Connect with us

Non classé

A Volatile Year Ahead: Scenarios for Ocean Freight in 2025

Published

on

A Volatile Year Ahead: Scenarios for Ocean Freight in 2025

Judah Levine

December 17, 2024

Freightos was delighted to host its seventh annual FreighTech conference recently, bringing together leaders in What does 2025 hold in store for ocean freight? The answer to that question starts with a look back at the factors that impacted the market this year, combined with the underlying freight data from the past few years.

And depending on how those play out in 2025 we can sketch worst case and best case scenarios for the coming year, as well as what may be the most likely path the market takes in 2025.

You can check out our 2025 air cargo outlook here, or catch our recent 2025 Ocean and Air Outlook webinar here.

2024 – A(nother) volatile year for supply chains

The Red Sea crisis started at the end of 2023 and continued throughout 2024 impacting operations, freight rates and seasonal demand. Diversions around the Cape of Good Hope meant additional lead times of one to two weeks for Asia – Europe and Mediterranean shippers, and the capacity absorbed by longer journeys and additional vessels – as well as bouts of significant schedule disruptions and congestion at some Asian and European hubs – on these lanes pushed rates up across the container market.

Ex-Asia container rates tripled from December to January/February – up to nearly $5,000/FEU to the US West Coast and $5,500/FEU to Europe – as the start of the crisis coincided with the seasonal demand increase ahead of Lunar New Year. When demand eased in the spring these rates settled around $3,000/FEU, about double typical levels, as diversions continued to keep capacity constrained.

The Peak Season Impact

And with lead times likewise extended, peak season started and ended earlier than usual, pushing rates past the $8,000/FEU mark in July. For transpacific shippers, peak season was also pulled forward by shippers rushing to receive goods before an expected October ILA port worker strike, which ended after three days with both a new wage agreement and a January 15th deadline to resolve the role of port automation or face another strike.

National Retail Federation Q4 volume estimates in December were adjusted well above projections from two months prior as frontloading began ahead of the possibility of a new strike and tariff increases
Data source: National Retail Federation, Global Port Tracker

Tariff Expectations

The new strike deadline and a Trump victory in November meant stronger than expected Q4 US ocean imports – and container rates – as shippers once again frontloaded ahead of a possible strike and now also ahead of expected tariff increases during the second Trump Administration.

And for Asia – Europe shippers, rates started climbing again in November – much earlier than usual for pre-LNY demand – as importers must ensure they move all the inventory they need out of China before the holiday or risk a much longer than usual wait to receive goods after LNY due to continued Red Sea diversions.

The Bottom Line

All of these factors – Red Sea diversions, potential labor disruptions, and tariff threats – remain in play for 2025, with the potential for overcapacity in the market once Red Sea traffic resumes another wrinkle in the story.

Stay informed every single week with our free weekly freight update.

Subscribe now (free)

So what will 2025 look like? Three Potential Outcomes

Worst Case

Including: Continued Red Sea attacks, labor strikes, and increased tariffs.

If attacks on Red Sea traffic persist throughout the year, we should expect shippers – especially Asia – Europe – to continue to move freight earlier than usual impacting the timing of seasonal demand. And though lessons learned this year could mean lower levels of congestion and schedule disruptions, we should still expect freight rates to look very similar to those of 2024 as long as diversions continue.

For transpacific shippers, a prolonged East Coast and Gulf port labor strike in January would cause additional congestion and backlogs, and possibly diversions to the West Coast that would put additional pressure on freight rates from their already elevated starting point.

Transpacific ocean rates have been elevated throughout the year due to Red Sea diversions, but frontloading ahead of expected tariffs is already putting additional pressure on rates as 2025 approaches.

If President Trump persists in tariff threats, and if he follows through on his stated intentions – 60% tariffs on Chinese imports, a universal 10% – 20% on all imports and 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico – then freight rates will face additional pressure up until expectations change or tariffs go into effect.

Frontloading ahead of tariffs will mean higher ocean demand and rates ahead of the tariffs and lower volumes and rates afterwards. Typical seasonality could therefore be skewed as shippers make decisions based on when tariffs will go into effect and not on inventory needs around seasonal goods/spending patterns.

And a sharp increase in demand – if there proves to be only a small window before tariffs go into effect – could also lead to some congestion that would likewise put upward pressure on rates. Tariff increases could also mean some shift in container volumes away from China and toward alternatives like Vietnam and India.

Best Case

Variables: End to Red Sea crisis, labor strikes averted and tariffs emerge as primarily a negotiating tactic

If the ILA strike is averted or brief – which may be increasingly likely given President-elect Trump’s recent support for the union – transpacific and transatlantic shippers will avoid a potential source of significant disruption and possible rate spikes.

And if Trump’s tariff threats turn out to be more negotiating tools than policy early enough in the year, then the end to frontloading ahead of tariff hikes would restore typical seasonality to these markets, avoid additional container rate spikes, and provide a degree of certainty to the many trade lanes and businesses that would’ve been impacted by tariff changes.

Finally, an end to attacks in the Red Sea in 2025 would restore container traffic to this crucial lane. An adjustment period, possibly of several months, will follow and will include schedule disruptions, congestion and delays as services are reshuffled and reset. But afterwards, all the capacity that had been absorbed by the diversions will be released back into the market, restoring typical transit times and container flows, removing a key source of congestion and delays in 2024 and relieving pressure on freight rates.

An end to Red Sea diversions would certainly – after the adjustment period – let rates come down from the elevated levels seen in 2024, but the growing container fleet could also push the market into a state of significant over capacity. This may be considered a best case for some shippers in that this supply surge could lead to extremely low rates like those seen in late 2023 when prices dipped below $1k/FEU on some ex-Asia lanes.

Most likely: Somewhere in Between

Labor Strikes

Though of course not a certainty, incoming President Trump’s explicit support for the ILA, may make a strike – or at least a prolonged one – less likely than before this announcement. The USMX could of course resist, but after conceding in October to probably less government pressure than they could face in January, it may be more likely that the dispute will end before or soon after the 15th and probably more in the ILA’s favor.

Tariffs

Some US tariff increases will almost certainly go into effect at some point in 2025, though the process required for tariff changes will mean they likely won’t happen on January 20th but a month or two later at the earliest. They’ll probably also not take the exact form proposed by Trump until now as he’s already facing domestic and international opposition to these sweeping changes.

But assuming tariff increases will be announced with a runway of several months before they’re introduced – which was the case in 2018 (see our analysis of the impact of those tariff increases here and here) – we’ll likely see container demand skew to before their roll out with rates under more upward pressure in that period too.

Red Sea and capacity levels

In terms of the Red Sea, the Israel – Hamas war is the Houthi’s stated motivation for attacking passing vessels. And though some observers speculate that even once there is a Gaza ceasefire Houthi attacks could continue anyway, it is possible that diversions will end once the war ends. And developments in the region make an end to the war this year more likely than it was in 2024.

As noted above, restored Red Sea traffic will trigger a bumpy adjustment period, after which rates will decrease significantly from their elevated levels in 2024. And though significant overcapacity is possible, in a recent earnings call Maersk speculated that a sharp increase in vessel scrapping, offloading chartered vessels, slow steaming and effective use of blanked sailings will allow carriers to avoid a complete rate collapse even after the Red Sea crisis ends.

And despite the flurry of new vessel deliveries and fears of overcapacity, the orderbook continues to be strong, with a high level of new orders throughout this year, suggesting carriers are confident that the fleet can continue to grow without causing a rate collapse.

So rates will certainly normalize once Red Sea traffic resumes. If that coincides with a drop in demand because tariffs led to a significant pull forward earlier in the year, then it will be even more challenging for carriers to avoid loss-making rate levels. Some increased competition as the new alliances are introduced early in the year could also put extra downward pressure on rates. But it will remain to be seen when the Red Sea will reopen, and what that will mean for capacity levels and rates as a result.

So, yet again, it seems the ocean container market must start the new year with high levels of uncertainty as to what the near future holds.

Stay informed every single week with our free weekly freight update.

Get industry-leading insights in your inbox.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post A Volatile Year Ahead: Scenarios for Ocean Freight in 2025 appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

Published

on

By

India–u.s. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change

The announcement by Donald Trump and Narendra Modi of an India–U.S. “trade deal” has drawn immediate attention from global markets. From a supply chain and logistics perspective, however, the more important observation is not the scale of the claims, but the lack of formal detail required for execution.

At this stage, what exists is a political statement rather than a completed trade agreement. For companies managing sourcing, manufacturing, transportation, and compliance across India–U.S. trade lanes, uncertainty remains the defining condition.

What Has Been Announced So Far

Based on public statements from the U.S. administration and reporting by CNBC and Al Jazeera, several points have been asserted:

U.S. tariffs on Indian goods would be reduced from an effective 50 percent to 18 percent

India would reduce tariffs and non tariff barriers on U.S. goods, potentially to zero

India would stop purchasing Russian oil and increase energy purchases from the United States

India would significantly increase purchases of U.S. goods across energy, agriculture, technology, and industrial sectors

Statements from the Indian government have been more limited. New Delhi confirmed that U.S. tariffs on Indian exports would be reduced to 18 percent, but it did not publicly confirm commitments related to Russian oil, agricultural market access, or large scale procurement from U.S. suppliers.

This divergence matters. In supply chain planning, commitments only become relevant when they are documented, scoped, and enforceable.

Why This Is Not Yet a Trade Agreement

From an operational standpoint, the announcement lacks several elements required to support planning and execution:

No published tariff schedules by HS code

No clarification on rules of origin

No definition of non tariff barrier reductions

No implementation timelines

No enforcement or dispute resolution mechanisms

Without these components, companies cannot reliably model landed cost, supplier risk, or network design changes.

By comparison, India’s recently announced trade agreement with the European Union includes detailed provisions covering market access, regulatory alignment, and investment protections. Those provisions are what allow supply chain leaders to translate trade policy into operational decisions. The U.S. announcement does not yet meet that threshold.

Implications for Supply Chains

Tariff Reduction Could Be Material if Formalized

An 18 percent tariff rate would improve India’s competitive position relative to regional peers such as Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. If implemented and sustained, this could support incremental sourcing from India in sectors such as textiles, pharmaceuticals, and light manufacturing.

For now, however, this remains a scenario rather than a planning assumption.

Energy Commitments Are the Largest Unknown

The claim that India would halt purchases of Russian oil has significant implications across energy, chemical, and manufacturing supply chains. Russian crude has been a key input for Indian refineries and downstream industrial production.

A shift away from that supply would affect energy input costs, tanker routing, port utilization, and U.S.–India crude and LNG trade volumes. None of these impacts can be assessed with confidence without confirmation from Indian regulators and implementing agencies.

Agriculture Remains Politically and Operationally Sensitive

U.S. officials have suggested expanded access for American agricultural exports. Historically, agriculture has been one of the most protected and politically sensitive sectors in India.

Any meaningful liberalization would raise questions around cold chain capacity, port infrastructure, domestic political resistance, and regulatory compliance. These factors introduce execution risk that supply chain leaders should consider carefully.

Compliance and Digital Trade Issues Are Unresolved

Several areas remain undefined:

Whether India will adjust pharmaceutical patent protections

Whether U.S. technology firms will receive exemptions from digital services taxes

Whether labor and environmental standards will be linked to market access

Each of these issues influences sourcing strategies, contract terms, and long term cost structures.

Practical Guidance for Supply Chain Leaders

Until formal documentation is released, a measured approach is warranted:

Avoid making structural network changes based on political announcements

Model tariff exposure using multiple scenarios rather than a single assumed outcome

Monitor customs and regulatory guidance rather than headline statements

Assess exposure to potential energy cost changes in Indian operations

Track implementation of the India–EU agreement as a near term reference point

Bottom Line

This announcement suggests a potential shift in the direction of India–U.S. trade relations, but it does not yet provide the clarity required for operational decision making.

For now, it creates strategic optionality rather than executable change.

Until tariff schedules, regulatory commitments, and enforcement mechanisms are formally published, supply chain and logistics leaders should treat this development as informational rather than actionable. In trade, execution begins only when the documentation exists.

The post India–U.S. Trade Announcement Creates Strategic Options, Not Executable Change appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Published

on

By

Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Published: February 3, 2026

Blog

Weekly highlights

Ocean rates – Freightos Baltic Index

Asia-US West Coast prices (FBX01 Weekly) decreased 10% to $2,418/FEU.

Asia-US East Coast prices (FBX03 Weekly) decreased 2% to $3,859/FEU.

Asia-N. Europe prices (FBX11 Weekly) decreased 5% to $2,779/FEU.

Asia-Mediterranean prices(FBX13 Weekly) decreased 5% to $4,179/FEU.

Air rates – Freightos Air Index

China – N. America weekly prices increased 8% to $6.74/kg.

China – N. Europe weekly prices decreased 4% to $3.44/kg.

N. Europe – N. America weekly prices increased 10% to $2.53/kg.

Analysis

Winter weather is complicating logistics on both sides of the Atlantic. Affected areas in the US, especially the southeast and southern midwest are still recovering from last week’s major storm and cold.

Storms in the North Atlantic slowed vessel traffic and disrupted or shutdown operations at several container ports across Western Europe and into the Mediterranean late last week. Transits resumed and West Med ports restarted operations earlier this week, but the disruptions have already caused significant delays, and weather is expected to worsen again mid-week.

The resulting delays and disruptions could increase congestion levels at N. Europe ports, but ocean rates from Asia to both N. Europe and the Mediterranean nonetheless dipped 5% last week as the pre-Lunar New Year rush comes to an end. Daily rates this week are sliding further with prices to N. Europe now down to about $2,600/FEU and $3,800/FEU to the Mediterranean – from respective highs of $3,000/FEU and $4,900/FEU in January.

Transpacific rates likewise slipped last week as LNY nears, with West Coast prices easing 10% to about $2,400/FEU and East Coast rates down 5% to $3,850/FEU. West Coast daily prices have continued to slide so far this week, with rates dropping to almost $1,900/FEU as of Monday, a level last seen in mid-December.

Prices across these lanes are significantly lower than this time last year due partly to fleet growth. ONE identified overcapacity as one driver of Q3 losses last year, with lower volumes due to trade war frontloading the other culprit.

And trade war uncertainty has persisted into 2026.

India – US container volumes have slumped since August when the US introduced 50% tariffs on many Indian exports. Just this week though, the US and India announced a breakthrough in negotiations that will lower tariffs to 18% in exchange for a reduction in India’s Russian oil purchases among other commitments. President Trump has yet to sign an executive order lowering tariffs, and the sides have not released details of the agreement, but once implemented, container demand is expected to rebound on this lane.

Recent steps in the other direction include Trump issuing an executive order that enables the US to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba, and threatening tariffs and other punitive steps targeting Canada’s aviation manufacturing.

The recent volatility of and increasing barriers to trade with the US since Trump took office last year are major drivers of the warmer relations and increased and diversified trade developing between other major economies. The EU signed a major free trade agreement with India last week just after finalizing a deal with a group of South American countries, and other countries like the UK are exploring improved ties with China as well.

In a final recent geopolitical development, Panama’s Supreme Court nullified Hutchinson Port rights to operate its terminals at either end of the Panama Canal. The Hong Kong company was in stalled negotiations to sell those ports following Trump’s objection to a China-related presence in the canal. Maersk’s APMTP was appointed to take over operations in the interim.

In air cargo, pre-LNY demand may be one factor in China-US rates continuing to rebound to $6.74/kg last week from about $5.50/kg in early January. Post the new year slump, South East Asia – US prices are climbing as well, up to almost $5.00/kg last week from $4.00/kg just a few weeks ago.

China – Europe rates dipped 4% to $3.44/kg last week, with SEA – Europe prices up 7% to more than $3.20/kg, and transatlantic rates up 10% to more than $2.50/kg, a level 25% higher than early this year.

Discover Freightos Enterprise

Freightos Terminal: Real-time pricing dashboards to benchmark rates and track market trends.

Procure: Streamlined procurement and cost savings with digital rate management and automated workflows.

Rate, Book, & Manage: Real-time rate comparison, instant booking, and easy tracking at every shipment stage.

Judah Levine

Head of Research, Freightos Group

Judah is an experienced market research manager, using data-driven analytics to deliver market-based insights. Judah produces the Freightos Group’s FBX Weekly Freight Update and other research on what’s happening in the industry from shipper behaviors to the latest in logistics technology and digitization.

Put the Data in Data-Backed Decision Making

Freightos Terminal helps tens of thousands of freight pros stay informed across all their ports and lanes

The post Winter weather challenges, trade deals and more tariff threats – February 3, 2026 Update appeared first on Freightos.

Continue Reading

Non classé

Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality

Published

on

By

Microsoft And The Operationalization Of Ai: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding With Execution Reality

Microsoft has positioned itself as one of the central platforms for enterprise AI. Through Azure, Copilot, Fabric, and a rapidly expanding ecosystem of AI services, the company is not merely offering tools, it is proposing an operating model for how intelligence should be embedded across enterprise workflows.

For supply chain and logistics leaders, the significance of Microsoft’s strategy is less about individual features and more about how platform decisions increasingly shape where AI lives, how it is governed, and which decisions it ultimately influences.

From Cloud Infrastructure to Operating Layer

Historically, Microsoft’s role in supply chain technology centered on infrastructure and productivity software. Azure provided scalable compute and storage, while Office and collaboration tools supported planning and coordination. That boundary has shifted.

Microsoft is now positioning AI as a horizontal operating layer that spans data management, analytics, decision support, and execution. Azure AI services, Microsoft Fabric, and Copilot are designed to work together, reducing friction between data ingestion, model development, and business consumption.

The implication for operations leaders is subtle but important: AI is no longer something added to systems; it is increasingly embedded into the platforms those systems rely on.

Copilot and the Question of Decision Proximity

Copilot has become a focal point of Microsoft’s AI narrative. Positioned as an assistive layer across applications, Copilot aims to surface insights, generate recommendations, and automate routine tasks.

For supply chain use cases, the key question is not whether Copilot can generate answers, but where those answers appear in the decision chain. Insights delivered inside productivity tools can improve awareness and coordination, but operational value depends on whether recommendations are connected to execution systems.

This highlights a broader pattern: AI that remains advisory improves efficiency; AI that is embedded into workflows influences outcomes. Microsoft’s challenge is bridging that gap consistently across heterogeneous enterprise environments.

Microsoft Fabric and the Data Foundation Problem

Microsoft Fabric represents an attempt to simplify and unify the enterprise data landscape. By combining data engineering, analytics, and governance into a single platform, Microsoft is addressing one of the most persistent barriers to AI adoption: fragmented and inconsistent data.

For supply chain organizations, Fabric’s value lies in its potential to standardize event data across planning, execution, and visibility systems. However, unification does not eliminate the need for data discipline. Event quality, latency, and ownership remain operational issues, not platform features.

Fabric reduces friction, but it does not resolve governance by itself.

Integration with Existing Enterprise Systems

Microsoft’s AI strategy assumes coexistence with existing ERP, WMS, TMS, and planning platforms. Integration, rather than replacement, is the dominant pattern.

This creates both opportunity and risk. On one hand, Microsoft can act as a connective tissue across systems that were never designed to work together. On the other, loosely coupled integration increases dependence on interface stability and data consistency.

In execution-heavy environments, even small integration failures can cascade quickly. As AI becomes more embedded, integration reliability becomes a strategic concern.

Where AI Is Delivering Value, and Where It Isn’t

AI deployments tend to deliver value fastest in areas such as demand sensing, scenario analysis, reporting automation, and exception identification. These use cases align well with Microsoft’s strengths in analytics, collaboration, and scalable infrastructure.

Where value is harder to realize is in autonomous execution. Closed-loop decision-making that directly triggers operational action requires tighter coupling with execution systems and clearer decision ownership.

This reinforces a recurring theme: platform AI accelerates insight, but execution still depends on operating model design.

Constraints That Still Apply

Despite the breadth of Microsoft’s AI portfolio, familiar constraints remain. Data quality, security, compliance, and organizational readiness continue to limit outcomes. AI platforms do not eliminate the need for process clarity or decision accountability.

In some cases, the ease of deploying AI services can outpace an organization’s ability to absorb them operationally. This creates a risk of insight saturation without action.

Why Microsoft Matters to Supply Chain Leaders

Microsoft’s relevance lies in its ability to shape the default environment in which enterprise AI operates. Platform decisions made today influence data architectures, governance models, and user expectations for years.

For supply chain leaders, the key takeaway is not to adopt Microsoft’s AI stack wholesale, but to understand how platform-level AI affects where intelligence sits, how it flows, and who ultimately acts on it.

The next phase of AI adoption will not be defined solely by model performance. It will be defined by how effectively platforms like Microsoft’s translate intelligence into operational decisions under real-world constraints.

The post Microsoft and the Operationalization of AI: Why Platform Strategy Is Colliding with Execution Reality appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.

Continue Reading

Trending