and scheduling.
Forecasts now incorporate external signals, real-time plant conditions, and multi-site interactions. Planners are starting to work with continuously updated recommendations instead of static plans.

Autonomous supply chain operations.
AI agents are beginning to negotiate with carriers, re-route shipments, rebalance inventory, and adjust sourcing strategies. This isn’t sci-fi. It’s quietly happening in live networks.

Graph intelligence.
Industrial networks are connected by thousands of relationships. Knowledge-graph models help organizations understand those connections and trace how one event cascades across an entire operation.

Data discipline.
AI’s performance depends on clean, harmonized data across ERP, MES, historians, WMS, TMS, and supplier systems. Many companies are now tackling this foundational work head-on.

Human and AI collaboration.
The most successful organizations aren’t automating people out. They’re giving operators, planners, and engineers AI tools that amplify experience and judgment.

Why Attend the ARC Industry Leadership Forum

The Forum is where these shifts come together. Attendees will see:

• Real-world case studies from global manufacturers, logistics leaders, and utilities
• Demonstrations of AI-enabled control towers and reliability platforms
• Deep-dive sessions on agent-based systems, context management, RAG assistants, and graph reasoning
• Roundtable conversations with peers facing the same operational pressures
• Practical discussions on governance, cybersecurity, workforce roles, and measurable ROI

This event is built for leaders who want clarity, validation, and a realistic roadmap for scaling AI across the industrial value chain.

A Turning Point for Industrial Operations

AI is changing the fundamentals of how materials move, how assets perform, how demand is met, and how decisions get made. The organizations that learn to use this intelligence well will operate with more resilience, more predictability, and less friction.

The ARC Industry Leadership Forum is the best place to understand what this looks like in practice and how to prepare your organization for it.

Join Us in Orlando

If your role touches operations, supply chain, engineering, logistics, maintenance, or industrial strategy, this gathering will be well worth your time.

Reserve your seat:
https://www.arcweb.com/events/arc-industry-leadership-forum-orlando

We hope to see you there.

The post How AI Is Driving the Future of Industrial Operations and the Supply Chain appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending