Non classé
Supply Chain Executives Face Growing C-Suite Complacency
Published
2 ans agoon
By
According to research by Ernst & Young LLP, the global consulting firm, as the Covid crisis recedes, supply chain executives are losing the strategic gains they made with their C-suite counterparts. During and immediately after the pandemic, supply chain leaders were in an unfamiliar position: they had the attention of top management and a once-in-a-generation opportunity to make their supply chains more agile and resilient. The EY research suggests that at many companies, that opportunity is receding.
While 87% of supply chain leaders say their organization has made significant investments to improve supply chain resiliency, 19% admit that today they are unprepared to face supply chain disruptions due to supply shortages. “To improve,” the report rightly notes, “organizations should enhance supply chain visibility with robust data and analytics; use AI to foresee disruptions; keep business continuity plans current; and diversify supply sources, suppliers, manufacturing and logistics partners.”
Further, while 88% of supply chain executives report that their organization’s supply chain plays a vital role in enhancing the customer experience, their colleagues in the C-suite overwhelmingly (88%) view the supply chain function as a cost center. Despite a heightened awareness of the importance of supply chains, 78% of supply chain leaders say their organization is back to focusing on supply chain cost management. 28% of supply chain leaders cite cost reduction as one of the top three priorities currently. This is a clear shift from pandemic-era strategies when agility and resilience were priorities.
88% of supply chain leaders say their supply chain has a vital role in enhancing the customer experience by promptly addressing customer needs. Only 76% of the C-suite see it the same way. Agility and resilience play a key role in customer satisfaction. Prepandemic research by the McKinsey Global Institute found that, on average, companies experience a disruption of one to two months in duration every 3.7 years.
While supply chain executives largely realize how critical collaboration and effective supply chain technology are. Supply chain executives tout the necessity of internal collaboration for resiliency (64%), revenue generation (62%), and customer satisfaction (63%). With supply chain management’s historic focus on breaking down silos, it is surprising that those numbers are not significantly higher.
In contrast, on achieving objectives like resilience, revenue generation, and customer satisfaction, the C-suite scores are 14-19% lower on the necessity of internal collaboration.
When it comes to the importance of external collaboration’s positive contribution to resilience, revenue generation, and customer satisfaction, the gaps are even bigger. 74% of supply chain executives say external collaboration contributes to resilience. Only 59% in the C-suite say the same. The comparative numbers for supply chain leaders vs. C-suite leaders for revenue generation (67 vs. 56%) and customer satisfaction (70 to 55%) are similar. There appears to be an expectation on the part of many C-suite leaders that the necessary collaboration is taking place.
What gets measured affects what gets prioritized. Yet in EY’s research, they report that “nearly all supply chain leaders (97%) say that their organizations are currently facing challenges as it relates to supply chain metrics and that challenges come from a lack of integrated data and cross-functional metrics being in conflict with each other, among others. Supply chain leaders’ performance is currently focused on key performance indicators such as rates of return (49%), cash-to-cash cycles (46%), and supply chain costs as a percentage of sales (45%). Ideally, supply chain metrics would also reflect customer satisfaction, revenue growth, and market share.
The survey indicates “that 84% of supply chain leaders say they are more focused on internal operations than customer needs, with 76% indicating they prioritize making new and innovative products over creating the best customer experience. In fact, only 44% of supply chain leaders report tracking customer satisfaction (e.g., net promoter score or similar metric) as a supply chain KPI. Yet, customer satisfaction depends upon reliable and timely deliveries. In the long term, satisfied customers – as measured by NPI scores in excess of key competitors – buy more, which leads to increases in a company’s market share.
For this research, 347 US supply chain leaders from different industries were surveyed. Those companies had at least $500 million in annual revenue. The margin of error for the total sample, conducted this spring, was plus or minus 5 percentage points at the 95% confidence interval.
The post Supply Chain Executives Face Growing C-Suite Complacency appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
You may like
Ocean freight forwarding is an $80+ billion market bogged down by the manual processes related to booking management, documentation services, and the coordination labor that holds it all together.
When working with a freight forwarder, you’re buying three things bundled together:
Carrier relationships — access to capacity, negotiated rates, allocation commitments.
Operational data — knowing which carrier fits a given lane, what documents a particular trade corridor requires, how to handle an exception when a booking gets rejected.
Coordination labor — the booking itself, the documents per container (industry estimates range from 9 to 18 depending on the corridor), the re-keying of data across disconnected systems, the email chains chasing confirmations and clearances.
Shippers have always paid for the bundle because you couldn’t get one piece without the others, but that’s changing.
Where the bundle comes apart
Travel agents used to bundle airline relationships, destination expertise, and the labor of putting trips together into a single fee. Aggregator platforms unbundled the pieces, and the booking layer went first because that’s where the volume was. Ocean freight forwarding is in the same position. More than digitizing booking, though, AI is automating it.
The bulk of the volume and labor cost for freight forwarders is tied up in rate comparisons across dozens of carriers, document preparation and routing by trade lane and commodity classification, booking execution against pre-negotiated contracts, and exception triage on rejected bookings.
But this is all high-volume, rule-governed, multi-system coordination where speed and consistency matter more than creativity. Exactly the type of work that AI agents are well-equipped to handle.
Platforms can now ingest a rate agreement, parse surcharges and FAK provisions into a digital rate profile, compare carriers on cost, transit time, and schedule reliability, and execute a booking based on pre-defined parameters, without a human in the loop.
Automating the entire order lifecycle
Every dollar of margin exposure in ocean freight traces back to a decision made without complete information. That means that every action must be rooted in live network data across shipment flows, carrier performance, and insight from inventory and order systems. A platform with that intelligence can automate and accelerate the full workflow from detecting a supply shortfall, selecting a carrier, booking the container, managing the documents, tracking the shipment, and handling exceptions.
A shipper stitching together a rate tool from one vendor, a booking portal from another, a document system from a third, and a visibility feed from a fourth gets digitization. They get a slightly faster version of the same manual process. The full picture still lives in a person’s head, and the handoffs between systems still require human coordination.
While freight forwarders and other intermediaries are also investing in AI, they’re primarily automating their own coordination labor before someone else absorbs it. But they can’t replicate the data advantage of a platform that sits across the entire supply chain.
A forwarder automating its booking desk draws on its own transaction history. A point solution built specifically for ocean booking draws on booking data. A platform processing millions of supply chain events daily across orders, inventory, carrier performance, and live shipment status, has a different signal base entirely. Carrier selection informed by real-time schedule reliability, live network disruption, and your actual inventory positions is structurally more accurate than carrier selection informed by historical rate tables.
The shrinking intermediary layer
The moats around freight forwarders’ profit margins are eroding, and the lines between legacy endpoint solutions are blurring. High-complexity corridors and specialized commodities still need human expertise, but the bread-and-butter containerized freight that makes up the bulk of forwarder revenue is the volume where automated workflows shine.
Meanwhile, software providers will have a hard time selling dashboards and chatbots to specific teams compared to AI-native platforms offering a single operating system across all supply chain operations, and serving downstream stakeholders.
The question for forwarders is how long they can keep patching automation onto a fragmented architecture with a booking tool here, a document system there, people bridging the handoffs in between. And how much revenue sits in structured, repeatable work that a connected platform absorbs?
For shippers, the choice is whether to invest in a platform that automates the order-to-delivery and exception lifecycle, or keep paying others to hold the pieces together. The second option is a decision to fund the intermediary layer sitting between them and their own data.
The post The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026
Published
18 heures agoon
8 mai 2026By
The logistics and supply chain landscape is undergoing a fundamental transformation as industries move from rigid, low-cost models toward strategies defined by agility and resilience. This week’s roundup explores how major players are navigating this shift, from Amazon’s bold move to offer its massive infrastructure as a standalone service to Ford’s strategic manufacturing reset in the EV sector. We also dive into the critical human element in modern cost engineering, the logistical reimagining of energy corridors due to geopolitical risks, and the new AI-driven tools closing the gap between inventory detection and real-time execution. Together, these developments highlight a common theme: the pursuit of flexibility and data-driven intelligence in an increasingly unpredictable global market.
Top Supply Chain Stories from this Week:
Modern Cost Engineering Evolution: Rewiring the Human Element for Supply Chain Resilience
In the latest shift for cost engineering, the focus is moving beyond purely digital tools to address the critical human element required for true supply chain resilience. As industrial organizations transition from traditional backward-looking estimates to modern “should-cost” methods powered by AI and digital twins, the real challenge lies in workforce transformation. Success in this new landscape requires a significant cultural shift, moving away from isolated departmental silos toward cross-functional collaboration. By reskilling traditional estimators to act as strategic consultants—capable of interpreting material science and operational constraints—companies can evolve from simple price negotiation to collaborative manufacturing improvements that ensure mutual profitability and long-term stability.
Hormuz Risk Is Redrawing the Supply Chain Geography of Energy
Geopolitical instability in the Strait of Hormuz is forcing a fundamental shift in energy logistics, moving the industry away from lowest-cost network design toward a risk-adjusted model. With the waterway handling roughly 20% of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas, repeated disruptions have transformed infrastructure like pipelines, storage terminals, and deep-water ports outside the Persian Gulf into high-value strategic assets. Nations and corporations are no longer viewing these as simple logistics nodes, but as essential escape routes that provide the optionality and recovery time needed to withstand chokepoint failures. This selective redesign of the global energy map signals a new era where geography and physical redundancy are the primary drivers of supply chain resilience.
Ford’s Manufacturing Reset Shows How Automakers Are Rebuilding the EV Supply Chain
Ford’s manufacturing pivot represents a fundamental shift from aggressive electric vehicle expansion toward capital discipline and supply chain flexibility. By taking a $19.5 billion write-down and restructuring battery joint ventures, the company is moving away from rigid, single-purpose production lines in favor of multi-energy platforms that can adapt to fluctuating demand for hybrids and EVs. A key component of this reset is the repurposing of battery manufacturing assets in Kentucky and Michigan for stationary energy storage and data center support. This strategy transforms these facilities into flexible energy infrastructure rather than just automotive supply nodes. Ultimately, Ford is signaling that the next phase of the market will be defined by the ability to manage uncertainty through cross-functional asset utilization and a focus on manufacturing-driven affordability.
How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes
FourKites has launched a unified solution that bridges the gap between stockout detection and freight execution, reducing resolution time from hours to less than five minutes. By integrating its Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI, the platform eliminates the traditional “manual scavenger hunt” where planners had to jump between ERPs and carrier portals to resolve inventory gaps. The system uses decision intelligence to identify stockout risks up to six weeks in advance and provides ranked recommendations for corrective transfers based on cost, speed, and carrier performance. This closed-loop workflow allows planners to execute optimized shipping options with a single click, addressing the massive financial impact of inventory distortion and reducing the need for expensive, unplanned expedited shipping.
Amazon Launches “Supply Chain Services” Leveraging its Global Logistics Network
Amazon has officially launched Amazon Supply Chain Services (ASCS), a move that decouples its massive logistics infrastructure from its retail marketplace to serve as a standalone utility for all businesses. Similar to the trajectory of Amazon Web Services (AWS), the platform opens up Amazon’s multimodal freight, automated warehousing, and last-mile parcel delivery networks to companies regardless of whether they sell on Amazon. Major early adopters like Procter & Gamble, 3M, and Lands’ End are already leveraging the service to move everything from raw materials to finished products. By consolidating fragmented logistics contracts into a single automated interface, Amazon aims to use its scale—currently moving 13 billion items annually—to provide businesses with end-to-end visibility and 96.4% on-time delivery rates, signaling a significant new challenge to traditional 3PLs and carriers like FedEx and UPS.
Song of the week:
The post Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026 appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
Non classé
How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes
Published
1 jour agoon
7 mai 2026By
FourKites is bridging the gap between identifying a problem and solving it. With the integration of Inventory Twin and Booking Connect AI. Traditionally, supply chain planners have been stuck in a manual scavenger hunt whenever a stockout alert surfaced, jumping between ERPs to find surplus stock and carrier portals to secure freight. This fragmented process typically took hours, often forcing companies to rely on expensive, last-minute expedited shipping or facing steep On-Time In-Full (OTIF) penalties to avoid customer dissatisfaction. By unifying these disparate data streams, the new solution allows teams to detect risks two to six weeks in advance and execute corrective transfers from a single, seamless workflow.
The impact on operational efficiency is significant, reducing the resolution time from detection to execution from several hours to less than five minutes. Instead of just receiving a warning, planners are presented with recommendations powered by Decision Intelligence that include the fastest, cheapest, and most optimal shipping options based on real-time carrier performance data. This closed-loop system directly addresses the 1.73 trillion dollar global issue of inventory distortion and aims to eliminate the 15-25 hours planners previously spent on manual coordination.
By keeping a human in the loop to select the best recommendation with a single click, FourKites ensures that exceptions are resolved without ever leaving the platform. This integration helps protect freight budgets, where unplanned expedited shipping often consumes up to 48% of total spend. This launch represents a shift from reactive firefighting to proactive execution, allowing teams to move away from costly safety stock and focus on high-value responsibilities. Supply chain planner responsibilities are changing with the continued developments of AI and the de-siloing of disparate systems.
FourKites is a supply chain technology provider that operates a global real-time visibility network tracking over 3.2 million shipments daily across 200 countries and territories. By integrating data from 1.1 million carriers across all modes (road, rail, ocean, and air), the platform uses AI-powered “digital workers” to automate exception resolution and provide predictive insights. More than 1,600 global brands, including leaders in the CPG and Food & Beverage sectors, trust FourKites to transform their logistics from reactive tracking into proactive, intelligent orchestration.
Read the full ARC brief breaking down the new FourKites solution here: https://www.fourkites.com/research/arc-advisory-stockout-detection-freight-execution/
The post How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes appeared first on Logistics Viewpoints.
The Freight Forwarder Moat Is Getting Shallower
Supply Chain and Logistics News Week of May 7th 2026
How FourKites Connects Stockout Detection to Freight Execution in Minutes
Walmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
Trending
-
Non classé1 an agoWalmart and the New Supply Chain Reality: AI, Automation, and Resilience
- Non classé7 mois ago
Ex-Asia ocean rates climb on GRIs, despite slowing demand – October 22, 2025 Update
- Non classé9 mois ago
13 Books Logistics And Supply Chain Experts Need To Read
- Non classé3 mois ago
Container Shipping Overcapacity & Rate Outlook 2026
- Non classé3 mois ago
Ocean rates ease as LNY begins; US port call fees again? – February 17, 2026 Update
- Non classé6 mois ago
Ocean rates climb – for now – on GRIs despite demand slump; Red Sea return coming soon? – November 11, 2025 Update
-
Non classé1 an agoAmazon and the Shift to AI-Driven Supply Chain Planning
- Non classé2 ans ago
Unlocking Digital Efficiency in Logistics – Data Standards and Integration
