Non classé
ProMat 2025: Robotics Steps Up to Tackle the Warehouse Labor Crisis
Published
1 an agoon
By
The cavernous halls of McCormick Place in Chicago played host to ProMat 2025, a sprawling testament to the relentless innovation shaping the future of manufacturing and supply chain. This year’s exhibition, held from March 17th to 20th, resonated with a palpable urgency, driven by a challenge that casts a long shadow over the industry: the persistent and intensifying labor shortage in warehousing and logistics. While ProMat has always been a showcase of cutting-edge technology, the 2025 edition felt particularly focused on solutions designed to alleviate the strain on human capital, with robotics taking center stage as a powerful and increasingly viable answer.
The warehousing and logistics sector has been grappling with a growing labor crisis for years, a situation exacerbated by factors ranging from an aging workforce and demanding physical labor to increased e-commerce volumes and evolving worker expectations. High turnover rates, recruitment difficulties, and the sheer volume of work required to keep supply chains flowing have created a critical need for automation. ProMat 2025 served as a crucial platform for businesses seeking tangible solutions to this pressing issue, and the sheer number and sophistication of robotic offerings were a clear indication of the industry’s direction.
The Rise of Warehouse Robotics: A Multifaceted Approach
Robotics in the warehouse is no longer a futuristic concept; it is a rapidly evolving reality, offering a spectrum of solutions tailored to various operational needs. ProMat 2025 provided a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art, highlighting several key areas where robotics is making significant inroads in addressing labor challenges:
Dense Storage Solutions: Maximizing Space and Automation
With warehouse space at a premium and the need for efficient storage increasing, dense storage solutions integrated with robotics are gaining significant traction. Robotic Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS) were prominently featured, demonstrating their ability to maximize storage density while automating the putaway and retrieval of goods. These systems, often utilizing vertical space and intricate robotic movements, reduce the need for extensive aisle space and manual picking, thereby minimizing labor requirements and increasing throughput. The integration of sophisticated software allows for optimized storage strategies and faster order fulfillment, directly addressing the need for efficiency in the face of labor constraints.
Autonomous Mobile Robotics (AMRs): Intelligent Movement and Task Execution
Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) have emerged as a versatile solution for a wide range of warehouse tasks. Unlike traditional Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) that rely on fixed pathways, AMRs utilize advanced sensors, cameras, and mapping software to navigate autonomously around obstacles and optimize routes in dynamic warehouse environments. ProMat 2025 showcased AMRs performing tasks such as goods-to-person picking, transporting materials, and even assisting with pallet movement. Their flexibility and ability to adapt to changing layouts and tasks make them a powerful tool for augmenting human labor and improving overall efficiency. By taking over repetitive and physically demanding transportation tasks, AMRs free up human workers for more complex and value-added activities.
Aerial Inventory Management: The Eyes in the Sky
While still a developing area, drone technology for warehouse inventory management was also present at ProMat 2025, highlighting its potential to address the time-consuming and often hazardous task of manual inventory checks. Autonomous drones equipped with cameras and scanning technology can navigate warehouse aisles, capture inventory data, and identify discrepancies with greater speed and accuracy than human workers. This technology not only reduces the labor required for inventory management but also provides real-time insights into stock levels, minimizing errors and improving overall inventory accuracy.
Robotic Picking: Precision and Versatility in Order Fulfillment
The picking process, a labor-intensive and often error-prone aspect of warehousing, is a prime target for robotic automation. ProMat 2025 featured a diverse array of robotic picking solutions, ranging from stationary robotic arms integrated with vision systems to mobile robots equipped with grasping capabilities. These robots are increasingly sophisticated, capable of handling a wide variety of items with different shapes, sizes, and textures. Advanced AI and machine learning algorithms enable them to identify and grasp items accurately, improving order fulfillment speed and reducing picking errors, directly mitigating the impact of labor shortages in this critical area. Collaborative robots (cobots), designed to work safely alongside human workers, also presented a compelling option for augmenting picking tasks and reducing the physical strain on employees.
A Walk Through Innovation Alley: Booth Highlights
My exploration of the ProMat 2025 exhibition floor provided a tangible understanding of the robotic solutions poised to tackle the labor crisis. Here are summaries of the key displays from the booths I visited:
Quicktron: Focused on their M5F AMR, highlighting its versatility and applications in warehouse automation, particularly for brownfield implementations.
XYZ Robotics: Showcased their advanced AI-driven robotic picking systems, emphasizing their ability to handle diverse SKUs with high accuracy and seamless integration with other warehouse technologies.
Universal Robots: Emphasized the versatility and ease of use of their collaborative robots (cobots) for various material handling tasks, integrated with a robust UR+ ecosystem.
ForwardX Robotics: Displayed their comprehensive range of vision-based AMRs, including the Flex 600-LS, Apex C1500-L, and Max 1500-L, highlighting their AI-powered navigation and integrated logistics capabilities.
Seegrid: Featured their advanced AMR solutions, particularly the Lift CR1 AMR for high-lift applications, and their “Sliding Scale Autonomy” concept for flexible automation.
Geek+: Showcased their high-density storage solutions and goods-to-person robotics, emphasizing scalability and practical steps for warehouse modernization.
EXOTEC Technologies: Highlighted their next-generation Skypod AS/RS and the debut of their Porter AMR, emphasizing end-to-end automation and scalability.
Ambi Robotics: Demonstrated their AI-powered robotic picking solutions, including AmbiSort and AmbiKit, emphasizing dexterity and precision in handling diverse items.
Tompkins Robotics: Showcased their flexible and efficient tSort robotic sortation systems, adaptable to various warehouse layouts and scalable for changing needs.
Pickle Robot: Conducted live demonstrations of their robotic truck unloading solutions, emphasizing their ability to handle messy piles and the use of “Physical AI.”
KUKA: Unveiled their KMP 3000P heavyweight AMR and demonstrated integrated robotic cells combining AMRs with industrial robots and cobots for enhanced efficiency.
Autostore: Focused on their high-density cube storage AS/RS, highlighting partnerships with Kardex and Element Logic to provide integrated automation solutions.
Berkshire Grey: Showcased their AI-powered robotic picking solutions, the V3 Robotic Put Wall, and the RPSi robotic package sortation system, emphasizing end-to-end automation.
Agility Robotics: Demonstrated the capabilities of their humanoid robot, Digit, performing autonomous tasks like tote loading and unloading, highlighting the potential of humanoid robots in material handling.
Brightpick: Provided live demonstrations of their Brightpick Autopicker for in-aisle robotic picking and order consolidation, emphasizing its versatility and AI-powered vision.
Hai Robotics: Displayed their HaiPick Climb system for goods-to-person automation in existing warehouses and the HaiPick System 3 for high-density storage and throughput.
Attabotics: Highlighted their 3D robotic AS/RS and their new “Fulfill” AI-orchestrated fulfillment software, emphasizing efficiency and density.
Slip Robotics: Showcased their SlipBot automated loading robots for truck loading and unloading, emphasizing speed, safety, and ease of integration without IT infrastructure changes.
SEER Robotics: Debuted their SPT-1000 autonomous pallet truck with AI-powered pallet recognition and showcased their SRC robot controllers and software solutions.
MyBull Intelligent Machinery: Demonstrated their range of AMR solutions, including autonomous tow tractors and unmanned forklifts for various industrial logistics applications.
Libiao Robotics: Featured their AMR-based parcel sortation systems, emphasizing flexibility, scalability, and high-speed, accurate sorting capabilities.
Corvus Robotics: Showcased their autonomous drone system for inventory management, highlighting their integration partnership with Honeywell and the use of computer vision.
Lab0: Debuted their fully autonomous RoboGlide warehouse system for end-to-end inbound logistics, emphasizing its humanoid-inspired design and AI-powered vision and motion planning.
Yaskawa: Displayed a comprehensive range of industrial robots and cobots for material handling and logistics, highlighting their Pallet Builder software and various application-specific solutions.
Gather AI: Introduced their MHE Vision AI-driven camera system for real-time material handling visibility and analytics, emphasizing warehouse digitization.
Plus One Robotics: Focused on their advanced palletizing and depalletizing solutions, highlighting their partnership with beRobox and the launch of their new Partner Portal.
FANUC: Presented a wide range of robotic solutions for warehousing and logistics, including mobile robotic order fulfillment, full-layer depalletizing, and tote consolidation.
Locus Robotics: Introduced LocusINTELLIGENCE AI-driven business intelligence software and showcased their Locus Array fully robotic zero-touch fulfillment system.
Ocado Intelligent Automation (OIA): Featured their OSRS, the debut of the Porter AMR, the Chuck AMR, and OCADEX robotic pick arms, emphasizing integrated automation solutions.
Oceaneering Mobile Robotics (OMR): Showcased their MaxMover and UniMover AMRs for industrial applications and strategies for seamless AMR integration.
Zebra Technologies: Displayed their end-to-end solutions for warehouse and supply chain optimization, including mobile computers, barcode scanners, RFID, AMRs, vision systems, and software.
Multiway Robotics: Highlighted their advanced AMR forklift solutions, including the X20S, SE15, and Q20 models, emphasizing versatility and heavy-duty capabilities.
Anyware Robotics: Won the MHI Innovation Award for their Pixmo Mobile Robot designed for autonomous truck unloading and palletization.
The Path Forward: A Collaborative Future
ProMat 2025 made it abundantly clear that robotics is no longer a peripheral technology in warehousing and logistics but a core component of future-proofing operations against persistent labor challenges. The diversity and sophistication of the robotic solutions on display underscored the industry’s commitment to automation as a key strategy for enhancing efficiency, improving safety, and mitigating the impact of labor shortages. While robotics offers a powerful solution, the path forward will likely involve a collaborative approach, integrating robotic systems seamlessly with human workers to create more efficient, resilient, and ultimately, more sustainable supply chains. The innovations showcased at ProMat 2025 provide a compelling glimpse into that automated future, a future where robots and humans work in tandem to overcome the challenges of a demanding and ever-evolving industry.
The post ProMat 2025: Robotics Steps Up to Tackle the Warehouse Labor Crisis appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
You may like
Non classé
IBM Shares Plunge as AI Infrastructure Spending Squeezes Enterprise Software Budgets
Published
8 heures agoon
14 juillet 2026By
IBM shares fell approximately 25 percent Tuesday after the company unexpectedly released preliminary second-quarter results that missed Wall Street expectations, raising concerns about how rapidly rising artificial intelligence infrastructure costs are reshaping enterprise technology budgets.
The decline erased nearly $68 billion from IBM’s market capitalization and represented the company’s largest one-day loss in market value. The stock was also headed for its steepest percentage decline since 1987.
IBM expects to report second-quarter revenue of $17.2 billion, an increase of 1 percent from the previous year, and adjusted earnings of $2.93 per share. Analysts had expected approximately $17.86 billion in revenue and earnings of $3.01 per share.
The company emphasized that these figures are preliminary and could change slightly when IBM reports its complete second-quarter results on July 22.
Customers Redirect Spending Toward Scarce Infrastructure
IBM CEO Arvind Krishna attributed much of the shortfall to an abrupt shift in customer capital spending during the final weeks of June.
Enterprise customers moved spending toward servers, storage and memory to secure supply-constrained infrastructure before anticipated price increases. That reprioritization reduced spending on IBM’s Z mainframes and the associated transaction-processing software.
“While we anticipated some supply chain related impact in our expectations, we did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization,” Krishna wrote in a letter to investors.
IBM’s infrastructure revenue declined 7 percent, driven partly by weaker-than-expected performance in its Z mainframe business and the related software stack. Software revenue increased 5 percent, while consulting revenue was essentially unchanged.
The company also acknowledged internal execution problems. Several large transactions did not close during the quarter, and Krishna said IBM did not adapt quickly enough as customer priorities changed.
AI Spending Is Moving Between Technology Layers
The results do not necessarily indicate that companies are reducing their overall commitment to artificial intelligence. Instead, they show how spending is moving between different layers of the technology stack.
Companies facing shortages and rising prices for memory, servers and storage may accelerate infrastructure purchases while delaying software, consulting and modernization projects.
That shift has implications throughout the enterprise technology supply chain. Hardware manufacturers may experience accelerated demand, while software and services providers encounter delayed purchasing decisions even when customers continue pursuing AI programs.
IBM’s warning also pressured other technology stocks Tuesday, including ServiceNow, Salesforce, Microsoft and Oracle, as investors considered whether the spending shift extends beyond IBM.
IBM will provide its complete financial results and updated outlook on July 22
The post IBM Shares Plunge as AI Infrastructure Spending Squeezes Enterprise Software Budgets appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
Published
12 heures agoon
14 juillet 2026By
Weekly highlights
Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index
Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) increased 1%.
Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 4%.
Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 3%.
Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) increased 1%.
Air rates – Freightos Air Index
China – N. America weekly prices increased 1%.
China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 6%.
N. Europe – N. America weekly prices decreased 2%.
Analysis
Approaching 100 days since the start of the Iran war, despite periodic reports that an agreement that would open the Strait of Hormuz is near, the sides continue to exchange fire and sanctions, and the waterway remains closed.
For the container market, the closure has primarily meant upward pressure on freight rates via carriers passing on war-elevated fuel costs, which manifested in different ways on different lanes during the low demand months of March, April and most of May this year.
Join 70,000+ Supply Chain Experts Who Never Miss an Issue!
Start your week with the industry insights others miss.
« * » indicates required fields
Consent*
But peak season demand is kicking in early on east-west lanes, with reports of contracted shippers already seeing allocations reduced and premiums applied. So spot rates that climbed moderately – about 15% – across the ex-Asia lanes through mid-May GRIs to levels around 20% higher than a year ago, are starting to spike this week.
Weekly averages for last week were about level to close out the month, with transpacific rates at about $3,200/FEU to the West Coast and $5,000/FEU to the East Coast, and Asia – Europe prices at about $3,000/FEU to N. Europe and $4,400/FEU to the Mediterranean. But June 1st GRIs and PSS introductions have daily rates spiking from $1,000/FEU to $1,800/FEU so far this week on these trades, with additional significant increases announced for mid-month across these lanes as well.
Daily rates for Asia – Europe lanes have already surpassed peak season highs from last June/July, with transpacific still about $1,000/FEU short of last year’s brief, tariff frontloading-driven rate spike in July. Pre-existing war-related congestion in some tranship hubs, as well as rail congestion in Germany could also be a factor for rate pressure or delays for the relevant trades.
In trade war developments, IEEPA refunds – totalling about half of the total $166B paid – are on the way for importers whose customs entries had not already been liquidated, or finalized, by US Customs and Border Protection. But the Trump Administration indicated last week that it may challenge refunds for liquidated entries, arguing that the CBP is unauthorized to reliquidate and refund closed out entries without importer-specific court orders instructing it to do so.
Check out our full IEEPA tariff refund explainer and update page here.
This challenge, if successful, could mean that these importers would need to sue the government in trade court in order to get these duties refunded, and even if unsuccessful could mean a longer wait for impacted importers while the legal issues get sorted out. In the meantime, some trade law experts are advising importers with liquidated entries to file protests if the window hasn’t closed yet.
The trade war has resulted in lower or flat import volumes to the US alongside trade diversions driving volume increases between other countries as global players seek closer ties and trade growth beyond the US. Asia – Europe trade for example grew significantly last year and continues on pace so far in 2026. Even so, trade tensions between China and the EU may be increasing, as the EU considers legislation to curb subsidized imports.
Part of this issue relates to e-commerce imports to EU countries, which continue to grow significantly even as they flatten to the US and are reflected in diverging freighter capacity trends on these lanes. The EU will introduce a flat 3 EUR fee for low value imports starting in July, and a 2 EUR handling fee in November.
Though not as extensive as the US de minimis cancellation, these moves are likely to reduce EU e-commerce volumes arriving by air to some extent. Parcel carriers are warning that the system is still not ready for the new reporting requirements that will accompany the fee introductions, and warn of delays at European borders if these take effect in July.
Air cargo rates were about level on most major lanes this week, though the Freightos Air Index global benchmark – which is about even with April levels – remains more than 30% higher than before the start of the Iran war and year on year as capacity reductions and elevated jet fuel prices continue to impact price levels.
The post Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.
Latest Ocean Freight Rate News
Transpacific ocean freight rates have been falling since Lunar New Year, with Asia-US West Coast prices down 7% and East Coast down 5% last week according to Freightos Baltic Index data. This despite higher shipping volumes than last year due to tariff frontloading. The approaching April 2nd tariff announcement deadline could significantly impact shipping rates and patterns.
Ocean/Sea Freight Shipping Rates
When you start to ship freight at high volumes, it’s time to consider ocean freight. Here is your guide to everything ocean, from choosing the mode that’s right for you to calculating costs and transit times.
How much will your shipment cost? You can use this free calculator to get instant ocean freight estimates.
What are Freight Shipping Rates?
Freight shipping rates are the costs of transporting cargo using ocean, air, rail, or road. These rates can vary significantly depending on mode of transport, distance, shipment volume, weight, and dimensions, as well as market conditions and seasonal fluctuations.
When it comes to ocean freight rates, several key components make up the total cost:
Base freight rate: The basic cost of shipping your goods from the port of origin to the port of destination.
Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF): A surcharge that accounts for fluctuations in fuel prices.
Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF): A surcharge that compensates for exchange rate fluctuations.
Terminal Handling Charges (THC): Fees charged by the port authorities for handling containers at the origin and destination ports.
Surcharges: Various additional fees that may apply, such as for hazardous materials, peak season, or congestion at ports.
Working with experienced freight forwarders can help you navigate the complexities of freight rates and find the most cost-effective solution for your shipment. Platforms like Freightos.com allow you to compare rates from multiple providers instantly, making it easier to make informed decisions and optimize your shipping costs.
Looking for ocean freight rates?
Compare ocean rates from dozens of vetted providers
Freightos – The Digital Freight Shipping Platform: Costs, Prices, Rates, and More.
Instantly compare ocean freight shipping rates with freight quotes from vetted providers. Find the balance of price and transit time that works for your ocean freight.
Our Ocean Freight Shipping Service
Freightos.com offers a comprehensive range of ocean freight shipping services, including instant quotes, freight forwarder comparison, online booking, customs clearance, cargo insurance, and shipment tracking.
As a global freight marketplace, we allow importers and exporters to choose from a variety of freight shipping options based on their specific needs. Freightos.com’s user-friendly interface and advanced technology also make it easy for small and large businesses to manage their freight shipments efficiently and cost-effectively. Discover how our reliable and seamless freight shipping service can simplify your logistics, providing the support you need for smooth operations.
LCL Shipping
Freightos.com offers a range of LCL (less-than-container load) shipping services to businesses looking to ship smaller quantities of cargo.
We provide instant quotes for LCL shipments, allowing businesses to compare rates from multiple forwarders and choose the best option based on their needs. Additionally, Freightos.com allows customs booking in-platform and easy communication with freight forwarders to help ensure that importers and exporters comply with all necessary regulations and requirements for LCL shipments.
FCL Shipping
For importers and exporters who need to transport larger quantities of cargo, Freightos.com offers a range of FCL (full container load) shipping services that include instant quotes for a variety of container types and sizes. Freightos.com can assist businesses with FCL shipping needs by providing instant quotes, a variety of container types and sizes, and support for customs clearance and documentation.
Ocean Freight Forwarders
Freightos.com works with many of the top and best ocean freight forwarders in the world.
The platform partners with leading freight forwarders to provide businesses with a wide range of shipping options, for both door-to-door and port-to-port shipments. Freightos.com’s advanced technology and online platform make it easy for businesses to compare rates and book freight shipments with its network of vetted forwarders. Our team of experts work closely with our forwarder partners to ensure that importers and exporters receive the highest quality of service throughout the shipping process.
Container Rates on Popular Routes
This data is based on Freightos Terminal.
To protect the underlying data, results here may vary slightly from the actual data points.
What is Ocean Freight?
Ocean freight transport is the shipping of goods by sea via shipping containers.
Ocean freight is the most common mode of transport that importers and exporters use. In fact, a full 90% of goods are shipped by ocean freight and sea freight. The other international freight transport modes (courier, air freight, express) are all faster, but they are also more expensive. Smaller shipments, and products with a high value, generally go by these other modes.
How Does Ocean Freight Work?
When you choose to ship your goods with ocean freight, your products will be packaged and possibly palletized either at the factory or by a third party. Your freight forwarder books space on a container vessel and your goods are shipped to the port to undergo a customs exam at the point of origin. Goods are then containerized into full containers or shared containers depending on whether you are shipping FCL or LC. Then the cargo is loaded onto ship for transportation.
Once the ship arrives at the destination port, goods pass through customs and once any duties and taxes are paid, are released. At this point, your goods will be shipped to a warehouse to be delivered to the final customer.
What Does Ocean Freight Mean?
Ocean freight means transporting goods through designated sea lanes by container vessel. This link in the supply chain is vital to cross-border trade that facilitates the movement of massive amounts of goods between countries.
There several shipping options available depending on the type of goods you are shipping. Full container load (FCL) shipping is when goods are containerized and shipped using standard sized 20 or 40 ft containers. For smaller quantities, LCL – or less than container load – means that shippers share container space since their volumes aren’t sufficient to fill a full container independently.
Ocean freight isn’t the only way to transport goods: for small, light, or high value products, many importers choose to ship by air. Air cargo is more expensive, but is faster and more secure. It’s also important to know that regulations for air cargo are more stringent than for ocean freight.
Freight Shipping by Sea
Capacity and Value – One container can hold 10,000 beer bottles! And ocean freight is cheaper. As a rule of thumb, any shipment weighing more than 500 kg is too expensive for air freight. For light shipments, use this chargeable weight calculator to work out whether your freight shipment will be charged by actual weight or dimensional weight. For live international shipping rates see our FBX index.
Fewer restrictions – International law, national law, carrier organization regulations, and individual carrier regulations all play their part in defining and restricting what goods are considered dangerous for transport. Generally, more products are restricted as air cargo than as ocean freight, including gases (e.g. lamp bulbs), all things flammable (e.g. perfume, Samsung Galaxy Note 7), toxic or corrosive items (e.g. batteries), magnetic substances (e.g. speakers), oxidizers and biochemical products (e.g. chemical medicines), and public health risks (e.g. untanned hides). For further information check out the Hazardous Material Table.
Emissions – CO2 freight emissions from ocean freight is minuscule compared with air freight. For example, according to this research, 2 tonnes shipped for 5,000 kilometers by ocean freight will lead to 150 kg of CO2 emissions, compared to 6,605 kg of CO2 emissions by air freight shipping.
What are the downsides of Ocean Freight?
Speed – Airplanes are about 30 times faster than ocean liners; passenger jets cruise at 575 mph, while slow-steaming ocean liners move at 16-18 mph. No surprise then, that a shipment going by air freight from China to the US usually takes at least 20 days more than by ocean freight.
Reliability – Port congestion, customs delays, and bad weather conditions generally add much more days to ocean freight than air freight. To date, tracking technology in air freight is often more advanced than ocean freight. That means that ocean freight is more likely to get misplaced than air freight. This is especially true when the ocean shipment is less than a container load. That said, ocean freight is becoming more reliable thanks to digitization.
Protection – Ocean freight is more likely to get damaged or destroyed than air cargo. That’s because it is in transit a lot longer, and because ships are more subject to movement. But don’t worry too much about ocean cargo falling off ships. The urban myth says 10,000 lost per year, but it’s more like 546 of the 120 million container movements per year that fall in the drink. Even less likely is piracy. Hotspots in recent years have included the Horn of Africa, the Gulf of Guinea, and the Malacca Straits.
Ocean Freight Services
Ocean and sea freight services break down to two further options: a full container load (FCL) and a less than container load (LCL). With LCL, several shipments are packed into one container. This means more work for the forwarder, there’s extra paperwork involved, as well as the physical work of consolidating various shipments into a container before the main transit and de-consolidating the shipments at the other end. This gives LCL three disadvantages:
LCL takes more time to deliver than an FCL shipment. It’s typically recommended to allow an extra one or two weeks for LCL.
There is an increased risk of damage, misplacement, and loss with LCL.
LCL costs more per cubic meter.
Since shipping rates are lower for FCL, it may be worth using a full container once your freight shipment is large enough, even if your goods do not fill a full container. The tipping point for upgrading from LCL to FCL (the smallest sized container is a 20 footer) is somewhere around 15 cubic meters.
Sea Freight Rates Per KG
With the exception of particularly heavy goods, most LCL is priced per volume of goods, and not by weight.
For most products, use these rules of thumb for which selecting the most cost-effective mode:
Freight shipments weighing more than 500 kg becomes uneconomic to go by air freight.
Ocean freight is around $2-$4/kg, and a China-US shipment will take around 30-40 days or more.
At about $5-8 per kilo, a China-US shipment between 150 kg and 500 kg can economically go air freight and will take around 8-10 days.
Express air freight is a few days quicker, but more expensive.
Packages that are lighter than 150 kg can economically go by courier (express freight).
Common Ocean and Sea Freight Costs, Rates, and Charges in Your Freight Quote:
Expect to see these items on ocean freight quotes and invoices:
Customs security surcharges (AMS, ISF)
Container Freight Station (these are the consolidation charges, and apply for LCL only)
Terminal Handling charges (charges by the port authority)
Customs brokerage
Pickup and delivery
Insurance
Accessorial charges (fuel surcharges, handling hazardous materials, storage, etc)
Routing charges (e.g. Panama Canal, Alameda Corridor)
Ocean Freight FAQs
Why do ocean freight quotes for the same shipment vary so much between providers?
Ocean freight quotes often vary because of differences in service levels and because quotes are not always directly comparable.
Not all freight forwarders have the same ability to secure space with carriers or offer the same level of support. Higher quotes may reflect stronger booking power, more reliable capacity, or additional services, while lower quotes may come with fewer included services or less support.
Just as often, quotes aren’t apples to apples. One may be door-to-door while another is port-to-port, assume a different Incoterm, or include services like inland transport or handling that others do not. Market conditions also play a role, as available space and seasonal demand can change what forwarders are able to quote at any given time.
Because of this, comparing quotes by email can be frustrating. Marketplaces like Freightos help by standardizing what’s being quoted upfront, making it easier to compare prices based on the same service scope.
How can I tell if my ocean freight quote is reasonable for my route and season?
The best way to judge whether a quote is reasonable is to compare multiple quotes rather than relying on a single price. Looking at several offers helps you understand the current market range for your route and timing.
If a quote is much higher than the rest, that can be a red flag – but prices that seem unusually low can also be risky, as they may come with limited service or additional fees added later. What matters most is where a quote sits relative to others for the same shipment details.
Using a marketplace like Freightos makes this comparison easier by showing multiple quotes at once for the same service scope, so you can quickly see where the market is. For businesses that want deeper insight into seasonal trends or route-specific shifts, tools like Freightos Terminal provide historical and real-time market data to help put individual quotes in context.
What is included (and not included) in a door-to-door ocean freight rate?
A door-to-door ocean freight rate typically includes the main transportation legs needed to move cargo from origin to destination. This often covers inland transport to the origin port, export handling and port fees, the ocean freight itself, port handling at the destination, and final delivery to the consignee’s location.
What’s not always included are GRIs, or costs that depend on the shipment, destination, or regulatory requirements. Customs duties and tariffs are usually paid separately, as are cargo insurance and optional services. Additional fees can also apply if special services are needed, such as liftgate delivery, appointments, or non-standard handling, and these are often only included if they’re requested upfront.
Because inclusions can vary by provider, it’s important to confirm exactly what’s covered in a “door-to-door” quote before booking.
Should I choose FCL or LCL for my shipment?
The choice between FCL (full container load) and LCL (less than container load) usually comes down to shipment size, timing, and reliability needs.
FCL is generally the better option if your shipment is large enough to justify a full container, or if reliability and predictability are especially important. Because the container is dedicated to a single shipper, FCL can be easier to plan around and may offer more consistent transit and handling, particularly during periods of congestion or tight capacity.
LCL is often a better fit for smaller shipments, whether that’s because you’re a smaller importer, you ship in smaller or more frequent batches, or your business is highly seasonal. Some shippers also use LCL strategically to split shipments or reduce exposure to market volatility, even when they could technically ship FCL.
If you’re unsure which option makes sense for your shipment, it’s worth checking with your forwarder or logistics provider, as the practical tipping point can vary by route, market conditions, and current capacity.
Is it better to let my supplier arrange freight or to use my own forwarder?
In most cases, shippers benefit from using their own freight forwarder, mainly for reasons of visibility and transparency.
When you work directly with a forwarder, it’s usually clearer what services are included in the quote, how costs are broken down, and who is responsible for each part of the shipment. That makes it easier to understand what you’re paying for and to spot potential gaps or add-ons before they become surprises.
When suppliers arrange freight, they typically work with logistics providers they already have relationships with. While this can be convenient, it often gives the shipper less insight into pricing and service scope, and additional charges may appear later that weren’t obvious upfront.
That said, supplier-arranged freight can make sense in some situations, especially for very small or infrequent shipments, but shippers who want more control and predictability usually prefer working with their own forwarder.
Do you need to know the seaport code for, say, the UK’s largest container port at Felixstowe? Check out this handy Seaport Code Finder. It’s GBFXT, by the way.
The post Ocean Freight Rates & Shipping Guide appeared first on Freightos.
IBM Shares Plunge as AI Infrastructure Spending Squeezes Enterprise Software Budgets
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
Ocean Freight Rates & Shipping Guide
Walmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
Why Sulfuric Acid Is Emerging as a Supply Chain Constraint in Copper
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
Trending
-
Non classé1 an agoWalmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
-
Non classé3 mois agoWhy Sulfuric Acid Is Emerging as a Supply Chain Constraint in Copper
- Non classé1 mois ago
Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update
- Non classé11 mois ago
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
- Non classé9 mois ago
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
- Non classé6 mois ago
Container Shipping Overcapacity & Rate Outlook 2026
- Non classé5 mois ago
Ocean rates ease as LNY begins; US port call fees again? – February 17, 2026 Update
-
Non classé1 an agoAmazon and the Shift to AI-Driven Supply Chain Planning
