Connect with us

Non classé

The Emergence of Supply Chain Data Fabrics

Published

on

The Emergence Of Supply Chain Data Fabrics

ARC was recently briefed by InterSystems. When one thinks of supply chain software vendors, the name InterSystems may not spring to mind. The company aims to change this with the expansion of its data fabric portfolio. Business cycles are compressing and the need to make course corrections is exploding. When you combine the volume, complexity, and speed with which decisions need to be made and executed, the current way companies manage this is unsustainable. Decisions need to be digitized. A supply chain data fabric can help companies augment their supply chain processes.

Who is InterSystems?

InterSystems is a rapidly growing global private company with nearly 2,000 employees and revenues of over $1 billion. The company is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts, in the US. They offer software systems and technology for complex integration, rapid application development, and advanced analytics and sell those solutions to companies that need to accelerate optimized business outcomes. They also used these technologies to build healthcare information systems and have achieved considerable success in that industry. They aim to achieve the same success in supply chain management that they have achieved in the healthcare sector. Their premise is that the supply chain sector is ripe for a solution to improve existing supply chain planning and execution systems and processes, and could benefit from the speed, scalability, and integration capabilities InterSystems provides. The company’s flagship supply chain product is InterSystems Supply Chain Orchestrator.

The Integration Problem

The most comprehensive form of planning companies engage in is integrated business planning (IBP). IBP balances what can be produced against projected demand. Based on this, a multiple-month financial, supply chain, and capital expenditure plan is produced.

Historically, the supply chain plan that resulted from the IBP process was too static. Production plans might be locked for as long as a month, regardless of how accurate the forecast was. The original plan developed in a month-long integrated business process can quickly become irrelevant as conditions change. Executives came to understand that IBP should not constrain a company’s ability to react to what was happening in the market. A production plan from an IBP meeting should be considered a rough-cut long-term plan, merely the best estimation of what was likely, not something written in stone. Production, in the short term, needed to flex to meet new opportunities and unexpected constraints.

This realization led to a new focus on agile planning. Agile planning is short-term planning that allows companies to flex to meet market demands. COVID accelerated executives’ understanding that supply chains needed to be agile.

However, a control tower that supports longer-term integrated business planning, short-term agile planning, and execution requires complex integration.

Implementing integrated business planning was already difficult. Often the core planning is done by a supply planning solution that creates a digital map of a company’s supply chain. That supply planning application needs to be integrated into an array of internal systems – ERP, transportation management, warehouse management, procurement, and other applications. Large companies often have a heterogeneous IT environment where different regions and divisions use different ERP and supply chain applications. So, the integration surrounding supply planning is already quite complex.

However, over time, most companies have expanded their digital supply chain model from being mainly internally facing to including an array of external trading partners and participants. Those can include suppliers, contract manufacturers, logistics service providers, customs brokers, governmental agencies, and other participants. That makes the integration even more difficult.

Then, when you move from IBP to agile planning, the integration is an order of magnitude more difficult. Now companies are trying to collect data from multiple tiers of a supply chain in near real-time. Further, each product a manufacturer produces usually has different end-to-end supply chain partners.

The challenges are not just about the volume but also the complexity and fragmentation of data generated by sensors, machines, and smart factories. This data is often disconnected and scattered across various applications, making it difficult to harness for insights and decision-making.

To solve this problem, data fabric technology is being increasingly used. InterSystems offers an enterprise data fabric that speeds and simplifies access to data assets across the entire business. It accesses, transforms, and harmonizes data from multiple sources to make it usable and actionable for a wide variety of business applications. They use this foundation to provide historical, predictive, and prescriptive analytics.

The Orchestration Problem

Generating integrated business plans, engaging in agile planning, and then executing those plans requires complex orchestration, near real-time visibility inside and outside the enterprise, and embedded advanced analytics to provide data driven prescriptive guidance to understand the impact and tradeoffs of various potential actions in response to unexpected exceptions and disruptions. While suppliers of enterprise applications assert that their platform supports all necessary orchestration, most companies find that is not the case, even if their whole enterprise application stack runs on one platform.

Companies need to coordinate and automate across multiple and often competing stakeholders. Those stakeholders include planners; supply chain, manufacturing, and logistics executives; sales and marketing; finance or regional or business unit leaders; and suppliers and other partners.

When a disruption occurs, and a plan cannot be created that meets all service level goals, complex tradeoffs are often required. Marketing may want an optimization scenario that costs more but leads to maximum service levels for a new product. A sales executive may argue that a very large customer needs priority because of their importance. A logistics planner may assert that expediting shipments will lead to very high shipping costs and retard their ability to meet greenhouse emission goals. It is all but impossible to program a planning engine to meet all the competing demands that arise when diverse supply chain disruptions occur. The creation of multiple scenarios, debate, and collaboration are required to evaluate these tradeoffs.

A smart data fabric supports orchestration by embedding a wide range of analytics capabilities, including Generative AI, data exploration, business intelligence, natural language processing, and machine learning directly within the fabric.

InterSystems believes their solution can help solve a variety of common supply chain problems that arise. The company has mapped out how its solution can be used to adapt to large order changes, demand sensing, and component allocation in situations where not all customers can be easily satisfied. Creating advanced agility can clearly contribute to superior business outcomes based on better adherence to service level agreements, better customer satisfaction, and lower costs.

Supply Chain Orchestrator fits well to provide an AI-enabled decision intelligence platform that predicts disruptions before they occur, and optimally handle them when they do, to be ready to manage the unexpected with confidence.

Combined with their smart data fabric architecture, it provides a real-time connective tissue to unify disparate data sources, and a set of next-generation solutions that complement your existing technology infrastructure to accelerate decision making and time to value, driving efficiencies throughout your entire supply chain.

This greatly enables Integrated Business Planning applications to accelerate their planning engine performance.

Final Thoughts

A new category of enterprise data fabrics is emerging to meet the unique needs of large businesses with complex supply chain processes. These new data fabrics must go beyond traditional enterprise data fabrics, which are not optimized for supply chain environments. These new platforms need to be able to embrace intricate supply chain data, real-time alerting, and complex decision-support tradeoffs. Such a platform is needed to allow companies to truly support agile business execution.

The post The Emergence of Supply Chain Data Fabrics appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

IBM Shares Plunge as AI Infrastructure Spending Squeezes Enterprise Software Budgets

Published

on

By

IBM shares fell approximately 25 percent Tuesday after the company unexpectedly released preliminary second-quarter results that missed Wall Street expectations, raising concerns about how rapidly rising artificial intelligence infrastructure costs are reshaping enterprise technology budgets.

The decline erased nearly $68 billion from IBM’s market capitalization and represented the company’s largest one-day loss in market value. The stock was also headed for its steepest percentage decline since 1987.

IBM expects to report second-quarter revenue of $17.2 billion, an increase of 1 percent from the previous year, and adjusted earnings of $2.93 per share. Analysts had expected approximately $17.86 billion in revenue and earnings of $3.01 per share.

The company emphasized that these figures are preliminary and could change slightly when IBM reports its complete second-quarter results on July 22.

Customers Redirect Spending Toward Scarce Infrastructure

IBM CEO Arvind Krishna attributed much of the shortfall to an abrupt shift in customer capital spending during the final weeks of June.

Enterprise customers moved spending toward servers, storage and memory to secure supply-constrained infrastructure before anticipated price increases. That reprioritization reduced spending on IBM’s Z mainframes and the associated transaction-processing software.

“While we anticipated some supply chain related impact in our expectations, we did not anticipate the magnitude of the capex reprioritization,” Krishna wrote in a letter to investors.

IBM’s infrastructure revenue declined 7 percent, driven partly by weaker-than-expected performance in its Z mainframe business and the related software stack. Software revenue increased 5 percent, while consulting revenue was essentially unchanged.

The company also acknowledged internal execution problems. Several large transactions did not close during the quarter, and Krishna said IBM did not adapt quickly enough as customer priorities changed.

AI Spending Is Moving Between Technology Layers

The results do not necessarily indicate that companies are reducing their overall commitment to artificial intelligence. Instead, they show how spending is moving between different layers of the technology stack.

Companies facing shortages and rising prices for memory, servers and storage may accelerate infrastructure purchases while delaying software, consulting and modernization projects.

That shift has implications throughout the enterprise technology supply chain. Hardware manufacturers may experience accelerated demand, while software and services providers encounter delayed purchasing decisions even when customers continue pursuing AI programs.

IBM’s warning also pressured other technology stocks Tuesday, including ServiceNow, Salesforce, Microsoft and Oracle, as investors considered whether the spending shift extends beyond IBM.

IBM will provide its complete financial results and updated outlook on July 22

The post IBM Shares Plunge as AI Infrastructure Spending Squeezes Enterprise Software Budgets appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) increased 1%.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) increased 4%.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) increased 3%.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) increased 1%.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 1%.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 6%.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices decreased 2%.

Analysis

Approaching 100 days since the start of the Iran war, despite periodic reports that an agreement that would open the Strait of Hormuz is near, the sides continue to exchange fire and sanctions, and the waterway remains closed.

For the container market, the closure has primarily meant upward pressure on freight rates via carriers passing on war-elevated fuel costs, which manifested in different ways on different lanes during the low demand months of March, April and most of May this year.

But peak season demand is kicking in early on east-west lanes, with reports of contracted shippers already seeing allocations reduced and premiums applied. So spot rates that climbed moderately – about 15% – across the ex-Asia lanes through mid-May GRIs to levels around 20% higher than a year ago, are starting to spike this week.

Weekly averages for last week were about level to close out the month, with transpacific rates at about $3,200/FEU to the West Coast and $5,000/FEU to the East Coast, and Asia – Europe prices at about $3,000/FEU to N. Europe and $4,400/FEU to the Mediterranean. But June 1st GRIs and PSS introductions have daily rates spiking from $1,000/FEU to $1,800/FEU so far this week on these trades, with additional significant increases announced for mid-month across these lanes as well.

Daily rates for Asia – Europe lanes have already surpassed peak season highs from last June/July, with transpacific still about $1,000/FEU short of last year’s brief, tariff frontloading-driven rate spike in July. Pre-existing war-related congestion in some tranship hubs, as well as rail congestion in Germany could also be a factor for rate pressure or delays for the relevant trades.

In trade war developments, IEEPA refunds – totalling about half of the total $166B paid – are on the way for importers whose customs entries had not already been liquidated, or finalized, by US Customs and Border Protection. But the Trump Administration indicated last week that it may challenge refunds for liquidated entries, arguing that the CBP is unauthorized to reliquidate and refund closed out entries without importer-specific court orders instructing it to do so.

Check out our full IEEPA tariff refund explainer and update page here.

This challenge, if successful, could mean that these importers would need to sue the government in trade court in order to get these duties refunded, and even if unsuccessful could mean a longer wait for impacted importers while the legal issues get sorted out. In the meantime, some trade law experts are advising importers with liquidated entries to file protests if the window hasn’t closed yet.

The trade war has resulted in lower or flat import volumes to the US alongside trade diversions driving volume increases between other countries as global players seek closer ties and trade growth beyond the US. Asia – Europe trade for example grew significantly last year and continues on pace so far in 2026. Even so, trade tensions between China and the EU may be increasing, as the EU considers legislation to curb subsidized imports.

Part of this issue relates to e-commerce imports to EU countries, which continue to grow significantly even as they flatten to the US and are reflected in diverging freighter capacity trends on these lanes. The EU will introduce a flat 3 EUR fee for low value imports starting in July, and a 2 EUR handling fee in November.

Though not as extensive as the US de minimis cancellation, these moves are likely to reduce EU e-commerce volumes arriving by air to some extent. Parcel carriers are warning that the system is still not ready for the new reporting requirements that will accompany the fee introductions, and warn of delays at European borders if these take effect in July.

Air cargo rates were about level on most major lanes this week, though the Freightos Air Index global benchmark – which is about even with April levels – remains more than 30% higher than before the start of the Iran war and year on year as capacity reductions and elevated jet fuel prices continue to impact price levels.

The post Container rates starting to spike on peak season rush – June 2, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Ocean Freight Rates & Shipping Guide

Published

on

By

Latest Ocean Freight Rate News

Transpacific ocean freight rates have been falling since Lunar New Year, with Asia-US West Coast prices down 7% and East Coast down 5% last week according to Freightos Baltic Index data. This despite higher shipping volumes than last year due to tariff frontloading. The approaching April 2nd tariff announcement deadline could significantly impact shipping rates and patterns.

Ocean/Sea Freight Shipping Rates

When you start to ship freight at high volumes, it’s time to consider ocean freight. Here is your guide to everything ocean, from choosing the mode that’s right for you to calculating costs and transit times.

How much will your shipment cost? You can use this free calculator to get instant ocean freight estimates.

Loading…
What are Freight Shipping Rates?

Freight shipping rates are the costs of transporting cargo using ocean, air, rail, or road. These rates can vary significantly depending on mode of transport, distance, shipment volume, weight, and dimensions, as well as market conditions and seasonal fluctuations.

When it comes to ocean freight rates, several key components make up the total cost:

Base freight rate: The basic cost of shipping your goods from the port of origin to the port of destination.
Bunker Adjustment Factor (BAF): A surcharge that accounts for fluctuations in fuel prices.
Currency Adjustment Factor (CAF): A surcharge that compensates for exchange rate fluctuations.
Terminal Handling Charges (THC): Fees charged by the port authorities for handling containers at the origin and destination ports.
Surcharges: Various additional fees that may apply, such as for hazardous materials, peak season, or congestion at ports.

Working with experienced freight forwarders can help you navigate the complexities of freight rates and find the most cost-effective solution for your shipment. Platforms like Freightos.com allow you to compare rates from multiple providers instantly, making it easier to make informed decisions and optimize your shipping costs.

Looking for ocean freight rates?

Compare ocean rates from dozens of vetted providers

Freightos – The Digital Freight Shipping Platform: Costs, Prices, Rates, and More.

Instantly compare ocean freight shipping rates with freight quotes from vetted providers. Find the balance of price and transit time that works for your ocean freight.

Our Ocean Freight Shipping Service

Freightos.com offers a comprehensive range of ocean freight shipping services, including instant quotes, freight forwarder comparison, online booking, customs clearance, cargo insurance, and shipment tracking.

As a global freight marketplace, we allow importers and exporters to choose from a variety of freight shipping options based on their specific needs. Freightos.com’s user-friendly interface and advanced technology also make it easy for small and large businesses to manage their freight shipments efficiently and cost-effectively. Discover how our reliable and seamless freight shipping service can simplify your logistics, providing the support you need for smooth operations.

LCL Shipping

Freightos.com offers a range of LCL (less-than-container load) shipping services to businesses looking to ship smaller quantities of cargo.

We provide instant quotes for LCL shipments, allowing businesses to compare rates from multiple forwarders and choose the best option based on their needs. Additionally, Freightos.com allows customs booking in-platform and easy communication with freight forwarders to help ensure that importers and exporters comply with all necessary regulations and requirements for LCL shipments.

FCL Shipping

For importers and exporters who need to transport larger quantities of cargo, Freightos.com offers a range of FCL (full container load) shipping services that include instant quotes for a variety of container types and sizes. Freightos.com can assist businesses with FCL shipping needs by providing instant quotes, a variety of container types and sizes, and support for customs clearance and documentation.

Ocean Freight Forwarders

Freightos.com works with many of the top and best ocean freight forwarders in the world.

The platform partners with leading freight forwarders to provide businesses with a wide range of shipping options, for both door-to-door and port-to-port shipments. Freightos.com’s advanced technology and online platform make it easy for businesses to compare rates and book freight shipments with its network of vetted forwarders. Our team of experts work closely with our forwarder partners to ensure that importers and exporters receive the highest quality of service throughout the shipping process.

Container Rates on Popular Routes

This data is based on Freightos Terminal.

To protect the underlying data, results here may vary slightly from the actual data points.

What is Ocean Freight?

Ocean freight transport is the shipping of goods by sea via shipping containers.

Ocean freight is the most common mode of transport that importers and exporters use. In fact, a full 90% of goods are shipped by ocean freight and sea freight. The other international freight transport modes (courier, air freight, express) are all faster, but they are also more expensive. Smaller shipments, and products with a high value, generally go by these other modes.

How Does Ocean Freight Work?

When you choose to ship your goods with ocean freight, your products will be packaged and possibly palletized either at the factory or by a third party. Your freight forwarder books space on a container vessel and your goods are shipped to the port to undergo a customs exam at the point of origin. Goods are then containerized into full containers or shared containers depending on whether you are shipping FCL or LC. Then the cargo is loaded onto ship for transportation.

Once the ship arrives at the destination port, goods pass through customs and once any duties and taxes are paid, are released. At this point, your goods will be shipped to a warehouse to be delivered to the final customer.

What Does Ocean Freight Mean?

Ocean freight means transporting goods through designated sea lanes by container vessel. This link in the supply chain is vital to cross-border trade that facilitates the movement of massive amounts of goods between countries.

There several shipping options available depending on the type of goods you are shipping. Full container load (FCL) shipping is when goods are containerized and shipped using standard sized 20 or 40 ft containers. For smaller quantities, LCL – or less than container load – means that shippers share container space since their volumes aren’t sufficient to fill a full container independently.

Ocean freight isn’t the only way to transport goods: for small, light, or high value products, many importers choose to ship by air. Air cargo is more expensive, but is faster and more secure. It’s also important to know that regulations for air cargo are more stringent than for ocean freight.

Freight Shipping by Sea

Capacity and Value – One container can hold 10,000 beer bottles! And ocean freight is cheaper. As a rule of thumb, any shipment weighing more than 500 kg is too expensive for air freight. For light shipments, use this chargeable weight calculator to work out whether your freight shipment will be charged by actual weight or dimensional weight. For live international shipping rates see our FBX index.
Fewer restrictions – International law, national law, carrier organization regulations, and individual carrier regulations all play their part in defining and restricting what goods are considered dangerous for transport. Generally, more products are restricted as air cargo than as ocean freight, including gases (e.g. lamp bulbs), all things flammable (e.g. perfume, Samsung Galaxy Note 7), toxic or corrosive items (e.g. batteries), magnetic substances (e.g. speakers), oxidizers and biochemical products (e.g. chemical medicines), and public health risks (e.g. untanned hides). For further information check out the Hazardous Material Table.
Emissions – CO2 freight emissions from ocean freight is minuscule compared with air freight. For example, according to this research, 2 tonnes shipped for 5,000 kilometers by ocean freight will lead to 150 kg of CO2 emissions, compared to 6,605 kg of CO2 emissions by air freight shipping.

What are the downsides of Ocean Freight?

Speed – Airplanes are about 30 times faster than ocean liners; passenger jets cruise at 575 mph, while slow-steaming ocean liners move at 16-18 mph. No surprise then, that a shipment going by air freight from China to the US usually takes at least 20 days more than by ocean freight.
Reliability – Port congestion, customs delays, and bad weather conditions generally add much more days to ocean freight than air freight. To date, tracking technology in air freight is often more advanced than ocean freight. That means that ocean freight is more likely to get misplaced than air freight. This is especially true when the ocean shipment is less than a container load. That said, ocean freight is becoming more reliable thanks to digitization.
Protection – Ocean freight is more likely to get damaged or destroyed than air cargo. That’s because it is in transit a lot longer, and because ships are more subject to movement. But don’t worry too much about ocean cargo falling off ships. The urban myth says 10,000 lost per year, but it’s more like 546 of the 120 million container movements per year that fall in the drink. Even less likely is piracy. Hotspots in recent years have included the Horn of Africa, the Gulf of Guinea, and the Malacca Straits.

Ocean Freight Services

Ocean and sea freight services break down to two further options: a full container load (FCL) and a less than container load (LCL). With LCL, several shipments are packed into one container. This means more work for the forwarder, there’s extra paperwork involved, as well as the physical work of consolidating various shipments into a container before the main transit and de-consolidating the shipments at the other end. This gives LCL three disadvantages:

LCL takes more time to deliver than an FCL shipment. It’s typically recommended to allow an extra one or two weeks for LCL.
There is an increased risk of damage, misplacement, and loss with LCL.
LCL costs more per cubic meter.

Since shipping rates are lower for FCL, it may be worth using a full container once your freight shipment is large enough, even if your goods do not fill a full container. The tipping point for upgrading from LCL to FCL (the smallest sized container is a 20 footer) is somewhere around 15 cubic meters.

Sea Freight Rates Per KG

With the exception of particularly heavy goods, most LCL is priced per volume of goods, and not by weight.

For most products, use these rules of thumb for which selecting the most cost-effective mode:

Freight shipments weighing more than 500 kg becomes uneconomic to go by air freight.
Ocean freight is around $2-$4/kg, and a China-US shipment will take around 30-40 days or more.
At about $5-8 per kilo, a China-US shipment between 150 kg and 500 kg can economically go air freight and will take around 8-10 days.
Express air freight is a few days quicker, but more expensive.
Packages that are lighter than 150 kg can economically go by courier (express freight).

Common Ocean and Sea Freight Costs, Rates, and Charges in Your Freight Quote:

Expect to see these items on ocean freight quotes and invoices:

Customs security surcharges (AMS, ISF)
Container Freight Station (these are the consolidation charges, and apply for LCL only)
Terminal Handling charges (charges by the port authority)
Customs brokerage
Pickup and delivery
Insurance
Accessorial charges (fuel surcharges, handling hazardous materials, storage, etc)
Routing charges (e.g. Panama Canal, Alameda Corridor)

Ocean Freight FAQs

Why do ocean freight quotes for the same shipment vary so much between providers?

Ocean freight quotes often vary because of differences in service levels and because quotes are not always directly comparable.

Not all freight forwarders have the same ability to secure space with carriers or offer the same level of support. Higher quotes may reflect stronger booking power, more reliable capacity, or additional services, while lower quotes may come with fewer included services or less support.

Just as often, quotes aren’t apples to apples. One may be door-to-door while another is port-to-port, assume a different Incoterm, or include services like inland transport or handling that others do not. Market conditions also play a role, as available space and seasonal demand can change what forwarders are able to quote at any given time.

Because of this, comparing quotes by email can be frustrating. Marketplaces like Freightos help by standardizing what’s being quoted upfront, making it easier to compare prices based on the same service scope.

How can I tell if my ocean freight quote is reasonable for my route and season?

The best way to judge whether a quote is reasonable is to compare multiple quotes rather than relying on a single price. Looking at several offers helps you understand the current market range for your route and timing.

If a quote is much higher than the rest, that can be a red flag – but prices that seem unusually low can also be risky, as they may come with limited service or additional fees added later. What matters most is where a quote sits relative to others for the same shipment details.

Using a marketplace like Freightos makes this comparison easier by showing multiple quotes at once for the same service scope, so you can quickly see where the market is. For businesses that want deeper insight into seasonal trends or route-specific shifts, tools like Freightos Terminal provide historical and real-time market data to help put individual quotes in context.

What is included (and not included) in a door-to-door ocean freight rate?

A door-to-door ocean freight rate typically includes the main transportation legs needed to move cargo from origin to destination. This often covers inland transport to the origin port, export handling and port fees, the ocean freight itself, port handling at the destination, and final delivery to the consignee’s location.

What’s not always included are GRIs, or costs that depend on the shipment, destination, or regulatory requirements. Customs duties and tariffs are usually paid separately, as are cargo insurance and optional services. Additional fees can also apply if special services are needed, such as liftgate delivery, appointments, or non-standard handling, and these are often only included if they’re requested upfront.

Because inclusions can vary by provider, it’s important to confirm exactly what’s covered in a “door-to-door” quote before booking.

Should I choose FCL or LCL for my shipment?

The choice between FCL (full container load) and LCL (less than container load) usually comes down to shipment size, timing, and reliability needs.

FCL is generally the better option if your shipment is large enough to justify a full container, or if reliability and predictability are especially important. Because the container is dedicated to a single shipper, FCL can be easier to plan around and may offer more consistent transit and handling, particularly during periods of congestion or tight capacity.

LCL is often a better fit for smaller shipments, whether that’s because you’re a smaller importer, you ship in smaller or more frequent batches, or your business is highly seasonal. Some shippers also use LCL strategically to split shipments or reduce exposure to market volatility, even when they could technically ship FCL.

If you’re unsure which option makes sense for your shipment, it’s worth checking with your forwarder or logistics provider, as the practical tipping point can vary by route, market conditions, and current capacity.

Is it better to let my supplier arrange freight or to use my own forwarder?

In most cases, shippers benefit from using their own freight forwarder, mainly for reasons of visibility and transparency.

When you work directly with a forwarder, it’s usually clearer what services are included in the quote, how costs are broken down, and who is responsible for each part of the shipment. That makes it easier to understand what you’re paying for and to spot potential gaps or add-ons before they become surprises.

When suppliers arrange freight, they typically work with logistics providers they already have relationships with. While this can be convenient, it often gives the shipper less insight into pricing and service scope, and additional charges may appear later that weren’t obvious upfront.

That said, supplier-arranged freight can make sense in some situations, especially for very small or infrequent shipments, but shippers who want more control and predictability usually prefer working with their own forwarder.

Do you need to know the seaport code for, say, the UK’s largest container port at Felixstowe? Check out this handy Seaport Code Finder. It’s GBFXT, by the way.

The post Ocean Freight Rates & Shipping Guide appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Trending